Estrogenic Exposure Alters the Spermatogonial Stem Cells in the Developing Testis, Permanently Reducing Crossover Levels in the Adult

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Vrooman, Lisa A ^a   Oatley, Jon M ^a   Griswold, Jodi E ^a   Hassold, Terry J ^a   Hunt, Patricia A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4,4' ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL; BENZHYDRYL DERIVATIVE; ESTROGEN; PHENOL DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL MATURATION; CELL POPULATION; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSING OVER; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; MALE; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; MOUSE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; SPERMATOGENESIS; SPERMATOGONIAL STEM CELL; STEM CELL; TESTIS DEVELOPMENT; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; GERM CELL; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MEIOSIS; SPERMATOCYTE; SPERMATOGONIUM; SPERMATOZOON; TESTIS;

MUS; SYNAPSIS;

ANIMALS; BENZHYDRYL COMPOUNDS; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; ESTROGENS; FEMALE; GERM CELLS; MALE; MEIOSIS; PHENOLS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SPERMATOCYTES; SPERMATOGENESIS; SPERMATOGONIA; SPERMATOZOA; STEM CELLS; TESTIS;

EID: 84924405570     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004949     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE, (1992) Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ 305: 609–613. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6854.609 1393072
2. Auger J, Kunstmann JM, Czyglik F, Jouannet P, (1995) Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the past 20 years. N Engl J Med 332: 281–285. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199502023320501 7816062
3. Bonde JP, Kold Jensen T, Brixen Larsen S, Abell A, Scheike T, et al. (1998) Year of birth and sperm count in 10 Danish occupational studies. Scand J Work Environ Health 24: 407–413. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.362 9869313
4. Andersen AG, (2000) High frequency of sub-optimal semen quality in an unselected population of young men. Hum Reprod 15: 366–372. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.2.366 10655308
5. Jørgensen N, Carlsen E, Nermoen I, Punab M, Suominen J, et al. (2002) East-West gradient in semen quality in the Nordic-Baltic area: a study of men from the general population in Denmark, Norway, Estonia and Finland. Hum Reprod 17: 2199–2208. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.8.2199 12151459
6. Jørgensen N, Joensen UN, Jensen TK, Jensen MB, Almstrup K, et al. (2012) Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men. BMJ Open 2. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000990 22761286
7. Iwamoto T, Nozawa S, Mieno MN, Yamakawa K, Baba K, et al. (2013) Semen quality of 1559 young men from four cities in Japan: a cross-sectional population-based study. BMJ Open 3: 4–8. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002222 23633418
8. Jørgensen N, Vierula M, Jacobsen R, Pukkala E, Perheentupa A, et al. (2011) Recent adverse trends in semen quality and testis cancer incidence among Finnish men. Int J Androl 34: e37–e48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2010.01133.x 21366607
9. Mendiola J, Jørgensen N, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Sarabia-Cos L, López-Espín JJ, et al. (2013) Sperm counts may have declined in young university students in Southern Spain. Andrology 1: 408–413. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00058.x 23307495
10. Mendiola J, Jørgensen N, Andersson A-M, Stahlhut RW, Liu F, et al. (2014) Reproductive parameters in young men living in Rochester, New York. Fertil Steril 101: 1064–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.007 24524829
11. Rolland M, Le Moal J, Wagner V, Royère D, De Mouzon J, (2013) Decline in semen concentration and morphology in a sample of 26,609 men close to general population between 1989 and 2005 in France. Hum Reprod 28: 462–470. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des415 23213178
12. Sharpe RM, (2003) The “oestrogen hypothesis” – where do we stand now ? 1.15: 2–15.
13. Sharpe RM, Skakkebaek NE, (1993) Are oestrogens involved in falling sperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract? Lancet 341: 1392–1395. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90953-E 8098802
14. Cosgrove M., Benton B, Henderson BE, (1977) Coscrove et al 1977.pdf. J Urol. 875202
15. Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, Hornsby PP, Herbst AL, (1995) Fertility in Men Exposed Prenatally to Diethylstilbestrol—NEJM. NEJM. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199505253322104
16. Strohsnitter WC, Noller KL, Hoover RN, Robboy SJ, Palmer JR, et al. (2001) Cancer Risk in Men Exposed In Utero to Diethylstilbestrol. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 545–551. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.7.545
17. Palmer JR, Herbst AL, Noller KL, Boggs DA, Troisi R, et al. (2009) Urogenital abnormalities in men exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero: a cohort study. Environ Health 8: 37. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-37 19689815
18. Gill WB, Schumacher FB, Bibbo M, Straus FH, Schoenberg HW, (1979) Gill et al 1979.pdf. J Urol.
19. Atanassova N, McKinnell C, Walker M, Turner KJ, Fisher JS, et al. (1999) Permanent effects of neonatal estrogen exposure in rats on reproductive hormone levels, Sertoli cell number, and the efficiency of spermatogenesis in adulthood. Endocrinology 140: 5364–5373. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.11.7108 10537168
20. Vom Saal FS, Cooke PS, Buchanan DL, Palanza P, Thayer KA, et al. (1998) A physiologically based approach to the study of bisphenol A and other estrogenic chemicals on the size of reproductive organs, daily sperm production, and behavior. Toxicol Ind Health 14: 239–260. doi: 10.1177/074823379801400115 9460178
21. Thayer KA, Ruhlen RL, Howdeshell KL, Buchanan DL, Cooke PS, et al. (2001) Altered prostate growth and daily sperm production in male mice exposed prenatally to subclinical doses of 17alpha-ethinyl oestradiol. Hum Reprod 16: 988–996. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.988 11331650
22. Richter CA, Birnbaum LS, Farabollini F, Newbold RR, Rubin BS, et al. (2007) In vivo effects of bisphenol A in laboratory rodent studies. Reprod Toxicol 24: 199–224. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.06.004 17683900
23. Howdeshell KL, Furr J, Lambright CR, Wilson VS, Ryan BC, et al. (2008) Gestational and lactational exposure to ethinyl estradiol, but not bisphenol A, decreases androgen-dependent reproductive organ weights and epididymal sperm abundance in the male long evans hooded rat. Toxicol Sci 102: 371–382. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm306 18096570
24. Frye CA, Bo E, Calamandrei G, Calzà L, Dessì-Fulgheri F, et al. (2012) Endocrine disrupters: a review of some sources, effects, and mechanisms of actions on behaviour and neuroendocrine systems. J Neuroendocrinol 24: 144–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02229.x 21951193
25. Atanassova N, McKinnell C, Fisher J, Sharpe RM, (2005) Neonatal treatment of rats with diethylstilboestrol (DES) induces stromal-epithelial abnormalities of the vas deferens and cauda epididymis in adulthood following delayed basal cell development. Reproduction 129: 589–601. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00546 15855622
26. Mathews E, Braden TD, Williams CS, Williams JW, Bolden-Tiller O, et al. (2009) Mal-development of the penis and loss of fertility in male rats treated neonatally with female contraceptive 17alpha-ethinyl estradiol: a dose-response study and a comparative study with a known estrogenic teratogen diethylstilbestrol. Toxicol Sci 112: 331–343. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp207 19729556
27. Akingbemi BT, Sottas CM, Koulova AI, Klinefelter GR, Hardy MP, (2004) Inhibition of testicular steroidogenesis by the xenoestrogen bisphenol A is associated with reduced pituitary luteinizing hormone secretion and decreased steroidogenic enzyme gene expression in rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 145: 592–603. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1174 14605012
28. N’Tumba-Byn T, Moison D, Lacroix M, Lecureuil C, Lesage L, et al. (2012) Differential effects of bisphenol A and diethylstilbestrol on human, rat and mouse fetal leydig cell function. PLoS One 7: e51579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051579 23284716
29. Sharpe RM, Rivas A, Walker M, McKinnell C, Fisher JS, (2003) Effect of neonatal treatment of rats with potent or weak (environmental) oestrogens, or with a GnRH antagonist, on Leydig cell development and function through puberty into adulthood. Int J Androl 26: 26–36. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2003.00385.x 12534935
30. Koh K-B, Toyama Y, Komiyama M, Adachi T, Fukata H, et al. (2006) Neonatal administration of diethylstilbestrol has adverse effects on somatic cells rather than germ cells. Reprod Toxicol 22: 746–753. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.07.006 17005366
31. Salian S, Doshi T, Vanage G, (2009) Neonatal exposure of male rats to Bisphenol A impairs fertility and expression of sertoli cell junctional proteins in the testis. Toxicology 265: 56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.09.012 19782717
32. Hunt PA, Koehler KE, Susiarjo M, Hodges CA, Ilagan A, et al. (2003) Bisphenol a exposure causes meiotic aneuploidy in the female mouse. Curr Biol 13: 546–553. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00189-1 12676084
33. Susiarjo M, Hassold TJ, Freeman E, Hunt PA, (2007) Bisphenol A exposure in utero disrupts early oogenesis in the mouse. PLoS Genet 3: e5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030005 17222059
34. Caldwell DJ, Mastrocco F, Nowak E, Johnston J, Yekel H, et al. (2010) An assessment of potential exposure and risk from estrogens in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect 118: 338–344. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900654 20194073
35. Wise A, O’Brien K, Woodruff T, (2011) Are oral contraceptives a significant contributor to the estrogenicity of drinking water? Environ Sci Technol 45: 51–60. doi: 10.1021/es1014482 20977246
36. Spearow JL, Doemeny P, Sera R, Leffler R, Barkley M, (1999) Genetic variation in susceptibility to endocrine disruption by estrogen in mice. Science 285: 1259–1261. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5431.1259 10455051
37. Svetlanov A, Baudat F, Cohen PE, de Massy B, (2008) Distinct functions of MLH3 at recombination hot spots in the mouse. Genetics 178: 1937–1945. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.084798 18430927
38. Svare B, Kinsley CH, Mann MA, Broida J, (1984) Svare et al.pdf. Physiol Behav 33: 137–152. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90024-6 6542232
39. Sutcliffe MJ, Darling SM, Burgoyne PS, (1991) Spermatogenesis in XY, XYSxra and XOSxra mice: a quantitative analysis of spermatogenesis throughout puberty. Mol Reprod Dev 30: 81–89. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080300202 1954032
40. McLean DJ, (2008) Spermatogonial stem cell transplantation, testicular function, and restoration of male fertility in mice. Methods Mol Biol 450: 149–162. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-214-8_11 18370058
41. Barlow AL, Benson FE, West SC, Hultén MA, (1997) Distribution of the Rad51 recombinase in human and mouse spermatocytes. EMBO J 16: 5207–5215. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.17.5207 9311981
42. Lynn A, Koehler KE, Judis L, Chan ER, Cherry JP, et al. (2002) Covariation of synaptonemal complex length and mammalian meiotic exchange rates. Science 296: 2222–2225. doi: 10.1126/science.1071220 12052900
43. Tease C, Hultén MA, (2004) Inter-sex variation in synaptonemal complex lengths largely determine the different recombination rates in male and female germ cells. Cytogenet Genome Res 107: 208–215. doi: 10.1159/000080599 15467366
44. Lenzi ML, Smith J, Snowden T, Kim M, Fishel R, et al. (2005) Extreme heterogeneity in the molecular events leading to the establishment of chiasmata during meiosis i in human oocytes. Am J Hum Genet 76: 112–127. doi: 10.1086/427268 15558497
45. Oliver-Bonet M, Turek PJ, Sun F, Ko E, Martin RH, (2005) Temporal progression of recombination in human males. Mol Hum Reprod 11: 517–522. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah193 16123081
46. Gruhn JR, Rubio C, Broman KW, Hunt PA, Hassold T, (2013) Cytological studies of human meiosis: sex-specific differences in recombination originate at, or prior to, establishment of double-strand breaks. PLoS One 8: e85075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085075 24376867
47. Baier B, Hunt P, Broman KW, Hassold T, (2014) Variation in Genome-Wide Levels of Meiotic Recombination Is Established at the Onset of Prophase in Mammalian Males. PLoS Genet 10: e1004125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004125 24497841
48. Eaker S, Cobb J, Pyle A, Handel MA, (2002) Meiotic prophase abnormalities and metaphase cell death in MLH1-deficient mouse spermatocytes: insights into regulation of spermatogenic progress. Dev Biol 249: 85–95. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0708 12217320
49. Vernet N, Mahadevaiah SK, Ojarikre OA, Longepied G, Prosser HM, et al. (2011) The Y-encoded gene zfy2 acts to remove cells with unpaired chromosomes at the first meiotic metaphase in male mice. Curr Biol 21: 787–793. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.057 21530259
50. Kouznetsova A, Lister L, Nordenskjöld M, Herbert M, Höög C, (2007) Bi-orientation of achiasmatic chromosomes in meiosis I oocytes contributes to aneuploidy in mice. Nat Genet 39: 966–968. doi: 10.1038/ng2065 17618286
51. Jefferson WN, Couse JF, Banks EP, Korach KS, Newbold RR, (2000) Expression of estrogen receptor beta is developmentally regulated in reproductive tissues of male and female mice. Biol Reprod 62: 310–317. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod62.2.310 10642567
52. Kong A, Thorleifsson G, Stefansson H, Masson G, Helgason A, et al. (2008) Sequence variants in the RNF212 gene associate with genome-wide recombination rate. Science 319: 1398–1401. doi: 10.1126/science.1152422 18239089
53. Chowdhury R, Bois PRJ, Feingold E, Sherman SL, Cheung VG, (2009) Genetic analysis of variation in human meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet 5: e1000648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000648 19763160
54. Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, Fledel-Alon A, Ober C, et al. (2010) PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327: 836–840. doi: 10.1126/science.1183439 20044539
55. Parvanov ED, Petkov PM, Paigen K, (2010) Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327: 835. doi: 10.1126/science.1181495 20044538
56. Murdoch B, Owen N, Shirley S, Crumb S, Broman KW, et al. (2010) Multiple loci contribute to genome-wide recombination levels in male mice. Mamm Genome 21: 550–555. doi: 10.1007/s00335-010-9303-5 21113599
57. Sandor C, Li W, Coppieters W, Druet T, Charlier C, et al. (2012) Genetic variants in REC8, RNF212, and PRDM9 influence male recombination in cattle. PLoS Genet 8: e1002854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002854 22844258
58. Lynn A, Schrump S, Cherry J, Hassold T, Hunt P, (2005) Sex, not genotype, determines recombination levels in mice. Am J Hum Genet 77: 670–675. doi: 10.1086/491718 16175513
59. Ward JO, Reinholdt LG, Motley WW, Niswander LM, Deacon DC, et al. (2007) Mutation in mouse hei10, an e3 ubiquitin ligase, disrupts meiotic crossing over. PLoS Genet 3: e139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030139 17784788
60. Reynolds A, Qiao H, Yang Y, Chen JK, Jackson N, et al. (2013) RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis. Nat Genet 45: 269–278. doi: 10.1038/ng.2541 23396135
61. Qiao H, Prasada Rao HBD, Yang Y, Fong JH, Cloutier JM, et al. (2014) Antagonistic roles of ubiquitin ligase HEI10 and SUMO ligase RNF212 regulate meiotic recombination. Nat Genet 46: 194–199. doi: 10.1038/ng.2858 24390283
62. De Muyt A, Zhang L, Piolot T, Kleckner N, Espagne E, et al. (2014) E3 ligase Hei10: a multifaceted structure-based signaling molecule with roles within and beyond meiosis. Genes Dev 28: 1111–1123. doi: 10.1101/gad.240408.114 24831702
63. Holloway JK, Sun X, Yokoo R, Villeneuve AM, Cohen PE, (2014) Mammalian CNTD1 is critical for meiotic crossover maturation and deselection of excess precrossover sites. J Cell Biol 205: 633–641. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201401122 24891606
64. Oatley JM, Brinster RL, (2012) The germline stem cell niche unit in mammalian testes. Physiol Rev 92: 577–595. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00025.2011 22535892
65. Ryu B-Y, Orwig KE, Oatley JM, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL, (2006) Effects of aging and niche microenvironment on spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal. Stem Cells 24: 1505–1511. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0580 16456131
66. Trasler JM, (2009) Epigenetics in spermatogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 306: 33–36. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.12.018 19481683
67. Seki Y, Hayashi K, Itoh K, Mizugaki M, Saitou M, et al. (2005) Extensive and orderly reprogramming of genome-wide chromatin modifications associated with specification and early development of germ cells in mice. Dev Biol 278: 440–458. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.025 15680362
68. Davis TL, Yang GJ, McCarrey JR, Bartolomei MS, (2000) The H19 methylation imprint is erased and re-established differentially on the parental alleles during male germ cell development. Hum Mol Genet 9: 2885–2894. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.19.2885 11092765
69. Ueda T, Abe K, Miura A, Yuzuriha M, Zubair M, et al. (2000) The paternal methylation imprint of the mouse H19 locus is acquired in the gonocyte stage during foetal testis development. Genes Cells 5: 649–659. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2000.00351.x 10947850
70. Kato Y, Kaneda M, Hata K, Kumaki K, Hisano M, et al. (2007) Role of the Dnmt3 family in de novo methylation of imprinted and repetitive sequences during male germ cell development in the mouse. Hum Mol Genet 16: 2272–2280. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm179 17616512
71. Anway MD, Memon MA, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK, (n.d.) Transgenerational effect of the endocrine disruptor vinclozolin on male spermatogenesis. J Androl 27: 868–879. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.106.000349 16837734
72. Manikkam M, Tracey R, Guerrero-Bosagna C, Skinner MK, (2013) Plastics derived endocrine disruptors (BPA, DEHP and DBP) induce epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of obesity, reproductive disease and sperm epimutations. PLoS One 8: e55387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055387 23359474
73. Koehler KE, Cherry JP, Lynn A, Hunt PA, Hassold TJ, (2002) Genetic control of mammalian meiotic recombination. I. Variation in exchange frequencies among males from inbred mouse strains. Genetics 162: 297–306. 12242241
74. Dumont BL, White MA, Steffy B, Wiltshire T, Payseur BA, (2011) Extensive recombination rate variation in the house mouse species complex inferred from genetic linkage maps. Genome Res 21: 114–125. doi: 10.1101/gr.111252.110 20978138
75. Taylor J a, Vom Saal FS, Welshons W V, Drury B, Rottinghaus G, et al. (2011) Similarity of bisphenol A pharmacokinetics in rhesus monkeys and mice: relevance for human exposure. Environ Health Perspect 119: 422–430. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002514 20855240
76. Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P, (1997) A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res 5: 66–68. doi: 10.1023/A:1018445520117 9088645
77. Evans EP, Breckon G, Ford CE, (1964) AN AIR-DRYING METHOD FOR MEIOTIC PREPARATIONS FROM MAMMALIAN TESTES. Cytogenetics 3: 289–294. doi: 10.1159/000129818 14248459
78. Oatley JM, Brinster RL, (2006) Spermatogonial stem cells. Methods Enzymol 419: 259–282. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)19011-4 17141059