Cross-country generalizability of the role of metacognitive knowledge in students' strategy use and Reading competence

Teachers College Record

Volumn 117, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Artelt, Cordula ^a   Schneider, Wolfgang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922441962     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Artelt, C. (2000). Strategisches Lernen [Strategic learning]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
3. Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Julius-McElvany, N., & Peschar, J. (2003). Learners for life. Student approaches to learning. Results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: OECD.
4. Artelt, C., Beinecke, A., Schlagmüller, M., & Schneider, W. (2009). Diagnose von Strategiewissen beim Textverstehen [Diagnosing knowledge of strategies in text comprehension]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 41, 96-103.
5. Artelt, C., & Neuenhaus, N. (2010). Metakognition und Leistung [Metacognition and performance]. In W. Bos, E. Klieme, & O. Köller (Eds.), Schulische Lerngelegenheiten und Kompetenzentwicklung (pp. 127-146). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
6. Artelt, C., Neuenhaus, N., Lingel, K., & Schneider, W. (2012). Entwicklung und wechselseitige Effekte von metakognitiven und bereichsspezifischen Wissenskomponenten in der Sekundarstufe [Development and reciprocal effects of metacognitive and domainspecific knowledge components in secondary school]. Psychologische Rundschau, 63(1), 18-25.
7. Artelt, C., Schiefele, U., & Schneider, W. (2001). Predictors of reading literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 363-384.
8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
9. Bempechat, J., Jimenez, N. V., & Boulay, B. A. (2002). Cultural-cognitive issues in academic achievement: New directions for cross-national research. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 117- 149). Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
10. Best, D. L., & Ornstein, P. A. (1986). Children's generation and communication of mnemonic organizational strategies. Developmental Psychology, 22, 845-853.
11. Borkowski, J. G., Milstead, M., & Hale, C. (1988). Components of children's metamemory: Implications for strategy generalization. In F. E. Weinert & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Memory development: Universal changes and individual differences (pp. 73-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Butler, D., Cartier, S.C., Schnellert, L, Gagnon, F. & Giammarino, M. (2011). Secondary students' self-regulated engagement in reading: Researching self-regulation as situated in context. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53, 73-105
14. Campione, J. C., & Armbruster, B. B. (1985). Acquiring information from texts: An analysis of four approaches. Thinking and learning skills. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (pp. 317-359). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Cavanaugh, J. C., & Perlmutter, M. (1982). Metamemory: A critical examination. Child Development, 53, 11-28.
16. Collins Block, C., & Pressley, M. (2002). (Eds.). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
17. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
19. Goswami, U. (2008). Cognitive development: The learning brain (2nd ed.). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
20. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
21. Heine, S. J., Lehmann, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794.
22. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
23. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. Kreutzer, M. A., Leonard, C., & Flavell, J. H. (1975). An interview study of children's knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40(1), 1-60.
25. McNamara, D. S. (Ed.). (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. National Reading Panel (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
27. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 125-141). New York, NY: Academic Press.
28. OECD. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life. First results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: OECD.
29. OECD. (2010a). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science. Paris, France: OECD.
30. OECD. (2010b). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn. Student engagement, strategies and practices. Paris, France: OECD.
31. OECD. (2012). PISA 2009 [Technical report]. Paris, France: OECD.
32. Paris, S. G., & Byrnes, J. (1989). The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice (pp. 169-200). New York, NY: Springer.
33. Paris, S. G., & Stahl, S. (2005). Children's reading comprehension and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Perry, N. E., & Winne, P. H. (2006). Learning from learning kits: gStudy traces of students' self-regulated engagements with computerized content. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 211-228
35. Pieschl, S. (2007). To calibrate or not to calibrate? Conditions and processes of metacognitive calibration during hypermedia learning (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Münster, Germany). Retrieved from urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-14569461694
36. Pintrich, P. R., (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219-225.
37. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: NCRIPTAL, The University of Michigan.
38. Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension strategies instruction. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 11-27). New York: Guilford Press.
39. Schlagmüller, M., & Schneider, W. (2007). WLST 7-12. Würzburger Lesestrategie Wissenstest für die Klassen 7 bis 12 [Wurzburg knowledge of reading strategies test for Grades 7 to 12]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
40. Schneider, W. (2010). Metacognition and memory development in childhood and adolescence. In H. Salatas Waters & W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction (pp. 54-81). New York: Guilford Press.
41. Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42, 149-16.
42. Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2008). Procedural metacognition in children: Evidence for developmental trends. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), A handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 391-410). New York: Psychology Press.
43. Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.
45. Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997) Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol. 1: Theory and method (pp. 257-300). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
46. Weinstein, C. E. (1987). Learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing Company.
47. Wild, K.-P., Schiefele, U., & Winteler, A. (1992). LIST: Ein Verfahren zur Erfassung von Lernstrategien im Studium [A procedure for assessing study learning strategies]. In A. Krapp (Ed.), Arbeiten zur empirischen Pädagogik und pädagogischen Psychologie (Vol. 20). Neubiberg, Germany: Gelbe Reihe.
48. Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 267-276.
49. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.