Amplification of pico-scale DNA mediated by bacterial carrier DNA for small-cell-number transcription factor ChIP-seq

BMC Genomics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Jakobsen, Janus S ^a,b,c   Bagger, Frederik O ^a,b,c,d   Hasemann, Marie S ^a,b,c   Schuster, Mikkel B ^a,b,c   Frank, Anne Katrine ^a,b,c   Waage, Johannes ^a,b,c,d,e   Vitting Seerup, Kristoffer ^d   Porse, Bo T ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^e GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

ChIP seq; Epigenetic profile; Histone mark; Pico scale; Transcription factor

Indexed keywords

DNA; HISTONE; HISTONE H3; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; BACTERIAL DNA; CHROMATIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CARRIER; CELL COUNT; CELL POPULATION; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; EMBRYO; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE CONTROL; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; IN VIVO STUDY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PROMOTER REGION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE; ANIMAL; BACTERIAL GENOME; DNA MICROARRAY; GENETICS; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA, BACTERIAL; GENOME, BACTERIAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84924062251     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-014-1195-4     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Furey TS. ChIP-seq and beyond: new and improved methodologies to detect and characterize protein-DNA interactions. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:840-52.
2. Park PJ. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:669-80.
3. Dahl JA, Collas P. MicroChIP-a rapid micro chromatin immunoprecipitation assay for small cell samples and biopsies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:e15.
4. Zhang JA, Mortazavi A, Williams BA, Wold BJ, Rothenberg EV. Dynamic transformations of genome-wide epigenetic marking and transcriptional control establish T cell identity. Cell. 2012;149:467-82.
5. Adli M, Zhu J, Bernstein BE. Genome-wide chromatin maps derived from limited numbers of hematopoietic progenitors. Nat Methods. 2010;7:615-8.
6. Shankaranarayanan P, Mendoza-Parra MA, Walia M, Wang L, Li N, Trindade LM, et al. Single-tube linear DNA amplification (LinDA) for robust ChIP-seq. Nat Methods. 2011;8:565-7.
7. Lara-Astiaso D, Weiner A, Lorenzo-Vivas E, Zaretsky I, Jaitin DA, David E, et al. Immunogenetics. Chromatin state dynamics during blood formation. Science. 2014;345:943-9.
8. Pronk CJ, Rossi DJ, Mansson R, Attema JL, Norddahl GL, Chan CK, et al. Elucidation of the phenotypic, functional, and molecular topography of a myeloerythroid progenitor cell hierarchy. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:428-42.
9. Cleaves R, Wang QF, Friedman AD. C/EBPalphap30, a myeloid leukemia oncoprotein, limits G-CSF receptor expression but not terminal granulopoiesis via site-selective inhibition of C/EBP DNA binding. Oncogene. 2004;23:716-25.
10. Kirstetter P, Schuster MB, Bereshchenko O, Moore S, Dvinge H, Kurz E, et al. Modeling of C/EBPalpha mutant acute myeloid leukemia reveals a common expression signature of committed myeloid leukemia-initiating cells. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:299-310.
11. Bereshchenko O, Mancini E, Moore S, Bilbao D, Mansson R, Luc S, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell expansion precedes the generation of committed myeloid leukemia-initiating cells in C/EBPalpha mutant AML. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:390-400.
12. Hasemann MS, Damgaard I, Schuster MB, Theilgaard-Monch K, Sorensen AB, Mrsic A, et al. Mutation of C/EBPalpha predisposes to the development of myeloid leukemia in a retroviral insertional mutagenesis screen. Blood. 2008;111:4309-21.
13. Li B, Carey M, Workman JL. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell. 2007;128:707-19.
14. Bernstein BE, Humphrey EL, Erlich RL, Schneider R, Bouman P, Liu JS, et al. Methylation of histone H3 Lys 4 in coding regions of active genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:8695-700.
15. Schneider R, Bannister AJ, Myers FA, Thorne AW, Crane-Robinson C, Kouzarides T. Histone H3 lysine 4 methylation patterns in higher eukaryotic genes. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:73-7.
16. Min J, Zhang Y, Xu RM. Structural basis for specific binding of Polycomb chromodomain to histone H3 methylated at Lys 27. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1823-8.
17. Fischle W, Wang Y, Jacobs SA, Kim Y, Allis CD, Khorasanizadeh S. Molecular basis for the discrimination of repressive methyl-lysine marks in histone H3 by Polycomb and HP1 chromodomains. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1870-81.
18. De Gobbi M, Garrick D, Lynch M, Vernimmen D, Hughes JR, Goardon N, et al. Generation of bivalent chromatin domains during cell fate decisions. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2011;4:9.
19. Pietersen AM, van Lohuizen M. Stem cell regulation by polycomb repressors: postponing commitment. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:201-7.
20. Consortium EP, Bernstein BE, Birney E, Dunham I, Green ED, Gunter C, et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57-74.
21. Jakobsen JS, Waage J, Rapin N, Bisgaard HC, Larsen FS, Porse BT. Temporal mapping of CEBPA and CEBPB binding during liver regeneration reveals dynamic occupancy and specific regulatory codes for homeostatic and cell cycle gene batteries. Genome Res. 2013;23:592-603.
22. Heliot C, Cereghini S. Analysis of in vivo transcription factor recruitment by chromatin immunoprecipitation of mouse embryonic kidney. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;886:275-91.
23. Li XY, Biggin MD. Genome-wide in vivo cross-linking of sequence-specific transcription factors. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;809:3-26.
24. Zwart W, Koornstra R, Wesseling J, Rutgers E, Linn S, Carroll JS. A carrier-assisted ChIP-seq method for estrogen receptor-chromatin interactions from breast cancer core needle biopsy samples. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:232.
25. Mendoza-Parra MA, Van Gool W, Mohamed Saleem MA, Ceschin DG, Gronemeyer H. A quality control system for profiles obtained by ChIP sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e196.
26. Ohlsson E, Hasemann MS, Willer A, Lauridsen FK, Rapin N, Jendholm J, et al. Initiation of MLL-rearranged AML is dependent on C/EBPalpha. J Exp Med. 2014;211:5-13.
27. Hasemann MS, Lauridsen FK, Waage J, Jakobsen JS, Frank AK, Schuster MB, et al. C/EBPalpha Is Required for Long-Term Self-Renewal and Lineage Priming of Hematopoietic Stem Cells and for the Maintenance of Epigenetic Configurations in Multipotent Progenitors. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004079.
28. Fullwood MJ, Liu MH, Pan YF, Liu J, Xu H, Mohamed YB, et al. An oestrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature. 2009;462:58-64.
29. O'Neill LP, VerMilyea MD, Turner BM. Epigenetic characterization of the early embryo with a chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol applicable to small cell populations. Nat Genet. 2006;38:835-41.
30. Sandmann T, Jakobsen JS, Furlong EE. ChIP-on-chip protocol for genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:2839-55.
31. Schuster MB, Frank AK, Bagger FO, Rapin N, Vikesaa J, Porse BT. Lack of the p42 form of C/EBPalpha leads to spontaneous immortalization and lineage infidelity of committed myeloid progenitors. Exp Hematol. 2013;41:882-93. e816.
32. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25.
33. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12:996-1006.
34. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078-9.
35. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841-2.
36. Kent WJ, Zweig AS, Barber G, Hinrichs AS, Karolchik D. BigWig and BigBed: enabling browsing of large distributed datasets. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2204-7.
37. Ye T, Krebs AR, Choukrallah MA, Keime C, Plewniak F, Davidson I, et al. seqMINER: an integrated ChIP-seq data interpretation platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:e35.
38. Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Brown GR, Maglott DR. NCBI Reference Sequences (RefSeq): current status, new features and genome annotation policy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D130-5.
39. Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 2008;9:R137.
40. Machanick P, Bailey TL. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1696-7.
41. Bailey TL, Machanick P. Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e128.