Concentration of clavulanic acid broths: Influence of the membrane surface charge density on NF operation

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 281, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 417-428

  Morão, Ana I Cavaco ^a   Brites Alves, Ana M ^a   Afonso, Maria Diná ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Fermentation broths; Membrane surface charge density; Nanofiltration; Zeta potential

Indexed keywords

FERMENTATION BROTHS; MEMBRANE SURFACE CHARGE DENSITY; SURFACE CHARGES; ZETA POTENTIAL;

ACIDS; ADSORPTION; ADSORPTION ISOTHERMS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); IONIC STRENGTH; NANOFILTRATION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

FERMENTATION;

CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM; CLAVULANIC ACID; ELECTROLYTE; MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE;

ACIDS; ADSORPTION; ADSORPTION ISOTHERMS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); FERMENTATION; IONIC STRENGTH; NANOFILTRATION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENSITY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; FERMENTATION MEDIUM; IONIC STRENGTH; ISOELECTRIC POINT; ISOTHERM; MEMBRANE FILTER; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NANOFILTRATION; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE CHARGE; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 33746703258     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Morão A., Brites Alves A.M., and Cardoso J.P. Ultrafiltration of dimethylchlortetracycline industrial fermentation broths. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22-23 (2001) 459-466
2. Cavaco Morão A.I., Brites Alves A.M., Costa M.C., and Cardoso J.P. Nanofiltration of a clarified fermentation broth. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61 (2006) 2418-2427
3. Bowen W.R., and Cao X. Electrokinetic effects in membrane pores and the determination of zeta-potential. J. Membr. Sci. 140 (1998) 267-273
4. Shäfer A.I., Fane A.G., and Waite T.D. Nanofiltration-Principles and Applications (2005), Elsevier, Oxford
5. Sung J.H., Chun M., and Choi H.J. On the behaviour of electrokinetic streaming potential during protein filtration with fully and partially retentive nanopores. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 264 (2003) 195-202
6. Xu Y., and Lebrun R. Investigation of the solute separation by charged nanofiltration membrane: effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type. J. Membr. Sci. 158 (1999) 93-104
7. Bowen W.R., Cassey B., Jones J., and Oatley D.L. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-application to an industrially relevant separation. J. Membr. Sci. 242 (2004) 211-220
8. Yaroshchuk E. Dielectric exclusion of ions from membranes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 85 (2000) 193-230
9. Martín A., Martínez F., Malfeito J., Palacio L., Prádanos P., and Hernández A. Zeta potential of membranes as a function of pH-optimization of isoelectric point evaluation. J. Membr. Sci. 213 (2003) 225-230
10. Ariza M.J., and Benavente J. Streaming potential along the surface of polysulfone membranes: a comparative study between two different experimental systems and determination of electrokinetic and adsorption parameters. J. Membr. Sci. 190 (2001) 119-132
11. Möckel D., Staude E., Dal-Cin M., Darcovich K., and Guiver M. Tangential flow streaming potential measurements: hydrodynamic cell characterization and zeta potentials of carboxilated polysulfone membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 145 (1998) 211-222
12. Lettmann C., Möckel D., and Staude E. Permeation and tangential flow streaming potential measurements for electrokinetic characterization of track-etched microfiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 159 (1999) 243-251
13. Freger V., Arnot T.C., and Howell J.A. Separation of concentrated organic/inorganic salt mixtures by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 178 (2000) 185-193
14. Capelle N., Moulin P., Charbit F., and Gallo R. Purification of heterocyclic drug derivatives from concentrated saline solution by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 196 (2002) 125-141
15. Pontalier P.-Y., Ismail A., and Ghoul M. Mechanisms for the selective rejection of solutes in NF membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 12 (1997) 175-181
16. Bowen W.R., and Mohammad A.W. Diafiltration by nanofiltration: prediction and optimisation. AIChE 44 (1998) 1799-1812
17. Shirg P., and Widmer F. Characterization of nanofiltration membranes for the separation of aqueous dye-salt solutions. Desalination 89 (1992) 89-107
18. Van der Horst H.C., Timmer J.M.K., Robbertsen T., and Leenders J. Use of nanofiltration for concentration and demineralization in the dairy industry: model for mass transport. J. Membr. Sci. 104 (1995) 205-218
19. Li S.-L., Li C., Liu Y.-S., Wang X.-L., and Cao Z.-A. Separation of l-glutamine from fermentation broth by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 222 (2003) 191-201
20. Hagmeyer G., and Gimbel R. Modeling the salt rejection of NF membranes for ternary ion mixtures and single salts at different pH values. Desalination 117 (1998) 247-256
21. Paugam L., Taha S., Dorange G., Jaouen P., and Quéméneur F. Mechanisms of nitrate ions transfer in nanofiltration depending on pressure, pH, concentration and medium composition. J. Membr. Sci. 231 (2004) 37-46
22. Deshmukh S., and Childress A. Zeta potential of commercial RO membranes: influence of source water type and chemistry. Desalination 140 (2001) 87-95
23. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 119 (1996) 253-268
24. Yaroshchuk A., and Ribitsch V. Role of channel wall conductance in the determination of ζ-potential from electrokinetic measurements. Langmuir 18 (2002) 2036-2038
25. Elimelech M., Chen W.H., and Waypa J.J. Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer. Desalination 95 (1994) 269-286
26. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J., and Nyström M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 265 (2005) 160-166
27. Wilbert M.C., Delagah S., and Pellegrino J. Variance of streaming potential measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 161 (1999) 247-261
28. Fievet P., Sbaï M., Szymczyk A., and Vidonne A. Determining the ζ-potential of plane membranes from tangential streaming measurements: effect of the membrane body conductance. J. Membr. Sci. 226 (2003) 227-236
29. Sbaï M., Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Sorin A., Vidonne A., Pellet-Rostaing S., Favre-Reguillon A., and Lemaire M. Influence of the membrane pore conductance on tangential streaming potential. Langmuir 19 (2003) 8867-8871
30. Werner C., Zimmermann R., and Kratzmüller T. Streaming potential and streaming current measurements at planar solid/liquid interfaces for simultaneous determination of zeta potential and surface conductivity. Colloids Surf. A 192 (2001) 205-213
31. Schweiss R., Welzel P.B., Werner C., and Knoll W. Dissociation of surface functional groups and preferential adsorption of ions on self-assembled monolayers assed by streaming potential measurements. Langmuir 17 (2001) 4304-4311
32. Brant J.A., Johnson K.M., and Childress A.E. Examining the electrochemical properties of a nanofiltration membrane with atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 276 (2006) 286-294
33. Bellona C., and Drewes J.E. The roles of membrane surface charge and solute physico-chemical properties in the rejection of organic acids by NF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 249 (2005) 227-234
34. Afonso M.D. Surface charge on loose nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 191 (2006) 262-272
35. Benavente J., Hernández A., and Jonsson G. Proper and adsorbed charges on the surfaces of the polysulfonic support of a composite membrane from electrokinetic phenomena. J. Membr. Sci. 80 (1993) 285-296
36. Hernández A., Martínez F., Martin A., and Prádanos P. Porous structure and surface charge density on the walls of microporous alumina membranes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 173 (1995) 284-296
37. Peeters J.M.M., Mulder M.H.V., and Strathmann H. Streaming potential measurements as a characterization method for nanofiltration membranes. Colloids Surf. A 150 (1999) 247-259
38. Afonso M.D., Hagmeyer G., and Gimbel R. Streaming potential measurements to assess the variation of nanofiltration membranes surface charge with the concentration of salt solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22-23 (2001) 529-541
39. Bird A.E., Bellis J.M., and Gasson B.C. Spectrophotometric assay of clavulanic acid by reaction with imidazole. Analyst 107 (1982) 1241-1245
40. Mänttäri M., Pihlajamäli A., Kaipainen E., and Nyström M. Effect of temperature and membrane pre-treatment by pressure on the filtration properties of nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 145 (2002) 81-86
41. Labbez C., Fievet P., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., and Pagetti J. Analysis of the salt retention of a titania membrane using the "DSPM" model; effect of pH, salt concentration and nature. J. Membr. Sci. 208 (2002) 315-329
42. Schnabel R., Langer P., and Breitenbach S. Separation of protein mixtures of a protein hydrolysate formula. J. Membr. Sci. 36 (1988) 55-66
43. Afonso M.D., and Pinho M.N. Mass transfer modelling for salt transport in amphoteric nanofiltration membranes. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 37 10 (1998) 4118-4127
44. 4 across an amphoteric nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 179 (2000) 137-154
45. Schaep J., and Vandecasteele C. Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 188 (2001) 129-136
46. Pauling L. The Nature of the Chemical Bond. third ed. (1960), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY p. 514
47. Waddington T.C. In: Emeléus H.J., and Sharpe A.G. (Eds). Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem. vol. 1 (1959), Academic Press, New York 180