Reflections on the ontological status of risk

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1201-1215

  Solberg, Øivind ^a   Njå, Ove ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

Author keywords

decision making; epistemology; philosophy; research

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT OF TIME; CONCERNING RISK; EPISTEMOLOGY; PHILOSOPHY; POINT OF DEPARTURES; STATE OF AFFAIRS;

ENGINEERING; RESEARCH; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 84868148762     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2012.713385     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Althaus, C.E. 2005. A disciplinary perspective on the epistemological status of risk. Risk Analysis 25, no. 3: 567-88. (Pubitemid 41133001)
2. Atmanspacher, H., and R. Bishop, eds. 2002. Between chance and choice. Interdisciplinary perspectives on determinism. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
3. Aven, T. 2010. Misconceptions of risk. Chichester: Wiley.
4. Benthem, J.V. 1991. The logic of time: A model-theoretic investigation into the varieties of temporal ontology and temporal discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
5. Castell L.,O. Ischebeck.2003. Time, quantum and information.Berlin: Springer Verlag
6. Callender, C., and R. Edney. 2010. Introducing time. London: Icon.
7. Drottz-Sjö berg, B.M 1991 Perception of risk, studies of risk attitudes, perceptions and definitions. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics.
8. Fitzgerald, P. 1969. The truth about tomorrow's sea fight. Journal of Philosophy 66, no. 11: 307-29.
9. Gleiser, M. 2010. A tear at the edge of creation: A radical new vision for life in an imperfect universe. New York, NY: Free Press.
10. Hamlyn, D.W. 1984. Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Hartnack, J. 1959. Knowledge of the future. Philosophical Studies (Minneapilos) 10, no. 6: 89-96.
12. Heron, J., and P. Reason. 1997. Qualitative inquiry. A participatory inquiry paradigm 3, no. 3: 274-94.
13. Jacquette, D. 2002. Ontology. Durham: Acumen. Kim, J. 1991. Events: Their metaphysics and semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51, no. 3: 641-6.
14. Lockwood, M. 2005. The labyrinth of time: Introducing the universe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15. McDermott, R. 2008. On the evolutionary origin of prospect theory preferences. Journal of Politics 70, no. 2: 335-50.
16. McTaggart, J.E. 1908. The unreality of time. Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 17: 456-73.
17. Oaklander, L.N. 1991. A defence of the new tenseless theory of time. The Philosophical Quarterly 41, no. 162: 26-38.
18. Oaklander, L.N. 2008. The Philosophy of time: Critical concepts in philosophy. London: Routledge. Renn, O. 1998. Three decades of risk research: Accomplishments and new challenges. Journal of Risk Research 1, no. 1: 49-71.
19. Rosa, E.A. 1998. Metatheorethical foundations for post-normal risk. Journal of Risk Research 1, no. 1: 15-44.
20. Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 1991. Risk and rationality: Philosophical foundations for populist reforms. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21. Slovic, P. 2000. The perception of risk. London: Earthscan.
22. Zacks, J.M., B. Tversky, and G. Iyer. 2001. Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130, no. 1: 29-58. (Pubitemid 33597692)
23. Zinn, J. 2008. Social theories of risk an uncertainty: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.