E3 ligase Hei10: A multifaceted structure-based signaling molecule with roles within and beyond meiosis

Genes and Development

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1111-1123

  De Muyt, Arnaud ^a,b   Zhang, Liangran ^c   Piolot, Tristan ^b   Kleckner, Nancy ^c   Espagne, Eric ^a   Zickler, Denise ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY OF THE CELL I2BC   (France)

^b INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hei10; Meiosis; Recombination; Spindle pole body centrosome; Synaptonemal complex

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENHANCER OF INVASION 10; SUMO PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; HUMAN; MEIOSIS; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RING FINGER MOTIF; SPINDLE POLE BODY; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX; TURNOVER TIME;

HEI10; MEIOSIS; RECOMBINATION; SPINDLE POLE BODY/CENTROSOME; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX;

FUNGAL PROTEINS; MEIOSIS; MUTATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SORDARIALES; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES;

EID: 84900800018     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.240408.114     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allers T, Lichten M. 2001. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106: 47-57.
2. Agarwal S, Roeder GS. 2000. Zip3 provides a link between recombination enzymes and synaptonemal complex proteins. Cell 102: 245-255.
3. Berchowitz LE, Copenhaver GP. 2010. Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me. Curr Genomics 11: 91-102.
4. Bhalla N, Wynne DJ, Jantsch V, Dernburg AF. 2008. ZHP-3 acts at crossovers to couple meiotic recombination with synaptonemal complex disassembly and bivalent formation in C. elegans. PLoS Genet 4: e1000235.
5. Bojko M. 1985. Human meiosis. IX. Crossing over and chiasma formation in oocytes. Carlsberg Res Commun 50: 43-72.
6. Börner GV, Kleckner N, Hunter N. 2004. Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117: 29-45.
7. Brown PW, Hwang K, Schlegel PN, Morris PL. 2008. Small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO)-1, SUMO-2/3 and SUMOylation are involved with centromeric heterochromatin of chromosomes 9 and 1 and proteins of the synaptonemal complex during meiosis in men. Hum Reprod 23: 2850-2857.
8. Budhidarmo R, Nakatani Y, Day CL. 2012. RINGs hold the key to ubiquitin transfer. Trends Biochem Sci 37: 58-65.
9. Carpenter ATC. 1979. Synaptonemal complex and recombination nodules in recombination deficient mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 75: 259-292.
10. Carpenter ATC. 1987. Gene conversion, recombination nodules, and the initiation of meiotic synapsis. Bioessays 6: 232-236.
11. Chelysheva L, Vezon D, Chambon A, Gendrot G, Pereira L, Lemhemdi A, Vrielynck N, Le Guin S, Novatchkova M, Grelon M. 2012. The Arabidopsis HEI10 is a new ZMM protein related to Zip3. PLoS Genet 8: e1002799.
12. Cheng CH, Lo YH, Liang SS, Ti SC, Lin FM, Yeh CH, Huang HY, Wang TF. 2006. SUMO modifications control assembly of synaptonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 20: 2067-2081.
13. de Boer E, Stam P, Dietrich AJJ, Pastink A, Heyting C. 2006. Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 9607-9612.
14. Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. 2009. Ring domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem 78: 399-434.
15. Ding Q, Li L, Whyte P. 2013. Human papillomavirus 18 E1E4 protein interacts with cyclin A/CDK 2 through an RXL motif. Mol Cell Biochem 373: 29-40.
16. Espagne E, Vasnier C, Storlazzi A, Kleckner NE, Silar P, Zickler D, Malagnac F. 2011. Sme4 coiled-coil protein mediates synaptonemal complex assembly, recombinosome relocalization, and spindle pole body morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108: 10614-10619.
17. Fung JC, Rockmill B, Odell M, Roeder GS. 2004. Imposition of crossover interference through the nonrandom distribution of synapsis initiation complexes. Cell 116: 795-802.
18. Hooker GW, Roeder GS. 2006. A role for SUMO in meiotic chromosome synapsis. Curr Biol 16: 1238-1243.
19. Hunter N. 2006. Meiotic recombination. In Molecular genetics of recombination (ed. A Aguilera, R Rothstein), pp. 381-442. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.
20. Jantsch V, Pasierbek P, Mueller MM, Schweizer D, Jantsch M, Loidl J. 2004. Targeted gene knockout reveals a role in meiotic recombination for ZHP-3, a Zip3-related protein in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Cell Biol 24: 7998-8006.
21. Jentsch S, Psakhye I. 2013. Control of nuclear activities by substrate-selective and protein-group SUMOylation. Annu Rev Genet 47: 167-186.
22. Jones GH, Franklin FCH. 2006. Meiotic crossing-over: obligation and interference. Cell 126: 246-248.
23. Klug H, Xaver M, Chaugule VK, Koidl S, Mittler G, Klein F, Pichler A. 2013. Ubc9 Sumoylation controls SUMO chain formation and meiotic synapsis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 50: 625-636.
24. Lhuissier FG, Offenberg HH, Wittich PE, Vischer NO, Heyting C. 2007. The mismatch repair protein MLH1 marks a subset of strongly interfering crossovers in tomato. Plant Cell 19: 862-876.
25. Libuda DE, Uzawa S, Meyer BJ, Villeneuve AM. 2013. Meiotic chromosome structures constrain and respond to designation of crossover sites. Nature 502: 703-706.
26. Luo Q, Tang D, Wang M, Luo W, Zhang L, Qin B, Shen Y, Wang K, Li Y, Cheng Z. 2013. The role of OsMSH5 in crossover formation during rice meiosis. Mol Plant 6: 729-742.
27. Nowrousian M, Stajich JE, Chu M, Engh I, Espagne E, Halliday K, Kamerewerd J, Kempken F, Knab B, Kuo HC, et al. 2010. De novo assembly of a 40 Mb eukaryotic genome from short sequence reads: Sordaria macrospora, a model organism for fungal morphogenesis. PLoS Genet 6: e1000891.
28. Qiao H, Prasada Rao HB, Yang Y, Fong JH, Cloutier JM, Deacon DC, Nagel KE, Swartz RK, Strong E, Holloway JK, et al. 2014. Antagonistic roles of ubiquitin ligase HEI10 and SUMO ligase RNF212 regulate meiotic recombination. Nat Genet 46: 194-199.
29. Reynolds A, Qiao H, Yang Y, Chen JK, Jackson N, Biswas K, Holloway JK, Baudat F, de Massy B, Wang J, et al. 2013. RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis. Nat Genet 45: 269-278.
30. Scoles DR. 2008. The merlin interacting proteins reveal multiple targets for NF2 therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1785: 32-54.
31. Singh MK, Nicolas E, Gherraby W, Dadke D, Lessin S, Golemis EA. 2007. HEI10 negatively regulates cell invasion by inhibiting cyclin B/Cdk1 and other promotility proteins. Oncogene 26: 4825-4832.
32. Snowden T, Acharya S, Butz C, Berardini M, Fishel R. 2004. hMSH4-hMSH5 recognizes Holliday junctions and forms a meiosis-specific sliding clamp that embraces homologous chromosomes. Mol Cell 15: 437-451.
33. Sriramachandran AM, Dohmen RJ. 2014. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1843: 75-85.
34. Storlazzi A, Gargano S, Ruprich-Robert G, Falque M, David M, Kleckner N, Zickler D. 2010. Recombination proteins mediate meiotic spatial chromosome organization and pairing. Cell 141: 94-106.
35. Strong ER, Schimenti JC. 2010. Evidence implicating CCNB1IP1, a RING domain-containing protein required for meiotic crossing over in mice, as an E3 SUMO ligase. Genes 1: 440-451.
36. Thompson-Coffe C, Zickler D. 1992. Three microtubule-organizing centers are required for ascus growth and sporulation in the fungus Sordaria macrospora. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 22: 257-273.
37. Thompson-Coffe C, Zickler D. 1993. Cytoskeleton interactions in the ascus development and sporulation of Sordaria macrospora. J Cell Sci 104: 883-898.
38. Toby GG, Gherraby W, Coleman TR, Golemis EA. 2003. A novel RING finger protein, human enhancer of invasion 10, alters mitotic progression through regulation of cyclin B levels. Mol Cell Biol 23: 2109-2122.
39. Voelkel-Meiman K, Taylor LF, Mukherjee P, Humphryes N, Tsubouchi H, Macqueen AJ. 2013. SUMO localizes to the central element of synaptonemal complex and is required for the full synapsis of meiotic chromosomes in budding yeast. PLoS Genet 9: e1003837.
40. von Wettstein D, Rasmussen SW, Holm PB. 1984. The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Annu Rev Genet 18: 331-413.
41. Wang K, Wang M, Tang D, Shen Y, Miao C, Hu Q, Lu T, Cheng Z. 2012. The role of rice HEI10 in the formation of meiotic crossovers. PLoS Genet 8: e1002809.
42. Ward JO, Reinholdt LG, Motley WW, Niswander LM, Deacon DC, Griffin LB, Langlais KK, Backus VL, Schimenti KJ, O'Brien MJ, et al. 2007. Mutation in mouse hei10, an e3 ubiquitin ligase, disrupts meiotic crossing over. PLoS Genet 3: e139.
43. Yokoo R, Zawadzki KA, Nabeshima K, Drake M, Arur S, Villeneuve AM. 2012. COSA-1 Reveals robust homeostasis and separable licensing and reinforcement steps governing meiotic crossovers. Cell 149: 75-87.
44. Zhang L, Liang Z, Hutchinson J, Kleckner N. 2014. Crossover patterning by the beam-film model: analysis and implications. PLoS Genet 10: e1004042.
45. Zickler D, Kleckner N. 1999. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu Rev Genet 33: 603-754.
46. Zickler D, Moreau PJ, Huynh AD, Slezec AM. 1992. Correlation between pairing initiation sites, recombination nodules and meiotic recombination in Sordaria macrospora. Genetics 132: 135-148.