Regeneration of brewery waste water using nanofiltration

Water Research

Volumn 38, Issue 13, 2004, Pages 3075-3082

  Braeken, L ^a   Van Der Bruggen, B ^a   Vandecasteele, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Flux decline; Nanofiltration; Retention; Reuse; Waste water

Indexed keywords

BREWERIES; GROUNDWATER; NANOFILTRATION; PH EFFECTS; STREAM FLOW; WATER RECYCLING;

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; RINSING WATER;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ALCOHOL; ORGANIC COMPOUND;

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; BREWING INDUSTRY; NANOFILTRATION; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; RECYCLING; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; BEER; BREWING; FILTRATION; MEMBRANE FILTER; NANOFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WASTE WATER; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER RECYCLING; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 3142707222     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Forstmeier M., Goers B., Wozny G. UF/NF treatment of rinsing waters in a liquid detergent production plant. Desalination. 149(1-3):2002;175-177
2. Chakraborty S., Bag B.C., Das Gupta S., De S., Basu J.K. Separation and fractionation of dye solution by nanofiltration. Sep Sci Technol. 38(1):2003;219-235
3. Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration. overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry Environ Poll. 122(3):2003;435-445
4. Everest W.R., Malloy S. Design\build approach to deep aquifer membrane treatment in Southern California. Desalination. 117:2000;149-158
5. Gorenflo A., Velazquez-Padron D., Frimmel F.H. Nanofiltration of a German groundwater of high hardness and NOM content. performance and costs Desalination. 151(3):2003;253-265
6. Cyna B., Chagneau G., Bablon G., Tanghe N. Two years of nanofiltration at the Méry-sur-Oise plant, France. Desalination. 147:2002;69-75
7. Rögener F., Willems M., Mavrov V., Chmiel H. The influence of cleaning additives on rejection and permeability in nanofiltration and ultrafiltration of bottle washing solutions. Separ Purif Technol. 28(3):2002;207-217
8. Van Damme A. Belgisch Staatsblad. 2003;173. www.staatsblad.be.
9. Emfri Europe Consulting, Technical Report, No. EM-004-INT, 2001. p. 3-27.
10. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Trusell RR. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17 ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Organization, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation; 1989.
11. Schaep J., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C., Wilms D. Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration. Sep Purif Technol. 14:1998;155-162
12. Kylefors K., Ecke H., Lagerkvist A. Accuracy of COD test for landfill leachates. Water Air Soil Pollut. 146(1-4):2003;153-169
13. Tanninen J., Nystrom M. Separation of ions in acidic conditions using NF. Desalination. 147:2002;295-299
14. Bragettha A., Digiano F.A., Ball W.P. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter. pH and ionic strength effects J Environ Eng. 123(7):1997;628-640
15. Berg P., Hagmeyer G., Gimbel R. Removal of pesticides and other pollutants by nanofiltration. Desalination. 113:1997;205-208
16. Schaep J., Vandecasteele C. Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J Membrane Sci. 188:2001;129-136
17. Qin J.J., Oo M.H., Wai M.N., Wong F.S. Effect of feed pH on an integrated membrane process for the reclamation of a combined rinsing water from electroless nickel plating. J Membrane Sci. 217(1-2):2003;261-268
18. Madireddi K., Babcock R.W. Jr., Levine B., Huo T.L., Khan E., Ye Q.F., Neethling J.B., Suffet I.H., Stenstrom M.K. Waste water reclamation at Lake Arrowhead, California. an overview Water Environ Res. 69(3):1997;350-362
19. Laurent P., Servais P., Gatel D., Randon G., Bonne P., Cavard J. Microbiological quality before and after nanofiltration. J AWWA. 91(10):1999;62-72
20. Van der Bruggen B., Braeken L., Vandecasteele C. Flux decline in nanofiltration due to adsorption of organic compounds. Sep Purif Technol. 29:2002;23-31
21. Lindau J., Jönsson A.S., Bottino A. Flux reduction of ultrafiltration membranes with different cut-off due to adsorption of low-molar mass hydrophobic solute-correlation between flux decline and pore size. J Membrane Sci. 149:1998;11-20