Talking about a black man: The influence of defendant and character witness race on jurors' use of character evidence

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 608-620

  Maeder, Evelyn M ^a   Hunt, Jennifer S ^b  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b BUFFALO STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHARACTER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; NEGRO; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CHARACTER; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREJUDICE;

EID: 79960780668     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: 10990798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.996     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669-679.
2. Borgida, E. (1979). Character proof and the fireside induction. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 189-202.
3. Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75-91.
4. Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children's credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702-732.
5. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
6. Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414-446.
7. Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139-1150.
8. Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1996). Trait implications as a moderator of memory for stereotype-consistent and inconsistent information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 425-432.
9. Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE). (2008). Thomson/West.
10. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio, & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
11. Greene, E. & Bornstein, B. H. (2000). Precious little guidance: Jury instruction on damage awards. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 743-768.
12. Hunt, J. S., & Budesheim, T. L. (2004). How jurors use and misuse character evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 347-361.
13. Hunt, J. S., & Edick, A. (2009, March). Are judicial instructions about the use of character evidence an effective guide for jurors? Poster presented at the Meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, San Antonio, TX.
14. Hunt, J. S., & Maeder, E. (2011, March). "He's not like you think:" The powerful impact of stereotype-inconsistent character evidence. Paper presented at the International Congress on Psychology and Law, Miami FL.
15. Jones, E., Moore, J. N., & Stanaland, A. J. S. (1998). Salesperson race and gender and the access and legitimacy paradigm: Does difference make a difference? Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 18, 71-88.
16. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
17. Lieberman, J. D., & Arndt, J. (2000). Understanding the limits of limiting instructions: Social psychological explanations for the failures to disregard pretrial publicity and other inadmissible evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 677-711.
18. Lieberman, J. D., & Sales, B. D. (2000). Jury instructions: Past, present, and future. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 587-590.
19. Lupfer, M., Cohen, R., Bernard, J. L., & Smalley, D. (1986). Presenting favourable and unfavourable character evidence to juries. Law and Psychology Review, 10, 59-71.
20. Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socio-economic status and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 24(15), 1315-1344.
21. Mitchell, T. L., Haw, R. M., Pfeifer, J., & Meissner, C. A. (2005). Racial bias in juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review. Law & Human Behavior, 29, 621-637.
22. Pfeifer, J. E., & Bernstein, D. J. (2003). Expressions of modern racism in judgments of others: The role of task and target specificity on attributions of guilt. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 749-766.
23. Pfeifer, J. E., & Ogloff, J. R. (2003). Mock juror ratings of guilt in Canada: Modern racism and ethnic heritage. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 301-312.
24. Ross, J. (2004). He looks guilty: Reforming good character evidence to undercut the presumption of guilt. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 65, 227-279.
25. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320.
26. Saltzburg, S. A., Martin, M. M., & Capra, D. J. (2006). Federal rules of evidence manual 9th ed., (Vol. 1). Charlottesville, VA: LEXIS Law Publishing.
27. Sargent, M. J., & Bradfield, A. L. (2004). Race and information processing in criminal trials: Does the defendant's race affect how the facts are evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 995-1008.
28. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
29. Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1369-1379.
30. Sommers, S. R., & Norton, M. I. (2007). Race-based judgments, race-neutral justifications: Experimental examination of peremptory use and the Batson Challenge procedure. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 261-273.
31. Sweeney, L. T., & Haney, C. (1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 179-195.
32. Tanford, S., & Cox, M. (1988). The effects of impeachment evidence and limiting instructions on individual and group decision-making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 477-497.
33. Uviller, H. R. (1982). Evidence of character to prove conduct: Illusion, illogic, and injustice in the courtroom. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 130, 845-891.
34. Uviller, H. R. (1993). Credence, character, and the rules of evidence: Seeing through the liar's tale. Duke Law Journal, 42, 776-839.
35. Willis-Esqueda, C. (1997). European American students' perceptions of crimes committed by five racial groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1406-1420.