Predictors of reading literacy

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 363-383

  Artelt, Cordula ^a   Schiefele, Ulrich ^b   Schneider, Wolfgang ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035438374     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03173188     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alexander, P.A., Kulikowich, J.M, & Jetton, T.L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64, 201-252.
2. Alexander, P.A., Murphy, P.K., Woods, B.S., Duhon, K.E., & Parker, D. (1997). College instruction and concomitant changes in students' knowledge, interest, und strategy use: A study of domain learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 125-146.
3. Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-293). New York: Longman.
4. Artelt, C. (2000). Strategisches Lernen. Münster: Waxmann.
5. Asendorpf, J. (1990). Die differentielle Sichtweise in der Psychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
6. Baker, L., & Brown, A.L. (1984a). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language and the structure of prose (pp. 21-44). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
7. Baker, L., & Brown, A.L. (1984b). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P.D. Pearson, M. Kamil, R. Barr, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
8. Bergin, D.A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest, Educational Psychologist, 34, 87-98.
9. Bjorklund, D.F. (1987). How age changes in the knowledge base contribute to the development of children's memory: An interpretive review. Developmental Review, 7, 93-130.
10. Bjorklund, D.F., & Schneider, W. (1996). The interaction of knowledge, aptitudes, and strategies in children's memory performance. In H.W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (vol. 26, pp. 59-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Borkowski, J.G., Milstead, M., & Hale, C. (1988). Components of children's metamemory: Implications for strategy generalization. In F.E. Weinert & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Memory development: Universal changes and individual differences (pp. 73-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Britton, B.K., & Graesser, A.C. (1996). Models of understanding text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Brown, A.L., Bransford, J.D., Ferrara, R.A., & Campione, J.C. (1933). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J.H. Flavell & E.M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognitive development (pp. 77-166). New York: Wiley.
14. Chi, M.T.H., & Ceci, S.J. (1987). Content knowledge: Its role, representation, and restructuring in memory development. In H.W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (vol. 20, pp. 91-142). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15. Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Towards a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 6, 159-176.
16. Deci, E.L. (1998). The relation of interest to motivation and human needs - The self-determination theory viewpoint. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning (pp. 146-162). Kiel: Institute for Science Education, University of Kiel.
17. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
18. Dochy, F.J.R.C. (1996). Assessment of domain-specific and domain-transcending prior knowledge: Entry assessment and the use of profile analysis. In M. Birenbaum & F.J.R.C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 227-264). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
19. Dochy, F.J.R.C., & Alexander, P.A. (1995). Mapping prior knowledge: A framework for discussion among researchers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 225-242.
20. Elley, W.B. (1992). How in the world do students read? IEA Study of reading literacy. Amsterdam: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
21. Elley, W.B. (1994). The IEA study of reading literacy: Achievement and instruction in thirty-two school systems. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
22. Ericsson, K.A. (Ed.). (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and science, sports and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Ericsson, K.A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
24. Flavell, J.H., & Wellman, H.M. (1977). Metamemory. In R.V. Kail Jr. & W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on development of memory and cognition (pp. 3-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Fletcher, C.R. (1986). Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 43-58.
27. Folds, T.F., Footo, M.M., Guttentag, R.E., & Ornstein, P.A. (1990). When children mean to remember: Issues of context specificity, strategy effectiveness, and intentionality in the development of memory. In D.F. Bjorklund (Ed.), Children's strategies: Contemporary views of cognitive development (pp. 67-91). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Garner, R., & Alexander, P.A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143-158.
29. Goldman, S. (1997). Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes, 23, 357-398.
30. Graesser, A.C., Hoffman, N.L., & Clark, L.F. (1980). Structural components of reading times. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 131-151.
31. Hasselhorn, M. (1995). Beyond production deficiency and utilization inefficiency: Mechanisms of the emergence of strategic categorization in episodic memory tasks. In F.E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Utilization deficiencies in the development of memory strategies (pp. 141-159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549-571.
33. Jacobs, J.E., & Paris, S.G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 225-178.
34. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
35. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
37. Kirsch, I.S., & Mosenthal, P.B. (1994). Interpreting the IEA reading literacy scales. In M. Binkley, K. Rust, & M. Winglee (Eds.), Methodological issues in comparative educational studies: The case of the IEA reading literacy study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics.
38. Kirsch, I.S., Jungblut, A., & Mosenthal, P.B. (1998). The measurement of adult literacy. In T.S. Murray, I.S. Kirsch, & L. Jenkins (Eds.), Adult literacy in OECD countries: Technical report on the first International Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
39. Köller, O., Baumert, J., & Schnabel, K. (2000). Zum Zusammenspiel von schulischem Interesse und Lernen im Fach Mathematik: Längsschnittanalysen in den Sekundarstufen I und II. In U. Schiefele & W.-P. Wild (Eds.), Interesse und Lernmotivation. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung, Förderung und Wirkung (pp. 163-181). Münster: Waxmann.
40. Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K.A. (1992). Interest, learning and development. In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Kurtz, B.E., & Borkowski, J.G. (1984). Children's metacognition: Exploring relations among knowledge, process, and motivational variables. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 335-354.
42. Larkin, J.H. (1989). What kind of knowledge transfer? In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 283-305). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Lehmann, R.H., Peek, R., Pieper, I., & Stritzky, R. von (1995). Leseverständnis und Lesegewohnheiten deutscher Schüler und Schülerinnen. Weinheim: Beltz.
44. Lehtinen, E. (1992). Lern-und Bewältigungsstrategien im Unterricht. In H. Mandl & H.F. Friedrich (Eds.), Lern-und Denkstrategien (pp. 125-149). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
45. Minnaert, A., & Janssen, P.J. (1995). How general are the effects of domain-specific prior knowledge on study expertise as compared to general thinking skills? In M. Birenbaum & F.J.R.C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 265-281). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
46. O'Neil, H.J., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 234-245.
47. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
48. Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857-867.
50. Pressley, M., Harris, K.R., & Marks, M.B. (1992). But good strategy instructors are constructivists. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 3-21.
51. Pressley, M., Wood, E., & Woloshyn, V. (1990). Elaborative interrogation and facilitation of fact learning: Why having a knowledge base is one thing and using it is quite another. In W. Schneider & F.E. Weinert (Eds.), Interactions among aptitudes, strategies, and knowledge in cognitive performance (pp. 200-221). New York: Springer.
52. Renninger, K.A. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 361-196). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Reusser, K. (1994). Die Rolle von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern neu denken. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 1, 19-37.
54. Schiefele, U. (1996). Motivation und Lernen mit Texten. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
55. Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257-280.
56. Schiefele, U. (2001). The role of interest in motivation and learning. In J.M. Collis & S. Messick (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap in theory and measurement (pp. 163-193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Schiefele, U., & Krapp, A. (1996). Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 141-160.
58. Schiefele, U., & Schreyer, I. (1994). Intrinsische Lernmotivation und Lernen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 8, 1-13.
59. Schlagmüller, M., & Schneider, W. (1999). Metacognitive knolwedge about text processing: A questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Würzburg.
60. Schneider, W. (1989). Zur Entwicklung des Meta-Gedächtnisses bei Kindern. Bern: Huber.
61. Schneider, W. (1999). The development of metamemory in children. In D. Gopher, A. Koriat et al. (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. Attention and performance (pp. 487-514). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Schneider, W. (2001). Giftedness, expertise, and (exceptional) performance: A developmental perspective. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks, R.J. Sternberg, & R.F. Subowik (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent. London: Elsevier Science.
63. th ed., pp. 467-521). New York: Wiley.
64. Schneider, W., & Bjorklund, D.F. (in press). Memory and knowledge development. In J. Valsiner & K. Connolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology, London: Sage.
65. Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Schneider, W., & Weinert, P.E. (1990). The role of knowledge, strategies, and aptitudes in cognitive performance: Concluding comments. In W. Schneider & F.E. Weinert (Eds.), Interactions among aptitudes, strategies, and knowledge in cognitive performance (pp. 286-302). New York: Springer.
67. Siegler, R.S. (1990). How content knowledge, strategies, and individual differences interact to produce strategy choices. In W. Schneider & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), Interactions among aptitudes, strategies, and knowledge in cognitive performance (pp. 73-89). New York: Springer.
68. Thorndike, R.L. (1973). Reading comprehension education in fifteen countries. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
69. van Kraayenoord, C.E., & Schneider, W.E. (1999). Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self-concept and interest: A study of German students in grades 3 and 4. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 305-324.
70. van Oostendorp, H., & Goldman, S.R. (Eds.). (1999). The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Wimmer, H., & Tornquist, K. (1980). The role of metamemory and metamemory activation in the development of mnemonic performance. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 3, 71-81.
72. Winne, P.H., & Perry, N.E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self regulation (pp. 531-566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
73. Wu, M.L., Adams, R.J., & Wilson M.R. (1998). ACER ConQuest: Generalized item response modeling software manual. Melbourne: The Australian Council for Educational Research.