Perceptions of repressed memories: A reappraisal

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 555-563

  Key, Holly G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEFENSE MECHANISM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; SEXUAL ABUSE; VICTIM;

EID: 0029800423     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01499041     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bottoms, B. L. (1993). Individual differences in perceptions of child sexual assault victims. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses (pp. 229-261). New York, Guilford Press.
2. Clark, H. L., & Nightingale, N. N. (in press). When jurors consider recovered memory cases: Effects of victim and juror gender. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation.
3. Duggan, L. M., III, Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Schemer, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sexual abuse case. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 71-99). New York, Springer-Verlag.
4. Golding, J. M., Sego, S. A., Sanchez, R. P., & Hasemenn, D. (1995). The believability of repressed memories. Law and Human Behavior, 19(6), 569-592.
5. Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., Helgeson, V. S., Haith, M. M., & Michelli, J. (1987). When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 27-40.