'Employees response to corporate social responsibility: Exploring the role of employees' collectivist orientation'

European Management Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 916-927

  Farooq, Mariam ^a   Farooq, Omer ^b   Jasimuddin, Sajjad M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAHORE   (Pakistan)

^b KEDGE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

Author keywords

Collectivism; Corporate social responsibility; Employees' knowledge sharing behavior; Organizational identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922433363     PISSN: 02632373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2014.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Aberson C.L., Healy M., Romero V. Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2000, 4:157-173.
2. Albinger H.S., Freeman S.J. Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics 2000, 28:243-253.
3. Allen N.J., Meyer J.P. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology 1990, 63:1-18.
4. Ashforth B.E., Harrison S.H., Corley K.G. Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of management 2008, 34:325.
5. Ashforth B.E., Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review 1989, 14:20-39.
6. Backhaus K.B., Stone B.A., Heiner K. Exploringthe relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society 2002, 41:292-318.
7. Bartel C.A. Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members' organizational identity and identification. Administrative Science Quarterly 2001, 46:379-413.
8. Bentler P.M., Speckart G. Models of attitude-behavior relations. Psychological Review 1979, 86:452.
9. Brammer S., Millington A., Rayton B. The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 2007, 18:1701-1719.
10. Branco M.C., Rodrigues L.L. Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 2006, 69:111-132.
11. Carmeli A., Gilat G., Waldman D.A. The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies 2007, 44:972-992.
12. Carroll A.B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 1979, 4:497-505.
13. Carroll A.B. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 1991, 34:39-48.
14. Cohen, J. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16:297-334.
16. Cropanzano R., Mitchell M.S. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management 2005, 31:874-900.
17. Dahlsrud A. How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2008, 15:1-13.
18. Datta D.K., Guthrie J.P., Wright P.M. Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter?. Academy of Management Journal 2005, 48:135-145.
19. Dorfman P.W., Howell J.P. Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management 1988, 3.
20. Dutton J.E., Dukerich J.M., Harquail C.V. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly 1994, 39:239-263.
21. Epitropaki O., Martin R. The moderating role of individual differences in the relation between transformational/transactional leadership perceptions and organizational identification. The Leadership Quarterly 2005, 16:569-589.
22. Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science 2000, 46:1554-1568.
23. Farooq O., Payaud M., Merunka D., Valette-Florence P. The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics 2013, 1-18.
24. Fombrun C., Shanley M. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 1990, 33:233-258.
25. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18:382-388.
26. Fryxell G.E., Jia W. The fortune corporate 'reputation' index: Reputation for what?. Journal of management 1994, 20:1-14.
27. Fuller J.B., Hester K., Barnett T., Frey L., Relyea C., Beu D. Perceived external prestige and internal respect: New insights into the organizational identification process. Human Relations 2006, 59:815.
28. Garriga E., Melé D. Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics 2004, 53:51-71.
29. Glavas A., Godwin L. Is the perception of 'goodness' good enough? Exploring the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee organizational identification. Journal of Business Ethics 2013, 114:15-27.
30. Göbbels M. Reframing corporate social responsibility: The contemporary conception of a fuzzy notion 2002, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
31. Greening D.W., Turban D.B. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society 2000, 39:254-280.
32. Henderson D. Misguided virtue false notions of corporate social responsibility 2001, New Zealand Business Roundtable, The Terrace, Wellington, New Zealand.
33. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5): Sage Publications, Incorporated.
34. Hogg M.A., Terry D.J. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. The Academy of Management Review 2000, 25:121-140.
35. Iacobucci D., Saldanha N., Deng X. A meditation on mediation: Evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2007, 17:139.
36. Jasimuddin S.M. Exploring knowledge transfer mechanisms: The case of a UK-based group within a high-tech global corporation. International Journal of Information Management 2007, 27:294-300.
37. Jasimuddin S.M., Connell N., Klein J.H. What motivates organisational knowledge transfer? Some lessons from a UK-based multinational. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management 2006, 5:165-171.
38. Jasimuddin S.M., Connell C., Klein J.H. Knowledge transfer frameworks: an extension incorporating knowledge repositories and knowledge administration. Information Systems Journal 2012, 22:195-209.
39. Kim H.R., Lee M., Lee H.T., Kim N.M. Corporate social responsibility and employee-company identification. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 95:557-569.
40. Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, (Methodology in the social sciences).
41. Kramer R.M. Social capital and cooperative behavior in the workplace: A social identity perspective. Advances in Group Processes 2006, 23:1-30.
42. Luo X., Bhattacharya C. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing 2006, 70:1-18.
43. Mael F., Ashforth B.E. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior 1992, 13:103-123.
44. Mael F., Ashforth B.E. Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology 1995, 48:309-333.
45. Maignan I., Ferrell O. Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics 2000, 23:283-297.
46. Maignan I., Ferrell O. Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: An investigation of French businesses. Journal of Business Research 2001, 51:37-51.
47. Maignan I., Ferrell O.C., Hult G.T.M. Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1999, 27:455-469.
48. Markus, H. & Oyserman, D. (1989). Gender and thought: The role of the self-concept. Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives, 100-127.
49. Matten D., Crane A. Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review 2005, 30:166-179.
50. Matten D., Moon J. " Implicit" and" explicit" CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review (AMR) 2008, 33:404-424.
51. McIntosh M., Thomas R., Leipziger D., Coleman G. Living Corporate Citizenship:Strategic Routes to Socially Responsible Business 2002, Financial Times / Pearson Education, London.
52. McWilliams A., Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 2001, 26:117-127.
53. Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R. (2007). Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity1. ajs, 113, 205-242.
54. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric theory 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York. 2nd ed.
55. Peterson D.K. The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business & Society 2004, 43:296.
56. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88:879-903.
57. Pratt M.G. To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. Identity in organizations, 171-208 1998, 171-208. Sage, CA. D.A. Whetton, P.C. Godfrey (Eds.).
58. Rego A., Leal S., Cunha M., Faria J., Pinho C. How the perceptions of five dimensions of corporate citizenship and their inter-inconsistencies predict affective commitment. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 94:107-127.
59. Rhoades L., Eisenberger R. Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology 2002, 87:698.
60. Riketta M. Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2005, 66:358-384.
61. Riordan C.M., Gatewood R.D., Bill J.B. Corporate image: Employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics 1997, 16:401-412.
62. Rupp D.E., Ganapathi J., Aguilera R.V., Williams C.A. Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: an organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2006, 27:537-543.
63. Sen S., Bhattacharya C. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 2001, 38:225-243.
64. Srivastava A., Bartol K.M., Locke E.A. Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal 2006, 49:1239.
65. Stites J.P., Michael J.H. Organizational commitment in manufacturing employees: relationships with corporate social performance. Business & Society 2011, 50:50.
66. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. The social identity theory of group behavior. Psychology of intergroup relations 1985, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. H. Tajfel (Ed.).
67. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism: Westview Press.
68. Triandis H.C., Bontempo R., Villareal M.J., Asai M., Lucca N. Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54:323-338.
69. Turban D.B., Greening D.W. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 1997, 40:658-672.
70. Turker D. How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics 2009, 89:189-204.
71. Tyler T.R. Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior 1999, 21:201-246.
72. Tyler T.R., Blader S.L. Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2002, 89:813-838.
73. Tyler T.R., Blader S.L. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2003, 7:349-361.
74. Valentine S., Fleischman G. Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics 2008, 77:159-172.
75. Van Knippenberg D., Sleebos E. Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2006, 27:571-584.
76. Verdeyen V., Put J., Van Buggenhout B. A social stakeholder model. International Journal of Social Welfare 2004, 13:325-331.
77. Vilanova M., Lozano J.M., Arenas D. Exploring the nature of the relationship between CSR and competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 2008, 87:57-69.
78. Waldman D.A., Siegel D.S., Javidan M. Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies 2006, 43:1703-1725.
79. Walsh G., Beatty S.E. Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: Scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2007, 35:127-143.
80. Wang C.L. Right appeals for the bright self Q: Connectedness-separateness self-schema and cross-cultural persuasion. Journal of Marketing Communications 2000, 6:205-217.
81. Wang C.L., Mowen J.C. The separateness connectedness self schema: Scale development and application to message construction. Psychology and Marketing 1997, 14:185-207.
82. WBCSD. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense. In (pp. 32). Geneva.
83. Werther Jr, W. B. & Chandler, D. (2010). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment: Sage.
84. Zanna M.P., Olson J.M., Fazio R.H. Attitude-behavior consistency: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980, 38:432.