A heritable switch in carbon source utilization driven by an unusual yeast prion

Genes and Development

Volumn 23, Issue 19, 2009, Pages 2320-2332

  Brown, Jessica C S ^a   Lindquist, Susan ^a,b  

^a WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Glucose repression; PMA1; Prion; STD1; Yeast

Indexed keywords

CELL MEMBRANE PROTEIN; FUNGAL PROTEIN; GLUCOSE; PRION PROTEIN; PROTEIN PMA1; PROTEIN STD1; PROTON PUMP; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CARBON SOURCE; CARBON UTILIZATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACHROMOSOMAL INHERITANCE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INDUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; YEAST; YEAST CELL;

CARBON; GENE EXPRESSION; GENES, FUNGAL; GLUCOSE; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MONOSACCHARIDE TRANSPORT PROTEINS; PHENOTYPE; PRIONS; PROTON-TRANSLOCATING ATPASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 70349612496     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1839109     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Aguzzi A, Heikenwalder M, Polymenidou M. 2007. Insights into prion strains and neurotoxicity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 552-561.
2. Alberti S, Halfmann R, King O, Kapila A, Lindquist S. 2009. A systematic survey identifies prions and illuminates sequence features of prionogenic proteins. Cell 137: 146-158.
3. +] form separate structures in yeast. J Biol Chem 279: 51042-51048.
4. Ball AJS, Wong DK, Elliott JJ. 1976. Glucosamine resistance in yeast. I. A preliminary genetic analysis. Genetics 84: 311-317.
5. Brachmann A, Baxa U, Wickner RB. 2005. Prion generation in vitro: Amyloid of Ure2p is infectious. EMBO J 24: 3082-3092. (Pubitemid 41486344)
6. Chen B, Newnam GP, Chernoff YO. 2007. Prion species barrier between the closely related yeast proteins is detected despite coaggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104: 2791-2796. (Pubitemid 46327958)
7. Chernoff YO, Derkach IL, Inge-Vechtomov SG. 1993. Multicopy SUP35 gene induces de-novo appearance of psi-like factors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 24: 268-270.
8. +]. Science 268: 880-884.
9. Chien P, Weissman JS, DePace AH. 2004. Emerging principles of conformation-based prion inheritance. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 617-656. (Pubitemid 39050382)
10. Conde J, Fink GR. 1976. A mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective for nuclear fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci 73: 3651-3655.
11. Courchesne WE, Magasanik B. 1988. Regulation of nitrogen assimilation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Roles of the URE2 and GLN3 genes. J Bacteriol 170: 708-713.
12. Coustou V, Deleu C, Saupe S, Begueret J. 1997. The protein product of the het-s heterokaryon incompatibility gene of the fungus Podospora anserina behaves as a prion analog. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94: 9773-9778. (Pubitemid 27408139)
13. Cox BS. 1965. PSI, a cytoplasmic suppressor of the super-suppressor in yeast. Heredity 20: 505-521.
14. +] prion in yeast. Genetics 165: 23-33.
15. Derkatch IL, Chernoff YO, Kushnirov VV, Inge-Vechtomov SG, Liebman SW. 1996. Genesis and variability of [PS1] prion factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 144: 1375-1386.
16. +] prion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147: 507-519.
17. +]: A two-prion system in yeast? EMBO J 19: 1942-1952.
18. +]. Cell 106: 171-182.
19. Du Z, Park K-W, Yu H, Fan Q, Li L. 2008. Newly identified prion linked to the chromatin-remodeling factor Swi1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet 40: 460-465.
20. Eisenkolb M, Zenzmaier C, Leitner E, Schneiter R. 2002. A specific structural requirement for ergosterol in long-chain fatty acid synthesis mutants important for maintaining raft domains in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 13: 4414-4428. (Pubitemid 35471195)
21. Eraso P, Cid A, Serrano R. 1987. Tight control of the amount of yeast plasma membrane ATPase during changes in growth conditions and gene dosage. FEBS Lett 224: 193-197.
22. +-ATPase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758: 164-170.
23. +] prion by guanidine hydrochloride is the result of Hsp104 inactivation. Mol Microbiol 40: 1357-1369.
24. Gaigg B, Timischl B, Corbino L, Schneiter R. 2005. Synthesis of sphingolipids with very long chain fatty acids but not ergosterol is required for routing of newly synthesized plasma membrane ATPase to the cell surface of yeast. J Biol Chem 280: 22515-22522. (Pubitemid 40827909)
25. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, Veronneau S, Dow S, Lucau-Danila A, Anderson K, Andre B, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418: 387-391. (Pubitemid 34826834)
26. +], a heritable prion-like factor of S. cerevisiae. Cell 89: 811-819.
27. Hockney RC, Freeman RF. 1980. Gratuitous catabolite repression by glucosamine of maltose utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol 121: 469-474.
28. Jones GW, Tuite MF. 2005. Chaperoning prions: The cellular machinery for propagating an infectious protein? Bioessays 27: 823-832.
29. Jung G, Masison DC. 2001. Guanidine hydrochloride inhibits Hsp104 activity in vivo: A possible explanation for its effect in curing yeast prions. Curr Microbiol 43: 7-10. (Pubitemid 32549917)
30. Kellis M, Birren BW, Lander ES. 2004. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428: 617-624. (Pubitemid 38524797)
31. Kim J-H, Polish J, Johnston M. 2003. Specificity and regulation of DNA binding by the yeast glucose transporter gene repressor Rgt1. Mol Cell Biol 23: 5208-5216. (Pubitemid 36950876)
32. Kim JH, Brachet V, Moriya H, Johnston M. 2006. Integration of transcriptional and posttranslational regulation in a glucose signal transduction pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 5: 167-173. (Pubitemid 43113462)
33. King C-Y, Diaz-Avalos R. 2004. Protein-only transmission of three yeast prion strains. Nature 428: 319-323. (Pubitemid 38418802)
34. Kryndushkin DS, Alexandrov IM, Ter-Avanesyan MD, Kushnirov VV. 2003. Yeast [PSI+] prion aggregates are formed by small Sup35 polymers fragmented by Hsp104. J Biol Chem 278: 49636-49643.
35. Kunz BA, Ball AJ. 1977. Glucosamine resistance in yeast II: Cytoplasmic determinants conferring resistance. Mol Gen Genet 153: 169-177.
36. Lacroute F. 1971. Non-mendelian mutation allowing ureidosuccinic acid uptake in yeast. J Bacteriol 106: 519-522.
37. Lakshmanan J, Mosley A, Özcan S. 2003. Repression of transcription by Rgt1 in the absence of glucose requires Std1 and Mth1. Curr Genet 44: 19-25. (Pubitemid 37265827)
38. Lecchi S, Allen KE, Pardo JP, Mason AB, Slayman CW. 2005. Conformational changes of yeast plasma membrane H(+)- ATPase during activation by glucose: Role of threonine- 912 in the carboxy-terminal tail. Biochem 44: 16624-16632. (Pubitemid 43000569)
39. +-ATPase leads to glucose-dependent activation. J Biol Chem 282: 35471-35481.
40. +- ATPase Pma1p in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 277: 22395-22401.
41. Leonardo B, Aaron R, Gerald M, Joshua L. 2002. The FLEXGene repository: Exploiting the fruits of the genome projects by creating a needed resource to face the challenges of the post-genomic era. Arch Med Res 33: 318-324.
42. Maddelein M-L, Dos Reis S, Duvezin-Caubet S, Coulary-Salin B, Saupe SJ. 2002. Amyloid aggregates of the HET-s prion protein are infectious. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99: 7402-7407. (Pubitemid 34568703)
43. Masison DC, Wickner RB. 1995. Prion-inducing domain of yeast Ure2p and protease resistance of Ure2p in prion-containing cells. Science 270: 93-95.
44. Mazon MJ, Eraso P, Portillo F. 2007. Efficient degradation of misfolded mutant Pma1 by endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation requires Atg19 and the Cvt/autophagy pathway. Mol Microbiol 63: 1069-1077. (Pubitemid 46184514)
45. +-ATPase. Labeling with a fluorescent malemide reveals a conformational change during glucose activation. J Biol Chem 277: 40981-40988.
46. Moriya H, Johnston M. 2004. Glucose sensing and signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the Rgt2 glucose sensor and casein kinase I. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 1572-1577. (Pubitemid 38234195)
47. Moriyama H, Edskes HK, Wickner RB. 2000. [URE3] prion propagation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Requirement for chaperone Hsp104 and curing by overexpressed chaperone Ydj1p. Mol Cell Biol 20: 8916-8922. (Pubitemid 32245922)
48. +-ATPase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1469: 133-157.
49. +] are diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102: 10575-10580.
50. Nemecek J, Nakayashiki T, Wickner RB. 2009. A prion of the yeast netacaspase homolog (Mca1p) detected by a genetic screen. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 1892-1896.
51. Ness F, Ferreira P, Cox BS, Tuite MF. 2002. Guanidine hydrochloride inhibits the generation of prion 'seeds' but not prion protein aggregation in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 22: 5593-5605.
52. Nevado J, Heredia CF. 1996. Galactose induces in Saccharomyces cerevisiae sensitivity of the utilization of hexose to inhibition by D-glucosamine. Can J Microbiol 42: 6-11. (Pubitemid 26072742)
53. Ohnishi G, Endo K, Doi A, Fujita A, Daigaku Y, Nunoshiba T, Yamamoto K. 2004. Spontaneous mutagenesis in haploid and diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 325: 928-933. (Pubitemid 39487961)
54. Oka M, Kimata Y, Mori K, Kohno K. 1997. Saccharomyces cerevisiae KAR2 (BiP) gene expression is induced by loss of cytosolic HSP70/Ssalp through a heat shock element-mediated pathway. J Biochem 121: 578-584. (Pubitemid 27145913)
55. +]: Infection with in vitro-made amyloid aggregates of Rnq1p-(132-405) induces [PIN+]. J Mol Biol 365: 773-782.
56. Patel BK, Gavin-Smyth J, Liebman SW. 2009. The yeast global transcriptional co-repressor protein Cyc8 can propagate as a prion. Nat Cell Biol 11: 344-349.
57. Patino MM, Liu J-J, Glover JR, Lindquist S. 1996. Support for the prion hypothesis for inheritance of a phenotypic trait in yeast. Science 273: 622-626. (Pubitemid 26262109)
58. +] determinant is mediated by oligomerization of the SUP35-encoded polypeptide chain release factor. EMBO J 15: 3127-3134.
59. Polish JA, Kim J-H, Johnston M. 2005. How the Rgt1 transcription factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated by glucose. Genetics 169: 583-594. (Pubitemid 40404296)
60. Prusiner SB. 1998. Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 13363-13383.
61. Rizet G. 1952. Les phenomenes de barrage chez Podospora anserina: Analyse genetique des barrages entre les souches s et S. Rev Cytol Biol Veg 13: 51-92.
62. Roberg KJ, Crotwell M, Espenshade P, Gimeno R, Kaiser CA. 1999. LST1 is a SEC24 homologue used for selective export of the plasma membrane ATPase from the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol 145: 659-672. (Pubitemid 29240846)
63. Santangelo GM. 2006. Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70: 253-282.
64. Santoso A, Chien P, Osherovich LZ, Weissman JS. 2000. Molecular basis of a yeast prion species barrier. Cell 100: 277-288. (Pubitemid 30064915)
65. Schmidt MC, McCartney RR, Zhang X, Tillman TS, Solimeo H, Wolfl S, Almonte C, Watkins SC. 1999. Std1 and Mth1 proteins interact with the glucose sensors to control glucose- regulated gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19: 4561-4571. (Pubitemid 29289494)
66. Serio TR, Cashikar AG, Kowal AS, Sawicki GJ, Moslehi JJ, Serpell L, Arnsdorf MF, Lindquist SL. 2000. Nucleated conformational conversion and the replication of conformational information by a prion determinant. Science 289: 1317-1321. (Pubitemid 30656041)
67. Serrano R. 1983. In vivo glucose activation of the yeast plasma membrane ATPase. FEBS Lett 156: 11-14.
68. 2+-ATPases. Nature 319: 689-693.
69. Shorter J, Lindquist S. 2004. Hsp104 catalyzes formation and elimination of self-replicating Sup35 prion conformer. Science 304: 1793-1797. (Pubitemid 38787894)
70. Shorter J, Lindquist S. 2005. Prions as adaptive conduits of memory and inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 6: 435-450. (Pubitemid 40733889)
71. Shorter J, Lindquist S. 2006. Destruction or potentiation of different prions catalyzed by similar Hsp104 remodeling activities. Mol Cell 23: 425-438. (Pubitemid 44128844)
72. Sondheimer N. 2000. "The identification of novel prion elements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae." PhD thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago.
73. Sondheimer N, Lindquist S. 2000. Rnq1: An epigenetic modifier of protein function in yeast. Mol Cell 5: 163-172. (Pubitemid 30105445)
74. Stansfield I, Jones KM, Kushnirov VV, Dagkesamanskaya AR, Poznyakovski AI, Paushkin SV, Nierras CR, Cox BS, Ter- Avanesyan MD, Tuite MF. 1995. The products of the SUP45 (eRF1) and SUP35 genes interact to mediate translation termination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 14: 4365-4373.
75. Sweeny EA, Shorter J. 2008. Prion proteostasis: Hsp104 meets its supporting cast. Prion 2: 135-140.
76. Tanaka M, Chien P, Naber N, Cooke R, Weissman JS. 2004. Conformational variations in an infectious protein determine prion strain differences. Nature 428: 323-328. (Pubitemid 38418803)
77. Ter-Avanesyan MD, Kushnirov VV, Dagkesamanskaya AR, Didichenko SA, Chernoff YO, Inge-Vechtomov SG, Smirnov VN. 1993. Deletion analysis of the SUP35 gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals two non-overlapping functional regions of the encoded protein. Mol Microbiol 7: 683-692. (Pubitemid 23090350)
78. Tipton KA, Verges KJ, Weissman JS. 2008. In vivo monitoring of the prion replication cycle reveals a critical role for Sis1 in delivering substrates to Hsp104. Mol Cell 32: 584-591.
79. Uptain SM, Lindquist S. 2002. Prions as protein-based genetic elements. Annu Rev Microbiol 56: 703-741.
80. Werner-Washburne M, Stone DE, Craig EA. 1987. Complex interactions among members of an essential subfamily of hsp70 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 7: 2568-2577.
81. Wickner RB. 1994. [URE3] as an altered URE2 protein: Evidence for a prion analog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 264: 566-569.
82. Wickner RB, Edskes HK, Ross ED, Pierce MM, Baxa U, Brachmann A, Shewmaker F. 2004. Prion genetics: New rules for a new kind of gene. Annu Rev Genet 38: 681-707. (Pubitemid 40013741)