Reducing racial bias in the penalty phase of capital trials

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 603-617

  Shaked Schroer, Netta ^a   Costanzo, Mark ^b   Marcus Newhall, Amy ^c  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE   (United States)

^c SCRIPPS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; PUNISHMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; CALIFORNIA; CAPITAL PUNISHMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; JURISPRUDENCE; MALE; PREJUDICE; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 56149084085     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: 10990798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.829     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Amnesty International. (2003, April). United States of America: Death by discrimination - The continuing role of race in capital cases (AI Index: AMR 51/057/2003).
2. Atkins v. Virginia. 122 S. Ct. 2428 (2002).
3. Baldus, D., Woodworth, G., Zuckerman, D., Weiner, N. A., & Broffit, B. (1998). Racial discrimination and the death penalty in the post-Furman era: An empirical and legal overview with recent findings from Philadelphia. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1630-1770.
4. Barkan, S. E., & Cohn, S. F. (1994). Racial prejudice and support for the death penalty by whites. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 202-209.
5. Batson v. Kentucky. 146 U.S. 79 (1986).
6. Bowers, W. J. (1984). Legal homicide: Death as punishment in America. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
7. Brewer, N., Harvery, S., & Semmler, C. (2004). Improving comprehension of jury instructions with audio-visual presentation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 765-776.
8. Charrow, R. P., & Charrow, V. R. (1979). Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia Law Review, 79, 1306-1374.
9. Costanzo, M. (1997). Just revenge: Costs and consequences of the death penalty. New York: St. Martin's.
10. Costanzo, M., & Peterson, J. (1994). Attorney persuasion in the capital penalty phase: A content analysis of closing arguments. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 125-148.
11. Costanzo, S., & Costanzo, M. (1994). Life or death decisions: An analysis of capital jury decision-making under the special issues sentencing framework. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 151-170.
12. Diamond, S. S. (1993). Instructing on death. American Psychologist, 43, 423-434.
13. Dovidio, J. F., Smith, J. K., Donnella, A. G., & Gaertner, S. L. (1997). Racial attitudes and the death penalty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 27, 1468-1487.
14. Fleury-Steiner, B. (2005). Jurors' stories of death: How America's death penalty invests in inequality. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
15. Frank, J., & Applegate, B. K. (1998). Assessing juror understanding of capital-sentencing instructions. Crime and Delinquency, 44, 412-433.
16. Fukurai, H., & Krooth, R. (2003). Race in the jury box: Affirmative action in jury selection. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
17. Furman v. Georgia. 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
18. Garvey, S. P., Johnson, S. L., & Marcus, P. (2000). Correcting deadly confusion: Responding to jury inquiries in capital cases. Cornell Law Review, 85, 627-655.
19. Gregg v. Georgia. 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
20. Haney, C., & Lynch, M. (1997). Clarifying life and death matters: An analysis of instructional comprehension and penalty phase closing arguments. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 575-594.
21. Haney, C., Sontag, L., & Costanzo, S. (1994). Deciding to take a life: Capital juries, sentencing instructions, and the jurisprudence of death. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 149-176.
22. Hays, J. R., & Cambron, S. (1999). Courtroom observations of ethnic representation among jurors in Harris County. Texas. Psychological Reports, 85, 1218-1220.
23. Indiana Criminal Law Study Commission. (2002). The application of Indiana's capital sentencing law. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Criminal Justice Institute.
24. Kerr, N. L. (1981). Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 684-702.
25. Klein, S. P., Beck, R. A., & Hickman, L. J. (June, 2006). Race and the decision to seek the death penalty in federal cases. Grant report prepared for the National Institute of Justice. Document 214730. Rand Corporation.
26. Luginbuhl, J., & Burkhead, M. (1994). Sources of bias and arbitrariness in the capital trial. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 103-124.
27. Lynch, M., & Haney, C. (2000). Discrimination and instructional comprehension: Guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 337-358.
28. McCleskey v. Kemp. 481 U.S. 279 (1987).
29. Mitchell, T. L., Haw, R. M., Pfeifer, J. E., & Meissner, C. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 621-637.
30. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bacon, S., Ditchfield, A., Biere, D., & Beckman, K., et al. (2003). An empirical analysis of Maryland's death sentencing system with respect to the influence of race and legal jurisdiction: Final report. University of Maryland.
31. Paternoster, R., & Kazyaka, A. M. (1988). The administration of the death penalty in South Carolina: Experiences over the first few years. South Carolina Law Review, 39, 245-414.
32. Ring v. Arizona. 122 S. Ct. 2428 (2002).
33. Roper v. Simmons. 125 S. Ct 1183 (2005).
34. Sandys, M., & Dillehay, R. C. (1995). First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 175-195.
35. Shaw, J. I., & Skolnick, P. (1995). Effects of prohibitive and informative judicial instructions on jury decision making. Social Behavior and Personality, 23(4), 319-326.
36. Smith, M. B. (1990). Psychology in the public interest: What have we done? What can we do? American Psychologist, 45, 530-536.
37. Snyder v. Louisiana. 06-10119.
38. Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 201-229.
39. Soss, J., Langbein, L., & Metelko, A. (2003). Why do White Americans support the death penalty? The Journal of Politics, 65, 397-421.
40. Unah, I., & Boger, J. (2001). Race and the death penalty in North Carolina, An empirical analysis: 1993-1997. The Common Sense Foundation, North Carolina Council of Churches.
41. Wiener, R. L., Pritchard, C. C., & Weston, M. (1995). Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 455-467.
42. Wiener, R. L., Rogers, M., Winter, R., Hurt, L., Hackney, A., & Kadela, K., et al. (2004). Guided jury discretion in capital murder cases: The role of declarative and procedural knowledge. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10, 516-576.
43. Young, R. L. (1991). Race, conceptions of crime and justice, and support for the death penalty. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 67-75.
44. Young, R. L. (1992). Religious orientation, race and support for the death penalty. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31, 76-87.