Kinetochores require oligomerization of Dam1 complex to maintain microtubule attachments against tension and promote biorientation

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Umbreit, Neil T ^a   Miller, Matthew P ^b   Tien, Jerry F ^a   Cattin Ortolá, Jérôme ^a   Gui, Long ^c   Lee, Kelly K ^c   Biggins, Sue ^b   Asbury, Charles L ^c   Davis, Trisha N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; DAM1 COMPLEX; NDC80 COMPLEX; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DAM1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; DNA; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; PHOTOPROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; YELLOW FLUORESCENT PROTEIN, BACTERIA;

BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOPHYSICS; CHROMOSOME; DNA; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CELL ADHESION; CENTROMERE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; KINETOCHORE MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NONHUMAN; OLIGOMERIZATION; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SEDIMENTATION RATE; SEGREGATION ANALYSIS; SISTER CHROMATID; SPINDLE POLE; TENSION; WILD TYPE; BINDING SITE; BIOPHYSICS; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIZE EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY; TEMPERATURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CENTROMERE; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GEL; DNA; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; KINETOCHORES; LUMINESCENT PROTEINS; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84923368760     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5951     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Shimogawa, M. M. et al. Mps1 phosphorylation of Dam1 couples kinetochores to microtubule plus ends at metaphase. Curr. Biol. 16, 1489-1501 (2006).
2. Tanaka, K. et al. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 434, 987-994 (2005).
3. Janke, C., Ortiz, J., Tanaka, T. U., Lechner, J. & Schiebel, E. Four new subunits of the Dam1-Duo1 complex reveal novel functions in sister kinetochore biorientation. EMBO J. 21, 181-193 (2002).
4. Westermann, S. et al. Formation of a dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. Mol. Cell 17, 277-290 (2005).
5. Miranda, J. J., De Wulf, P., Sorger, P. K. & Harrison, S. C. The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 138-143 (2005).
6. Grishchuk, E. L. et al. The Dam1 ring binds microtubules strongly enough to be a processive as well as energy-efficient coupler for chromosome motion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15423-15428 (2008).
7. Efremov, A., Grishchuk, E. L., McIntosh, J. R. & Ataullakhanov, F. I. In search of an optimal ring to couple microtubule depolymerization to processive chromosome motions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19017-19022 (2007).
8. Gestaut, D. R. et al. Phosphoregulation and depolymerization-driven movement of the Dam1 complex do not require ring formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 407-414 (2008).
9. Franck, A. D. et al. Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 832-837 (2007).
10. Akiyoshi, B. et al. Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Nature 468, 576-579 (2010).
11. Sarangapani, K. K., Akiyoshi, B., Duggan, N. M., Biggins, S. & Asbury, C. L. Phosphoregulation promotes release of kinetochores from dynamic microtubules via multiple mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7282-7287 (2013).
12. Tien, J. F. et al. Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B. J. Cell Biol. 189, 713-723 (2010).
13. Lampert, F., Hornung, P. & Westermann, S. The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Cell Biol. 189, 641-649 (2010).
14. Miranda, J. J., King, D. S. & Harrison, S. C. Protein arms in the kinetochore-microtubule interface of the yeast DASH complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2503-2510 (2007).
15. Westermann, S., Drubin, D. G. & Barnes, G. Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 563-591 (2007).
16. Wang, H. W. et al. Architecture of the Dam1 kinetochore ring complex and implications for microtubule-driven assembly and force-coupling mechanisms. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 721-726 (2007).
17. Franck, A. D., Powers, A. F., Gestaut, D. R., Davis, T. N. & Asbury, C. L. Direct physical study of kinetochore-microtubule interactions by reconstitution and interrogation with an optical force clamp. Methods 51, 242-250 (2010).
18. Powers, A. F. et al. The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips via biased diffusion. Cell 136, 865-875 (2009).
19. Asbury, C. L., Gestaut, D. R., Powers, A. F., Franck, A. D. & Davis, T. N. The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9873-9878 (2006).
20. Li, J. M., Li, Y. & Elledge, S. J. Genetic analysis of the kinetochore DASH complex reveals an antagonistic relationship with the ras/protein kinase A pathway and a novel subunit required for Ask1 association. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 767-778 (2005).
21. Kastenmayer, J. P. et al. Functional genomics of genes with small open reading frames (sORFs) in S. cerevisiae. Genome Res. 16, 365-373 (2006).
22. Nishimura, K., Fukagawa, T., Takisawa, H., Kakimoto, T. & Kanemaki, M. An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat. Methods 6, 917-922 (2009).
23. Pinsky, B. A., Kung, C., Shokat, K. M. & Biggins, S. The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 78-83 (2006).
24. Anderson, M., Haase, J., Yeh, E. & Bloom, K. Function and assembly of DNA looping, clustering, and microtubule attachment complexes within a eukaryotic kinetochore. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 4131-4139 (2009).
25. De Wulf, P., McAinsh, A. D. & Sorger, P. K. Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. Genes Dev. 17, 2902-2921 (2003).
26. Janke, C. et al. The budding yeast proteins Spc24p and Spc25p interact with Ndc80p and Nuf2p at the kinetochore and are important for kinetochore clustering and checkpoint control. EMBO J. 20, 777-791 (2001).
27. Tanaka, T. U. et al. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108, 317-329 (2002).
28. Koshland, D. E., Mitchison, T. J. & Kirschner, M. W. Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerization in vitro. Nature 331, 499-504 (1988).
29. Mandelkow, E. M., Mandelkow, E. & Milligan, R. A. Microtubule dynamics and microtubule caps: a time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy study. J. Cell Biol. 114, 977-991 (1991).
30. Molodtsov, M. I., Grishchuk, E. L., Efremov, A. K., McIntosh, J. R. & Ataullakhanov, F. I. Force production by depolymerizing microtubules: a theoretical study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4353-4358 (2005).
31. Miller, M. P., Unal, E., Brar, G. A. & Amon, A. Meiosis I chromosome segregation is established through regulation of microtubule-kinetochore interactions. ELife 1, e00117 (2012).
32. Welburn, J. P. et al. The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility. Dev. Cell 16, 374-385 (2009).
33. Alushin, G. M. et al. The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms oligomeric arrays along microtubules. Nature 467, 805-810 (2010).
34. Umbreit, N. T. et al. The Ndc80 kinetochore complex directly modulates microtubule dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16113-16118 (2012).
35. Miller, S. A., Johnson, M. L. & Stukenberg, P. T. Kinetochore attachments require an interaction between unstructured tails on microtubules and Ndc80(Hec1). Curr. Biol. 18, 1785-1791 (2008).
36. Wei, R. R., Sorger, P. K. & Harrison, S. C. Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5363-5367 (2005).
37. Burke, D., Dawson, D. & Stearns, T. Methods in Yeast Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2000).
38. Gestaut, D. R., Cooper, J., Asbury, C. L., Davis, T. N. & Wordeman, L. Reconstitution and functional analysis of kinetochore subcomplexes. Methods Cell Biol. 95, 641-656 (2010).
39. Wargacki, M. M., Tay, J. C., Muller, E. G., Asbury, C. L. & Davis, T. N. Kip3, the yeast kinesin-8, is required for clustering of kinetochores at metaphase. Cell Cycle 9, 2581-2588 (2010).
40. Straight, A. F., Marshall, W. F., Sedat, J. W. & Murray, A. W. Mitosis in living budding yeast: anaphase A but no metaphase plate. Science 277, 574-578 (1997).
41. Wach, A., Brachat, A., Alberti-Segui, C., Rebischung, C. & Philippsen, P. Heterologous HIS3 marker and GFP reporter modules for PCR-targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13, 1065-1075 (1997).
42. Longtine, M. S. et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCRbased gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14, 953-961 (1998).
43. Muller, E. G. D. et al. The organization of the core proteins of the yeast spindle pole body. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 3341-3352 (2005).
44. Shimogawa, M. M., Wargacki, M. M., Muller, E. G. & Davis, T. N. Laterally attached kinetochores recruit the checkpoint protein Bub1, but satisfy the spindle checkpoint. Cell Cycle 9, 3619-3628 (2010).
45. Walker, R. A. et al. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: Rate constants and transition frequencies. J. Cell Biol. 107, 1437-1448 (1988).