Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 109-134

  Devine, Dennis J ^a   Caughlin, David E ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Criminal trials; Extralegal bias; Juries; Juror decision making; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925347559     PISSN: 10768971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/law0000006     Document Type: Article

References (325)

1. Abramson, J. B. (1994). We, the jury: The jury system and the ideal of democracy. New York: Basic Books.
2. Abwender, D. A., & Hough, K. (2001). Interactive effects of characteristics of defendant and mock juror on US participants' judgment and sentencing recommendations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 603-615. doi:10.1080/00224540109600574
3. Adler, F. (1973). Socioeconomic factors influencing jury verdicts. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 3, 1-10.
4. Adler, S. J. (1994). The jury trial and error in the American courtroom. New York: Times Books.
5. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brusnwick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harpers.
6. Aguinis, H., Dalton, D. R., Bosco, F. A., Pierce, C. A., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Meta-analytic choices and judgment calls: Implications for the theory building and testing, obtained effect sizes, and scholarly impact. Journal of Management, 37, 5-38. doi:10.1177/0149206310377113
7. Alicke, M. D., & Yurak, T. J. (1995). Perpetrator personality and judgments of acquaintance rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1900-1921. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01823.x
8. Allison, J. A. (1996). The law and information processing: Implications for verdicts in rape cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1961-1977. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01782.x
9. Allison, M., & Brimacombe, C. A. (2010). Alibi believability: The effect of prior convictions and judicial instructions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1054-1084. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00610.x
10. Altemeyer, R. A. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
11. Anderson, D. D. (1981). Defendant's past criminal record: Effects of attributional information and judicial instructions on verdict-related judgments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
12. Andrews, F. M. (1981). The influence of evidenciary and extraevidenciary factors on decisions in a simulated rape trial (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO.
13. Austin, J. L., & Kovera, M. B. (2010). The effects of inquisitorial versus adversarial cross-examination on juror evaluations of expert evidence validity. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society/International Congress of Psychology and Law, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
14. Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D., Rector, N. A., & Kalemba, V. (1994). Racial prejudice in the Canadian legal system: Juror decisions in a simulated rape trial. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 339-350. doi:10.1007/BF01499592
15. Baldus, D. C., Pulaski, C., & Woodworth, G. (1983). Comparative review of death sentences: An empirical study of the Georgia experience. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74, 661-753. doi:10.2307/1143133
16. Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G., & Pulaski, C. A. (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
17. Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G., Zuckerman, D., Weiner, N. A., & Broffitt, B. (1998). Racial discrimination and the death penalty in the post-Furman era: An empirical and legal overview, with recent findings from Philadelphia. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1638-1821.
18. Baldwin, J., & McConville, M. (1979). Jury Trials. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19. Baldwin, J., & McConville, M. (1980). Juries, foremen and verdicts. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 34-44.
20. Barnett, M. A., Brodsky, S. L., & Davis, C. M. (2004). When mitigation evidence makes a difference: Effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22, 751-770. doi:10.1002/bsl.591
21. Beck, C., Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2012). Assessing pretrial juror attitudes while controlling for order effects: An examination of effect sizes for the RLAQ, JBS, and PJAQ. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Beckham, C. M., Spray, B. J., & Pietz, C. A. (2007). Jurors' locus of control and defendants' attractiveness in death penalty sentencing. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 285-298. doi:10.3200/SOCP.147.3.285-298
23. Bennett, W. L., & Feldman, M. S. (1981). Reconstructing reality in the courtroom: Justice and judgment in American culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
24. Bernard, J. L. (1979). Interaction between the race of the defendant and that of jurors in determining verdicts. Law & Psychology Review, 5, 103-111.
25. Boehm, V. R. (1968). Mr. Prejudice, Miss Sympathy, and the authoritarian personality: An application of psychological measuring techniques to the problem of jury bias. Wisconsin Law Review, 1968, 734-750.
26. Boone, J. S. (1973). The effects of race, arrogance, and evidence on simulated jury decisions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
27. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 2). Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
28. Bornstein, B. H., & Muller, S. L. (2001). The credibility of recovered memory testimony: Exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 1415-1426. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00282-4
29. Bottoms, B. L. (1992). Individual differences in reactions to child sexual assault cases (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
30. Bottoms, B. L. (1993). Individual differences in perceptions of child sexual assault victims. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony (pp. 229-261). New York: Guilford Press.
31. Bottoms, B. L., Davis, S. L., & Epstein, M. A. (2004). Effects of victim and defendant race on jurors' decisions in child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1-33. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02535.x
32. Bottoms, B. L., Diviak, K. R., & Davis, S. L. (1997). Jurors' reactions to satanic ritual abuse allegations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21, 845-859. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00046-X
33. Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children's credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702-732. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00608.x
34. Bottoms, B. L., Kalder, A. K., Stevenson, M. C., Oudekerk, B. A., Wiley, T. R., & Perona, A. (2011). Gender differences in jurors' perceptions of infanticide involving disabled and non-disabled infant victims. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 127-141. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.10.004
35. Bottoms, B. L., Nysse-Carris, K. L., Harris, T., & Tyda, K. (2003). Jurors' perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 205-227. doi:10.1023/A:1022551314668
36. Bowers, W. J., & Pierce, G. L. (1980). Arbitrariness and discrimination under post-Furman capital statutes. Crime & Delinquency, 26, 563-632. doi:10.1177/001112878002600409
37. Braden-Maguire, J., Sigal, J., & Perrino, C. S. (2005). Battered women who kill: Variables affecting simulated jurors' verdicts. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 403-408. doi:10.1007/s10896-005-7801-0
38. Bray, R. M. (1974). Decision rules, attitude similarity, and jury decision making (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
39. Bray, R. M., & Noble, A. M. (1978). Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1424-1430. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1424
40. Breheney, C., Groscup, J., & Galietta, M. (2007). Gender matters in the insanity defense. Law & Psychology Review, 31, 93-123.
41. Brekke, N., & Borgida, E. (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 372-386. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.372
42. Brown, M. J., Henriquez, E., & Groscup, J. (2008). The effects of eyeglasses and race on juror decisions involving a violent crime. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 26, 25-43.
43. Bucolo, D. O. (2004). Race salience in defense attorney opening and closing statements: The effects of ambiguity and juror attitudes (Unpublished master's thesis). University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH.
44. Bucolo, D. O., & Cohn, E. S. (2010). Playing the race card: Making race salient in defense opening and closing statements. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 293-303. doi:10.1348/135532508X400824
45. Burd, K. (2010). The impact of interview style and timing of expert testimony on mock jurors' perceptions of child sexual abuse interviews (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY.
46. Burke, D. M., Ames, M. A., Etherington, R., & Pietsch, J. (1990). Effects of victim's and defendant's physical attractiveness on the perception of responsibility in an ambiguous domestic violence case. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 199-207. doi:10.1007/BF00980815
47. Butler, B. (2006). NGRI revisited: Venirepersons' attitudes toward the insanity defense. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1833-1847. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00084.x
48. Butler, B. (2007). The role of death qualification in capital trials involving juvenile defendants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 549-560. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00174.x
49. Butler, B. (2008). Moving beyond Ford, Atkins, and Roper: A community attitude survey regarding the execution of the elderly and the physically disabled. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 631-647. doi:10.1080/10683160902998033
50. Butler, B. (2010). What's beautiful is bad? The effect of capital defendant attractiveness and gender on juror decision-making processes. Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference/International Congress of Psychology and Law, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
51. Butler, B., & Evans, R. (2010). An eye for an eye vs. turn the other cheek: How individual differences impact capital jurors' receptiveness to religious appeals in the courtroom. Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference/International Congress of Psychology and Law, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
52. Butler, B. M., & Moran, G. (2002). The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 175-184. doi:10.1023/A:1014640025871
53. Butler, B., & Moran, G. (2007). The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 561-571. doi:10.1002/bsl.758
54. Butler, B., & Moran, G. (2009). Is "more" mitigation better? A comparison of the additive and averaging models in capital cases. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 27, 57-70.
55. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
56. Carver, C. A. (1978). Psychological androgyny and its relationship to jurors' decisions in sexual assault cases (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
57. Castelli, P., Goodman, G. S., & Ghetti, S. (2005). Effects of interview style and witness age on perceptions of children's credibility in sexual abuse cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 297-317. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02122.x
58. Cheyne, N., & Dennison, S. (2005). An examination of a potential reform to the provocation defence: The impact of gender of the defendant and the suddenness requirement. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 388-400. doi:10.1375/pplt.12.2.388
59. Clark, H. L., & Nightingale, N. N. (1997). When jurors consider recovered memory cases: Effects of victim and juror gender. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 25, 87-104. doi:10.1300/J076v25n03_06
60. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
61. Conley, J. M., Turnier, W. J., & Rose, M. R. (2000). The racial ecology of the courtroom: An experimental study of juror response to the race of criminal defendants. Wisconsin Law Review, 6, 1185-1220.
62. Cowan, C. L., Thompson, W. C., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1984). The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 53-79. doi:10.1007/BF01044351
63. Cowley, M., & Colyer, J. B. (2010). Asymmetries in prior conviction reasoning: Truth suppression effects in child protection contexts. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 211-231. doi:10.1080/10683160802612916
64. Cramer, R. J., Wakeman, E. E., Chandler, J. F., Mohr, J. J., & Griffin, M. P. (2013). Hate crimes on trial: Judgments about violent crime against gay men. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20, 202-215. doi:10.1080/13218719.2011.633488
65. Crowley, M. J., O'Callaghan, M. G., & Ball, P. J. (1994). The juridical impact of psychological expert testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 89-105. doi:10.1007/BF01499146
66. Culhane, S. E., Hosch, H. M., & Weaver, W. G. (2004). Crime victims serving as jurors. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 649-659. doi:10.1007/s10979-004-0792-1
67. Cutler, B. L., Moran, G., & Narby, D. J. (1992). Jury selection in insanity defense cases. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 165-182. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(92)90052-6
68. Daftary-Kapur, T. (2009). The effects of pre-and post-venire publicity on juror decision-making (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The City University of New York, New York, NY.
69. Daftary-Kapur, T., Groscup, J. L., O'Connor, M., Coffaro, F., & Galietta, M. (2011). Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense: Scale construction and validation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 40-63. doi:10.1002/bsl.938
70. Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125. doi:10.1037/h0033951
71. Davis, J. H., Au, W. T., Hulbert, L., Chen, X. P., & Zarnoth, P. (1997). Effects of group size and procedural influence on consensual judgments of quantity: The example of damage awards and mock civil juries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 703-718. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.703
72. Davis, J. H., Kerr, N. L., Atkin, R. S., Holt, R., & Meek, D. (1975). The decision processes of 6-and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1-14. doi:10.1037/h0076849
73. Davis, J. H., Kerr, N. L., Stasser, G., Meek, D., & Holt, R. (1977). Victim consequences, sentence severity, and decision processes in mock juries. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 346-365. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(77)90035-6
74. Deitz, S. R., & Byrnes, L. E. (1981). Attribution of responsibility for sexual assault: The influence of observer empathy and defendant occupation and attractiveness. The Journal of Psychology, 108, 17-29. doi:10.1080/00223980.1981.9915241
75. De La Fuente, E., Garcia, J., & Tamayo, I. M. (1998). Some individual differences in perception of the evidence and the verdict choice. Psychology, Crime & Law, 4, 361-373. doi:10.1080/10683169808401765
76. De La Fuente, L., De La Fuente, E. I., & Garcia, J. (2003). Effects of pretrial juror bias, strength of evidence and deliberation process on juror decisions: New validity evidence of the Juror Bias Scale scores. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 197-209. doi:10.1080/1068316031000116283
77. Devine, D. J. (2012). Jury decision making: The state of the science. New York: New York University Press.
78. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Dunford, B. B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 622-727.
79. Dexter, H. R., Cutler, B. L., & Moran, G. (1992). A test of voir dire as a remedy for the prejudicial effects of pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 819-832. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00926.x
80. Dillehay, R. C., & Nietzel, M. T. (1985). Juror experience and jury verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 179-191. doi:10.1007/BF01067050
81. Dolnik, L., Case, T. I., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Stealing thunder as a courtroom tactic revisited: Processes and boundaries. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 267-287. doi:10.1023/A:1023431823661
82. Doob, A. N., & Kirshenbaum, H. M. (1972). Some empirical evidence on the effect of s. 12 of the Canada Evidence Act upon an accused. The Criminal Law Quarterly, 15, 88-96.
83. Duggan, L. M., Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sex abuse trial. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 71-99). New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8832-6_5
84. Dumas, R., & Testé, B. (2006). The influence of criminal facial stereotypes on juridic judgments. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 237-244. doi:10.1024/1421-0185.65.4.237
85. Dunlap, E. E., Golding, J. M., Hodell, E. C., & Marsil, D. F. (2007). Perceptions of elder physical abuse in the courtroom: The influence of hearsay witness testimony. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 19, 19-39. doi:10.1300/J084v19n03_02
86. Dunlap, E. E., Hodell, E. C., Golding, J. M., & Wasarhaley, N. E. (2012). Mock jurors' perception of stalking: The impact of gender and expressed fear. Sex Roles, 66, 405-417. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9970-z
87. Dunn, K. F., Cowan, G., & Downs, D. (2006). Effects of sex and race of perpetrator and method of killing on outcome judgments in a mock filicide case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2395-2416. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00109.x
88. Efran, M. G. (1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 45-54. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(74)90044-0
89. Elliott, C. (2011). Juries, sex, and emotional affect. Law & Psychology Review, 35, 37-59.
90. Erian, M., Lin, C., Patel, N., Neal, A., & Geiselman, R. E. (1998). Juror verdicts as a function of victim and defendant attractiveness in sexual assault cases. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16, 25-40.
91. Escamilla, G. (2011). How age and race of defendant and victim influence mock jurors' perceptions in a child sexual molestation case (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
92. Espinoza, R. K. E. (2005). The effects of defendant race and SES, and defense attorney race on juror decision making: An aversive racism explanation for prejudice against Mexican Americans (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE.
93. Espinoza, R. K. E. (2009). Juror bias and the death penalty: Deleterious effects of ethnicity, SES, and case circumstances. The American Association of Behavioral and Social Sciences Journal, Fall, 33-41.
94. Espinoza, R. K. E., Ek, B. J., & Espinoza, H. A. (2011). An examination of juveniles being tried as adults: Influences of ethnicity, socioeconomic status and age of defendant. National Social Science Journal, 37, 30-37.
95. Espinoza, R. K. E., & Willis-Esqueda, C. (2008). Defendant and defense attorney characteristics and their effects on juror decision making and prejudice against Mexican Americans. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 364-371. doi:10.1037/a0012767
96. Espinoza, R. K. E., & Willis-Esqueda, C. (2009). The influence of aggravating and mitigating factors, ethnicity, and SES on death penalty decisions by European American and Hispanic venire persons. Unpublished manuscript.
97. Espinoza, R. K. E., & Willis-Esqueda, C. (2013). The influence of aggravating and mitigating factors, ethnicity and SES on death penalty decisions by European American and Hispanic venire persons. Manuscript submitted for publication.
98. Esqueda, C. W., Espinoza, R. K. E., & Culhane, S. E. (2008). The effects of ethnicity, SES, and crime status on juror decision making. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 30, 181-199. doi:10.1177/0739986308315319
99. Evans, J. R., & Compo, N. S. (2010). Mock jurors' perceptions of identifications made by intoxicated eyewitnesses. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 191-210. doi:10.1080/10683160802612890
100. Fischer, G. J. (1997). Gender effects on individual verdicts and on mock jury verdicts in a simulated acquaintance rape trial. Sex Roles, 36, 491-501. doi:10.1007/BF02766686
101. Fischoff, S. (1979). "Recipe for a jury" revisited: A balance theory prediction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 335-349. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1979.tb00808.x
102. Foley, L. A., & Powell, R. S. (1982). The discretion of prosecutors, judges, and juries in capital cases. Criminal Justice Review, 7, 16-22. doi:10.1177/073401688200700203
103. Fradella, H. D., & Brown, K. (2007). The effects of using social scientific rape typologies on juror decisions to convict. Law & Psychology Review, 31, 1-19.
104. Freeman, N. J. (2006). Socioeconomic status and belief in a just world: Sentencing of criminal defendants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2379-2394. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00108.x
105. Gabora, N. J., Spanos, N. P., & Joab, A. (1993). The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 103-119. doi:10.1007/BF01044540
106. Givelber, D., & Farrell, A. (2008). Judges and juries: The defense case and differences in acquittal rates. Law & Social Inquiry, 33, 31-52. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00093.x
107. Gleason, J. M., & Harris, V. A. (1975). Race, socio-economic status, and perceived similarity as determinants of judgements by simulated jurors. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 3, 175-180. doi:10.2224/sbp.1975.3.2.175
108. Golding, J. M., Allen, R., Yozwiak, J. A., Marsil, D. F., & Kinstle, T. L. (2005). Perceptions of elder neglect in the courtroom. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 16, 23-46. doi:10.1300/J084v16n01_02
109. Golding, J. M., Bradshaw, G. S., Dunlap, E. E., & Hodell, E. C. (2007). The impact of mock jury gender composition on deliberations and conviction rates in a child sexual assault trial. Child Maltreatment, 12, 182-190. doi:10.1177/1077559506298995
110. Golding, J. M., Fryman, H. M., Marsil, D. F., & Yozwiak, J. A. (2003). Big girls don't cry: The effect of child witness demeanor on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse trial. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 1311-1321. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.03.001
111. Golding, J. M., Hodell, E. C., Dunlap, E. E., Wasarhaley, N. E., & Keller, P. S. (2013). When a son steals money from his mother: Perceptions of elder financial exploitation. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 25, 126-148. doi:10.1080/08946566.2013.751816
112. Golding, J. M., Sanchez, R. P., & Sego, S. A. (1997). The believability of hearsay testimony in a child sexual assault trial. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 299-325. doi:10.1023/A:1024842816130
113. Golding, J. M., Sego, S. A., Sanchez, R. P., & Hasemann, D. (1995). The believability of repressed memories. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 569-592. doi:10.1007/BF01499375
114. Golding, J. M., Yozwiak, J. A., Kinstle, T. L., & Marsil, D. F. (2005). The effect of gender in the perception of elder physical abuse in court. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 605-614. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6831-8
115. Goodman, G. S., Myers, J. E. B., Qin, J., Quas, J. A., Castelli, P., Redlich, A. D., & Rogers, L. (2006). Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 363-401. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9009-0
116. Goodman, G. S., Tobey, A. E., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., Orcutt, H., Thomas, S., Shapiro, C., & Sachsenmaier, T. (1998). Face-to-face confrontation: Effects of closed-circuit technology on children's eyewitness testimony and jurors' decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 165-203. doi:10.1023/A:1025742119977
117. Goodman-Delahunty, J., Cossins, A., & O'Brien, K. (2010). Enhancing the credibility of complainants in child sexual assault trials: The effect of expert evidence and judicial directions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 769-783. doi:10.1002/bsl.936
118. Grant, D. R. (1996). From prior record to current verdict: How character evidence affects jurors' decisions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Irvine, CA.
119. Greene, E., & Dodge, M. (1995). The influence of prior record evidence on juror decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 67-78. doi:10.1007/BF01499073
120. Gross, S. R., & Mauro, R. (1984). Patterns of death: An analysis of racial disparities in capital sentencing and homicide victimization. Stanford Law Review, 27, 153. doi:10.2307/1228652
121. Gunnell, J. J., & Ceci, S. J. (2010). When emotionality trumps reason: A study of individual processing style and juror bias. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 850-877. doi:10.1002/bsl.939
122. Gurley, J. R., & Marcus, D. K. (2008). The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26, 85-97. doi:10.1002/bsl.797
123. Haegerich, T. M., & Bottoms, B. L. (2000). Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 421-448. doi:10.1023/A:1005592213294
124. Hancock, R. C. (2003). Ethnicity in verdicts and sentencing: An African-American juror perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kentucky, Frankfort, KY.
125. Hans, V. P., & Doob, A. N. (1976). Section 12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the deliberations of simulated juries. Criminal Law Quarterly, 18, 235-253.
126. Hastie, R., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
127. Hepburn, J. R. (1980). The objective reality of evidence and the utility of systematic jury selection. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 89-101. doi:10.1007/BF01040485
128. Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539-1558. doi:10.1002/sim.1186
129. Hill, E. L., & Pfeifer, J. E. (1992). Nullification instructions and juror guilt ratings: An examination of modern racism. Contemporary Social Psychology, 16, 6-10.
130. Hodell, E. C., Dunlap, E. E., Wasarhaley, N. E., & Golding, J. M. (2012). Factors impacting juror perceptions of battered women who kill their abusers: Delay and sleeping status. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 338-359. doi:10.1037/a0025145
131. Hodell, E. C., Golding, J. M., Yozwiak, J. A., Bradshaw, G. S., Kinstle, T. L., & Marsil, D. F. (2009). The perception of elder sexual abuse in the courtroom. Violence Against Women, 15, 678-698. doi:10.1177/1077801209332294
132. Hodson, G., Hooper, H., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2005). Aversive racism in Britain: The use of inadmissible evidence in legal decisions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 437-448. doi:10.1002/ejsp.261
133. Hoffarth, M. (2010). Gender and sexuality in a mock sexual assault trial. Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference/International Congress of Psychology and Law, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
134. Honess, T. M., & Mathews, G. A. (2012). Admitting evidence of a defendant's previous conviction (PCE) and its impact on juror deliberation in relation to both juror processing style and juror concerns over the fairness of introducing PCE. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 163-181. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9028-x
135. Hosch, H. M., Chanez, G. J., Bothwell, R. K., & Munoz, H. (1991). A comparison of Anglo-American and Mexican-American jurors' judgments of mothers who fail to protect their children from abuse. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1681-1698. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00498.x
136. Hosch, H. M., Culhane, S. E., Jolly, K. W., Chavez, R. M., & Shaw, L. H. (2011). Effects of an alibi witness's relationship to the defendant on mock jurors' judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 127-142. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9225-5
137. Hosch, H. M., Culhane, S. E., Tubb, V. A., & Granillo, E. A. (2011). Town vs. gown: A direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 452-466. doi:10.1002/bsl.970
138. Howard, M. V. A., Brewer, N., & Williams, K. D. (2006). How processing resources shape the influence of stealing thunder on mock-juror verdicts. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 13, 60-66. doi:10.1375/pplt.13.1.60
139. Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index. Psychological Methods, 11, 193-206. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193
140. Hunter, M. (1996). Improving the jury system: Reducing jury size. Public Law Research Institute.
141. Isquith, P. K., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1993). Blaming the child: Attribution of responsibility to victims of child sexual abuse. In G. S. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony (pp. 203-228). New York: Guilford Press.
142. Izzett, R. R., & Leginski, W. (1974). Group discussion and the influence of defendant characteristics in a simulated jury setting. The Journal of Social Psychology, 93, 271-279. doi:10.1080/00224545.1974.9923161
143. Jacobson, M. B. (1981). Effects of victim's and defendant's physical attractiveness on subjects' judgments in a rape case. Sex Roles, 7, 247-255. doi:10.1007/BF00287539
144. Jacobson, M. B., & Popovich, P. M. (1983). Victim attractiveness and perceptions of responsibility in an ambiguous rape case. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 100-104. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1983.tb00621.x
145. Jenkins, G., & Schuller, R. A. (2007). The impact of negative forensic evidence on mock jurors' perceptions of a trial of drug-facilitated sexual assault. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 369-380. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9068-2
146. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 496-528). London: Cambridge University Press.
147. Johnson, J. H. (1983). The effects of refusing to testify, socialoccupational status, prior convictions, judge's instructions, and authoritarianism on juridic decision-making (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, New York, NY.
148. Jones, C. S., & Kaplan, M. F. (2003). The effects of racially stereotypical crimes on juror decision-making and information-processing strategies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1-13. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2501_1
149. Jones, M. (1997). Preventing the application of stereotypic biases in the courtroom: The role of detailed testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1767-1784. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01624.x
150. Jones, S., & Harrison, M. (2009). To testify or not to testify-That is the question: Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of testifying across situations. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 5, 165-181.
151. Jurow, G. L. (1971). New data on the effect of a "death qualified" jury on the guilt determination process. Harvard Law Review, 48, 567-611. doi:10.2307/1339553
152. Kahn, A. S., Rodgers, K. A., Martin, C., Malick, K., Claytor, J., Gandolfo, M., & Webne, E. (2011). Gender versus gender role in attributions of blame for a sexual assault. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 239-251. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00711.x
153. Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown.
154. Kasian, M., Spanos, N. P., Terrance, C. A., & Peebles, S. (1993). Battered women who kill. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 289-312. doi:10.1007/BF01044510
155. Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1983). The construction and validation of a juror bias scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 423-442. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(83)90070-3
156. Keil, T. J., & Vito, G. F. (1989). Race, homicide severity, and application of the death penalty: A consideration of the Barnett Scale. Criminology, 27, 511-535. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb01044.x
157. Kelly, J. O. (2011). Veterans on trial: Juror attitudes and behaviors toward veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (Unpublished master's thesis). The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
158. Kepes, S., McDaniel, M. A., Brannick, M. T., & Banks, G. C. (2013). Meta-analytic reviews in the organizational sciences: Two meta-analytic schools on the way to MARS (the Meta-Analytic Reporting Standards). Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 123-143. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9300-2
159. Kerr, N. L., Atkin, R. S., Stasser, G., Meek, D., Holt, R. W., & Davis, J. H. (1976). Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 282-294. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.282
160. Kerr, N. L., Nerenz, D. R., & Herrick, D. (1979). Role playing and the study of jury behavior. Sociological Methods & Research, 7, 337-355. doi:10.1177/004912417900700305
161. Key, H. G., Warren, A. R., & Ross, D. F. (1996). Perceptions of repressed memories. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 555-563. doi:10.1007/BF01499041
162. Kinstle, T. L., Hodell, E. C., & Golding, J. M. (2008). The impact of juror characteristics and victim health status on the perception of elder physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1143-1161. doi:10.1177/0886260508314294
163. Klein, K., & Creech, B. (1982). Race, rape, and bias: Distortion of prior odds and meaning changes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 21-33. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0301_2
164. Klippenstine, M. A., & Schuller, R. A. (2012). Perceptions of sexual assault: Expectancies regarding the emotional response of a rape victim over time. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 79-94. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.589389
165. Klippenstine, M. A., Schuller, R. A., & Wall, A. M. (2007). Perceptions of sexual assault: The expression of gender differences and the impact of target alcohol consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2620-2641. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00273.x
166. Koehler, J. J. (2011). If the shoe fits they might acquit: The value of forensic science testimony. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 21-48. doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01225.x
167. Kravitz, D. A., Cutler, B. L., & Brock, P. (1993). Reliability and validity of the original and revised legal attitudes questionnaire. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 661-677. doi:10.1007/BF01044688
168. Lamberth, J., Krieger, E., & Shay, S. (1982). Juror decision making: A case of attitude change mediated by authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 419-434. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(82)90003-4
169. Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2002). Examining the construct validity of the original and revised JBS: A cross-validation of sample and method. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 455-463. doi:10.1023/A:1016335422706
170. Lecci, L. B., & Myers, B. (2009). Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 619-634. doi:10.1080/10683160802477757
171. Leippe, M. R., Eisenstadt, D., Rauch, S. M., & Seib, H. M. (2004). Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 524-541. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.524
172. Lieberman, J. D., Carrell, C. A., Miethe, T. D., & Krauss, D. A. (2008). Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence?. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 27-62. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.14.1.27
173. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
174. Lloyd-Bostock, S. (2000). The effects on juries of hearing about the defendant's previous criminal record: A simulation study. Criminal Law Review, 734-755.
175. Locatelli, S. M. (2011). Personal beliefs and public print: The influence of pre-existing attitudes and pretrial publicity information on final verdicts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL.
176. Lynch, M., & Haney, C. (2000). Discrimination and instructional comprehension: Guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 337-358. doi:10.1023/A:1005588221761
177. Lynch, M., & Haney, C. (2009). Capital jury deliberation: Effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 481-496. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9168-2
178. Lyons, A. W., & Regina, J. (1986). Mock jurors' behavior as a function of sex and exposure to an educational videotape about jury duty. Psychological Reports, 58, 599-604. doi:10.2466/pr0.1986.58.2.599
179. MacCoun, R. J. (1990). The emergence of extralegal bias during jury deliberation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 303-314. doi:10.1177/0093854890017003005
180. MacLin, K. M., Downs, C., MacLin, O. H., & Caspers, H. M. (2009). The effect of defendant facial expression on mock juror decision-making: The power of remorse. North American Journal of Psychology, 11, 323-332.
181. Maeder, E., Dempsey, J., & Pozzulo, J. (2012). Behind the veil of juror decision making testing the effects of Muslim veils and defendant race in the courtroom. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 666-678. doi:10.1177/0093854812436478
182. Maeder, E. M., & Hunt, J. S. (2011). Talking about a black man: The influence of defendant and character witness race on jurors' use of character evidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 608-620. doi:10.1002/bsl.996
183. Mancini, D. E. (2011). The CSI effect reconsidered: Is it moderated by need for cognition. North American Journal of Psychology, 13, 155-174.
184. Marcus-Newhall, A., Blake, L. P., & Baumann, J. (2002). Perceptions of hate crime perpetrators and victims as influenced by race, political orientation, and peer group. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 108-135. doi:10.1177/0002764202046001008
185. Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1315-1338. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01552.x
186. McAlexander, M. S. (2009). An examination of the role of attractiveness and self-esteem in jury decision making (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). The Ohio State University at Mansfield, Mansfield, OH.
187. McAuliff, B. D., & Duckworth, T. D. (2010). I spy with my little eye. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 489-500. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9219-3
188. McCauley, M. R., & Parker, J. F. (2001). When will a child be believed? The impact of the victim's age and juror's gender on children's credibility and verdict in a sexual-abuse case. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 523-539. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00224-1
189. McCoy, M. L., & Gray, J. M. (2007). The impact of defendant gender and relationship to victim on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1578-1593. doi:10.1111/j .1559-1816.2007.00228.x
190. McGlynn, R. P., Megas, J. C., & Benson, D. H. (1976). Sex and race as factors affecting the attribution of insanity in a murder trial. The Journal of Psychology, 93, 93-99. doi:10.1080/00223980.1976.9921378
191. McKimmie, B. M., Masters, J. M., Masser, B. M., Schuller, R. A., & Terry, D. J. (2013). Stereotypical and counterstereotypical defendants: Who is he and what was the case against her? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Advanced online publication, E1-E12.
192. McNamara, K., Vattano, F., & Viney, W. (1993). Verdict, sentencing, and certainty as a function of sex of juror and amount of evidence in a simulated rape trial. Psychological Reports, 72, 575-583. doi:10.2466/pr0.1993.72.2.575
193. Mechanic, M. B. (1996). Battered woman syndrome: Juror common understanding and expert testimony (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
194. Miller, M. K., & Hayward, R. D. (2008). Religious characteristics and the death penalty. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 113-123. doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9090-z
195. Miller, M., & Hewitt, J. (1978). Conviction of a defendant as a function of juror-victim racial similarity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 159-160. doi:10.1080/00224545.1978.9924107
196. Mills, C. J., & Bohannon, W. E. (1980). Character structure and jury behavior: Conceptual and applied implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 662-667. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.662
197. Mitchell, H. E., & Byrne, D. (1973). The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 123-129. doi:10.1037/h0034263
198. Mitchell, T. L., Haw, R. M., Pfeifer, J. E., & Meissner, C. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 621-637. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-8122-9
199. Moran, G., & Comfort, J. C. (1986). Neither "tentative" nor "fragmentary": Verdict preference of impaneled felony jurors as a function of attitude toward capital punishment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 146-155. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.146
200. Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (1997). Correcting effect sizes computed from factor analysis of variance for use in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 2, 192-199. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.192
201. Mossiere, A., Maeder, E., & Brown, D. (2013). The influence of defendant weight and gender on juror decision-making. Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference/International Congress of Psychology and Law, Portland, OR.
202. Myers, B., & Lecci, L. (1998). Revising the factor structure of the Juror Bias Scale: A method for the empirical validation of theoretical constructs. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 239-256. doi:10.1023/A: 1025798204956
203. Myers, B., Lynn, S. J., & Arbuthnot, J. (2002). Victim impact testimony and juror judgments: The effects of harm information and witness demeanor. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2393-2412. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01869.x
204. Myers, B., Rosol, A., & Boelter, E. (2003). Polygraph evidence and juror judgments: The effects of corroborating evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 948-962. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01933.x
205. Myers, M. A. (1979). Offended parties and official reactions: Victims and the sentencing of criminal defendants. The Sociological Quarterly, 20, 529-540. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1979.tb01233.x
206. Nadler, J. (2000). The effects of perceived injustice on deference to the law (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
207. Najdowski, C. J., Bottoms, B. L., & Vargas, M. C. (2009). Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: The influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 401-430. doi:10.1002/bsl.873
208. Narby, D. J., Cutler, B. L., & Moran, G. (1993). A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 34-42. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.34
209. Nemeth, C., Endicott, J., & Wachtler, J. (1976). From the'50s to the'70s: Women in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 39, 293-304. doi:10.2307/3033495
210. Niedermeier, K. E., Horowitz, I. A., & Kerr, N. L. (1999). Informing jurors of their nullification power: A route to a just verdict or judicial chaos?. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 331-351. doi:10.1023/A: 1022360632283
211. Niedermeier, K. E., Horowitz, I. A., & Kerr, N. L. (2001). Exceptions to the rule: The effects of remorse, status, and gender on decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 604-623. doi:10.1111/j .1559-1816.2001.tb02058.x
212. Orcutt, H. K., Goodman, G. S., Tobey, A. E., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., & Thomas, S. (2001). Detecting deception in children's testimony: Factfinders' abilities to reach the truth in open court and closed-circuit trials. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 339-372. doi:10.1023/A: 1010603618330
213. Otto, A. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1994). The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 453-469. doi:10.1007/BF01499050
214. Patry, M. W. (2008). Attractive but guilty: Deliberation and physical attractiveness bias. Psychological Reports, 102, 727-733. doi:10.2466/pr0.102.3.727-733
215. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242-258. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
216. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: The effects of structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 53, 621-635.
217. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189-206. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
218. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). The story model for juror decision making. In R. Hastie (Ed.), Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 192-224). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511752896.010
219. Peters, C. S., Lampinen, J. M., Erickson, W. B., Sweeney, L. N., Zeiler, B., Harris, M., & Lopez, K. (2013). Jury decision making in the context of excuse defenses. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society/International Congress of Psychology and Law, Portland, OR.
220. Pettalia, J., Pozzulo, J., Dempsey, J., & Gooden, A. (2013). Defendant age and alibi corroboration: Do these variables interact to influence jurors' perceptions and verdicts? Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference/International Congress of Psychology and Law, Portland, OR.
221. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
222. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1
223. Pfeifer, J. E., & Bernstein, D. J. (2003). Expressions of modern racism in judgments of others: The role of task and target specificity on attributions of guilt. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31, 749-765. doi:10.2224/sbp.2003.31.8.749
224. Pfeifer, J. E., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (1991). Ambiguity and guilt determinations: A modern racism perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1713-1725. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00500.x
225. Pfeifer, J. E., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2003). Mock juror ratings of guilt in Canada: Modern racism and ethnic heritage. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31, 301-312. doi:10.2224/sbp.2003.31.3.301
226. Pickel, K. L., Karam, T. J., & Warner, T. C. (2009). Jurors' responses to unusual inadmissible evidence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 466-480. doi:10.1177/0093854809332364
227. Plumm, K. M., & Terrance, C. A. (2009). Battered women who kill the impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom. Violence Against Women, 15, 186-205. doi:10.1177/1077801208329145
228. Pope, J., & Meyer, R. (1999). An attributional analysis of jurors' judgments in a criminal case: A preliminary investigation. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 27, 563-574. doi:10.2224/sbp.1999.27.6.563
229. Poulson, R. L. (1990). Mock juror attribution of criminal responsibility: Effects of race and the guilty but mentally ill (GBMI) verdict option. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1596-1611. doi:10.1111/j .1559-1816.1990.tb01495.x
230. Pozzulo, J. D., & Dempsey, J. L. (2009). Witness factors and their influence on jurors' perceptions and verdicts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 923-934. doi:10.1177/0093854809338450
231. Pozzulo, J. D., Dempsey, J., Maeder, E., & Allen, L. (2010). The effects of victim gender, defendant gender, and defendant age on juror decision making. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 47-63. doi:10.1177/0093854809344173
232. Pryor, B., & Buchanan, R. W. (1984). The effects of a defendant's demeanor on juror perceptions of credibility and guilt. Journal of Communication, 34, 92-99. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02176.x
233. Pugh, M. D. (1983). Contributory fault and rape convictions: Loglinear models for blaming the victim. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 233-242. doi:10.2307/3033794
234. Quas, J. A., Bottoms, B. L., Haegerich, T. M., & Nysse-Carris, K. L. (2002). Effects of victim, defendant, and juror gender on decisions in child sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1993-2021. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02061.x
235. Radelet, M. L. (1981). Racial characteristics and the imposition of the death penalty. American Sociological Review, 46, 918-927. doi:10.2307/2095088
236. Rector, N. A., Bagby, R. M., & Nicholson, R. (1993). The effect of prejudice and judicial ambiguity on defendant guilty ratings. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 651-659. doi:10.1080/00224545.1993.9713920
237. Reed, K. (2010). Hot or not? The influence of attorney attractiveness and gender on juror decision-making. Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference/International Congress of Psychology and Law, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
238. Rempala, D. M., & Geers, A. L. (2011). The influence of nondiagnostic information and victim stereotypes on perceptions of guilt. Journal of Western Society of Criminology, 12, 90-105.
239. Rendell, J. A., Huss, M. T., & Jensen, M. L. (2010). Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 411-425. doi:10.1002/bsl.913
240. Richardson, D. D. (1979). The influence of socioeconomic status and reciprocity on mock jurors' verdicts in a hypothetical rape case (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
241. Rickman, L. E. (1988). Juror and defendant characteristics, "crimestereotype," and jurors' guilty verdicts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Howard University, Washington, DC.
242. Robert, I. G., & Jacobs, P. D. (1969). Forensic psychology: Perception of guilt and income. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 28, 143-146. doi:10.2466/pms.1969.28.1.143
243. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedure for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
244. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple general purpose display of magnitude and experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166-169. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.166
245. Russell, B. L., & Melillo, L. S. (2006). Attitudes toward battered women who kill defendant typicality and judgments of culpability. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 219-241. doi:10.1177/0093854805284412
246. Russell, B. L., Oswald, D. L., & Kraus, S. W. (2011). Evaluations of sexual assault: Perceptions of guilt and legal elements for male and female aggressors using various coercive strategies. Violence and Victims, 26, 799-815. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.26.6.799
247. Ruva, C. L., Guenther, C. C., & Yarbrough, A. (2011). Positive and negative pretrial publicity: The roles of impression formation, emotion, and predecisional distortion. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 511-534. doi:10.1177/0093854811400823
248. Ruva, C. L., & Hudak, E. M. (2013). Pretrial publicity and juror age affect mock-juror decision making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 179-202. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.616509
249. Salekin, R. T., Ogloff, J. R. P., McFarland, C., & Rogers, R. (1995). Influencing jurors' perceptions of guilt: Expression of emotionality during testimony. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 13, 293-305. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370130208
250. Salerno, J. M., & Peter-Hagene, C. L. (2011). Gruesome evidence: Probative or prejudicial? The effect of probative versus non-probative photographs and defendant race on jurors' verdicts. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society/4th International Congress of Psychology and Law, Miami, FL.
251. Sannito, T., & Arnolds, E. B. (1982). Jury study results: The factors at work. Trial Diplomacy Journal, 1, 6-11.
252. Sargent, M. J., & Bradfield, A. L. (2004). Race and information processing in criminal trials: Does the defendant's race affect how the facts are evaluated?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 995-1008. doi:10.1177/0146167204265741
253. Schmidt, C. W., & Brigham, J. C. (1996). Jurors' perceptions of child victim-witnesses in a simulated sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 581-606. doi:10.1007/BF01499233
254. Schnopp-Wyatt, E. N. (1999). Expert testimony in rape trials: Prejudicial or probative? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
255. Schroer, N. (2011). Believing a snitch: An examination of jailhouse informants and juror decision-making (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA.
256. Schuller, R. A., & Hastings, P. A. (2002). Complainant sexual history evidence: Its impact on mock jurors' decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 252-261. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00064
257. Schuller, R. A., Kazoleas, V., & Kawakami, K. (2009). The impact of prejudice screening procedures on racial bias in the courtroom. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 320-328. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9153-9
258. Schuller, R. A., McKimmie, B. M., & Janz, T. (2004). The impact of expert testimony in trials of battered women who kill. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11, 1-12. doi:10.1375/pplt.2004.11.1.1
259. Schuller, R. A., Ryan, A., Krauss, D., & Jenkins, G. (2013). Mock juror sensitivity to forensic evidence in drug facilitated sexual assaults. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36, 121-128. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp .2013.01.011
260. Schuller, R. A., & Rzepa, S. (2002). Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: Its impact on jurors' decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 655-673. doi:10.1023/A:1020933618221
261. Schuller, R. A., & Wall, A.-M. (1998). The effects of defendant and complainant intoxication on mock jurors' judgments of sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 555-573. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00177.x
262. Schuller, R. A., Wells, E., Rzepa, S., & Klippenstine, M. A. (2004). Rethinking battered woman syndrome evidence: The impact of alternative forms of expert testimony on mock jurors' decisions. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 127-136. doi:10.1037/h0087223
263. Schutte, J. W., & Hosch, H. M. (1997). Gender differences in sexual assault verdicts: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12, 759-772.
264. Schweitzer, N. J., & Saks, M. J. (2011). Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 592-607. doi:10.1002/bsl.995
265. Schweitzer, N. J., Saks, M. J., Murphy, E. R., Roskies, A. L., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Gaudet, L. M. (2011). Neuroimages as evidence in a mens rea defense: No impact. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 357-393. doi:10.1037/a0023581
266. Scurich, N., & John, R. S. (2011). Trawling genetic databases: When a DNA match is just a naked tactic. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 49-71. doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01231.x
267. Sealy, A. P. (1981). Another look at social psychological aspects of juror bias. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 187-200. doi:10.1007/BF01044762
268. Sealy, A. P., & Cornish, W. R. (1973). Jurors and their verdicts. The Modern Law Review, 36, 496-508. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1973 .tb01381.x
269. Shaked-Schroer, N., Costanzo, M., & Marcus-Newhall, A. (2008). Reducing racial bias in the penalty phase of capital trials. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26, 603-617. doi:10.1002/bsl.829
270. Shermer, L. O., Rose, K. C., & Hoffman, A. (2011). Perceptions and credibility: Understanding the nuances of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27, 183-203.
271. Sigal, J., Braden, J., & Aylward, G. (1978). The effect of attractiveness of defendant, number of witnesses, and personal motivation of defendant on jury decision making behavior. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 15, 1-10.
272. Simcic, T., Wasarhaley, N., & Golding, J. (2011). The effect of SANE testimony on juror perceptions during a child sexual assault trial. Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society/4th International Congress of Psychology and Law, Miami, FL.
273. Simon, R. J. (1967). The jury and the defense of insanity. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
274. Simon, R. J. (1970). Beyond a reasonable doubt: An experimental attempt at quantification. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 6, 203-209. doi:10.1177/002188637000600205
275. Skolnick, P., & Shaw, J. I. (1997). The OJ Simpson criminal trial verdict: Racism or status shield?. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 503-516. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02125.x
276. Smith, B. A. (2008). Social recognition memory and the cross-race effect (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX.
277. Smith, H. C., Fromuth, M. E., & Morris, C. C. (1998). Effects of gender on perceptions of child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6, 51-63. doi:10.1300/J070v06n04_04
278. Smith, L. L., & Bull, R. (2012). Identifying and measuring juror pre-trial bias for forensic evidence: Development and validation of the Forensic Evidence Evaluation Bias Scale. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 797-815. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.561800
279. Sommers, S. R. (2006). On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 597-612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.597
280. Sommers, S. R. (2007). Race and the decision making of juries. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 171-187. doi:10.1348/135532507X189687
281. Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1367-1379. doi:10.1177/0146167200263005
282. Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 201-229. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.201
283. Sommers, S. R., & Kassin, S. M. (2001). On the many impacts of inadmissible testimony: Selective compliance, need for cognition, and the overcorrection bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1368-1377. doi:10.1177/01461672012710012
284. Sorenson, K. M., & Stevenson, M. C. (2010). Socioeconomic status affects perceptions of juvenile defendants in adult criminal court. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference/International Congress of Psychology and Law, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
285. Spanos, N. P., DuBreuil, S. C., & Gwynn, M. I. (1991). The effects of expert testimony concerning rape on the verdicts and beliefs of mock jurors. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 11, 37-51. doi:10.2190/0VFG-0DVL-TGQ8-BJFF
286. Stasser, G. L. (1977). A model of social influence during group discussion: An application with four-and six-person mock juries (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
287. Stein, G. (2000). Searching for legal domination: An applied multimediabased empirical analysis of juror decision-making (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
288. Stevenson, M. C., & Bottoms, B. L. (2009). Race shapes perceptions of juvenile offenders in criminal court. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 1660-1689. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00499.x
289. Stevenson, M. C., Bottoms, B. L., & Diamond, S. S. S. (2010). Jurors' discussions of defendants history of child abuse and alcohol abuse in capital sentencing deliberations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 1-38. doi:10.1037/a0018404
290. Stevenson, M. C., Sorenson, K. M., Farnum, A. L. S., Skinner, A. L., & Dzwairo, R. A. (2011). The impact of race on perceptions of adolescent sex offenders. In M. R. Paludi (Ed.), The psychology of teen violence and victimization (pp. 57). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
291. Struckman-Johnson, C., Miller, M. G., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (2008). Effects of Native American race, intoxication, and crime severity on judgments of guilt. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1981-1992. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00376.x
292. Sue, S., Smith, R. E., & Pedroza, G. (1975). Authoritarianism, pretrial publicity, and awareness of bias in simulated jurors. Psychological Reports, 37, 1299-1302. doi:10.2466/pr0.1975.37.3f.1299
293. Sunnafrank, M., & Fontes, N. E. (1983). General and crime related racial stereotypes and influence on juridic decisions. Cornell Journal of Social Relations, 17, 1-15.
294. Sweeney, L. T., & Haney, C. (1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10, 179-195. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370100204
295. Tait, D. (2011). Deliberating about terrorism: Prejudice and jury verdicts in a mock terrorism trial. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44, 387-403. doi:10.1177/0004865811419067
296. Tallon, J. (2009). Understanding the role of defendant apology as a potential response to victim impact statements (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The City University of New York, New York, NY.
297. Tamborini, R., Huang, R. H., Mastro, D., & Nabashi-Nakahara, R. (2007). The influence of race, heuristics, and information load on judgments of guilt and innocence. Communication Studies, 58, 341-358. doi:10.1080/10510970701648566
298. Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1986). Jury deliberations: Discussion content and influence processes in jury decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 322-347. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986 .tb01144.x
299. Tang, C. M., & Nunez, N. (2003). Effects of defendant age and juror bias on judgment of culpability: What happens when a juvenile is tried as an adult?. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 37-52. doi:10.1007/BF02885751
300. Tang, C. M., & Turner, K. (2010). The impact of crime severity and pre-trial bias on the judgment of juveniles tried as adults. Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference/International Congress of Psychology and Law, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
301. Terrance, C. A., Matheson, K., & Spanos, N. P. (2000). Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 207-229. doi:10.1023/A:1005411003414
302. Tetford, I., & Schuller, R. A. (1996). Mock jurors' evaluations of child sexual abuse: The impact of memory recovery and therapeutic intervention. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 14, 205-218. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199621)14:2_205::AID-BSL232_3.0.CO;2-5
303. Thornton, B. (1977). Effect of rape victim's attractiveness in a jury simulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 666-669. doi:10.1177/014616727700300422
304. Ugwuegbu, D. C. E. (1979). Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 133-146. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(79)90025-8
305. Vidmar, N., & Hans, V. P. (2007). American juries: The verdict. New York: Prometheus Books.
306. Villemur, N. K., & Hyde, J. S. (1983). Effects of sex of defense attorney, sex of juror, and age and attractiveness of the victim on mock juror decision making in a rape case. Sex Roles, 9, 879-889. doi:10.1007/BF00289961
307. Walker, C. M., & Woody, W. D. (2011). Juror decision making for juveniles tried as adults: The effects of defendant age, crime type, and crime outcome. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 659-675. doi:10.1080/10683160903493471
308. Wall, A., & Schuller, R. A. (2000). Sexual assault and defendant/victim intoxication: Jurors' perceptions of guilt. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 253-274. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02315.x
309. Warling, D., & Peterson-Badali, M. (2003). The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: The effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 63-82. doi:10.1002/bsl.517
310. Warren, J., Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2010). How do jurors argue with one another? Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 64-71.
311. Wasieleski, D. T. (1995). Criminal justice attitudes, personality, attributions, crime severity, demographics, and the prediction of juror decision-making (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
312. Weir, J. A., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1990). The determinants of mock jurors' verdicts in a rape case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 901-919. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb01467.x
313. Wenger, A. A., & Bornstein, B. H. (2006). The effects of victim's substance use and relationship closeness on mock jurors' judgments in an acquaintance rape case. Sex Roles, 54, 547-555. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9014-2
314. Werner, C. M., Kagehiro, D. K., & Strube, M. J. (1982). Conviction proneness and the authoritarian juror: Inability to disregard information or attitudinal bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 629-636. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.629
315. Werner, C. M., Strube, M. J., Cole, A. M., & Kagehiro, D. K. (1985). The impact of case characteristics and prior jury experience on jury verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 409-427. doi:10.1111/j .1559-1816.1985.tb02262.x
316. Wiener, R. L., Wiener, A. T., & Grisso, T. (1989). Empathy and biased assimilation of testimonies in cases of alleged rape. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 343-355. doi:10.1007/BF01056407
317. Wiley, T. R., & Bottoms, B. L. (2009). Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors' perceptions of child sexual assault. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 46-60. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9131-2
318. Williams, K. D., Bourgeois, M. J., & Croyle, R. T. (1993). The effects of stealing thunder in criminal and civil trials. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 597-609. doi:10.1007/BF01044684
319. Williams, L. R. (2011). The effect of attorney race upon jury decisionmaking (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kentucky, Frankfurt, KY.
320. Willis-Esqueda, C., Espinoza, R. K. E., & Culhane, S. E. (2008). The effects of ethnicity, SES, and crime status on juror decision making: A cross-cultural examination of European American and Mexican American mock jurors. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 30, 181-199. doi:10.1177/0739986308315319
321. Wilson, D. B. (May 23, 2005). Meta-analysis macros for SAS, SPSS, and Stata. Retrieved November 15, 2013 from http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwils onb/ma.html.
322. Wissler, R. L., & Saks, M. J. (1985). On the inefficacy of limiting instructions: When jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide on guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 37-48. doi:10.1007/BF01044288
323. Wong, J. (2011). European-American juror decisions and trait assessments of defendants who vary by ethnicity, SES and case circumstances (Unpublished master's thesis). California State University at Fullerton, Fullerton, CA.
324. Woody, W. D., & Forrest, K. D. (2009). Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 333-360. doi:10.1002/bsl.865
325. Yanchar, N. V. (1982). Subject-juror decision-making in rape cases: Effects of status of the complainant, and gender of the defense attorney, the prosecuting attorney, and the subject-juror (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.