Analysis of intestinal microbiota in hybrid house mice reveals evolutionary divergence in a vertebrate hologenome

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Wang, Jun ^a,b   Kalyan, Shirin ^b   Steck, Natalie ^b   Turner, Leslie M ^a   Harr, Bettina ^a   Künzel, Sven ^a   Vallier, Marie ^a,b   Häsler, Robert ^b   Franke, Andre ^b   Oberg, Hans Heinrich ^b   Ibrahim, Saleh M ^c   Grassl, Guntram A ^b   Kabelitz, Dieter ^b   Baines, John F ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DIVERGENCE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; HYBRID ZONE; NATURAL SELECTION; NEW SPECIES; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; RODENT; SUBSPECIES;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CENTRAL EUROPEAN; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC INCOMPATIBILITY; GENOME; HYBRID MOUSE STRAIN; HYBRID ZONE; IMMUNOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; INFLAMMATION; INTESTINE FLORA; MALE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIOME; MOUSE; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; MUS MUSCULUS MUSCULUS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; DNA SEQUENCE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GERMANY; HYBRIDIZATION; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POPULATION GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

CENTRAL EUROPE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS MUSCULUS MUSCULUS; VERTEBRATA;

PRIMER DNA;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CROSSES, GENETIC; DNA PRIMERS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME; GERMANY; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84924203445     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7440     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ley, R. E. et al. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 320, 1647-1651 (2008).
2. McFall-Ngai, M. et al. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3229-3236 (2013).
3. Ochman, H. et al. Evolutionary relationships of wild hominids recapitulated by gut microbial communities. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000546 (2010).
4. Brucker, R. M. & Bordenstein, S. R. The hologenomic basis of speciation: gut bacteria cause hybrid lethality in the genus Nasonia. Science 341, 667-669 (2013).
5. Ley, R. E., Lozupone, C. A., Hamady, M., Knight, R. & Gordon, J. I. Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 776-788 (2008).
6. Linnenbrink, M. et al. The role of biogeography in shaping diversity of the intestinal microbiota in house mice. Mol. Ecol. 22, 1904-1916 (2013).
7. Wang, J. et al. Dietary history contributes to enterotype-like clustering and functional metagenomic content in the intestinal microbiome of wild mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2703-E2710 (2014).
8. Staubach, F., Baines, J. F., Kunzel, S., Bik, E. M. & Petrov, D. A. Host species and environmental effects on bacterial communities associated with Drosophila in the laboratory and in the natural environment. PLoS ONE 8, e70749 (2013).
9. Zilber-Rosenberg, I. & Rosenberg, E. Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 32, 723-735 (2008).
10. Brucker, R. M. & Bodensteiner, S. R. Speciation by symbiosis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 443-451 (2012).
11. McFall-Ngai, M. Adaptive immunity: care for the community. Nature 445, 153 (2007).
12. Guenet, J. L. & Bonhomme, F. Wild mice: an ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends Genet. 19, 24-31 (2003).
13. Pedersen, A. B. & Babayan, S. A. Wild immunology. Mol. Ecol. 20, 872-880 (2011).
14. Abolins, S. R., Pocock, M. J. O., Hafalla, J. C. R., Riley, E. M. & Viney, M. E. Measures of immune function of wild mice, Mus musculus. Mol. Ecol. 20, 881-892 (2011).
15. Geraldes, A. et al. Inferring the history of speciation in house mice from autosomal, X-linked, Y-linked and mitochondrial genes. Mol. Ecol. 17, 5349-5363 (2008).
16. Forejt, J. & Ivanyi, P. Genetic studies on male sterility of hybrids between laboratory and wild mice (Mus musculus L.). Genet. Res. 24, 189-206 (1974).
17. Britton-Davidian, J., Fel-Clair, F., Lopez, J., Alibert, P. & Boursot, P. Postzygotic isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse: estimates from fertility patterns in wild and laboratory-bred hybrids. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84, 379-393 (2005).
18. Good, J. M., Handel, M. A. & Nachman, M. W. Asymmetry and polymorphism of hybrid male sterility during the early stages of speciation in house mice. Evolution 62, 50-65 (2008).
19. Turner, L. M., Schwahn, D. J. & Harr, B. Reduced male fertility is common but highly variable in form and severity in a natural house mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 66, 443-458 (2012).
20. Sage, R. D., Heyneman, D., Lim, K. C. & Wilson, A. C. Wormy mice in a hybrid zone. Nature 324, 60-63 (1986).
21. Baird, S. J. et al. Where are the wormy mice? A reexamination of hybrid parasitism in the European house mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 66, 2757-2772 (2012).
22. Bateson, W. Heredity and variation in modern lights. Darwin and Modern Science 85 (1909).
23. Dobzhansky, T. Studies on hybrid sterility. I. Spermatogenesis in pure and hybrid Drosophila pseudoobscura. Z. Zellforsch. 21, 169-221 (1934).
24. Muller, H. Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics. in The New Systematics (ed. Huxley, J.) 185-268 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1940).
25. Janousek, V. et al. Genome-wide architecture of reproductive isolation in a naturally occurring hybrid zone between Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus. Mol. Ecol. 21, 3032-3047 (2012).
26. deVicente, M. C. & Tanksley, S. D. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134, 585-596 (1993).
27. Rawls, J. F., Mahowald, M. A., Ley, R. E. & Gordon, J. I. Reciprocal gut microbiota transplants from zebrafish and mice to germ-free recipients reveal host habitat selection. Cell 127, 423-433 (2006).
28. Harr, B. Genomic islands of differentiation between house mouse subspecies. Genome Res. 16, 730-737 (2006).
29. Anderson, M. J. & Willis, T. J. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84, 511-525 (2003).
30. Chao, A. Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 11, 265-270 (1984).
31. Benson, A. K. et al. Individuality in gut microbiota composition is a complex polygenic trait shaped by multiple environmental and host genetic factors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18933-18938 (2010).
32. Srinivas, G. et al. Genome-wide mapping of gene-microbiota interactions in susceptibility to autoimmune skin blistering. Nat. Commun. 4, 2462 (2013).
33. Dixon, P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 14, 927-930 (2003).
34. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289-300 (1995).
35. Rieseberg, L. H., Archer, M. A. & Wayne, R. K. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83, 363-372 (1999).
36. Rieseberg, L. H., Widmer, A., Arntz, A. M. & Burke, J. M. The genetic architecture necessary for transgressive segregation is common in both natural and domesticated populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 358, 1141-1147 (2003).
37. Ubeda, C. et al. Familial transmission rather than defective innate immunity shapes the distinct intestinal microbiota of TLR-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 209, 1445-1456 (2012).
38. Lindesmith, L. et al. Human susceptibility and resistance to Norwalk virus infection. Nat. Med. 9, 548-553 (2003).
39. Rausch, P. et al. Colonic mucosa-associated microbiota is influenced by an interaction of Crohn disease and FUT2 (Secretor) genotype. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19030-19035 (2011).
40. Zhu, L. F., Wu, Q., Dai, J. Y., Zhang, S. N. & Wei, F. W. Evidence of cellulose metabolism by the giant panda gut microbiome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17714-17719 (2011).
41. Peatman, E. et al. Basal polarization of the mucosal compartment in Flavobacterium columnare susceptible and resistant channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Mol. Immunol. 56, 317-327 (2013).
42. Neu, B. et al. Expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha-related apoptosisinducing ligand and its proapoptotic receptors is down-regulated during gastric infection with virulent cagA+/vacAs1+ Helicobacter pylori strains. J. Infect. Dis. 191, 571-578 (2005).
43. Maynard, C. L., Elson, C. O., Hatton, R. D. & Weaver, C. T. Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system. Nature 489, 231-241 (2012).
44. McCoy, K. D. & Le Gros, G. The role of CTLA-4 in the regulation of T cell immune responses. Immunol. Cell Biol. 77, 1-10 (1999).
45. Nakagawa, R. et al. SOCS-1 participates in negative regulation of LPS responses. Immunity 17, 677-687 (2002).
46. Monteleone, G. et al. Blocking Smad7 restores TGF-beta1 signaling in chronic inflammatory bowel disease. J. Clin. Invest. 108, 601-609 (2001).
47. Ferreira, Z. et al. Reproduction and immunity driven natural selection in the human WFDC locus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 938-950 (2013).
48. White, M. A., Steffy, B., Wiltshire, T. & Payseur, B. A. Genetic dissection of a key reproductive barrier between nascent species of house mice. Genetics 189, 289-304 (2011).
49. Stecher, B. et al. Like will to like: abundances of closely related species can predict susceptibility to intestinal colonization by pathogenic and commensal bacteria. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1000711 (2010).
50. Ochman, H., Elwyn, S. & Moran, N. A. Calibrating bacterial evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 12638-12643 (1999).
51. Kanzaki, N. & Futai, K. PCR primer set for determination of phylogenetic relationships of Bursaphelenchus species within the xylophilus group. Nematology 4, 35-41 (2002).
52. Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537-7541 (2009).
53. Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460-2461 (2010).
54. Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261-5267 (2007).
55. Faith, D. P. Conservation Evaluation and Phylogenetic Diversity. Biol. Cons. 61, 1-10 (1992).
56. Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8228-8235 (2005).
57. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 1641-1650 (2009).
58. Gompert, Z. & Buerkle, C. A. INTROGRESS: a software package for mapping components of isolation in hybrids. Mol. Ecol. Resource 10, 378-384 (2010).
59. Broman, K. W., Wu, H., Sen, S. & Churchill, G. A. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19, 889-890 (2003).
60. Vandesompele, J. et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome. Biol. 3, RESEARCH0034 (2002).
61. Macholán, M. et al. Genetic conflict outweighs heterogametic incompatibility in the mouse hybrid zone? BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 271 (2008).