If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

Volumn 8, Issue SUPPL.1, 2011, Pages 21-48

  Koehler, Jonathan J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867682570     PISSN: 17401453     EISSN: 17401461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01225.x     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Aitken, Colin G. G. (1995) Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. Chichester: Wiley.
2. Aitken, Colin G. G., & Franco Taroni (2004) Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, 2nd ed. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
3. Aitken, Colin G. G., Grzegorz Zadora, & David Lucy (2007) "A Two-Level Model for Evidence Evaluation," 52 J. Forensic Sciences 412.
4. Allen, Ronald, & Michael Pardo (2007) "The Problematic Value of Mathematical Models of Evidence," 36 J. of Legal Studies 107.
5. Berger, Charles E. H., John Buckleton, Christophe Champod, Ian W. Evett, & Graham Jackson (2011) "Evidence Evaluation: A Response to the Court of Appeal Judgment in R. v. T," 51 Science & Justice 43.
6. Biedermann, A., & Taroni, F. (2006) "A Probabilistic Approach to the Joint Evaluation of Firearm Evidence and Gunshot Residues," 163 Forensic Science International 18.
7. Black, W. C., & Armstrong, P. (1986) "Communicating the Significance of Radiologic Test-Results: The Likelihood Ratio," 147 American J. of Roentgenology 1313.
8. Bozza, Silvia, Franco Taroni, Raymond Marquis, & Matthieu Schmittbuhl (2008) "Probabilistic Evaluation of Handwriting Evidence: Likelihood Ratio for Authorship," 57 Applied Statistics 329.
9. Champod, Christophe, & Ian W. Evett (2001) "A Probabilistic Approach to Fingerprint Evidence," 51 J. Forensic. Identification 101.
10. Champod, Christophe, Ian W. Evett, & G. Jackson (2004) "Establishing the Most Appropriate Databases for Addressing Source Level Propositions," 44 Science & Justice 153.
11. Cole, Simon A. (2004) "Grandfathering Evidence: Fingerprint Admissibility Rulings from Jennings to Llera Plaza and Back Again," 41 American Criminal Law Rev. 1189.
12. Cole, Simon A. (2009) "Forensics Without Uniqueness, Conclusions Without Individualization: The New Epistemology of Forensic Identification," 8 Law, Probability & Risk 233.
13. Cook, R., Ian W. Evett, G. Jackson, P. J. Jones, & J. A. Lambert (1998a) "A Hierarchy of Propositions: Deciding Which Level to Address in Casework," 38 Science & Justice 231.
14. Cook, R., Ian W. Evett, G. Jackson, P. J. Jones, & J. A. Lambert (1998b) "A Model for Case Assessment and Interpretation," 38 Science & Justice 151.
15. Cook, R., Ian W. Evett, G. Jackson, P. J. Jones, & J. A. Lambert (1999) "Case Pre-Assessment and Review of a Two-Way Transfer Case," 39 Science & Justice 103.
16. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993) 509 U.S. 579.
17. Edwards, Harry. T. (2009) "Solving the Problems that Plague the Forensic Science Community," 50 Jurimetrics J. 5.
18. Edwards, Ward, H. Lindman, & Leonard J. Savage (1963). "Bayesian Statistical Inference for Psychological Research," 70 Psychological Rev. 193.
19. Edwards, Ward, & Detlof von Winterfeldt (1986) "Cognitive Illusions and Their Implications for the Law," 59 Southern California Law Rev. 225.
20. Evett, Ian W. (1984) "A Quantitative Theory for Interpreting Transfer Evidence in Criminal Cases," 33 Applied Statistics 25.
21. Evett, Ian W., G. Jackson, & J. A. Lambert (2000a) "More on the Hierarchy of Propositions: Exploring the Distinction Between Explanations and Propositions," 40 Science & Justice 3.
22. Evett, Ian W., G. Jackson, J. A. Lambert, & S. McCrossan (2000b) "The Impact of the Principles of Evidence Interpretation on the Structure and Content of Statements," 40 Science & Justice 233.
23. Evett, Ian. W., & Bruce S. Weir (1998) Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
24. Farabee, W. C. (1922) Indian Tribes of Eastern Peru. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, vol. X, p. 170. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
25. Federal Rule of Evidence 401.
26. Finkelstein, Michael O., & Bruce Levin (2003) "On the Probative Value of Evidence from a Screening Search," 43 Jurimetrics J. 265.
27. Fischhoff, Baruch, & Ruth Beyth-Marom (1983) "Hypothesis Evaluation from a Bayesian Perspective," 90 Psychological Rev. 239.
28. Foreman, L. A., Christophe Champod, Ian W. Evett, J. A. Lambert, & S. Pope (2003) "Interpreting DNA evidence: A Review," 71 International Statistical Rev. 473.
29. Friedman, Richard D., & Roger C. Park (2003) "Sometimes What Everybody Thinks They Know is True," 27 Law & Human Behavior 629.
30. Garrett, Brandon L., & Peter J. Neufeld (2009) "Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions," 95 Virginia Law Rev. 1.
31. Gilovich, Thomas, Dale Griffin, & Daniel Kahneman, eds. (2002) Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
32. Hammer, Lesley (2010) "Forensic Footwear Examination Overview," presentation given at the Workshop on Cognitive Bias and Forensic Science, Northwestern Law School, Chicago, IL.
33. Hicks, Tacha (2007) "Addressing Activity Level When Interpreting Glass or Trace Evidence: What Else?" 3 Global Forensic Science Today 16.
34. Jaeschke, R., G. Guyatt, & D. L. Sackett (1994) "Users' Guides to the Medical Literature III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test. A. Are the Results of the Study Valid?" 271 J. of the American Medical Association 389.
35. Kaasa, Suzanne O., T. Peterson, E. K. Morris, & William C. Thompson (2007) "Statistical Inference and Forensic Evidence: Evaluating a Bullet Lead Match," 31 Law & Human Behavior 433.
36. Kadane, Jay B., & David A. Schum (1996) A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence. New York: Wiley.
37. Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, & Amos Tversky (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
38. Kahneman Daniel, & Amos Tversky, eds. (2000) Choices, Values, and Frames. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
39. Kaye, David H. (1986) "Quantifying Probative Value," 66 Boston Univ. Law Rev. 761.
40. Kaye, David H. (2010) "Probability, Individualization, and Uniqueness in Forensic Science Evidence: Listening to the Academies," 75 Brooklyn Law Rev. 1163.
41. Kaye, David H., Valerie P. Hans, Michael Dann, E. Farley, & S. Albertson (2007) "Statistics in the Jury Box: How Jurors Respond to Mitochondrial DNA Match Probabilities," 4 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 797.
42. Kaye, David H., & Jonathan J. Koehler (1991) "Can Jurors Understand Probabilistic Evidence?" 154 J. Royal Statistical Society, Series A 75.
43. Kaye, David H., & Jonathan J. Koehler (2003) "The Misquantification of Probative Value," 27 Law & Human Behavior 645.
44. Koehler, Jonathan J. (1993a) "DNA Matches and Statistics: Important Questions, Surprising Answers," 76 Judicature 222.
45. Koehler, Jonathan J. (1993b) "Error and Exaggeration in the Presentation of DNA Evidence," 34 Jurimetrics J. 21.
46. Koehler, Jonathan J. (1996) "On Conveying the Probative Value of DNA Evidence: Frequencies, Likelihood Ratios and Error Rates," 67 Univ. Colorado Law Rev. 859.
47. Koehler, Jonathan J. (2001a) "When are People Persuaded by DNA Match Statistics?" 25 Law & Human Behavior 493.
48. Koehler, Jonathan J. (2001b) "The Psychology of Numbers in the Courtroom: How to Make DNA Match Statistics Seem Impressive or Insufficient," 74 Southern California Law Rev. 1275.
49. Koehler, Jonathan J. (2008) "Fingerprint Error Rates and Proficiency Tests: What They Are and Why They Matter," 59 Hastings Law J. 1077.
50. Koehler, Jonathan J., A. Chia, & J. S. Lindsey (1995) "The Random Match Probability (RMP) in DNA Evidence: Irrelevant and Prejudicial?" 35 Jurimetrics J. 201.
51. Koehler, Jonathan J., & Laura Macchi (2004) "Thinking About Low-Probability Events: An Exemplar Cuing Theory," 15 Psychological Science 540.
52. Koehler, Jonathan J., & Michael J. Saks (2010) "Individualization Claims in Forensic Science: Still Unwarranted," 75 Brooklyn Law Rev. 1187.
53. Koehler, Jonathan J., & William C. Thompson (2006) "Mock Jurors' Reactions to Selective Presentation of Evidence from Multiple-Opportunity Searches," 30 Law & Human Behavior 455.
54. Leonard, David P., Edward J. Imwinkelried, David H. Kaye, David E. Bernstein, & Jennifer L. Mnookin (2010) "Forensic Science and Identity," in The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence, Chapter 12. New York: Aspen Publishers.
55. Lieberman, Joel D., Terance D. Miethe, Courtney A. Carrell, & Daniel A. Krauss (2008) "Gold Versus Platinum: Do Jurors Recognize the Superiority and Limitation of DNA Evidence Compared to Other Types of Forensic Evidence?" 14 Psychology. Pub. Pol'y & Law 27.
56. Lindsey, Samuel, Ralph Hertwig, & Gerd Gigerenzer (2003) "Communicating Statistical DNA Evidence," 43 Jurimetrics J. 147.
57. Lloyd, J. J., P. R. Talbot, & R. S. Lawson (1998) "Quantifying the Value of Diagnostic Tests," 19 Nuclear Medicine Communications 999.
58. Lyon, T. D., & Jonathan J. Koehler (1996) "The Relevance Ratio: Evaluating the Probative Value of Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases," 82 Cornell Law Rev. 43.
59. McCormick, C. T. (1999) Handbook of the Law of Evidence, 5th ed. St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
60. McQuiston-Surrett, Dawn, & Michael J. Saks (2008) "Communicating Opinion Evidence in the Forensic Identification Sciences: Accuracy and Impact," 59 Hastings Law J. 1159.
61. McQuiston-Surrett, Dawn, & Michael J. Saks (2009) "The Testimony of Forensic Identification Science: What Expert Witnesses Say and What Factfinders Hear," March 4 Law & Human Behavior online.
62. Meehl, Paul E., & A. Rosen (1955) "Antecedent Probability and the Efficiency of Psychometric Signs, Patterns, or Cutting Scores," 52 Psychological Bulletin 194.
63. Mnookin, Jennifer (2009) "Error Rates for Latent Fingerprinting as a Function of Visual Complexity and Cognitive Difficulty," National Institute of Justice Award 2009-DN-BX-K225.
64. Mnookin, Jennifer L., Simon A. Cole, Itiel E. Dror, Barry A. J. Fisher, Max Houck, Keith Inman, David H. Kaye, Jonathan J. Koehler, Glenn Langenburg, D. Michel Risinger, Norah Rudin, Jay Siegel, & David Stoney (2011) "The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences," 58 UCLA Law Rev. 725.
65. Morgan, John, Mark Stolorow, & Melissa Taylor (2008) "Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis," November 8 personal email.
66. Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2009) "Forensic Voice Comparison and the Paradigm Shift," 49 Science & Justice 298.
67. Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Cuiling Zhang, & Philip Rose (2011) "An Empirical Estimate of the Precision of Likelihood Ratios from a Forensic-Voice-Comparison System," 208 Forensic Science International 59.
68. Murphy, Shiela T., & Robert B. Zajonc (1993) "Affect, Cognition, and Awareness: Affective Priming with Optimal and Suboptimal Stimulus Exposures," 64 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 723.
69. Nance, Dale. A., & Scott B. Morris (2002) "An Empirical Assessment of Presentation Formats for Trace Evidence with a Relatively Large and Quantifiable Random Match Probability," 42 Jurimetrics J. 403.
70. Nance, Dale. A., & Scott B. Morris (2005) "Juror Understanding of DNA Evidence: An Empirical Assessment of Presentation Formats for Trace Evidence with a Relatively Small Random Match Probability," 34 J. of Legal Studies 395.
71. National Research Council (NRC)(2009) Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Science Community, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
72. Neumann, Cedric, Christophe Champod, Roberto Puch-Solis, Nicole Egli, Alexandre Anthonioz, Didier Meuwly, & Andie Bromage-Griffiths (2006) "Computation of Likelihood Ratios in Fingerprint Identification for Configurations of Three Minutiae," 51 J. Forensic Science 1255.
73. Neumann, Cedric, Christophe Champod, Roberto Puch-Solis, Nicole Egli, Alexandre Anthonioz, Didier Meuwly, & Andie Bromage-Griffiths (2007) "Computation of Likelihood Ratios in Fingerprint Identification for Configurations of Any Number of Minutiae," 52 J. Forensic Sciences 54.
74. Neumann, Cedric, Ian W. Evett, James E. Skerrett, & Ismael Mateos-Garcia (2011) "Quantitative Assessment of Evidential Weight for a Fingerprint Comparison I. Generalisation to the Comparison of a Mark with Set of Ten Prints from a Suspect," 207 Forensic Science International 101.
75. Nisbett, Richard. E., & Lee Ross (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
76. Redmayne, Michael, Paul Roberts, Colin G. G. Aitken, & Graham Jackson (2011) "Forensic Science Evidence in Question," Criminal Law Rev. 347.
77. Robertson, Bernard, & G. Anthony Vignaux (1995 1998) Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Limited.
78. Saks, M. J., & Robert F. Kidd (19801981) "Human Information Processing and Adjudication: Trial by Heuristics," 15 Law & Society Rev. 124.
79. Saks, M. J., & Jonathan J. Koehler (2008) "The Individualization Fallacy in Forensic Science Evidence," 61 Vanderbilt Law Rev. 199.
80. Schklar, Jason, & Shari Diamond (1999) "Juror Reactions to DNA Evidence: Errors and Expectancies," 23 Law & Human Behavior 159.
81. Schum, David A. (1994) Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. New York: Wiley.
82. Scientific Working Group for Shoeprint and Tire Tread Evidence (2009) Standard Terminology for Expressing Conclusions of Forensic Footwear and Tire Impression Examinations. Available at .
83. Taroni, Franco, & Colin G. G. Aitken (1998) "Probabilistic Reasoning in the Law, Part I: Assessment of Probabilistic and Explanation of the Value of DNA Evidence," 38 Science & Justice 165.
84. Thompson, W. C. (1989) "Are Juries Competent to Evaluate Statistical Evidence?" 52 Law & Contemporary Problems 9.
85. Thompson, W. C. (1995) "Subjective Interpretation, Laboratory Error and the Value of DNA Evidence: Three Case Studies," 96 Genetica 153.
86. Thompson, W. C. (1996) "DNA Evidence in the Trial of O.J. Simpson," 67 Colorado Law Rev. 845.
87. Thompson, William C., & Simon A. Cole (2007) "Psychological Aspects of Forensic Identification Evidence," in M. Costanzo, D. Krauss, & K. Pezdek, eds., Expert Testimony for the Courts, pp. 31-68. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
88. Thompson, W. C., F. Taroni, & C. G. G. Aitken (2003) "How the Probability of a False Positive Affects the Value of DNA Evidence," 48 J. Forensic Sciences 47.
89. Tversky, Amos, & Daniel Kahneman, D. (1974) "Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases," 185 Science 1124.
90. Ulery, Bradford T., R. Austin Hicklin, JoAnn Buscaglia, & Maria Antonia Roberts (2011) "Accuracy and Reliability of Forensic Latent Fingerprint Decisions," 108 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 7733.
91. Wagenaar, Willem A. (1988) "The Proper Seat: A Bayesian Discussion of the Position of Expert Witnesses," 12 Law & Human Behavior 499.
92. Yates, J. Frank (1990) Judgment and Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Sons.