Influence of implant surfaces on osseointegration

Brazilian Dental Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 471-481

  Novaes Jr , Arthur Belém ^a   de Souza, Sérgio Luis Scombatti ^a   de Barros, Raquel Rezende Martins ^a   Pereira, Karina Kimiko Yamashina ^a   Iezzi, Giovanna ^b   Piattelli, Adriano ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biomimetic coating; Dental implants; Osseointegration; Surface modifications; Topography

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251550742     PISSN: 01036440     EISSN: 18064760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000600001     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1- review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-543.
2. Junker R, Dimakis A, Thoneick M, Jansen JA. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:185-206.
3. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-533.
4. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:49-58.
5. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1567-1575.
6. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:63-74.
7. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:172-184.
8. Beutner R, Michael J, Schwenzer B, Scharnweber D. Biological nano-functionalization of titanium-based biomaterial surfaces: a flexible toolbox. J R Soc Interface 2010;7:S93-S105.
9. Barros RR, Novaes AB Jr, Papalexiou V, Souza SL, Taba M Jr, Palioto DB, et al. Effect of biofunctionalized implant surface on osseointegration: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Braz Dent J 2009;20:91-98.
10. Lutz R, Srour S, Nonhoff J, Weisel T, Damien CJ, Schlegel KA. Biofunctionalization of titanium implants with a biomimetic active peptide (P-15) promotes early osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:726-734.
11. Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:76-94.
12. Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, Suzuki M, Silva NR, Cardaropoli G, et al. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:579-596.
13. Lemons JE. Biomaterials, biomechanics, tissue healing, and immediate-function dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2004;30:318-324.
14. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesio on biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000;21:667-681.
15. Kasemo B. Biological surface science. Surf Sci 2002;500:656-677.
16. Deligianni DD, Katsala N, Ladas S, Sotiropoulou D, Amedee J, Missirlis YF. Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti- 6Al-4V on human broadcast marrow cell response and on protein adsorption. Biomaterials 2001;22:1241-1251.
17. Lamers E, Walboomers XF, Domanski M, te Riet J, van Delft FC, Luttge R, et al. The influence of nanoscale grooved substrates on osteoblast behavior and extracellular matrix deposition. Biomaterials 2010;31:3307-3316.
18. Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Aragão FJ, Cooper LF. The combination of micron and nanotopography by H(2)SO(4)/H(2) O(2) treatment and its effects on osteoblast-specific gene expression of hMSCs. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;94:169-179.
19. Lincks J, Boyan BD, Blanchard CR, Lohmann CH, Liu Y, Cochran DL, et al. Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998;19:2219-2232.
20. von der Mark K, Park J, Bauer S, Schmuki P. Nanoscale engineering of biomimetic surfaces: cues from the extracellular matrix. Cell Tissue Res 2010;339:131-153.
21. Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion. Acta Biomater 2005;1:211-222.
22. Cooper LF, Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1998;13:163-174.
23. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:391-401.
24. Lim YJ, Oshida Y, Andres CJ, Barco MT. Surface characterizations of variously treated titanium materials. Int J Oral Maxillof Imp 2001;16:333-342.
25. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Coelho PG, Kang BS, Sul YT, Albrektsson T. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends Biotechnol 2010;28:198-206.
26. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:331-344.
27. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007;23:844-854.
28. Healy KE, Thomas CH, Rezania A, Kim JE, McKeown PJ, Lom B, et al. Kinetics of bone cell organization and mineralization on materials with patterned surface chemistry. Biomaterials 1996;17:195-208.
29. Rosa AL, Beloti MM. Effect of cpTi surface roughness on human bone marrow cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Braz Dent J 2003;14:16-21.
30. Zinger O, Anselme K, Denzer A, Habersetzer P, Wieland M, Jeanfils J, et al. Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scaleresolved topography. Biomaterials 2004;25:2695-2711.
31. Mustafa K, Wennerberg A, Wroblewski J, Hultenby K, Lopez BS, Arvidson K. Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO(2) blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:515-525.
32. Wieland M, Textor M, Chehroudi B, Brunette DM. Synergistic interaction of topographic features in the production of bonelike nodules on Ti surfaces by rat osteoblasts. Biomaterials 2005;26:1119-1130.
33. Matsuzaka K, Walboomers XF, Yoshinari M, Inoue T, Jansen JA. The attachment and growth behavior of osteoblast-like cells on microtextured surfaces. Biomaterials 2003;24:2711-2719.
34. Boyan BD, Lossdorfer S, Wang L, Zhao G, Lohmann CH, Cochran DL, et al. Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies. Eur Cell Mater 2003;6:22-27.
35. Schwartz Z, Lohmann CH, Oefinger J, Bonewald LF, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Implant surface characteristics modulate differentiation behavior of cells in the osteoblastic lineage. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:38-48.
36. Schwartz Fo HO, Novaes AB Jr, de Castro LMS, Rosa AL, de Oliveira PT. In vitro osteogenesis on a microstructured titanium surface with additional submicron-scale topography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:333-344.
37. De Oliveira PT, Nanci A. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials 2004;25:403-413.
38. De Oliveira PT, Zalzal SF, Beloti MM, Rosa AL, Nanci A. Enhancement of in vitro osteogenesis on titanium by chemically produced nanotopography. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;80:554-564.
39. Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Stanford C. Osteoblast integrin adhesion and signaling regulate mineralization. J Dent Res 2001;80:1540-1544.
40. Variola F, Yi JH, Richert L, Wuest JD, Rosei F, Nanci A. Tailoring the surface properties of Ti6Al4V by controlled chemical oxidation. Biomaterials 2008;29:1285-1298.
41. Vetrone F, Variola F, Tambasco de Oliveira P, Zalzal SF, Yi JH, Sam J, et al. Nanoscale oxidative patterning of metallic surfaces to modulate cell activity and fate. Nano Lett 2009;9:659-665.
42. Liu Y, de Groot K, Hunziker EB. Osteoinductive implants: the mise-en-scène for drug-bearing biomimetic coatings. Ann Biomed Eng 2004;32:398-406.
43. Yang Y, Kim KH, Ong JL. A review on calcium phosphate coatings produced using a sputtering process-an alternative to plasma spraying. Biomaterials 2005;26:327-337.
44. 3-. Bone 1999;25:107S-111S.
45. Tosatti S, Schwartz Z, Campbell C, Cochran DL, Vandevondele S, Hubbel JA, et al. RGD-containing peptide GCRGYGRGDSPG reduces enhancement of osteoblast differentiation by poly(Llysine)- graft-poly(ethylene glycol)-coated titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;68:458-472.
46. Schliephake H, Scharnweber D, Dard M, Sewing A, Aref A, Roessler S. Functionalization of dental implant surfaces using adhesion molecules. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;73:88-96.
47. Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the boneimplant interface. Biomaterials 1999;20:2311-2321.
48. Geissler U, Hempel U, Wolf C, Scharnweber D, Worch H, Wenzel KW. Collagen type I coating of Ti6Al4V promotes adhesion of osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:752-760.
49. Mizuno M, Imai T, Fujisawa R, Tani H, Kuboki Y. Bone sialoprotein (BSP) is a crucial factor for the expression of osteoblastic phenotypes of bone marrow cells cultured on type I collagen matrix. Calcif Tissue Int 2000;66:388-396.
50. De Assis AF, Beloti MM, Crippa GE, de Oliveira PT, Morra M, Rosa AL. Development of the osteoblastic phenotype in human alveolar bone-derived cells grown on a collagen type I-coated titanium surface. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:240-246.
51. Cooper LF, Zhou Y, Takebe J, Guo J, Abron A, Holmén A, et al. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 2006;27:926-936.
52. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L. State of the art in oral implants. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:474-481.
53. Al-Nawas B, Groetz KA, Goetz H, Duschner H, Wagner W. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1-8.
54. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:350-357.
55. Sammons RL, Lumbikanonda N, Gross M, Cantzler P. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behavior in an explants model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopy study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:657-666.
56. Novaes AB Jr, Papalexiou V, Grisi MF, Souza SS, Taba M Jr, Kajiwara JK. Influence of implant microstructure on the osseointegration of immediate implants placed in periodontally infected sites. A histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:34-43.
57. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructure titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;76:323-334.
58. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Hirt HP, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.
59. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLAactive®) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:78-86.
60. Bornstein MM, Valderrama P, Jones AA, Wilson TG, Seibl R, Cochran DL. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Clin Oral Impl Res 2008;19:233-241.
61. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and remova l torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:252-259.
62. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading of Branemark System TiUnite and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible: a randomized open-ended clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:557-563.
63. Burgos PM, Rasmusson L, Meirelles L, Senerby L. Early bone tissue responses to turned and oxidized implants in a rabbit tibia. Clin Impl Dent Relat Res 2008;10:181-190.
64. Huang YH, Xiropaidis AV, Sorensen RG, Albandar JM, Hall J, Wikesjö UME. Bone formation of titanium porous oxide (TiUnite) oral implants in type IV bone. Clin Oral Impl Res 2005;16:105-111.
65. Barrère F, van der Valk CM, Meijer G, Dalmeijer RA, de Groot K, Layrolle P. Osteointegration of biomimetic apatite coating applied onto dense and porous metal implants in femurs of goats. J Biomed Mater Res 2003;67:655-665.
66. Quaranta A, Iezzi G, Scarano A, Coelho PG, Vozza I, Marincola M, et al. A histomorphometric study of nanothickness and plasmasprayed calcium-phosphorous-coated implant surfaces in rabbit bone. J Periodontol 2010;81:556-561.
67. Yang GL, He FM, Hu JA, Wang XX, Zhao SF. Biomechanical comparison of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:420-427.
68. Lee J, Rouhfar L, Beirne O. Survival of hydroxypatite-coated implants: a meta-analytic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:1372-1379.
69. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystalline deposition enhances osteoconduction on titaniumbased implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;90:577-585.
70. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2007;28:4748-4755.
71. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystalline deposition enhances osteoconduction on titaniumbased implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;90:577-585.
72. Rezania A, Healy KE. Biomimetic peptide surfaces that regulate adhesion, spreading, cytoskeletal organization, and mineralization of the matrix deposited by osteoblast-like cells. Biotechnol Prog 1999;15:19-32.
73. Rezania A, Thomas CH, Branger AB, Waters CM, Healy KE. The detachment strength and morphology of bone cells contacting materials modified with a peptide sequence found within bone sialoprotein. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:9-19.
74. Germanier Y, Tosatti S, Broggini N, Textor M, Buser D. Enhanced bone apposition around biofunctionalized sandblasted and acidetched titanium implant surfaces. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006;17:251-257.
75. Liu Y, Enggist L, Kuffer AF, Buser D, Hunziker EB. The influence of BMP-2 and its mode of delivery on the osteoconductivity of implant surfaces during the early phase of osseointegration. Biomaterials 2007;28:2677-2686.
76. Wikesjö UM, Qahash M, Polimeni G, Susin C, Shanaman RH, Rohrer MD, et al. Alveolar ridge augmentation using implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: histologic observations. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:1001-1010.
77. Park JM, Koak JY, Jang JH, Han CH, Kim SK, Heo SJ. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants coated with fibroblast growth factor-fibronectin (FGF-FN) fusion protein. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:859-866.