Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 280, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 311-320

  Mänttäri, Mika ^a   Pihlajamäki, Arto ^a   Nyström, Marianne ^a  

^a LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Hydrophilicity; Ion and sugar retention; Nanofiltration; Retention pH dependency; Surface charge

Indexed keywords

FILTRATION; HYDROPHILICITY; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; NANOFILTRATION; PH EFFECTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ION AND SUGAR RETENTION; RETENTION PH DEPENDENCY; SALT RETENTION; SURFACE CHARGE;

ION EXCHANGE MEMBRANES;

SUGAR;

FILTRATION; HYDROPHILICITY; ION EXCHANGE MEMBRANES; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; NANOFILTRATION; PH EFFECTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ALKALINITY; ARTICLE; FILTRATION; HYDROPHILICITY; ION TRANSPORT; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; NANOFILTRATION; PH MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SODIUM RETENTION; WATER VAPOR; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 33745714107     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.01.034     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Szoke S., Patzay G., and Weiser L. Characteristics of thin-film nanofiltration membranes at various pH-values. Desalination 151 (2002) 123-129
2. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000) 3710-3716
3. 2 membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 379-389
4. Hagmeyer G., and Gimbel R. Modelling the rejection of nanofiltration membranes using zeta potential measurements. Sep. Purif. Technol. 15 (1999) 19-30
5. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 119 (1996) 253-268
6. Van der Bruggen B., Koninckx A., and Vandecasteele C. Separation of monovalent and divalent ions from aqueous solution by electrodialysis and nanofiltration. Water Res. 38 (2004) 1347-1353
7. Hagmeyer G., and Gimbel R. Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values. Desalination 117 (1998) 247-256
8. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S., and Williams P.M. Linearized transport model for nanofiltration: development and assessment. AIChE J. 48 (2002) 760-773
9. Mänttäri M., Pihlajamäki A., and Nyström M. Comparison of nanofiltration and tight ultrafiltration membranes in the filtration of paper mill process water. Desalination 149 (2002) 131-136
10. Ikeda K., Nakano T., Ito H., Kubota T., and Yamamoto S. New composite charged reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination 68 (1988) 109-119
11. Mänttäri M., and Nyström M. Critical flux in NF of high molar mass polysaccharides and effluents from paper industry. J. Membr. Sci. 170 (2000) 257-273
12. Bowen W.R., Doneva T.A., and Stoton J.A.G. The use of atomic force microscopy to quantify membrane surface electrical properties. Colloids Surf. A 201 (2002) 73-83
13. Fievet P., Sbaï M., Szymczyk A., and Vidonne A. Determining the ζ-potential of plane membranes from tangential streaming potential measurements: effect of the membrane body conductance. J. Membr. Sci. 226 (2003) 227-236
14. Brant J.A., Johnson K.M., and Childress A.E. Examining the electrochemical properties of a nanofiltration membrane with atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 276 1-2 (2006) 286-294
15. Sbaï M., Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Sorin A., Vidonne A., Pellet-Rostaing S., Favre-Reguillon A., and Lemaire M. Influence of the membrane pore conductance on tangential streaming potential. Langmuir 19 (2003) 8867-8871
16. Yaroshchuk A., and Ribitsch V. Role of channel wall conductance in the determination of ζ-potential from electrokinetic measurements. Langmuir 18 (2002) 2036-2038
17. A. Pihlajamäki, Electrochemical characterisation of filter media properties and their exploitation in enhanced filtration, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Research papers 70, Doctoral Dissertation, Lappeenranta, Finland, 1998 (92 pages).
18. Nyström M., Pihlajamäki A., and Ehsani N. Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 87 (1994) 245-256
19. Palacio L., Calvo J.I., Prádanos P., Hernándes A., Väisänen P., and Nyström M. Contact angles and external protein adsorption onto UF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 152 (1999) 189-201
20. Freger V., Gilron J., and Belfer S. TFC polyamide membranes modified by grafting of hydrophilic polymers: an FT-IR/AFM/TEM study. J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 283-292
21. V. Freger, A. Pihlajamäki, Y. Shabtai, J. Gilron, Distribution of fixed charge functional groups in the polyamide composite membranes, in: Supplementary Book of Abstracts, ICOM'02, Toulouse, France, 2002, p. 144.
22. Braghetta A., DiGiano F.A., and Ball W.P. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: pH and ionic strength effects. J. Environ. Eng. 123 (1997) 628-641
23. Xu Y., and Lebrun R.E. Investigation of the solute separation by charged nanofiltration membrane: effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type. J. Membr. Sci. 158 (1999) 93-104
24. Schaep J., and Vandecasteele C. Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 188 (2001) 129-136
25. Nyström M., Kaipia L., and Luque S. Fouling and retention of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 98 (1995) 249-262