Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: An investigation of French businesses

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 37-51

  Maignan, Isabelle ^a   Ferrell, O C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Business performance; Corporate citizenship; Employee commitment; French businesses

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041871024     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00042-9     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abbott WF, Monsen JR On the measurement of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage J. 22(3):1979;501-515.
2. Ackerman RW, Bauer RA Corporate Social Responsiveness. 1976;Reston Publishing, Reston.
3. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW Some methods for respecifying measurement models to obtain unidimensional construct measurement. J Mark Res. 19:1988;453-460. (November).
4. Armstrong JS, Overton TS Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res. 14:1977;396-402. (August).
5. Aupperle KE. An empirical inquiry into the social responsibilities as defined by corporations: an examination of various models and relationships. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Georgia, 1982.
6. Aupperle KE, Carroll AB, Hatfield JD An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Acad Manage J. 28(2):1985;46-463.
7. Barney J Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage. 17(1):1991;99-120.
8. Baucus MS, Baucus DA Paying the piper: a empirical examination of longer-term financial consequences of illegal corporate behavior. Acad Manage J. 40(1):1997;129-151.
9. Bowen HR Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. 1953;Harper & Row, New York.
10. Brown TJ, Dacin PA The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J Mark. 61:1997;68-84. (January).
11. Carroll AB A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad Manage Rev. 4(4):1979;497-505.
12. Carroll AB Corporate social performance measurement: a comment on methods for evaluating an elusive construct. Post LE Res Corp Soc Perform Policy. 12:1991;385-401.
13. Clarkson MBE Corporate social performance in Canada, 1976-1986. Res Corp Soc Perform Policy. 10:1988;241-265.
14. Clarkson MBE Defining, evaluating and managing corporate social performance: the stakeholder management model. Res Corp Soc Perform Policy. 12:1991;331-358.
15. Clarkson MBE A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manage Rev. 20(1):1995;92-117.
16. Cochran PL, Wood RA Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Acad Manage J. 27:1984;42-56.
17. Cooke RA, Burack EH Organizational culture and human resource management. Organizational Culture Inventory Leader's Guide. 1989;Human Synergistics, Plymouth. Appendix 3.1-3.36.
18. Cooke RA, Hartmann JL Interpreting the cultural styles measured by the OCI. Organizational Culture Inventory Leader's Guide. 1989;23-48 Human Synergistics, Plymouth.
19. Cooke RA, Rousseau DM Behavioral norms and expectations: a quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group Organ Stud. 13(3):1988;245-273.
20. Davidson WN, Worrell DL A comparison and test of the use of accounting and stock market data in relating corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Akron Bus Econ Rev. 21:1990;7-19.
21. Day GS The capabilities of market-driven organization. J Mark. 58:1994;37-52. (October).
22. Day GS Continuous learning about markets. Calif Manage Rev. 36:1994;9-31. (Summer).
23. Day GS, Wensley R Assessing advantage: a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. J Mark. 52:1988;1-20. (April).
24. Deshpandé R, Webster FE Jr. Organizational culture and marketing: defining the research agenda. J Mark. 53:1989;3-15. (January).
25. Dess GS, Robinson RB Jr. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures. Strategic Manage J. 5(3):1984;265-273.
26. Dick AS, Basu K Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework. J Acad Mark Sci. 22(2):1994;99-113.
27. Donaldson T, Preston LE The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Acad Manage Rev. 20(1):1995;65-91.
28. Drumwright ME Socially responsible organizational buying: environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. J Mark. 58:1994;1-19. (July).
29. Eilbirt H, Parket IR The practice of business - the current status of corporate social responsibility. Bus Horizons. 1973;5-14. (August).
30. Frederick WC. From CSR1 to CSR2 - the maturing of the business-and-society thought. Working Paper 279. Pittsburg: Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburg. Reproduced in Bus Soc 1978;33:150-64.
31. Graves SB, Waddock SA Acad Manage J. 37(5):1994;1034-1046.
32. Griffin JJ, Mahon JF The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Bus Soc. 36(1):1997;5-31.
33. Huber GP, Power DJ Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Manage J. 6:1985;171-180. (April-June).
34. Izraeli D, Schwontz M What we can learn from the federal sentencing guidelines for organizational ethics. J Bus Ethics. 1998;1045-1055. (July).
35. Jacoby J, Kyner DB Brand loyalty versus repeat purchase behavior. J Mark Res. 10:1973;1-9. (February).
36. Jaworski BJ, Kohli AK Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. J Mark. 57:1993;53-70. (July).
37. Jones TM Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economic. Acad Manage Rev. 20(2):1997;404-437.
38. Jones T Food works, good business. USA Today. 1B:1997;. (April 25).
39. Keller KL Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity. J Mark. 57(1):1993;1-22.
40. Kilman RH, Saxton MJ The Kilman-Saxton Culture-Gap Survey. 1983;Organizational Design Consultants, Pittsburgh.
41. Lemaitre F, Leparmentier A Les Appels de M. Chirac à l'Entreprise Citoyenne. Le Monde. 1995;. July 10, Entreprise.
42. Lewin AY, Sakano T, Stevens CU, Victor B Corporate citizenship in Japan: survey from Japanese firms. J Bus Ethics. 14(2):1995;83-101.
43. Mason CH, Perreault WD Jr. Collinearity, power and interpretation of multiple regression. J Mark Res. 28:1991;268-280. (August).
44. McGuire JB, Sundgren A, Schneeweis T Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Acad Manage J. 31(4):1988;854-872.
45. Menon A, Menon A Environmental marketing strategy: the emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. J Mark. 61:1997;51-67. (January).
46. Mowday R, Porter L, Steers S The measurement of organizational commitment. J Vocational Behav. 14:1979;224-247.
47. Narver JC, Slater SF The effect of market orientation on business profitability. J Mark. 1990;20-35. (October).
48. Nunnally JC Psychometric Theory. 2nd edn. 1978;McGraw-Hill, New York.
49. O'Reilly C III, Chatman J Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: the effects of compliance, identification and internalization on prosocial behavior. J Appl Psychol. 71(3):1986;492-499.
50. Pearce JA, Robbins DK, Robinson RB The impact of grand strategy and planning formality on financial performance. Strategic Manage J. 8:1987;125-134. (March-April).
51. Perret B, Roustang G L'Economie Contre la Société - Affronter la Crise de l'Intégration Sociale et Culturelle. 1993;Editions de Seuil, Paris.
52. Preston LE, O'Bannon DP The corporate social-financial performance relationship. Bus Soc. 36(4):1997;419-429.
53. Pritchard RD, Karasick BW The effects of organizational climate on managerial job performance and job satisfaction. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 9:1973;126-146.
54. Reynolds PD Organizational culture as related to industry, position and performance: a preliminary report. J Manage Stud. 23(3):1986;333-345.
55. Robin DP, Reidenbach RE Social responsibility, ethics and marketing strategy: closing the gap between concept and application. J Mark. 51:1987;44-58. (January).
56. Schein EH Coming to a new awareness of organization culture. Sloan Manage Rev. 1984;3-16. (Winter).
57. Schlegelmich BB, Robertson DC The influence of country and industry on ethical perceptions of senior executives in the US and Europe. J Int Bus Stud. 4:1995;879-881.
58. Sethi SP A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. Acad Manage Rev. 4(1):1979;63-74.
59. Smith C Corporate citizens and their critics. NY Times. 1996;11. (September 8).
60. Spencer BA, Taylor GS A within and between analysis of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Akron Bus Econ Rev. 18:1987;7-18.
61. Spicer BH Market risk, accounting data and companies' pollution control records. J Bus, Finance Account. 5:1980;67-83.
62. Stanwick PA, Stanwick SD The relationship between corporate social performance and organization size, financial performance and environmental performance: an empirical examination. J Bus Ethics. 17:1998;195-204.
63. Thomas AS, Simerly RL Academy of Management Best Paper, 55th Annual Meeting - Vancouver British Columbia. 1995;411-415 Omnipress, Madison, WI.
64. Ullman AA Data in search of theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure and economic performance of US firms. Acad Manage Rev. 10(3):1985;540-557.
65. Vance SC Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks? Manage Rev. 64(8):1975;19-24.
66. Vershoor CC Principles build profits; link between corporate social performance and financial and nonfinancial performance. Manage Account. 1997;160.
67. Victor B, Cullen JB The organizational bases of work climates. Adm Sci Q. 1988;101-125. (March).
68. Victor B, Cullen JB A theory and measurement of ethical climate in organizations. Greenberg BA, Bellenger DN Res Corp Soc Perform Policy. 1987;477-481 American Marketing Association, Chicago.
69. Waddock SE, Graves SB The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Manage J. 18(4):1997;303-319.
70. Wokutch RE, McKinney EW Behavioral and perceptual measures of corporate social performance. Res Corp Soc Perform Policy. 12:1991;309-330.
71. Wood D Corporate social performance revisited. Acad Manage Rev. 16(4):1991;691-718.
72. Xenikou A, Furnham A A correlational and factor analytic study of four questionnaire measures of organizational culture. Hum Relat. 49(3):1996;349-371.