Centrosome dynamics as a source of chromosomal instability

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 65-73

  Nam, Hyun Ja ^a   Naylor, Ryan M ^b   van Deursen, Jan M ^a,b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b MAYO GRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Centrosome disjunction; Centrosome dynamics; Centrosome movement; Chromosomal instability

Indexed keywords

AURORA A KINASE; BETA CATENIN; CYCLIN B2; NEK2A PROTEIN; PHOSPHOPROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 1; POLO LIKE KINASE 1; PROTEIN; PROTEIN P53; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANAPHASE; CANCER CELL; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CENTRIOLE; CENTROSOME; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME; DEREGULATION; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; METAPHASE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMETAPHASE; REVIEW; ANIMAL; CELL CYCLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MOUSE; NEOPLASM; PATHOLOGY; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CENTROSOME; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; METAPHASE; MICE; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; NEOPLASMS; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

EID: 84921716770     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.10.002     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Ricke R.M., van Deursen J.M. Aneuploidy in health, disease, and aging. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 201:11-21.
2. Baker D.J., et al. Whole chromosome instability caused by Bub1 insufficiency drives tumorigenesis through tumor suppressor gene loss of heterozygosity. Cancer Cell 2009, 16:475-486.
3. Orr B., Compton D.A. A double-edged sword: how oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes can contribute to chromosomal instability. Front. Oncol. 2013, 3:164.
4. Zhang Y., et al. USP44 regulates centrosome positioning to prevent aneuploidy and suppress tumorigenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 2012, 122:4362-4374.
5. Nam H.J., van Deursen J.M. Cyclin B2 and p53 control proper timing of centrosome separation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16:538-549.
6. Kaseda K., et al. Dual pathway spindle assembly increases both the speed and the fidelity of mitosis. Biol. Open 2012, 1:12-18.
7. Silkworth W.T., et al. Timing of centrosome separation is important for accurate chromosome segregation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23:401-411.
8. Nigg E.A., Raff J.W. Centrioles, centrosomes, and cilia in health and disease. Cell 2009, 139:663-678.
9. Bettencourt-Dias M., Glover D.M. Centrosome biogenesis and function: centrosomics brings new understanding. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:451-463.
10. Nigg E.A. Centrosome duplication: of rules and licenses. Trends Cell Biol. 2007, 17:215-221.
11. Fukasawa K. Centrosome amplification, chromosome instability and cancer development. Cancer Lett. 2005, 230:6-19.
12. Salisbury J.L. Centrosomes: coiled-coils organize the cell center. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:R88-R90.
13. Mardin B.R., Schiebel E. Breaking the ties that bind: new advances in centrosome biology. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 197:11-18.
14. Nigg E.A., Stearns T. The centrosome cycle: centriole biogenesis, duplication and inherent asymmetries. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1154-1160.
15. Wang G., et al. The role of mitotic kinases in coupling the centrosome cycle with the assembly of the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Sci. 2014, Published online August 15, 2014. 10.1242/jcs.151753.
16. Gonczy P. Towards a molecular architecture of centriole assembly. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13:425-435.
17. Mayor T., et al. The centrosomal protein C-Nap1 is required for cell cycle-regulated centrosome cohesion. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 151:837-846.
18. Fry A.M. The Nek2 protein kinase: a novel regulator of centrosome structure. Oncogene 2002, 21:6184-6194.
19. Faragher A.J., Fry A.M. Nek2A kinase stimulates centrosome disjunction and is required for formation of bipolar mitotic spindles. Mol. Biol. Cell 2003, 14:2876-2889.
20. Mardin B.R., et al. Components of the Hippo pathway cooperate with Nek2 kinase to regulate centrosome disjunction. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:1166-1176.
21. Jackman M., et al. Human cyclins B1 and B2 are localized to strikingly different structures: B1 to microtubules, B2 primarily to the Golgi apparatus. EMBO J. 1995, 14:1646-1654.
22. Spalluto C., et al. Evidence for centriolar satellite localization of CDK1 and cyclin B2. Cell Cycle 2013, 12:1802-1803.
23. Yoshitome S., et al. The C-terminal seven amino acids in the cytoplasmic retention signal region of cyclin B2 are required for normal bipolar spindle formation in Xenopus oocytes and embryos. Mol. Cancer Res. 2003, 1:589-597.
24. Macurek L., et al. Polo-like kinase-1 is activated by aurora A to promote checkpoint recovery. Nature 2008, 455:119-123.
25. Mardin B.R., et al. Plk1 controls the Nek2A-PP1gamma antagonism in centrosome disjunction. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1145-1151.
26. Wu C.C., et al. p53 negatively regulates Aurora A via both transcriptional and posttranslational regulation. Cell Cycle 2012, 11:3433-3442.
27. Kaplan D.D., et al. Identification of a role for beta-catenin in the establishment of a bipolar mitotic spindle. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:10829-10832.
28. Bahmanyar S., et al. beta-Catenin is a Nek2 substrate involved in centrosome separation. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:91-105.
29. Graser S., et al. Cep68 and Cep215 (Cdk5rap2) are required for centrosome cohesion. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120:4321-4331.
30. Tanenbaum M.E., Medema R.H. Mechanisms of centrosome separation and bipolar spindle assembly. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:797-806.
31. Bertran M.T., et al. Nek9 is a Plk1-activated kinase that controls early centrosome separation through Nek6/7 and Eg5. EMBO J. 2011, 30:2634-2647.
32. Cahu J., et al. Phosphorylation by Cdk1 increases the binding of Eg5 to microtubules in vitro and in Xenopus egg extract spindles. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3936.
33. Gavet O., Pines J. Activation of cyclin B1-Cdk1 synchronizes events in the nucleus and the cytoplasm at mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189:247-259.
34. McCleland M.L., O'Farrell P.H. RNAi of mitotic cyclins in Drosophila uncouples the nuclear and centrosome cycle. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:245-254.
35. Gayek A.S., Ohi R. Kinetochore-microtubule stability governs the metaphase requirement for Eg5. Mol. Biol. Cell 2014, 25:2051-2060.
36. Tanenbaum M.E., et al. Dynein, Lis1 and CLIP-170 counteract Eg5-dependent centrosome separation during bipolar spindle assembly. EMBO J. 2008, 27:3235-3245.
37. Raaijmakers J.A., et al. Nuclear envelope-associated dynein drives prophase centrosome separation and enables Eg5-independent bipolar spindle formation. EMBO J. 2012, 31:4179-4190.
38. Toso A., et al. Kinetochore-generated pushing forces separate centrosomes during bipolar spindle assembly. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:365-372.
39. Khodjakov A., et al. Centrosome-independent mitotic spindle formation in vertebrates. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10:59-67.
40. Hinchcliffe E.H., et al. Requirement of a centrosomal activity for cell cycle progression through G1 into S phase. Science 2001, 291:1547-1550.
41. Rosenblatt J., et al. Myosin II-dependent cortical movement is required for centrosome separation and positioning during mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 2004, 117:361-372.
42. Basto R., et al. Flies without centrioles. Cell 2006, 125:1375-1386.
43. Silkworth W.T., Cimini D. Transient defects of mitotic spindle geometry and chromosome segregation errors. Cell Div. 2012, 7:19.
44. Lampson M.A., Cheeseman I.M. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:133-140.
45. Cimini D., et al. Aurora kinase promotes turnover of kinetochore microtubules to reduce chromosome segregation errors. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1711-1718.
46. Tanaka T.U., et al. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 2002, 108:317-329.
47. Maresca T.J., Salmon E.D. Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:373-381.
48. Uchida K.S.K., et al. Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:383-390.
49. Castillo A., et al. Overexpression of Eg5 causes genomic instability and tumor formation in mice. Cancer Res. 2007, 67:10138-10147.
50. Lu M.S., Johnston C.A. Molecular pathways regulating mitotic spindle orientation in animal cells. Development 2013, 140:1843-1856.
51. Lee C.Y., et al. Lgl, Pins and aPKC regulate neuroblast self-renewal versus differentiation. Nature 2006, 439:594-598.
52. Inaba M., Yamashita Y.M. Asymmetric stem cell division: precision for robustness. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 11:461-469.
53. Bergstralh D.T., St Johnston D. Spindle orientation: what if it goes wrong?. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014, 34C:140-145.
54. Du Q., Macara I.G. Mammalian Pins is a conformational switch that links NuMA to heterotrimeric G proteins. Cell 2004, 119:503-516.
55. Thery M., et al. The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:947-953.
56. Thery M., et al. Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation. Nature 2007, 447:493-496.
57. Fink J., et al. External forces control mitotic spindle positioning. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:771-778.
58. Wong C., Stearns T. Centrosome number is controlled by a centrosome-intrinsic block to reduplication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5:539-544.
59. Tsou M.F., et al. Polo kinase and separase regulate the mitotic licensing of centriole duplication in human cells. Dev. Cell 2009, 17:344-354.
60. Schockel L., et al. Cleavage of cohesin rings coordinates the separation of centrioles and chromatids. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:966-972.
61. Oliveira R.A., Nasmyth K. Cohesin cleavage is insufficient for centriole disengagement in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:R601-R603.
62. Cabral G., et al. Multiple mechanisms contribute to centriole separation in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:1380-1387.
63. Wang X., et al. sSgo1, a major splice variant of Sgo1, functions in centriole cohesion where it is regulated by Plk1. Dev. Cell 2008, 14:331-341.
64. Thein K.H., et al. Astrin is required for the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and centrosome integrity. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178:345-354.
65. Nakamura A., et al. Centrosomal Aki1 and cohesin function in separase-regulated centriole disengagement. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187:607-614.
66. Strnad P., Gonczy P. Mechanisms of procentriole formation. Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18:389-396.
67. Bettencourt-Dias M., et al. SAK/PLK4 is required for centriole duplication and flagella development. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:2199-2207.
68. Habedanck R., et al. The Polo kinase Plk4 functions in centriole duplication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:1140-1146.
69. Holland A.J., et al. Centriole duplication: a lesson in self-control. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:2731-2736.
70. Liu L., et al. Downregulation of polo-like kinase 4 in hepatocellular carcinoma associates with poor prognosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e41293.
71. Ko M.A., et al. Plk4 haploinsufficiency causes mitotic infidelity and carcinogenesis. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37:883-888.
72. van Breugel M., et al. Structures of SAS-6 suggest its organization in centrioles. Science 2011, 331:1196-1199.
73. Strnad P., et al. Regulated HsSAS-6 levels ensure formation of a single procentriole per centriole during the centrosome duplication cycle. Dev. Cell 2007, 13:203-213.
74. Leidel S., et al. SAS-6 defines a protein family required for centrosome duplication in C. elegans and in human cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:115-125.
75. Puklowski A., et al. The SCF-FBXW5 E3-ubiquitin ligase is regulated by PLK4 and targets HsSAS-6 to control centrosome duplication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1004-1009.
76. Tang C.J., et al. CPAP is a cell-cycle regulated protein that controls centriole length. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:825-831.
77. Hsu W.B., et al. Functional characterization of the microtubule-binding and -destabilizing domains of CPAP and d-SAS-4. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314:2591-2602.
78. D'Angiolella V., et al. SCF(Cyclin F) controls centrosome homeostasis and mitotic fidelity through CP110 degradation. Nature 2010, 466:138-142.
79. Wiese C., Zheng Y. Microtubule nucleation: gamma-tubulin and beyond. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119:4143-4153.
80. Lane H.A., Nigg E.A. Antibody microinjection reveals an essential role for human polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) in the functional maturation of mitotic centrosomes. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 135:1701-1713.
81. Hannak E., et al. Aurora-A kinase is required for centrosome maturation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 155:1109-1116.
82. Lens S.M., et al. Shared and separate functions of polo-like kinases and aurora kinases in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10:825-841.
83. Eyers P.A., et al. A novel mechanism for activation of the protein kinase Aurora A. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:691-697.
84. Tsai M.Y., et al. A Ran signalling pathway mediated by the mitotic kinase Aurora A in spindle assembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5:242-248.
85. De Luca M., et al. A functional interplay between Aurora-A, Plk1 and TPX2 at spindle poles: Plk1 controls centrosomal localization of Aurora-A and TPX2 spindle association. Cell Cycle 2006, 5:296-303.
86. Santamaria A., et al. The Plk1-dependent phosphoproteome of the early mitotic spindle. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10. M110 004457.
87. Lee K., Rhee K. PLK1 phosphorylation of pericentrin initiates centrosome maturation at the onset of mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 195:1093-1101.
88. Zhu H., et al. FAM29A promotes microtubule amplification via recruitment of the NEDD1-gamma-tubulin complex to the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183:835-848.
89. Smith E., et al. Differential control of Eg5-dependent centrosome separation by Plk1 and Cdk1. EMBO J. 2011, 30:2233-2245.
90. Kotak S., et al. Cortical dynein is critical for proper spindle positioning in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 199:97-110.
91. van Heesbeen R.G., et al. Nuclear envelope-associated dynein cooperates with Eg5 to drive prophase centrosome separation. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2013, 6:e23841.
92. Carter S.L., et al. A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:1043-1048.