The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment

Biomaterials

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 706-713

  Puckett, Sabrina D ^a   Taylor, Erik ^a   Raimondo, Theresa ^a   Webster, Thomas J ^a  

^a Brown University   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Bacteria; Fibronectin; Nanotopography; Titanium

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; BACTERIA; BIOMATERIALS; BONE; CELL ADHESION; ELECTRON BEAMS; ENZYME INHIBITION; EVAPORATION; OSTEOBLASTS; PHYSICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION; STAINLESS STEEL; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; TISSUE; TITANIUM;

ELECTRON BEAM EVAPORATION; FIBRONECTIN; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; ORTHOPEDIC PROSTHESIS; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

FLUORINE; NANOMATERIAL; TITANIUM; FIBRONECTIN;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BONE TISSUE; CHEMISTRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTALLIZATION; ELECTRON BEAM; EVAPORATION; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; ORTHOPEDICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY; DRUG EFFECT; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; MICROBIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FIBRONECTINS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOSTRUCTURES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; TITANIUM;

EID: 75549091207     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.081     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Donlan RM. Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:277-81.
2. von Recum AF, Park JB. Permanent percutaneous devices. Crit Rev Bioeng 1981;5:37-77.
3. Lentino JR. Prosthetic joint infections: bane of orthopedists, challenge for infectious disease specialists. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:1157-61.
4. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong KL, Zhao K, Parvizi J. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:984-91.
5. Van Lenthe GH, de Waal Malefijt MC, Huiskes R. Stress shielding after total knee replacement may cause bone resorption in the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:117-22.
6. Burke DW, O'Connor DO, Zalenski EB, Jasty M, Harris WH. Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:33-7.
7. Lerouge S, Huk O, Yahia LH, Sedel L. Characterization of in vivo wear debris from ceramic-ceramic total hip arthroplasties. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:627-33.
8. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002;15:167-93.
9. Gristina AG. Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science 1987;237:1588-95.
10. Moroni A, Vannini F, Mosca M, Giannini S. State of the art review: techniques to avoid pin loosening and infection in external fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:189-95.
11. Mahan J, Seligson D, Henry SL, Hynes P, Dobbins J. Factors in pin tract infections. Orthopedics 1991;14:305-8.
12. Zlowodzki M, Prakash JS, Aggarwal NK. External fixation of complex femoral shaft fractures. Int Orthop 2007;31:409-13.
13. Green SA, Ripley MJ. Chronic osteomyelitis in pin tracks. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:1092-8.
14. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999;284:1318-22.
15. Rimondini L, Fini M, Giardino R. The microbial infection of biomaterials: a challenge for clinicians and researchers. A short review. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2005;3:1-10.
16. Fux CA, Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Stoodley P. Survival strategies of infectious biofilms. Trends Microbiol 2005;13:34-40.
17. Baquero F. Gram-positive resistance: challenge for the development of new antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997;39(Suppl. A):1-6.
18. Campoccia D, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance. Biomaterials 2006; 27:2331-9.
19. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 2004;25:4731-9.
20. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999;20:1221-7.
21. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000;21:1803-10.
22. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced osteoclastlike cell functions on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2001;22:1327-33.
23. Ejiofor JU,Webster TJ. Bone cell adhesion on titanium implants with nanoscale surface features. Int J Powder Metall 2004;40:43-53.
24. Ward BC, Webster TJ. Increased functions of osteoblasts on nanophase metals. Mater Sci Eng C 2007;27:575-8.
25. Miller DC, Vance RJ, Thapa A, Webster TJ, Haberstroh KM. Comparison of fibroblast and vascular cell adhesion to nano-structured poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) films. Appl Bionics Biomech 2005;2:1-7.
26. Cohen A, Liu-Synder P, Storey D,Webster T. Decreased fibroblast and increased osteoblast functions on ionic plasma deposited nanostructured Ti coatings. Nanoscale Res Lett 2007;2:385-90.
27. Puckett S, Pareta R, Webster TJ. Nano rough micron patterned titanium for directing osteoblast morphology and adhesion. Int J Nanomed 2008;3:229-41.
28. Yao C, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;85: 157-66.
29. Woo KM, Chen VJ, Ma PX. Nano-fibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:531-7.
30. Khang D, Kim SY, Liu-Snyder P, Palmore GT, Durbin SM, Webster TJ. Enhanced fibronectin adsorption on carbon nanotube/poly(carbonate) urethane: independent role of surface nano-roughness and associated surface energy. Biomaterials 2007;28:4756-68.
31. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:475-83.
32. Colon G, Ward BC, Webster TJ. Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78:595-604.
33. Anagnostou F, Debet A, Pavon-Djavid G, Goudaby Z, Helary G, Migonney V. Osteoblast functions on functionalized PMMA-based polymers exhibiting Staphylococcus aureus adhesion inhibition. Biomaterials 2006;27:3912-9.
34. Kinnari TJ, Peltonen LI, Kuusela P, Kivilahti J, Kononen M, Jero J. Bacterial adherence to titanium surface coated with human serum albumin. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:380-4.
35. Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, PfisterW. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:278-85.
36. Correa CB, Pires JR, Fernandes-Filho RB, Sartori R, Vaz LG. Fatigue and fluoride corrosion on Streptococcus mutans adherence to titanium-based implant/ component surfaces. J Prosthodont 2009;18:382-7.
37. Li B, Logan BE. Bacterial adhesion to glass and metal-oxide surfaces. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2004;36:81-90.
38. Katsikogianni M, Spiliopoulou I, Dowling DP, Missirlis YF. Adhesion of slime producing Staphylococcus epidermidis strains to PVC and diamond-like carbon/silver/fluorinated coatings. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:679-89.
39. Popat KC, Eltgroth M, Latempa TJ, Grimes CA, Desai TA. Decreased Staphylococcus epidermis adhesion and increased osteoblast functionality on antibiotic-loaded titania nanotubes. Biomaterials 2007;28:4880-8.
40. Yoshinari M, Oda Y, Kato T, Okuda K. Influence of surface modifications to titanium on antibacterial activity in vitro. Biomaterials 2001;22:2043-8.
41. Raulio M, Jarn M, Ahola J, Peltonen J, Rosenholm JB, Tervakangas S, et al. Microbe repelling coated stainless steel analysed by field emission scanning electron microscopy and physicochemical methods. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2008;35:751-60.
42. Hyde FW, Alberg M, Smith K. Comparison of fluorinated polymers against stainless steel, glass and polypropylene in microbial biofilm adherence and removal. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 1997;19:142-9.
43. Wentworth JS, Austin FE, Garber N, Gilboa-Garber N, Paterson CA, Doyle RJ. Cytoplasmic lectins contribute to the adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biofouling: J Bioadhesion Biofilm Res 1991;4:99-104.
44. Palma M, Haggar A, Flock JI. Adherence of Staphylococcus aureus is enhanced by an endogenous secreted protein with broad binding activity. J Bacteriol 1999;181:2840-5.
45. Del Curto B, Brunella MF, Giordano C, Pedeferri MP, Valtulina V, Visai L, et al. Decreased bacterial adhesion to surface-treated titanium. Int J Artif Organs 2005;28:718-30.
46. Yang B, Uchida M, Kim HM, Zhang X, Kokubo T. Preparation of bioactive titanium metal via anodic oxidation treatment. Biomaterials 2004;25:1003-10