Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 138, Issue , 2015, Pages 115-134

  Goerlandt, Floris ^a   Montewka, Jakub ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Foundational issues; Maritime accident; Maritime safety; Maritime transportation; Risk analysis principles

Indexed keywords

RISK ASSESSMENT; WATERWAY TRANSPORTATION;

CLASSIFICATION OF RISK; CURRENT SITUATION; FOUNDATIONAL ISSUES; FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS; MARITIME ACCIDENTS; MARITIME SAFETY; MARITIME TRANSPORTATION; SCIENTIFIC FIELDS;

RISK ANALYSIS;

EID: 84923253511     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.025     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. IALA. IALA recommendation O-134 on the IALA risk management tool for ports and restricted waterways. International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities; May, 2009.
2. IMO. Degree of risk evaluation. SN.1/Circ.296. International Maritime Organization; Dec, 2010.
3. LR. Guidance notes for collision analysis. Lloyd's register, London, UK; 2014.
4. EA Rosa The logical status of risk - to burnish or to dull J Risk Res 13 3 2010 239 253 (Apr.)
5. T Aven, and E Zio Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management Risk Anal 34 7 2014 1164 1172
6. T Aven Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management Risk Anal 32 10 2012 1647 1656 (Oct.)
7. S Li, Q Meng, and X Qu An overview of maritime waterway quantitative risk assessment models Risk Anal 32 3 2012 496 512
8. B Özbaş Safety risk analysis of maritime transportation: review of the literature Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2326 2013 32 38
9. A Mazaheri, J Montewka, and P Kujala Modeling the risk of ship grounding - a literature review from a risk management perspective WMU J Marit Aff 13 2 2014 269 297
10. T Aven The risk concept - historical and recent development trends Reliab Eng Syst Saf 99 2012 33 44 (Mar.)
11. T Aven Misconceptions of risk 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, UK
12. F Goerlandt, and P Kujala On the reliability and validity of ship-ship collision risk analysis in light of different perspectives on risk Saf Sci 62 2014 348 365 (Feb.)
13. T Aven, and G Reniers How to define and interpret a probability in a risk and safety setting Saf Sci 51 1 2013 223 231 (Jan.)
14. T Aven Interpretations of alternative uncertainty representations in a reliability and risk analysis context Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96 3 2011 353 360 (Mar.)
15. SR Watson The meaning of probability in probabilistic safety analysis Reliab Eng Syst Saf 45 3 1994 261 269
16. G Apostolakis The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems Science 250 4986 1990 1359 1364
17. JK Vaurio On the meaning of probability and frequency Reliab Eng Syst Saf 28 1990 121 130
18. TF Liao Interpreting probability models 1994 Sage Publications Inc
19. JH Aldrich, and FD Nelson Linear probability, logit and probit models vol. 45 1995 Sage Publications Inc.
20. P Szwed, JR van Dorp, JRW Merrick, TA Mazzuchi, and A Singh A Bayesian paired comparison approach for relative accident probability assessment with covariate information Eur J Oper Res 169 1 2006 157 177 (Feb.)
21. J Davies, M Finlay, T McLenaghen, D Wilson. Key risk indicators - their role in operational risk management and measurement. In: The advanced measurement approach to operational risk, London: Risk books; 2006. p. 215-46.
22. MS Beasley, BC Branon, and BV Hancock Developing key risk indicators to strengthen enterprise risk management, 2010 The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
23. A Immaneni, C Mastro, and M Haubenstock A structured approach to building predictive key risk indicators J Enterp Risk Manage 2004 42 47 (May)
24. JM Mendel Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: a tutorial Proc IEEE 83 3 1995 345 375
25. T Bilgiç, B̄ Türkşen. Measurement of membership functions: theoretical and empirical work. In: International handbook of fuzzy sets and possibility theory, Norwell: Kluwer Academic; 1998.
26. D Dubois, W Ostasiewicz, H Prade. Fuzzy sets: history and basic notions, IRIT, technical report 27R; 1999.
27. O Solberg, and O Njå Reflections on the ontological status of risk J Risk Res 15 9 2012 1201 1215
28. R Flage, and T Aven Expressing and communicating uncertainty in relation to quantitative risk analysis (QRA) Reliab Risk Anal Theory Appl 2 13 2009 9 18
29. T Aven Practical implications of the new risk perspectives Reliab Eng Syst Saf 115 2013 136 145 (Jul.)
30. R Levin Uncertainty in risk assessment - contents and modes of communication 2005 Royal Intitute of Technology Stockholm
31. JC Helton, and JD Johnson Quantification of margins and uncertainties: alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96 9 2011 1034 1052 (Sep.)
32. E Zio, and N Pedroni Methods for representing uncertainty - a literature review 2013 Fondation pour une Culture de Sécurité Industrielle Toulouse, France (2013-03)
33. E Zio, and GE Apostolakis Two methods for the structured assessment of model uncertainty by experts in performance assessments of radioactive waste repositories Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54 2-3 1996 225 241 (Nov.)
34. T Aven, and E Zio Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96 1 2011 64 74 (Jan.)
35. ME Paté-Cornell Uncertainties in risk analysis: six levels of treatment Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54 2-3 1996 95 111 (Nov.)
36. T Rosqvist, and R Tuominen Qualification of formal safety assessment: an exploratory study Saf Sci 42 2 2004 99 120 (Feb.)
37. F Goerlandt, J Montewka. Expressing and communicating uncertainty and bias in relation to Quantitative Risk Analysis. In: Safety and reliability: methodology and applications, Wroclaw, Poland; 2015. p. 1691-1699.
38. T Aven Perspectives on risk in a decision-making context - review and discussion Saf Sci 47 6 2009 798 806 (Jul.)
39. KS Shrader-Frechette Risk and rationality: philosophical foundations for populist reforms 1991 University of California Press Berkeley
40. JA Bradbury The policy implications of differing concepts of risk Sci Technol Hum Values 14 4 1989 380 399
41. EA Rosa Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk J Risk Res 1 1 1998 15 44
42. PB Thompson, and WR Dean Competing conceptions of risk Risk Health Saf Environ 7 1996 361 384
43. C Starr, and C Whipple Risks of risk decisions Science 6 208 1980 1114 1119 (Jun.)
44. B Wandall Values in science and risk assessment Toxicol Lett 152 2004 265 272
45. SH Jore, and O Njå Risk of terrorism: a scientifically valid phenomenon or a wild guess? The impact of different approaches to risk assessment Crit Approaches Discourse Anal Discip 4 2 2010 197 216
46. M Douglas, and A Wildavsky Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers 1982 University of California Press Berkeley; Los Angeles
47. PC Stern, and HV Fineberg Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society 1996 National Academy Press Washington, DC
48. YY Haimes On the complex definition of risk: a systems-based approach Risk Anal 29 12 2009 1647 1654
49. S Kaplan The words of risk analysis, Risk Anal 17 4 1997 407 417 (Aug.)
50. S Kaplan, and JB Garrick On the quantitative definition of risk Risk Anal 1 1 1981 11 27
51. T Aven Some reflections on uncertainty analysis and management Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95 3 2010 195 201 (Mar.)
52. T Aven, and O Renn On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain J Risk Res 12 1 2009 1 11
53. T Aven, O Renn, and EA Rosa On the ontological status of the concept of risk Saf Sci 49 8-9 2011 1074 1079 (Oct.)
54. T Rosqvist On the validation of risk analysis - a commentaty Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95 2010 1261 1265
55. P Slovic Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk assessment battlefield Risk Anal 19 4 1999 689 701
56. Y Fujii, H Yamanouchi, and N Mizuki Some factors affecting the frequency of accidents in marine traffic J Navig 27 1974 239 427
57. T MacDuff The probability of vessel collisions Ocean Ind 1974 144 148
58. K Hara, and S Nakamura A comprehensive assessment system for the maritime traffic environment Saf Sci 19 1995 203 215
59. PT Pedersen. Collision and grounding mechanics. In: Proceedings of the Danish Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers; 1995. p. 125-57.
60. D Roeleven, M Kokc, HI Stipdonk, and W.A. De Vries Inland waterway transport: modelling the probability of accidents Saf Sci 19 2-3 1995 191 202 (Jun.)
61. JR Harrald, TA Mazzuchi, J Spahn, R Van Dorp, J Merrick, S Shrestha, and M Grabowski Using system simulation to model the impact of human error in a maritime system Saf Sci 30 1-2 1998 235 247 (Oct.)
62. TG Fowler, and E Sørgård Modeling ship transportation risk Risk Anal 20 2 2000 225 244
63. JR Merrick, JR van Dorp, J Harrald, T Mazzuchi, JE Spahn, and M Grabowski A systems approach to managing oil transportation risk in Prince William Sound Syst Eng 3 3 2000 128 142
64. JR Van Dorp, JRW Merrick, JR Harrald, TA Mazzuchi, and M Grabowski A risk management procedure for the Washington State Ferries Risk Anal 21 2001 127 142
65. P Friis-Hansen, and BC Simonsen GRACAT: software for grounding and collision risk analysis Mar Struct 15 4-5 2002 383 401 (Jul.)
66. F Kaneko Methods for probabilistic safety assessments of ships J Mar Sci Technol 7 2002 1 16
67. JR Merrick, JR van Dorp, TA Mazzuchi, JR Harrald, JE Spahn, and M Grabowski The Prince William Sound risk assessment Interfaces 32 6 2002 25 40 (Dec.)
68. T Rosqvist, T Nyman, S Sonninen, R Tuominen. The implementation of the VTMIS system for the Gulf of Finland - a FSA study. In: Proceedings of the RINA international conference on formal safety assessment, London: Royal Institution of Naval Architects; 2002. p. 1-14.
69. S Kristiansen Maritime transportation: safety management and risk analysis 1st ed. 2005 Routeledge
70. USCG. Ports and waterways safety assessment. Available 〈http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=pawsaMain〉; 2005 [accessed: 10-Nov-2014].
71. JR Merrick, and R Van Dorp Speaking the truth in maritime risk assessment Risk Anal 26 1 2006 223 237
72. S Hu, Q Fang, H Xia, and Y Xi Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 3 2007 369 377
73. COWI. Risk analysis of sea traffic in the area aroudn Bornholm, P-65775-002; 2008.
74. M Przywarty. Probabilistic model of ships navigational safety assessment on large sea areas. In: Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on electronics in transport, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2008.
75. AK Debnath. Traffic-conflict-based modeling of collision risk in port waters. PhD dissertation. National University of Singapore, Singapore; 2009.
76. E Klemola, J Kuronen, J Kalli, T Arola, M Hänninen, A Lehikoinen, S Kuikka, P Kujala, and U Tapaninen A cross-disciplinary approach to minimizing the risks of maritime transport in the Gulf of Finland World Rev Intermodal Transp Res 2 2009 343 363
77. ÖS Ulusçu, B Özbaş, T Altiok, and O Ilhan Risk analysis of the vessel traffic in the Strait of Istanbul Risk Anal 29 2009 1454 1472
78. AK Debnath, and HC Chin Navigational traffic conflict technique: a proactive approach to quantitative measurement of collision risks in port waters J Navig 63 1 2010 137 152
79. F Kaneko. A method for estimation of grounding frequency by using trajectories of ships and geometry of seabed. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on collision and grounding of ships, Espoo, Finland; 2010. p. 123-32.
80. A Klanac, T Duletić, S Erceg, S Ehlers, F Goerlandt, D Frank. Environmental risk of collisions in the enclosed European waters: Gulf of Finland, Northern Adriatic and the implications for tanker design. In: Fifth international conference on collision and grounding of ships, Espoo, Finland: Aalto University; 2010. p. 55-65.
81. A Lehikoinen. SAFGOF a cross-disciplinary modelling approach to minimizing the ecological risks of maritime oil transportation in the Gulf of Finland. In: Presented at the international conference on collision and grounding of ships, Otaniemi, Finland; 2010. p. 244-8.
82. G Mermiris, D Vassalos. Collision risk revisited. In: Proceedings of the fourth design for safety conference and third risk-based approaches in the Marine Industry Workship, Trieste, Italy; 2010.
83. J Montewka, T Hinz, P Kujala, and J Matusiak Probability modelling of vessel collisions Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95 5 2010 573 589 (May)
84. J Ylitalo Modeling marine accident frequency 2010 Helsinki University of Technology Otaniemi, Finland
85. F Goerlandt, and P Kujala Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96 1 Jan. 2011 91 107
86. J Montewka, P Krata, F Goerlandt, A Mazaheri, and P Kujala Marine traffic risk modelling - an innovative approach and a case study Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 225 3 2011 307 322 (Sep.)
87. JR van Dorp, and JR Merrick On a risk management analysis of oil spill risk using maritime transportation system simulation Ann Oper Res 187 2011 249 277
88. X Qu, Q Meng, and S Li Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait Accid Anal Prev 43 6 2011 2030 2036 (Nov.)
89. J Akhtar, T Bjornskau, and V Jean-Hansen Oil spill risk analysis of routeing heavy ship traffic in Norwegian waters WMU J Marit Aff 11 2012 233 247
90. OA Almaz. Risk and performance analysis of ports and waterways: the case of Delaware river and bay. PhD dissertation. Rutgers University, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, New Brunswick, New Jersey; 2012.
91. A Blokus-Roszkowska, and L Smolarek Collision risk estimation for motorways of the sea Reliab Theory Pract 7 2012 58 68
92. COWI. BRISK - sub-regional risk of spill of oil and haardous substances in the Baltic Sea, COWI; 2012.
93. F Goerlandt, M Hänninen, K Ståhlberg, J Montewka, and P Kujala Simplified risk analysis of tanker collisions in the Gulf of Finland Trans Nav-Int J Mar Navig Saf Sea Transp 6 2012 381 387
94. F Goerlandt, K Ståhlberg, and P Kujala Influence of impact scenario models on collision risk analysis Ocean Eng 47 2012 74 87 (Jun.)
95. JS Jeong, G-K Park, and KI Kim Risk assessment model of maritime traffic in time-variant CPA environments in waterway J Adv Comput Intell Intell Inform 16 7 2012 866 873
96. J Montewka, S Ehlers, and K Tabri Modelling risk of a collision between a LNG tanker and a harbour tug Mar Syst Ocean Technol 7 1 2012 5 15
97. FM Rasmussen, KAK Glibbery, K Melchild, MG Hansen, TK Jensen, T Lehn-Schioler, and S Randrup-Thomsen Quantitative assessment of risk to ship traffic in the Fehmarnbelt Fixed Link project J Pol Saf Reliab Assoc 3 1-2 2012 1 12
98. S Hu, and J Zhang Risk assessment of marine traffic safety at coastal water area Procedia Eng 43 2012 31 37
99. O.-V.E. Sormunen Spill estimation of chemical tanker collisions in the Gulf of Finland, (MSc thesis) 2012 Aalto University Otaniemi, Finland
100. S Suman, V Nagarajan, OP Sha, S Khanfir, E Kobayashi, and AM bin Abdul Malik Ship collision risk assessment using AIS data Int J Innov Res Dev 1 10 2012 509 524 (Dec.)
101. J Weng, Q Meng, and X Qu Vessel collision frequency estimation in the Singapore Strait J Navig 65 2 2012 207 221
102. H-C Burmeister, C Jahn, S Töter, J Froese. Maritime risk assessment: modeling collisions with vessels laying at an anchorage. In: Safety, reliability and risk assessment: advances in marine navigation - marine navigation and safety of sea transportation, London: Taylor & Francis Group; 2013. p. 287-91.
103. PAM Silveira, AP Teixeira, and C. Guedes Soares Use of AIS data to characterise marine traffic patterns and ship collision risk off the coast of Portugal J Navig 66 06 2013 879 898
104. L Smolarek, and H ͆niegocki Risk modelling for passages in an approach channel Math Prob Eng 2013 2013 1 8
105. A Talavera, R Aguasca, B Galván, and A Cacereño Application of Dempster-Shafer theory for the quantification and propagation of the uncertainty caused by the use of AIS data Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111 2013 95 105
106. D Zhang, XP Yan, ZL Yang, A Wall, and J Wang Incorporation of formal safety assessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of the Yangtze River Reliab Eng Syst Saf 118 2013 93 105
107. F Goerlandt, J Montewka, and P Kujala Tools for an extended risk assessment for Ropax ship-ship collision M Beer, S-K Au, JW Hall, Vulnerability, uncertainty, and risk: quantification, mitigation, and management 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers 2292 2302
108. M Hänninen, A Mazaheri, P Kujala, J Montewka, P Laaksonen, M Salmiovirta, and M Klang Expert elicitation of a navigation service implementation effects on ship groundings and collisions in the Gulf of Finland Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 228 2014 19 28
109. J Montewka, S Ehlers, F Goerlandt, T Hinz, K Tabri, and P Kujala A framework for risk assessment for maritime transportation systems - a case study for open sea collisions involving RoPax vessels Reliab Eng Syst Saf 124 2014 142 157 (Apr.)
110. Y Mulyadi, E Kobayashi, N Wakabayashi, and T Pitana Development of ship sinking frequency model over subsea pipeline for Madura Strait using AIS data WMU J Marit Aff 13 2014 43 59
111. O.-V.E. Sormunen, F Goerlandt, J Häkkinen, A Posti, M Hänninen, J Montewka, K Ståhlberg, and P Kujala Uncertainty in maritime risk analysis: extended case study on chemical tanker collisions Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng. Marit Environ 2014 (p. 1475090213515640, Jan.)
112. J Wang, M Lu, Y Liu, H Zhang, W Zou, and L Cheng Safety assessment of shipping routes in the South China Sea based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process Saf Sci 62 2014 46 57
113. MB Zaman, E Kobayashi, N Wakabayashi, S Khanfir, T Pitana, and A Mainmun Fuzzy FMEA model for risk evaluation of ship collisions in the Malacca Strait: based on AIS data J Simul 8 2014 91 104
114. CA Kontovas, and HN Psaraftis Formal safety assessment: a critical review Mar Technol 46 1 2009 45 59
115. IMO. Formal safety assessment - consolidated text of the guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process (MSC/Circ.1023-MEPC/Circ.392). In: International Maritime Organization; 14-May-2007.
116. ISO Risk management - vocabulary Guide 73 2009 2009
117. H Corvellec Organizational risk as it derives from what managers value - a practice-based approach to risk assessment J Conting Crisis Manage 18 3 2010 145 154
118. J Hampel Different concepts of risk - a challenge for risk communication Int J Med Microbiol 296 2006 5 10
119. B Fischhoff, SR Watson, and C Hope Defining risk Policy Sci 17 1984 123 139
120. Céline Kermisch, Vers une définition multidimensionnelle du risque, VertigO - Rev Électron Sci Environ [Online], 2012;12(2), Online since 12.09.12, connection on 12.02.15. 〈 http://vertigo.revues.org/12214 〉; 10.4000/vertigo.12214
121. RM Perhac Defining risk: normative considerations Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2 1996 381 392
122. H Veland, and T Aven Risk communication in the light of different risk perspectives Reliab Eng Syst Saf 110 2013 34 40
123. T Aven On how to define, understand and describe risk Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95 6 2010 623 631 (Jun.)
124. T Aven, and B Heide Reliability and validity of risk analysis Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94 11 2009 1862 1868 (Nov.)
125. H Douglas Science, policy and the value-free ideal 2009 University of Pittsburgh Press Pittsburgh, PA
126. N Vareman, and J Persson Why separate risk assessors and risk managers? Further external values affecting the risk assessor qua risk assessor J Risk Res 13 2010 687 700
127. W Trochim, and JP Donnely The research methods knowledge base 3rd ed. 2008 Atomic Dog Publishing
128. HN Psaraftis Formal safety assessment: an updated review J Mar Sci Technol 17 2012 390 402
129. RA Cahill Collisions and their causes 3rd ed. 2002 The Nautical Institute London
130. FJ Buzek, and HMC Holdert Collision cases judgments and diagrams 2nd ed. 1990 Lloyds's of London Press Ltd. London
131. Å Svensson, A method for analysing the traffic process in a safety perspective. In: Doctoral, Lund University, Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund, Sweden; 1998.
132. A Mazaheri, J Montewka, P Kotilainen, O.-V.E. Sormunen, and P Kujala Assessing grounding frequency using ship traffic and waterway complexity J Navig 68 1 2015 89 106
133. E van Iperen, Detection of hazardous encounters at the North Sea from AIS data. In: Proceedings of international workshop of next generation nautical traffic models, Shanghai, China; 2012. p. 1-12.
134. MG Hansen, TK Jensen, T Lehn-Schiøler, K Melchild, FM Rasmussen, and F Ennemark Empirical ship domain based on AIS data J Navig 66 6 2013 931 940
135. JM Mou, C van der Tak, and H Ligteringen Study on collision avoidance in busy waterways by using AIS data Ocean Eng 37 2010 483 490