Perceptions of D.M.D. student readiness for basic science courses in the United States: Can online review modules help?

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-7

  Miller, C J ^a   Aiken, S A ^a   Metz, M J ^b  

^a University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental physiology; E learning; Educational technology; Graduate dental education; Multimedia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CURRICULUM; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL STUDENT; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; SCIENCE; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, PREDENTAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTION; SCIENCE; STUDENTS, DENTAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84921436659     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/eje.12094     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Humphrey SP, Mathews RE, Kaplan AL, Beeman CS. Undergraduate basic science preparation for dental school. J Dent Educ 2002: 66: 1252-1259.
2. Geissberger MJ, Jain P, Kluemper GT, et al. Realigning biomedical science instruction in predoctoral curricula: a proposal for change. J Dent Educ 2008: 72: 135-141.
3. Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: sound education method or hype? A Review of the Evaluation Literature. Acad Med 2002: 77: S86-S93.
4. Goldberg HR, McKhann GM. Student test scores are improved in a virtual learning environment. Adv Physiol Educ 2000: 23: 59-66.
5. McFarlin BK. Hybrid lecture-online format increases student grades in an undergraduate exercise physiology course at a large urban university. Adv Physiol Educ 2008: 32: 86-91.
6. Reed R. Streaming technology improves achievement. T.H.E. J 2003: 30: 7.
7. Woo MA, Kimmick JV. Comparison of Internet versus lecture instructional methods for teaching nursing research. J Prof Nurs 2000: 16: 132-139.
8. Smith W, Rafeek R, Marchan S, Paryag A. The use of video-clips as a teaching aide. Eur J Dent Educ 2011: 16: 91-96.
9. Kavadella A, Tsiklakis K, Vougiouklakis G, Lionarakis A. Evaluation of a blended learning course for teaching radiology to undergraduate dental students. Eur J Dent Educ 2012: 16: 88-95.
10. Rosenberg H, Grad HA, Matear DW. The effectiveness of computer-aided, self-instructional programs in dental education: a systematic review of the literature. J Dent Educ 2003: 67: 524-532.
11. Miller CJ. The physiology of receptors: a video. American Physiology Society Archive of Teaching Resources. 2013. Available at: http://www.apsarchive.org/resource.cfm?submissionID=7629 (accessed 21 October 2013).
12. Miller C, Metz M. The autonomic nervous system review module. MedEdPORTAL. 2013. Available at: www.mededportal.org/publication/9550 (accessed 21 October 2013).
13. Miller CJ. How hormones use G-protein signaling pathways: a video review of the basics. American Physiological Society Archive of Teaching Resources. 2012. Available at: http://www.apsarchive.org/resource.cfm?submissionID=6715 (accessed 8 January 2013).
14. Miller CJ. A collection of games and activities for the endocrine system: It CAN be fun! American Physiological Society Archive of Teaching Resources. 2012. Available at: http://www.apsarchive.org/resource.cfm?submissionID=6716 (accessed 15 January 2013).
15. University of Louisville Dental School, Admissions Requirements, from University of Louisville Dental School. Available at: http://louisville.edu/dental/students/dmd/admission (accessed 2 January 2013).
16. Jackson T, Hannum W, Koroluk L, Proffit W. Effectiveness of web-based teaching modules: test-enhanced learning in dental education. J Dent Educ 2011: 75: 775-781.
17. Tan PL, Hay DB, Whaites E. Implementing e-learning in a radiological science course in dental education: a short-term longitudinal study. J Dent Educ 2009: 73: 1202-1212.
18. Oblinger D. Boomers, Gen-Xers, & Millennials Understanding the New Students. Educause. 2003.
19. Hendricson WD, Panagakos F, Eisenberg E, et al. Electronic curriculum implementation at north american dental schools. J Dent Educ 2004: 68: 1041-1057.
20. Schonwetter D, Reynolds P. Discovering online learning barriers: survey of health educational stakeholders in dentistry. Eur J Dent Educ 2012: 17: 126-135.
21. Hillenburg KL, Cederberg RA, Gray SA, Hurst CL, Johnson GK, Potter BJ. E-learning and the future of dental education: opinions of administrators and information technology specialists. Eur J Dent Educ 2006: 10: 169-177.
22. American Physiological Society. Archive of Teaching Resources, from American Physiological Society. Available at: http://www.apsarchive.org/ (accessed 14 January 2013).
23. MedEdPORTAL/AAMC. Available at: http://mededportal.org/(accessed 9 January 2013).
24. Gough KC. Enhanced podcasts for teaching biochemistry to veterinary students. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2011: 39: 421-425.
25. Friedl R, Höppler H, Ecard K, et al. Multimedia driven teaching significantly improves students' performance during heart operations when compared to a print medium: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2006: 81: 1760-1766.
26. Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ 2001: 322: 40-44.
27. Dugdale D, Epstein R, Pantilat S. Time and the patient-physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med 1999: 14: 34-40.
28. Allers N. Teaching physiology to dental students: matching teaching and learning styles in a South African Dental School. J Dent Educ 2010: 74: 986-992.
29. Saylor CD, Keselyak NT, Simmer-Beck M, Tira D. Evaluation of social interaction, task management, and trust among dental hygiene students in a collaborative learning environment. J Dent Educ 2011: 75: 180-189.
30. Dantas AK, Shinagawa A, Deboni MC. Assessment of preclinical learning on oral surgery using three instructional strategies. J Dent Educ 2010: 74: 1230-1236.
31. Miller CJ, McNear J, Metz MJ. A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course. Adv Physiol Educ 2013: 37: 347-355.
32. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006: 81: 207-212.