Move your research from the Ivy tower to the board room: A primer on action research for academics, consultants, and business executives

Human Resource Management

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 151-174

  Zhang, Wenhong ^a   Levenson, Alec ^b   Crossley, Craig ^c  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Organizational change; Organizational development; Organizational effectiveness; Qualitative research methodology; Quantitative research methodology; Research methods and design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921652494     PISSN: 00904848     EISSN: 1099050X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21616     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Adler, N., & Docherty, P. (1998). Bringing business into sociotechnical theory and practice. Human Relations, 51, 319-345.
2. Amabile, T. M., & Conti, R. (1999). Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 630-640.
3. Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5-32.
4. Amabile, T. M., Sigal, G., Barsade, J., Mueller, S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367-403.
5. Argyris, C. (1996). Actionable knowledge: Design causality in the service of consequential theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 390-406.
6. Bartunek, J. M., Walsh, K., & Lacey, C. A. (2000). Dynamics and dilemmas of women leading women. Organization Science, 11, 589-610.
7. Beer, M. (2003). Why total quality management programs do not persist: The role of management quality and implications for leading a TQM transformation. Decision Sciences, 34, 623-642.
8. Beer, M., & Eisenstat, R. A. (1996). Developing an organization capable of implementing strategy and learning. Human Relations, 49, 597-619.
9. Bennis, W. G., & O'Toole, P. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96-104.
10. Benson, G., Finegold, D., & Mohrman, S. (2004). You paid for the skills, now keep them: Tuition-reimbursement and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 315-333.
11. Benson, G., & Pattie, M. (2009). The comparative roles of home and host supervisors in the expatriate experience. Human Resource Management, 48, 49-68.
12. Bradbury, H., & Lichtenstein, B. (2000). The space between: Operationalizing relationality in organizational research. Organization Science, 11, 551-564.
13. Church, A. H., & Oliver, D. H. (2006). The importance of taking action, not just sharing survey feedback. In A. Kraut (Ed.), Getting action from organizational surveys: New concepts, technologies and applications (pp. 102-130). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14. Church, A. H., & Waclawski, J. (Eds.). (2001). Designing and using organizational surveys: A seven-step process. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15. Coghlan, D. (2002). Interlevel dynamics in systematic action research. Systematic Practice and Action Research, 15, 273-283.
16. Cohen, D. J. (2007). The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource management: Reasons for the divide and concrete solutions for bridging the gap. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1013-1019.
17. Cohen, S. G., Chang, L., & Ledford, G. E. (1997). A hierarchical construct of self-management leadership and its relationship to quality of work life and perceived work group effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 50, 275-308.
18. Cohen, S. G., Ledford, G. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49, 643-676.
19. Crossley, C. D., Cooper, C. D., & Wernsing, T. S. (2013). Making things happen through challenging goals: Leader proactivity, trust, and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 540-549.
20. Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2009), Organization development and change. Independence, KY: Cengage Learning.
21. Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. S. (1990). Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial. Organization Science, 1, 1-9.
22. Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J. C., & Schuh, S. (1998). Job creation and destruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Drexler, J. A., & Lawler, E. E. (1977). A union-management cooperative project to improve the quality of work life. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13, 373-386.
24. Dunn, W. N., & Swiercze, F. W. (1977). Planned organizational change: Toward grounded theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13, 135-157.
25. Eden, C., & Huxham, C. (2006). Researching organizations using action research. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 388-408). London, UK: Sage.
26. Fendt, J., & Sachs, W. (2007). Grounded theory method in management research: Users' perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 430-455.
27. Finegold, D., Levenson, A., & Van Buren, M. (2005). Access to training and its impact on temporary workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(2), 1-19.
28. Finegold, D., Mohrman, S., & Spreitzer, G. (2002). Age effects on the predictors of technical workers' commitment and willingness to turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 655-674.
29. Foss, L., & Moldenæs, T. (2007). The engaged researcher-From translator to literary change agent. Systematic Practice and Action Research, 20, 27-39.
30. Fricke, W. (2006). General reflections on how to practice and train for action research. International Journal of Action Research, 2, 269-282.
31. George, E., Levenson, A., Finegold, D., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2010). Extra-role behaviors among temporary workers: How firms create relational wealth in the United States of America. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 530-550.
32. Gergen, K. J., & Thatchenkery, T.J. (1996). Organization science as a social construction: Postmodern potentials. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 356-377.
33. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 75-91.
34. Gibson, C. B. (2001). Me and us: Differential relationships among goal-setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 789-808.
35. Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209-226.
36. Gibson, C. B., Cooper, C., & Conger, J. (2009). Do you see what I see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 62-76.
37. Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451-495.
38. Gibson, C. B., & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 202-239.
39. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
40. Graham, M. E., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Gainsharing and women's and men's relative pay satisfaction. Journal of Organization Behavior, 20, 1027-1042.
41. Greenwood, D. J., Whyte, W. F., & Harkavy, I. (1993). Participatory action research as a process and as a goal. Human Relations, 46, 175-192.
42. Hambrick, D. C. (1994). What if the academy really mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19, 11-16.
43. Huff, A. S. (2000). Changes in organizational knowledge production. Academy of Management Review, 25, 288-293.
44. Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2007). Action research. In S. Clegg & J. Bailey (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organization studies (pp. 21-25). London, UK: Sage.
45. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2003). Researching organizational practice through action research: Case studies and design choices. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 383-403.
46. Jenkins, G. D., Jr., & Lawler, E. E., III. (1981). Impact of employee participation in pay plan development. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 111-128.
47. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 107-122.
48. Judge, T. A., & Welbourne, T. M. (1994). A confirmatory investigation of the dimensionality of the pay satisfaction questionnaire. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 461-466.
49. Kelemen, M., & Bansal, P. (2002). The conventions of management research and their relevance to management practice. British Journal of Management, 13, 97-108.
50. Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2009). Why the rigor-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 516-533.
51. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 187-208.
52. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). Enhancing the transfer of computer assisted training proficiency in geographically distributed teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 706-716.
53. Kraut, A. I. (2006). Getting action from organizational surveys: New concepts, technologies, and applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54. Latham, G. P. (2007). A speculative perspective on the transfer of behavioral science findings to the workplace: "The times they are a-changin'." Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1027-1032.
55. Lawler, E. E., III. (1985). Education, management style, and organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 38, 1-26.
56. Lawler, E. E., III, Mohrman, A. M., Mohrman, S. A., Ledford, G. E., & Cummings, T. G. (1985). Doing research that is useful for theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
57. Ledford, G. E., & Mohrman, S. A. (1993a). Looking backward and forward at action research. Human Relations, 46, 1349-1359.
58. Ledford, G. E., & Mohrman, S. A. (1993b). Self-design for high involvement: A large-scale organizational change. Human Relations, 46, 143-173.
59. Levenson, A. R., Van der Stede, W. A., & Cohen, S. G. (2006). Measuring the relationship between managerial competencies and performance. Journal of Management, 32, 360-380.
60. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34-46.
61. Liu, Y. (2008). Implementing and evaluating performance: Measurement initiative in public leisure facilities: An action research project. Systematic Practice and Action Research, 22, 15-30.
62. Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London, UK: Sage.
63. MacLean, D., MacIntosh, R., & Grant, S. (2002). Mode 2 management research. British Journal of Management, 13, 189-207.
64. Martin, P. Y., & Turner, B. A. (1986). Grounded theory and organizational research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 141-157.
65. Mintzberg, H. (1977). Policy as a field of management theory. Academy of Management Review, 2, 88-103.
66. Mirvis, P. H., & Lawler, E. E. (1977). Measuring the financial impact of employee attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 1-8.
67. Mohrman, S. A., Gibson, C. B., & Mohrman, A. M. (2001). Doing research that is useful to practice: A model and empirical exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 357-375.
68. Mohrman, S. A., Lawler, E. E., and Associates. (2011). Useful research: Advancing theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
69. Mohrman, S. A., Tenkasi, R. V., & Mohrman, A. M. (2003). The role of networks in fundamental organizational change: A grounded analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 301-323.
70. Nadler, D. A. (1977). Feedback and organization development: Using data-based methods (Prentice Hall Organization Development Series). Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
71. Noffke, S., & Somekh, B. (2009). The Sage handbook of action research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
72. Pasmore, W., & Friedlander, F. (1982). An action-research program for increasing employee involvement in problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 343-362.
73. Pasmore, W. A., & King, D. C. (1978). Understanding organizational change: A comparative study of multifaceted interventions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 14, 455-468.
74. Payne, G. T., Benson, G. S., & Finegold, D. L. (2009). Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 704-731.
75. Pelled, L. H., Ledford, G. E., & Mohrman, S. A. (2002). Demographic dissimilarity and workplace inclusion. Journal of Management Studies, 36, 1013-1031.
76. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1), 78-95.
77. Prell, C., Hubacek, K., Quinn, C., & Reed, M. (2008). Who's in the network? When stakeholders influence data analysis. Systematic Practice and Action Research, 21, 443-458.
78. Prince, J. B., & Lawler, E. E. (1986). Does salary discussion hurt the developmental performance appraisal? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 357-375.
79. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2006). The handbook of action research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
80. Rico, R., & Cohen, S. G. (2005). Effects of task interdependence and type of communication on performance in virtual teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 261-274.
81. Romme, A. G. L., & Endenburg, G. (2006). Construction principles and design rules in the case of circular design. Organization Science, 17, 287-297.
82. Rousseau, D. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as 'evidence-based management'? Academy of Management Review, 31, 256-269.
83. Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 475-515.
84. Rynes, S. L. (2007). Let's create a tipping point: What academics and practitioners can do, alone and together. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1046-1054.
85. Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340-355.
86. Rynes, S. L., Giluk, T. L., & Brown, K. G. (2007). The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 987-1008.
87. Schein, E. H. (2006). Clinical inquiry/research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 185-217). London, UK: Sage.
88. Shani, A. B., Mohrman, S. A, Pasmore, W. A., Stymne, B., & Adler, N. (2008). Handbook of collaborative management research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
89. Shotter, J. (2007). With what kind of science should action research be contrasted? International Journal of Action Research, 3(1+ 2), 65-92.
90. Spreitzer, G. M., Cohen, S. G., & Ledford, G. E. (1999). Developing effective self-managing work teams in service companies. Group and Organization Management, 24, 340-366.
91. Starkey, K., & Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of Management, 12(Special Issue), S3-S26.
92. Stebbins, M. W., & Snow, C. C. (1982). Processes and payoffs of programmatic action research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 69-86.
93. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
94. Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633-642.
95. Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 582-603.
96. Tenkasi, R. V., & Chesmore, M. C. (2003). Social networks and planned organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 281-300.
97. Tenkasi, R. V., & Hay, G. W. (2008). Following the second legacy of Aristotle: The scholar-practitioner as an epistemic technician. In A. Shani, S. Mohrman, W. Pasmore, B. Stymne, & N. Adler (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research (pp. 49-72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
98. Vickers, M. H. (2007). Reflections from an action researcher-Why we do what we do. International Journal of Action Research, 3(1+ 2), 168-189.
99. Viswanathan, M. (2012, June). Economic impact of category captaincy: An examination of assortments and prices (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Retrieved from http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/132030/1/Viswanathan_umn_0130E_12847.pdf
100. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
101. Wageman, R., & Gordon, F. (2005). As the twig is bent: How group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups. Organization Science, 16, 687-700.
102. Wageman, R., Hackman, J. R., & Lehman, E. V. (2005). Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 373-398.
103. Welbourne, T. M., Balkin, D. B., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1995). Gainsharing and mutual monitoring: A combined agency-organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 881-899.
104. Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure of performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 540-555.
105. Werr, A., & Greiner, L. (2008). Collaboration and the production of management knowledge in research, consulting, and management practice. In A. Shani, S. Mohrman, W. Pasmore, B. Stymne, & N. Adler (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research (pp. 93-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
106. Yorks, L., & Nicolaides, A. (2007). The role conundrums of co-inquiry action research: Lessons from the field. Systematic Practice and Action Research, 20, 105-116.
107. Zellmer-Bruhn, M., & Gibson, C. (2006). Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 501-518.