Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 369-377

  Hu, Shenping ^a   Fang, Quangen ^a   Xia, Haibo ^a   Xi, Yongtao ^a  

^a SHANGHAI MARITIME UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Formal safety assessment (FSA); Fuzzy sets; Marine engineering; Probability; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION; FUZZY SETS; MARINE ENGINEERING; PORTS AND HARBORS; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING;

FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT (FSA); GENERIC RISK MODEL; PILOTAGE SAFETY; SHIP NAVIGATION;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 33751008093     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Fang Q.G., Wang J., and Datubo A. FSA and its applications to the safety of ships. Navig Chin (J Chin Inst Navig) 1 (2004) 1-5 [in Chinese]
2. Wang J. Current status and future aspects of formal safety assessment of ships. Saf Sci 38 (2001) 19-30
3. Soares C.G., and Teixeira A.P. Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 74 3 (2001) 299-309
4. IMO. Interim guidelines for the application of formal safety assessment (FSA) to the IMO rule-making processes, MSC/Circ. 829 and MEPC/Circ. 335, 1997, London.
5. Transportation Administration of People's Republic of China. Statistical measures of water transportation accidents. People's Republic of China, 2002.
6. Yang L.B., and Gao Y. Fuzzy math principle and applications. 3rd ed (2002), South China Sciences and Technology University Press [in Chinese]
7. Cao J., and Chen K. Introduction to reliability mathematics (1986), Academic Publisher, Beijing [in Chinese]
8. Qian S. Operation research (1995), Tsinghua University Press, Beijing [in Chinese]
9. Ma Z., and Ren H. An evaluation method based on some sample units and its applying on FSA. Syst Eng Th Appl 2 (2003) 95-101 [in Chinese]
10. Wang J. Offshore safety case approach and formal safety assessment of ships. J Saf Res 33 1 (2002) 81-115
11. Fang Q.G. Formal safety assessment for preventing ship accidents and application of navigation simulators. J Shanghai Marit Univ 2 (2005) 18-22 [in Chinese]
12. Liu J., Yang J.B., Wang J., and Sii H.S. Engineering system safety analysis and synthesis using the fuzzy rule-based evidential reasoning approach. Qual Reliab Eng Int 21 4 (2005) 387-411
13. Merrick J.R.W., van Dorp J.R., and Dinesh V. Assessing uncertainty in simulation-based maritime risk assessment. Risk Anal 25 3 (2005) 731-743
14. Wang J., Sii H.S., Yang J.B., Pillay A., Maistralis E., and Saajedi A. Use of advances in technology in marine risk assessment. Risk Anal 24 4 (2004) 1011-1033
15. Sii H.S., Ruxton T., and Wang J. A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative safety modelling for marine systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 73 1 (2001) 19-34
16. Peachey J. Overview of the 5 steps of FSA. Formal safety assessment seminar, IMO MSA, May 18, 1995, Section 1, paper 2.
17. Chen Z.H., and Fang Q.G. Study on application of FSA to safety pilotage in Shanghai Harbour. Navig Chin (J Chin Inst Navig) 1 (2005) 1-5 [in Chinese]
18. Hu S.P., Fang Q.G., and Xia H.B. Study on formal safety assessment in ship navigation and modeling based on relative risk. J Dalian Marit Univ 2 (2005) 18-22 [in Chinese]
19. Podofillini L., Zio E., and Vatn J. Risk-informed optimisation of railway tracks inspection and maintenance procedures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 1 (2006) 20-35
20. Hokstad P., and Steiro T. Overall strategy for risk evaluation and priority setting of risk regulations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 1 (2006) 100-111
21. Ale B.J.M. Living with risk: a management question. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90 2-3 (2005) 196-205
22. Arends B.J., Jonkman S.N., Vrijling J.K., et al. Evaluation of tunnel safety: towards an economic safety optimum. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90 2-3 (2005) 217-228
23. Proske D., and Curbach M. Risk to historical bridges due to ship impact on German inland waterways. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90 2-3 (2005) 261-270
24. Keller W., and Modarres M. A historical overview of probabilistic risk assessment development and its use in the nuclear power industry: a tribute to the late Professor Norman Carl Rasmussen. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 89 3 (2005) 271-285
25. Cepin M. Analysis of truncation limit in probabilistic safety assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 87 3 (2005) 395-403
26. Merrick J.R.W., van Dorp J.R., Blackford J.P., et al. A traffic density analysis of proposed ferry service expansion in San Francisco Bay using a maritime simulation model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 81 2 (2003) 119-132
27. Holý J. Some insights from recent applications of HRA methods in PSA effort and plant operation feedback in Czech Republic. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83 2 (2004) 169-177
28. Johnson C., and Holloway C.M. A survey of logic formalisms to support mishap analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 80 3 (2003) 271-291
29. Guedes Soares C., and Teixeira A.P. Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 74 3 (2001) 299-309
30. Delvosalle C., Fiévez C., Pipart A., Casal Fabrega J., Planas E., Christou M., and Mushtaq F. Identification of reference accident scenarios in SEVESO establishments. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90 2-3 (2005) 238-246
31. Aven T., and Erik Vinnem J. On the use of risk acceptance criteria in the offshore oil and gas industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90 1 (2005) 15-24
32. Vaurio J.K., and Jänkälä K.E. Evaluation and comparison of estimation methods for failure rates and probabilities. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 2 (2006) 209-221
33. Hokstad P., and Steiro T. Overall strategy for risk evaluation and priority setting of risk regulations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 1 (2006) 100-111