Understanding the structural basis for controlling chromosome division

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 373, Issue 2036, 2015, Pages

  Barford, David ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaphase promoting complex or cyclosome; Cell cycle; Chromosome division

Indexed keywords

CELL PROLIFERATION; CHROMOSOMES; CRYSTAL ATOMIC STRUCTURE; PROTEINS;

ANAPHASE-PROMOTING COMPLEXES; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIVISION CYCLE; CRYO-ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CYCLOSOME; MACROMOLECULAR COMPLEXES; REGULATORY PROTEIN; SUBSTRATE RECOGNITION;

COORDINATION REACTIONS;

ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; PROTEASOME;

ANIMAL; CELL CYCLE; CHROMOSOME; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; DIMERIZATION; HUMAN; MITOSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; UBIQUITINATION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ANAPHASE-PROMOTING COMPLEX-CYCLOSOME; ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CHROMOSOMES; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DIMERIZATION; HUMANS; MITOSIS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84921813034     PISSN: 1364503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2013.0392     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Santaguida S, Musacchio A. 2009 The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 28, 2511-2531. (doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.173)
2. Maresca TJ, Salmon ED. 2010 Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal. J. Cell Sci. 123, 825-835. (doi:10.1242/jcs.064790)
3. Foley EA, Kapoor TM. 2013 Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 25-37. (doi:10.1038/nrm3494)
4. Rago F, Cheeseman IM. 2013 Review series: the functions and consequences of force at kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 200, 57-65. (doi:10.1083/jcb.201211113)
5. Nishino T, Rago F, Hori T, Tomii K, Cheeseman IM, Fukagawa T. 2013 CENP-T provides a structural platform for outer kinetochore assembly. EMBO J. 32, 24-36. (doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.348)
6. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. 2007 The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 79-93. (doi:10.1038/nrm2163)
7. Jia L, Kim S, Yu H. 2013 Tracking spindle checkpoint signals from kinetochores to APC/C. Trends Biochem. Sci. 38, 2-11. (doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2013.03.004)
8. Lara-Gonzalez P, Westhorpe FG, Taylor SS. 2012 The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 22, R966-R980. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.006)
9. Jordan MA, Wilson L. 2004 Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 53-65. (doi:10.1038/nrc1317)
10. Dumontet C, Jordan MA. 2010 Microtubule-binding agents: a dynamic field of cancer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 790-803. (doi:10.1038/nrd3253)
11. Barford D. 2011 Structural insights into anaphase-promoting complex function and mechanism. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 3605-3624. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0069)
12. Pines J. 2011 Cubism and the cell cycle: the many faces of the APC/C. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 427-438. (doi:10.1038/nrm3132)
13. Primorac I, Musacchio A. 2013 Panta rhei: the APC/C at steady state. J. Cell Biol. 201, 177-189. (doi:10.1083/jcb.201301130)
14. Glotzer M, Murray AW, Kirschner MW. 1991 Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature 349, 132-138. (doi:10.1038/349132a0)
15. King RW, Glotzer M, Kirschner MW. 1996 Mutagenic analysis of the destruction signal of mitotic cyclins and structural characterization of ubiquitinated intermediates. Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1343-1357. (doi:10.1091/mbc.7.9.1343)
16. Pfleger CM, Kirschner MW. 2000 The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes Dev. 14, 655-665.
17. Williamson A, Werner A, Rape M. 2013 The colossus of ubiquitylation: decrypting a cellular code. Mol. Cell 49, 591-600. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.028)
18. Schreiber A, Stengel F, Zhang Z, Enchev RI, Kong EH, Morris EP, Robinson CV, da Fonseca PCA, Barford D. 2011 Structural basis for the subunit assembly of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 470, 227-232. (doi:10.1038/nature09756)
19. Wendt KS, Vodermaier HC, Jacob U, Gieffers C, Gmachl M, Peters JM, Huber R, Sondermann P. 2001 Crystal structure of the APC10/DOC1 subunit of the human anaphase-promoting complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 784-788. (doi:10.1038/nsb0901-784)
20. Vodermaier HC, Gieffers C, Maurer-Stroh S, Eisenhaber F, Peters JM. 2003 TPR subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex mediate binding to the activator protein CDH1. Curr. Biol. 13, 1459-1468. (doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00581-5)
21. Kraft C, Vodermaier HC, Maurer-Stroh S, Eisenhaber F, Peters JM. 2005 The WD40 propeller domain of Cdh1 functions as a destruction box receptor for APC/C substrates. Mol. Cell 18, 543-553. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.04.023)
22. Thornton BR, Ng TM, Matyskiela ME, Carroll CW, Morgan DO, Toczyski DP. 2006 An architectural map of the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 20, 449-460. (doi:10.1101/gad.1396906)
23. Matyskiela ME, Morgan DO. 2009 Analysis of activator-binding sites on the APC/C supports a cooperative substrate-binding mechanism. Mol. Cell 34, 68-80. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.027)
24. Schwab M, Neutzner M, Mocker D, Seufert W. 2001 Yeast Hct1 recognizes the mitotic cyclin Clb2 and other substrates of the ubiquitin ligase APC. EMBO J. 20, 5165-5175. (doi:10.1093/emboj/20.18.5165)
25. Kimata Y, Baxter JE, Fry AM, Yamano H. 2008 A role for the Fizzy/Cdc20 family of proteins in activation of the APC/C distinct from substrate recruitment. Mol. Cell 32, 576-583. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.023)
26. Lupas A, Baumeister W, Hofmann K. 1997 A repetitive sequence in subunits of the 26S proteasome and 20S cyclosome (anaphase-promoting complex). Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 195-196. (doi:10.1016/S0968-0004(97)01058-X)
27. He J, Kulkarni K, da Fonseca PC, Krutauz D, Glickman MH, Barford D, Morris EP. 2012 The structure of the 26S proteasome subunit Rpn2 reveals its PC repeat domain as a closed toroid of two concentric alpha-helical rings. Structure 20, 513-521. (doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.12.015)
28. Mansfeld J, Collin P, Collins MO, Choudhary JS, Pines J. 2011 APC15 drives the turnover of MCC-CDC20 tomake the spindle assembly checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1234-1243. (doi:10.1038/ncb2347)
29. Foster SA, Morgan DO. 2012 The APC/C subunit Mnd2/Apc15 promotes Cdc20 autoubiquitination and spindle assembly checkpoint inactivation. Mol. Cell 47, 921-932. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.031)
30. Uzunova K et al. 2012 APC15 mediates CDC20 autoubiquitylation by APC/C(MCC) and disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1116-1123. (doi:10.1038/nsmb.2412)
31. Zhang Z, Roe SM, Diogon M, Kong E, El Alaoui H, Barford D. 2010 Molecular structure of the N-terminal domain of the APC/C subunit Cdc27 reveals a homo-dimeric tetratricopeptide repeat architecture. J. Mol. Biol. 397, 1316-1328. (doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.02.045)
32. Zhang Z, Kulkarni K, Hanrahan SJ, Thompson AJ, Barford D. 2010 The APC/C subunit Cdc16/Cut9 is a contiguous tetratricopeptide repeat superhelix with a homo-dimer interface similar to Cdc27. EMBO J. 29, 3733-3744. (doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.247)
33. Zhang Z, Chang L, Yang J, Conin N, Kulkarni K, Barford D. 2013 The four canonical TPR subunits of human APC/c form related homo-dimeric structures and stack in parallel to form a TPR suprahelix. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 4236-4248. (doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.04.004)
34. Chao WC, Kulkarni K, Zhang Z, Kong EH, Barford D. 2012 Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nature 484, 208-213. (doi:10.1038/nature10896)
35. Au SW, Leng X, Harper JW, Barford D. 2002 Implications for the ubiquitination reaction of the anaphase-promoting complex from the crystal structure of the Doc1/Apc10 subunit. J. Mol. Biol. 316, 955-968. (doi:10.1006/jmbi.2002.5399)
36. Zheng N et al. 2002 Structure of the Cul1-Rbx1-Skp1-F boxSkp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Nature 416, 703-709. (doi:10.1038/416703a)
37. Passmore LA et al. 2003 Doc1 mediates the activity of the anaphase-promoting complex by contributing to substrate recognition. EMBO J. 22, 786-796. (doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg084)
38. Carroll CW, Enquist-Newman M, Morgan DO. 2005 The APC subunit Doc1 promotes recognition of the substrate destruction box. Curr. Biol. 15, 11-18. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.066)
39. Carroll CW, Morgan DO. 2002 The Doc1 subunit is a processivity factor for the anaphase-promoting complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 880-887. (doi:10.1038/ncb871)
40. da Fonseca PC, He J, Morris EP. 2012 Molecular model of the human 26S proteasome. Mol. Cell 46, 54-66. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.026)
41. da Fonseca PC, Kong EH, Zhang Z, Schreiber A, Williams MA, Morris EP, Barford D. 2011 Structures of APC/C(Cdh1) with substrates identify Cdh1 and Apc10 as the D-box co-receptor. Nature 470, 274-278. (doi:10.1038/nature09625)
42. Choi E, Dial JM, Jeong DE, Hall MC. 2008 Unique D box and KEN box sequences limit ubiquitination of Acm1 and promote pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23 701-23 710. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M803695200)
43. Enquist-Newman M, Sullivan M, Morgan DO. 2008 Modulation of the mitotic regulatory network by APC-dependent destruction of the Cdh1 inhibitor Acm1. Mol. Cell 30, 437-446. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.004)
44. Ostapenko D, Burton JL, Wang R, Solomon MJ. 2008 Pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex by Acm1: regulation by proteolysis and Cdc28 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 4653-4664. (doi:10.1128/MCB.00055-08)
45. Burton JL, Xiong Y, Solomon MJ. 2011 Mechanisms of pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase promoting complex by Acm1. EMBO J. 30, 1818-1829. (doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.90)
46. He J, Chao WC, Zhang Z, Yang J, Cronin N, Barford D. 2013 Insights into Degron recognition by APC/C coactivators from the structure of an Acm1-Cdh1 Complex. Mol. Cell 50, 649-660. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.04.024)
47. Luo X et al. 2000 Structure of the Mad2 spindle assembly checkpoint protein and its interaction with Cdc20. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 224-229. (doi:10.1038/73338)
48. Luo X, Yu H. 2008 Protein metamorphosis: the two-state behavior of Mad2. Structure 16, 1616-1625. (doi:10.1016/j.str.2008.10.002)
49. Sironi L, Mapelli M, Knapp S, De Antoni A, Jeang KT, Musacchio A. 2002 Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 21, 2496-2506. (doi:10.1093/emboj/21.10.2496)
50. De Antoni A et al. 2005 The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 15, 214-225. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.038)
51. Burton JL, Solomon MJ. 2007 Mad3p, a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of APCCdc20 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Genes Dev. 21, 655-667. (doi:10.1101/gad.1511107)
52. King EM, van der Sar SJ, Hardwick KG. 2007 Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PLoS ONE 2, e342. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000342)
53. Sczaniecka M, Feoktistova A, May KM, Chen JS, Blyth J, Gould KL, Hardwick KG. 2008 The spindle checkpoint functions of Mad3 and Mad2 depend on a Mad3 KEN box-mediated interaction with Cdc20-anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C). J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23 039-23 047. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M803594200)
54. Herzog F, Primorac I, Dube P, Lenart P, Sander B, Mechtler K, Stark H, Peters J-M. 2009 Structure of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome interacting with a mitotic checkpoint complex. Science 323, 1477-1481. (doi:10.1126/science.1163300)