Discrimination and instructional comprehension: Guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 337-358

  Lynch, Mona ^a   Haney, Craig ^a,b  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; LAW; PUNISHMENT; RACE DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CALIFORNIA; CAPITAL PUNISHMENT; COGNITION; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREJUDICE;

EID: 0034037133     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005588221761     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. American Bar Association (1997). Recommendation and Report as Approved by the ABA House of Delegates, February 3, 1997.
2. Applegate, B., Wright, J., Dunaway, R., Cullen, F., and Wooldredge, J. (1993). Victim-offender race and support for capital punishment: A factorial design approach. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 95-115.
3. Baldus, D., Woodworth, G., and Pulaski, C. (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal empirical analysis. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
4. Black, D. (1989). Sociological justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1988). Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of Stereotypic use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726-737.
6. Bodenhausen, G. V., and Lichtenstein, M. (1987). Social stereotypes and information processing strategies: The impact of task complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 871-880.
7. Bodenhausen, G. V., and Wyer, R. S. (1985). Effects of stereotypes on decision-making and information-processing strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 267-282.
8. Bowers, W., & Steiner, B. (1999). Death by default: An empirical demonstration of false and forced choices in capital sentencing. Texas Law Review, 77, 605-717.
9. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. Zanna, J. Olson, and C. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 5 (pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Charrow, R., and Charrow, V. (1979). Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia Law Review, 52, 386-407.
11. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
12. Diamond, S. (1993). Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges. American Psychologist, 48, 423-434.
13. Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 590-598.
14. Eisenberg, T., and Wells, M. (1993). Deadly confusion: Juror instructions in capital cases. Cornell Law Review, 79, 1-52.
15. Elwork, A., Sales, B., and Alfini, J. (1982). Making jury instructions understandable. Charlottesville, VA: Michie.
16. Fiske, S., and Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
18. Gaertner, S. L., and Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio and S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Goodman, J., and Greene, E. (1989). The use of paraphrase analysis in the simplification of jury instructions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 237-251.
20. Gordon, R., Bindrim, T., McNicholas, M., and Walden, T. (1988). Perceptions of blue-collar and white-collar crime: The effect of defendant race on simulated juror decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 191-197.
21. Government Accounting Office (1990). Death penalty sentencing: Research indicates pattern of racial disparities (Report to Senate and House Committee on the Judiciary, 101st Congress, 2d Session). Washington, DC: Author.
22. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
23. Gross, S., and Mauro, R. (1989). Death and discrimination. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
24. Haney, C. (1995a). The social context of capital murder: Social histories and the logic of mitigation. Santa Clara Law Review, 35, 547-609.
25. Haney, C. (1995b). Taking capital jurors seriously. Indiana Law Journal, 70, 1223-1232.
26. Haney, C. (1997a). Commonsense justice and capital punishment: Problematizing the "will of the people." Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 303-337.
27. Haney, C. (1997b). Violence and the capital jury: Mechanisms of moral disengagement and the impulse to condemn to death. Stanford Law Review, 49, 1447-1486.
28. Haney, C., Hurtado, A. and Vega, L. (1994). "Modern" death qualification: New data on its biasing effects. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 619-633.
29. Haney, C., and Lynch, M. (1994). Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 411-436.
30. Haney, C., and Lynch, M. (1997). Clarifying life and death matters. An analysis of instructional comprehension and penalty phase arguments. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 575-595.
31. Haney, C., Sontag, L., and Costanzo, S. (1994). Deciding to take a life: Capital juries, sentencing instructions, and the jurisprudence of death. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 149-176.
32. Haney, C., and Sweeney, L. (1998). Race and capital sentencing: Another look at discriminatory death penalties. Unpublished Manuscript, University of California, Santa Cruz, California.
33. Hill, E., and Pfeifer, J. (1992). Nullification instructions and juror guilt ratings: An examination of modern racism. Contemporary Social Psychology, 16, 6-10.
34. Keil, T., and Vito, G. (1989). Race, homicide severity, and application of the death penalty: A consideration of the Barnett Scale. Criminology, 27, 511-535.
35. Luginbuhl, J., and Burkhead, M. (1994). Sources of bias and arbitrariness in the capital trial. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 103-124.
36. Luginbuhl, J., and Howe, J. (1995). Discretion in capital sentencing instructions: Guided or misguided? Indiana Law Journal, 70, 1161-1182.
37. Lungren, D., and Krotoski, M. (1995). The Racial Justice Act of 1994 - Undermining enforcement of the death penalty without promoting racial justice. University of Dayton Law Review, 20, 655-697.
38. Mazzella, R., and Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1315-1344.
39. Meertens, R., and Pettigrew, T. (1997). Is subtle prejudice really prejudice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 54-71.
40. Morgan v. Illinois, 112 S.Ct. 2222 (1992).
41. Pettigrew, T., and Meertens, R. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75.
42. Petty, R., and Cacioppo, J. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 19 (pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
43. Pfeifer, J., and Ogloff, J. (1991). Ambiguity and guilt determinations: A modern racism perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1713-1725.
44. Rector, N., Bagby, R., and Nicholson, R. (1993). The effect of prejudice and judicial ambiguity on defendant guilt ratings. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 651-659.
45. Reifman, A., Gusick, S., and Ellsworth, P. (1992). Real jurors' understanding of the law in real cases. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 539-554.
46. Sagar, H. A., and Schofield, J. W. (1980). Racial and behavioral cues in Black and White children's perceptions of ambiguously aggressive cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 590-598.
47. Severence, L., and Loftus, E. (1982). Improving the ability of jurors to comprehend and apply criminal jury instructions. Law and Society Review, 17, 153-198.
48. Sorenson, J., and Wallace, D. (1995). Capital punishment in Missouri: Examining the issue of racial disparity. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 61-80.
49. Stephan, C., and Stephan, W. (1986). Habla Ingles? The effects of language translation on simulated juror instructions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 577-589.
50. Sweeney, L., and Haney, C. (1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies. Behavioral Science and Law, 10, 179-195.
51. Tiersma, P. (1995). Dictionaries and death: Do capital jurors understand mitigation? Utah Law Review, 1995, 1-49.
52. Ugwuegbu, D. C. E. (1979). Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 136-146.
53. Wiener, R., Hurt, L., Thoma S., Sadler M., Bauer C., and Sargent, T. (1998). The role of declarative and procedural knowledge in capital murder sentencing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 124-144.
54. Wiener, R., Pritchard, C., and Weston, M. (1995). Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 455-467.
55. Wainright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 (1985).
56. Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968).