An examination of digital game-based situated learning applied to Chinese language poetry education

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 171-186

  Chen, Hong Ren ^a   Lin, You Shiuan ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAICHUNG UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Chinese language poetry education; digital game based learning; situation simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924363326     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2015.1007077     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. D.A.Adams,, R.R.Nelson,, & P.A.Todd, (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16, 227–247.
2. K.Becker, (2007). Digital game-based learning once removed: Teaching teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 478–488.
3. B.Beizer, (1990). Software testing techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
4. J.Bourgonjon,, M.Valcke,, R.Soetaert,, B.D.Wever, B. de, & T.Schellens, (2011). Parental acceptance of digital game-based learning. Computers & Education, 57, 1434–1444.
5. J.S.Brown,, A.Collins,, & P.Duguid, (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
6. H.-R.Chen,, & J.-W.Huang, (2012). Learning effects of RFID-based game-guided learning in libraries. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 10, 351–365.
7. M.S.Chen,, M.U.Lai,, Y.F.Lee,, & Y.A.Lin,. (2007, June). The application of digital content in situated learning: A case study of role-playing game. Paper presented at the Conference of Digital Technology and Creative Management, Taiwan.
8. Z.Z.Chen, (2008). Chinese language teaching methodology and materials. Taipei: Wu-Nan Book Co.
9. Y.-M.Cheng,, S.-J.Lou,, S.-H.Kuo,, & R.-C.Shih, (2013). Investigating elementary school students’ technology acceptance by applying digital game-based learning to environmental education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 96–110.
10. Y.H.Chien, (2009). Learning context of use for small-screen leading displays on visual performance in a Chinese sample. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108, 505–512.
11. M.Csikszentmihalyi, (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. F.D.Davis,. (1986). A technology acceptance model of empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
13. S.Erhel,, & E.Jamet, (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156–167.
14. Y.L.Eow,, B.W.A.Wan Zah,, B.M.Rosnaini,, & B.B.Roselan, (2010). Computer games development experience and appreciative learning approach for creative process enhancement. Computers & Education, 55, 1131–1144.
15. S.D.Freitas,, & M.Oliver, (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46, 249–264.
16. R.Garris,, R.Ahlers,, & J.Driskell, (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 441–467.
17. J.Herrington,, & R.Oliver, (1999). Using situated learning and multimedia to investigate higher-order thinking. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 401–422.
18. H.Horz,, C.Winter,, & S.Fries, (2009). Differential benefits of situated instructional prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 818–828.
19. C.L.Hsu,, & H.P.Lu, (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information and Management Learning, 41, 853–868.
20. S.-Y.Huang,, T.-P.Liang,, & C.-M.Chang, (2005). A meta-analysis of empirical research using TAM. Journal of Information Management, 12, 211–234.
21. G.J.Hwang,, & P.H.Wu, (2011). Advancements and trends in digital game-based learning research: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, E6–E10.
22. K.Kiili, (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. Internet & Higher Education, 8, 13–24.
23. H.Kima,, & J.Hannafin, (2011). Developing situated knowledge about teaching with technology via Web-enhanced case-based activity. Computers & Education, 57, 1378–1388.
24. J.Kirriemuir,, & A.McFarlane, (2004). Literature review in games and learning. Bristol: Nestafuturelab.
25. D.Kolb, (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. S.C.Kuo,, H.Lin,, & C.C.Hou,. (1998). The Study of a constructivistic gamelike MUD learning environment. Educational Technology & Media, 37, 28–41.
27. C.M.Lai,, H.M.Huang,, S.S.Liaw,, & W.W.Huang, (2009). A study of user’s acceptance on three-dimensional virtual reality applied in medical education. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 40, 341–361.
28. J.Lave,, & E.Wenger, (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29. H.McLellan, (1996). Situated learning: Multiple perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Education Technology Publications.
30. M.Papastergiou, (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52, 1–12.
31. K.A.Pituch,, & Y.-K.Lee, (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47, 222–244.
32. M.Pivec, (2007). Editorial: Play and learning: Potentials of game-based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 387–393.
33. M.Prensky, (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
34. W.W.Royce,. (1970, August). Managing the development of large software systems. Paper presented at Technical Papers of Western Electronic Show and Convention (WesCon).
35. S.Scribner, (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B.Rogoff, & J.Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9–40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. H.M.Selim, (2002). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers and Education, 40, 343–360.
37. I.Sommerville, (2011). Software engineering (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Addison-Wesley.
38. Y.Su, (2007). Scenario design for Chinese poetry teaching. Data of Culture and Education, 17, 143–144.
39. L.A.Suchman, (1987). Plans and situated action: The problem of human–machine communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40. B.Szajna, (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42, 85–92.
41. Y.-H.Tao,, C.-J.Cheng,, & S.-Y.Sun, (2009). What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? The Taiwan experience. Computers & Education, 53, 929–939.
42. V.Venkatesh,, & F.D.Davis, (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451–481.
43. H.Y.Wang,, & Y.S.Wang, (2008). Gender differences in the perception and acceptance of online game. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 787–806.
44. C.-C.Yang,, S.-S.Tseng,, Y.-H.Liao,, & T.Liang, (2013). Situated poetry learning using multimedia resource sharing approach. Educational Technology & Society, 16, 282–295.
45. K.C.Yu,, H.S.Hsiao,, & F.H.Tsai, (2006). A study of using online role-playing game to support web-based learning. Journal of Computer Science and Application, 2, 119–128.