Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management

Risk Analysis

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1164-1172

  Aven, Terje ^a   Zio, Enrico ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^b ECOLE CENTRALE PARIS   (France)

^c POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Foundations; Risk assessment; Risk management

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; FOUNDATIONS; RISK MANAGEMENT;

PRESENT SITUATION; RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENTS; RISK DISCIPLINE; SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATIONS; SOCIAL SCIENTISTS; TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; RISK ASSESSMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84905054609     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12132     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Thompson KM, Deisler PH, Jr., Schwing RC. Interdisciplinary vision: The first 25 years of the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA), 1980-2005. Risk Analysis, 2005; 25:1333-1386.
2. Aven T. Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(10):1647-1656.
3. Paté-Cornell ME. On black swans and perfect storms: Risk analysis and management when statics are not enough. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(11):1823-1833.
4. Aven T, Zio E. Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision-making. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011; 96:64-74.
5. Cox LA. Confronting deep uncertainties in risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(10):1607-1629.
6. Apostolakis GE. How useful is quantitative risk assessment? Risk Analysis, 2004; 24:515-520.
7. Aven T. On Funtowicz & Ravetz's "decision stake-system uncertainties" structure and recently developed risk perspectives frameworks. Risk Analysis, 2012; 22(2):270-280.
8. Brown G, Cox LA, Jr. How probabilistic risk assessment can mislead terrorism risk analysts. Risk Assessment, 2011; 31:196-204.
9. Cox LA, Jr. Risk Analysis: Foundations, Models and Methods. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
10. Cox LA, Ricci PF. Causation in risk assessment and management: Models, inference, biases, and a microbial risk-benefit case study. Environment International, 2005; 31:377-397.
11. Aven T. On different types of uncertainties in the context of the precautionary principle. Risk Analysis, 2011; 31(10):1515-1525. With discussion 1538-1542.
12. Singpurwalla N. On causality and causal mechanisms: Comment on Dennis Lindley's "Seeing and doing. The concept of causation". International Statistical Review, 2002; 70(2):198-206.
13. Shrader-Frechette KS. Risk and Rationality. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and Oxford: University of California Press, 1991.
14. Rosa EA. Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. Journal of Risk Research, 1998; 1:15-44.
15. Aven, T, Renn O. Risk Management and Risk Governance. New York: Springer Verlag, 2010.
16. Aven T. On risk governance deficits. Safety Science, 2011; 49(6):912-919.
17. Renn O. Risk Governance. Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan, 2008.
18. Tckner J, Kriebel D. The role of science and precaution in environmental and public health policy. Pp. 42-62 in Fisher E, Jones J, von Schomberg R (eds). Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006.