Preparation of nanofiltration membranes and relating surface chemistry with potential and topography: Application in separation and desalting of amino acids

Desalination

Volumn 362, Issue , 2015, Pages 104-116

  Vyas, B B ^a   Ray, P ^a  

^a CSIR CENTRAL SALT AND MARINE CHEMICALS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Amino acids; Differential rejection; Membrane topography; Nanofiltration membranes; Surface potential

Indexed keywords

AMINES; AMINO ACIDS; AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; DESALINATION; FILM PREPARATION; MEMBRANES; MIXTURES; MORPHOLOGY; NANOFILTRATION; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; SURFACE POTENTIAL; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TOPOGRAPHY;

DIFFERENTIAL REJECTION; HOMOGENEOUS SURFACES; INTERFACIAL POLYMERIZATION; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; PHENYLENEDIAMINES; REJECTION RATIOS; THIN FILM COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; TRIMESOYL CHLORIDE;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

AMINO ACID; DESALINATION; FILTRATION; MEMBRANE; SEPARATION;

EID: 84922513141     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ernst M., Bismarck A., Springer J., Jekel Martin Zeta-potential and rejection rates of a polyethersulfone nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 165:251-259.
2. Nanda D., Tung K., Li Y., Lin N., Chuang C. Effect of pH on membrane morphology, fouling potential, and filtration performance of nanofiltration membrane for water softening. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 349:411-420.
3. Deon S., Aure'lie E., Patrick F. A transport model considering charge adsorption inside pores to describe salts rejection by nanofiltration membranes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66:2823-2832.
4. Afonso M.D. Surface charge on loose nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 2006, 191:262-272.
5. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J., Nystrom M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 265:160-166.
6. Morao A.C., Alves A.B., Afonso M.D. Concentration of clavulanic acid broths: Influence of the membrane surface charge density on NF operation. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:417-428.
7. Costa A.R., de Pinho M.N. Performance and cost estimation of nanofiltration for surface water treatment in drinking water production. Desalination 2006, 196:55-65.
8. Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 122:435-445.
9. Lhassani A., Rumeau M., Benjelloun D., Pontie M. Selective demineralization of water by nanofiltration application to the de-fluorination of brackish water. Water Res. 2001, 35:3260-3264.
10. Hilal N., Al-Zoubi H., Mohammad A.W., Darwish N.A. Nanofiltration of highly concentrated salt solutions up to seawater salinity. Desalination 2005, 184:315-326.
11. Braeken L., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Regeneration of brewery waste water using nanofiltration. Water Res. 2004, 38:3075-3082.
12. 2 salts by nanofiltration and characterization of the membrane. Desalination 2009, 247:610-622.
13. VanderBruggen B., Manttari M., Nystrom M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:251-263.
14. Capelle N., Moulin P., Charbit F., Gallo R. Purification of drug derivative from concentrated saline solution by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 196:125-141.
15. Christy C., Vermant S. The state-of-the-art of filtration in recovery processes for biopharmaceutical production. Desalination 2002, 147:1-4.
16. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34:3710-3716.
17. Schaep J., Vandecasteele C. Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 188:129-136.
18. Nilsson M., Tragardh G., Ostergren K. The influence of pH, salt and temperature on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 312:97-106.
19. Kovacs Z., Samhaber W. Nanofiltration of concentrated amino acid solutions. Desalination 2009, 240:78-88.
20. Kovács Z., Discacciati M., Samhaber W. Modeling of amino acid nanofiltration by irreversible thermodynamics. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 332:38-49.
21. Hong S.U., Bruening M.L. Separation of amino acid mixtures using multilayer polyelectrolyte nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280:1-5.
22. Eckera J., Raabb T., Haraseka M. Nanofiltration as key technology for the separation of LA and AA. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 389:389-398.
23. Martin-Orue C., Bouhallab S., Garem A. Nanofiltration of amino acid and peptide solutions: mechanism of separation. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 142:225-233.
24. Shim Y., Rixey W.G., Chellam S. Influence of sorption on removal of tryptophan and phenylalanine during nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 323:99-104.
25. Grib H., Persin M., Gavach C., Piron D.L., Sandeaux J., Mameri N. Amino acid retention with alumina γ nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 172:9-17.
26. Timmer J.M.K., Speelmans M.P.J., van der Horst H.C. Separation of amino acids by nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1998, 14:133-144.
27. Li S., Li C., Liu Y., Wang X., Cao Z. Separation of l-glutamine from fermentation broth by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 222:191-201.
28. Wang X., Ying A., Wang W. Nanofiltration of l-phenylalanine and l-aspartic acid aqueous solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 196:59-67.
29. Gotoh T., Iguchi H., Kikuchi K. Separation of glutathione and its related amino acids by nanofiltration. Biochem. Eng. J. 2004, 19:165-170.
30. Tryfona T., Bustard M.T. Mechanistic understanding of the fermentative l-glutamic acid over production by Corynebacterium glutamicum through combined metabolic flux profiling and transmembrane transport characteristics. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2004, 79:1321-1330.
31. Koros W.J., Ma Y.H., Shimidzu T. Terminology for membranes and membrane processes. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68:1479-1489.
32. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 1991, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
33. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W., Hilal N. Characterization of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes-use of, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 126:91-105.
34. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W. Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance-a general assessment. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1998, 76:885-893.
35. Li Q., Pan X., Qu Z., Zhao X., Jin Y., Dai H., Yang B., Wang X. Understanding the dependence of contact angles of commercially RO membranes on external conditions and surface features. Desalination 2013, 309:38-45.
36. Li Q., Pan X., Hou C., Jin Y., Dai H., Wang H., Zhao X., Liu X. Exploring the dependence of bulk properties on surface chemistries and microstructures of commercially composite RO membranes by novel characterization approaches. Desalination 2012, 292:9-18.
37. Wang Y., Xu T. Anchoring hydrophilic polymer in substrate: an easy approach for improving the performance of TFC FO membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 476:330-339.
38. Birns D.B., Zydney A.L. Buffer effects on the zeta potential of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 172:39-48.
39. Manttari M., Pihlajamaki A., Nystrom M. Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280:311-320.
40. Saha N.K., Joshi S.V. Performance evaluation of thin film composite polyamide nanofiltration membrane with variation in monomer type. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342:60-69.
41. Oldani M., Schock G. Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by infrared spectroscopy, ESCA and contact angle measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 1989, 43:243-258.
42. Lo R., Bhattacharya A., Ganguly B. Probing the selective salt rejection behavior of thin film composite membranes: ADFT study. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 436:90-96.
43. Baroña G.N.B., Lim J., Jung B. High performance thin film composite polyamide reverse osmosis membrane prepared via m-phenylenediamine and 2,2'-benzidinedisulfonic acid. Desalination 2012, 291:69-77.
44. Verissimo S., Peinemann K.V., Bordado J. Influence of the diamine structure on the nanofiltration performance, surface morphology and surface charge of the composite polyamide membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 279:266-275.
45. Yua S., Liu M., Ma M., Qi M., Lü Z., Gao C. Impacts of membrane properties on reactive dye removal from dye/salt mixtures by asymmetric cellulose acetate and composite polyamide nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 350:83-91.
46. Bargeman G., Vollenbroek J.M., Straatsma J., Schroen C.G.P.H., Boom R.M. Nanofiltration of multi-component feeds. Interactions between neutral and charged components and their effect on retention. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 247:11-20.