Electrochemical growth behavior, surface properties, and enhanced in vivo bone response of Tio2 nanotubes on microstructured surfaces of blasted, screw-shaped titanium implants

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 87-100

  Sul, Young Taeg ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY AT UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Electrochemical fabrication; In vivo bone response; Nanotubes; Osseo integrated titanium implant; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

FLUORIDE ION; NANOTUBE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE REGENERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; FEMUR; FLUORINATION; IMPLANT; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; METAL IMPLANTATION; NANOFABRICATION; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; POROSITY; RABBIT; REACTION TIME; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 77951174777     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s8012     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Zwilling V, Aucouturier M, Darque-Ceretti E. Anodic oxidation of titanium and TA6V alloy in chromic media. An electrochemical approach. Electrochimi Acta. 1999;45(6):921-929.
2. Ghicov A, Schmuki P. Self-ordering electrochemistry: a review on growth and functionality of TiO2 nanotubes and other self-aligned MO(x) structures. Chem Commun. 2009;(20):2791-2808.
3. Macak JM, Tsuchiya H, Ghicov A, et al. TiO2 nanotubes: Self-organized electrochemical formation, properties and applications. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2007;11(1-2):3-18.
4. Mor GK, Varghese OK, Paulose M, Shankar K, Grimes CA. A review on highly ordered, vertically oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: Fabrication, material properties, and solar energy applications. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2006;90(14):2011-2075.
5. Chen X, Mao SS. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem Rev. 2007;107(7):2891-2959.
6. Yao C, Webster TJ. Anodization: a promising nano-modification technique of titanium implants for orthopedic applications. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2006;6(9-10):2682-2692.
7. Christenson EM, Anseth KS, van den Beucken JJ, et al. Nanobiomaterial applications in orthopedics. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(1):11-22.
8. Variola F, Vetrone F, Richert L, et al. Improving biocompatibility of implantable metals by nanoscale modification of surfaces: an overview of strategies, fabrication methods, and challenges. Small. 2009;5(9):996-1006.
9. Sul YT, Johansson C, Wennerberg A, et al. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20(3):349-359.
10. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Albrektsson T. The electrochemical oxide growth behaviour on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytes. Med Eng Phys. 2001;23(5):329-346.
11. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S, et al. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials. 2002;23(2):491-501.
12. Sul YT. Modified oxide. US Patent. 7,291,178. 2007.
13. Sul YT. Osseoinductive magnesium-titanate implant and method of manufacturing the same. US Patent. 7,452,566. 2008.
14. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, et al. Oxidized implants and their influence on the bone response. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001; 12(10-12):1025-1031.
15. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13(3):252-259.
16. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Roser K, Albrektsson T. Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implants. Biomaterials. 2002;23(8):1809-1817.
17. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Kang Y, Jeon DG, Albrektsson T. Bone reactions to oxidized titanium implants with electrochemical anion sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid incorporation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4(2):78-87.
18. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17(5):625-634.
19. Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials. 2003;24(22):3893-3907.
20. Sul YT, Jeong Y, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1 experimental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(5):521-526.
21. Sul YT, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(4):319-328.
22. Sul YT, Kang BS, Johansson C, et al. The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2009;89(4):942-950.
23. Sul YT, Johansson C, Byon E, Albrektsson T. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials. 2005;26(33):6720-6730.
24. Sul YT, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. A novel in vivo method for quantifying the interfacial biochemical bond strength of bone implants. J R Soc Interface. 2009 Apr 24 [Epub ahead of print].
25. von Wilmowsky C, Bauer S, Lutz R, et al. In vivo evaluation of anodic TiO2 nanotubes: an experimental study in the pig. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2009;89(1):165-171.
26. Popat KC, Leary Swan EE, Mukhatyar V, et al. Influence of nanoporous alumina membranes on long-term osteoblast response. Biomaterials. 2005;26(22):4516-4522.
27. Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 2007;7(6):1686-1691.
28. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS, et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(7): 2130-2135.
29. Park J, Bauer S, Schlegel KA, et al. TiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. Small. 2009;5(6):666-671.
30. Burns K, Yao C, Webster TJ. Increased chondrocyte adhesion on nanotubular anodized titanium. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2009; 88(3):561-568.
31. von der Mark K, Bauer S, Park J, Schmuki P. Another look at "Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(24):E60; author reply E61.
32. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS, et al. Reply to von der Mark et al: Looking further into the effects of nanotube dimension on stem cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(7):E61.
33. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol. 1982;11(4):318-326.
34. Bauer S, Kleber S, Schmuki P. TiO2 nanotubes: Tailoring the geometry in H3PO4/HF electrolytes. Electrochem Commun. 2006;8(8): 1321-1325.
35. Yasuda K, Schmuki P. Control of morphology and composition of self-organized zirconium titanate nanotubes formed in (NH4)2SO4/NH4F electrolytes. Electrochim Acta. 2007;52(12):4053-4061.
36. Prakasam HE, Shankar K, Paulose M, Varghese OK, Grimes CA. A new benchmark for TiO2 nanotube array growth by anodization. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111(20):7235-7241.
37. Sul YT, Byon ES, Jeong Y. Biomechanical measurements of calciumincorporated oxidized implants in rabbit bone: effect of calcium surface chemistry of a novel implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(2):101-110.
38. Yu JC, Yu J, Ho W, Jiang Z, Zhang L. Effects of F-doping on the photocatalytic activity and microstructures of nanocrystalline TiO2 powders. Chem Mater. 2002;14(9):3808-3816.
39. 2. J Mater Sci Lett. 2002;21(1):33-35.
40. Li D, Haneda H, Labhsetwar NK, Hishita S, Ohashi N. Visible-light-driven photocatalysis on fluorine-doped TiO2 powders by the creation of surface oxygen vacancies. Chem Phys Lett. 2005;401(4-6):579-584.
41. Delplancke JL, Winand R. Galvanostatic anodization of titanium I. Structures and compositions of the anodic films. Electrochim Acta. 1988;33(11):1539-1549.
42. Bestetti M, Franz S, Cuzzolin M, Arosio P, Cavallotti PL. Structure of nanotubular titanium oxide templates prepared by electrochemical anodization in H2SO4/HF solutions. Thin Solid Films. 2007;515(13):5253-5258.
43. Kubota S, Johkura K, Asanuma K, et al. Titanium oxide nanotubes for bone regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15(9):1031-1035.
44. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials. 1996;17(1):15-22.
45. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 1999;45(2):75-83.
46. Ronold HJ, Ellingsen JE. Effect of micro-roughness produced by TiO2 blasting tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants. Biomaterials. 2002;23(21):4211-4219.
47. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NH. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2006;85(6):496-500.
48. Cooper LF, Zhou Y, Takebe J, et al. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials. 2006;27(6):926-936.
49. ® implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1146-1155.