Differential introgression and effective size of marker type influence phylogenetic inference of a recently divergent avian group (Phasianidae: Tympanuchus)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 84, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-13

  Galla, Stephanie J ^a   Johnson, Jeff A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Effective population size; Hybridization; Mito nuclear discordance; Sexual selection; Species tree; Z chromosome

Indexed keywords

AVES; PHASIANIDAE; TETRAONIDAE; TYMPANUCHUS; VASCONCELLEA CANDICANS;

GENETIC MARKER; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GALLIFORMES; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION DENSITY;

ANIMALS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GALLIFORMES; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKERS; HAPLOTYPES; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION DENSITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84920872148     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Aldridge C.L., Oyler-McCance S.J., Brigham R.M. Occurrence of greater sage-grouse×sharp-tailed grouse hybrids in Alberta. Condor 2001, 103:657-660.
2. Antao T., Lopes A., Lopes R., Beja-Pereira A., Luikart G. LOSITAN: a workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC BioInfo. 2008, 9:323.
3. Arrieta R.S., Lijtmaer D.A., Tubaro P.L. Evolution of postzygotic reproductive isolation in galliform birds: analysis of first and second hybrid generations and backcrosses. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 2013, 110:528-542.
4. Augustine J.K., Sandercock B.K. Demography of female Greater Prairie-Chickens in unfragmented grasslands in Kansas. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 2011, 6:2. 10.5751/ACE-00429-060102.
5. Axelsson E., Smith N.G.C., Sundström H., Berlin S., Ellegren H. Male-biased mutation rate and divergence in autosomal, Z-linked, and W-linked introns of chicken and turkey. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21:1538-1547.
6. Backstöm N., Väli Ü. Sex - and species-biased gene flow in a spotted eagle hybrid zone. BMC Evol. Biol. 2011, 11:100-109.
7. Backström N., Brandström M., Gustafsson L., Qvarnstöm A., Cheng H., Ellegren H. Genetic mapping in a natural population of collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis): conserved synteny but gene order rearrangements on the avian z chromosome. Genetics 2006, 174:377-386.
8. Backström N., Fagerberg S., Ellegren H. Genomics of natural bird populations: a gene-based set of reference markers evenly spread across the avian genome. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:964-980.
9. Bain M.R., Farley G.H. Apparent hybrid prairie-chickens in a zone of geographic overlap. Condor 2002, 104:683-687.
10. Behney A.C., Grisham B.A., Baol C.W., Whitlaw H.A., Haukos D.A. Sexual selection and mating chronology of lesser prairie-chickens. Wilson J. Ornithol. 2012, 124:96-105.
11. Borge T., Webster M.T., Andersson G., Sætre G.P. Contrasting patterns of polymorphism and divergence on the Z chromosome and autosomes in two Ficedula flycatcher species. Genetics 2005, 171:1861-1873.
12. Brumfield R.T., Liu L., Lum D.E., Edwards S.V. Comparison of species tree methods for reconstructing the phylogeny of bearded manakins (Aves: Pipridae, Manacus) from multilocus sequence data. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:719-731.
13. Carling M.D., Lovette I.J., Brumfield R.T. Historical divergence and gene flow: coalescent analyses of mitochondrial, autosomal and sex-linked loci in Passerina buntings. Evolution 2010, 64:1762-1772.
14. Charlesworth B. The effect of life-history and mode of inheritance on neutral genetic variability. Genet. Res. 2001, 77:153-166.
15. Charlesworth B. Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:195-205.
16. Charlesworth B., Coyne J.A., Barton N.H. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 1987, 130:113-146.
17. Chesser R.K., Baker R.J. Effective sizes and dynamics of uniparentally and diparentally inherited genes. Genetics 1996, 144:1225-1235.
18. Connelly, J.W., Gratson, M.W., Reese, K.P., 1998. Sharp-tailed Grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus). In: Poole, A. (Eds.), The Birds of North America Online, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithica, NY doi: doi:10.2173/bna.354.
19. Corl A., Ellegren H. The genomic signature of sexual selection in the genetic diversity of the sex chromosomes and autosomes. Evolution 2012, 66:2138-2149.
20. Corl A., Ellegren H. Sampling strategies for species trees: the effects on pylogenetic inference of the number of genes, number of individuals, and whether loci are mitochondrial, sex-linked, or autosomal. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 62:358-366.
21. Crawford J.A. Morphology and behavior of greater×lesser prairie chicken hybrids. Southwest Nat. 1978, 23:591-596.
22. Currat M., Ruedi M., Petit R.J., Excoffier L. The hidden side of invasions: massive introgression by local genes. Evolution 2008, 62:1908-1920.
23. Dimcheff D.E., Drovetski S.V., Mindell D.P. Phylogeny of Tetraoninae and other galliform birds using mitochondrial 12S and ND2 genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2002, 24:203-215.
24. Drovetski S.V. Molecular phylogeny of grouse: individual and combined performance of w-linked, autosomal, and mitochondrial loci. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:930-945.
25. Drovetski S.V. Plio-Pleistocene climatic oscillations, Holarctic biogeography and speciation in an avian subfamily. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30:1173-1181.
26. Drummond A.J., Suchard M.A., Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:1969-1973.
27. Eckert A.J., Carstens B.C. Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 49:832-842.
28. Elgvin T.O., Hermansen J.S., Fijarczyk A., Bonnet T., Borge T., Sæther S.A., Voje K.L., Sætre G.P. Hybrid speciation in sparrows II: a role for sex chromosomes?. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:3823-3837.
29. Ellegren H. Molecular evolutionary genomics of birds. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2007, 117:120-130.
30. Ellegren H. Genomic evidence for a large z-effect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 276:361-366.
31. Ellegren H. The different levels of genetic diversity in sex chromosomes and autosomes. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:278-284.
32. Ellsworth D.J., Honeycutt R.L., Silvy N.J., Rittenhouse K.D., Smith M.H. Mitochondrial-DNA and nuclear-gene differentiation in North American prairie grouse (genus Tympanuchus). Auk 1994, 111:661-671.
33. Eshelman R., Hager M. Two Irvingtonian (Medial Pleistocene) vertebrate faunas from north-central Kansas. Contribut. Quater. Vertebrate Paleontol. 1984, 8:384-404.
34. Fridolfsson A.K., Ellegren H. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J. Avian Biol. 1999, 30:116-121.
35. Gratson M.W. Sexual selection for increased male courtship and acoustic signals and against large male size at sharp-tailed grouse leks. Evolution 1993, 47:691-696.
36. Gutiérrez R.J., Barrowclough G.F., Groth J.G. A classification of the grouse (Aves: Tetraoninae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Wildlife Biol. 2000, 6:205-211.
37. Hagen, C.A., Giesen, K.M., 2005. Lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus). In: Poole, A. (Ed.) The Birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithica, NY http://bna.birds.cornell.Edu/bna/species/364.
38. Hagen C.A., Jamison B.E., Giesen K.M., Riley T.Z. Guidelines for managing lesser prairie-chicken populations and their habitats. Wild. Soc. Bull. 2004, 32:69-82.
39. Hagen C.A., Pitman J.C., Sandercock B.K., Wolfe D.H., Robel R.J., Applegate R.D., Oyler-McCance S.J. Regional variation in mtDNA of the lesser prairie-chicken. Condor 2010, 112:29-37.
40. Hale, J.A., 2013. The role of male vocal signals during the male-male competition and female mate choice in greater prairie-chickens (Tympanuchus cupido), MS thesis, The Ohio State University.
41. Hey J. Isolation with migration models for more than two populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:905-920. 10.1093/molbev/msp296.
42. Hey J., Nielsen R. Integration within the Felsenstein equation for improved Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in population genetics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:2785-2790.
43. Hill, G.E., Johnson, J.D., 2013. The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 280, 20131314. doi: doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1314.
44. Hudson R.R., Coyne J.A. Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution 2002, 56:1557-1565.
45. Hudson R.R., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 1987, 116:153-159.
46. Huynh L.Y., Maney D.L., Thomas J.W. Contrasting population genetic patterns within the white-throated sparrow genome (Zonotrichia albicollis). BMC Genet. 2010, 11:96.
47. Jacobsen F., Friedman N.R., Omland K.E. Congruence between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA: combination of multiple nuclear introns resolves a well-supported phylogeny of New World orioles (Icterus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 56:419-427.
48. Jarvis, E.D., Mirarab, S., Aberer, A.J., Bo, L., Houde, P., et al., (+100 more authors), 2014. Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 346, 1320-1331. doi: doi:10.1126/science.1253451.
49. Johnsgard P.A. Grassland Grouse and Their Conservation 2002, The Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DC.
50. Johnsgard P.A., Wood R.E. Distributional changes and interaction between prairie chickens and sharp-tailed grouse in the midwest. Wilson Bull. 1968, 80:173-188.
51. Johnson J.A. Recent range expansion and divergence among North American prairie grouse. J. Hered. 2008, 99:165-173.
52. Johnson J.A., Toepfer J.E., Dunn P.O. Contrasting patterns of mitochondrial and microsatellite population structure in fragmented populations of greater prairie-chicken. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12:3335-3347.
53. Johnson J.A., Dunn P.O., Bouzat J.L. Effects of recent population bottlenecks on reconstructing the demographic history of prairie-chickens. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:2203-2222.
54. Johnson, J.A., Schroeder, M.A., Robb, L.A., 2011. Greater prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus cupido). In: Poole, A. (Ed.), The Birds of North America Online, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithica, NY http://bna.birds.cornell.edubna/species/036.
55. Keinan A., Mullikin J.C., Patterson N., Reich D. Accelerated genetic drift on chromosome X during human dispersal out of Africa. Nature Genet. 2009, 41:66-70.
56. Kimball R.T., Braun E.L., Barker F.K., Bowie R.C.K., Braun M.J., Chojnowski J.L., Hackett S.J., Han K., Harshman J., Heimer-Torres V., Holznagel W., Huddleston C.J., Marks B.D., Miglia K.J., Moore W.S., Reddy S., Sheldon F.H., Smith J.V., Witt C.C., Yuri T. A well-tested set of primers to amplify regions spread across the avian genome. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 50:654-660.
57. Kohn S.C., Kobriger G.D. Occurrence of a sage grouse/sharp-tailed grouse hybrid in North Dakota. Prairie Natural. 1986, 18:33-36.
58. Kutschera V.E., Bidon T., Hailer F., Rodi J.L., Fain S.R., Janke A. Bears in a forest of gene trees: phylogenetic inference is complicated by incomplete lineage sorting and gene flow. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 10.1093/molbev/msu186.
59. Lanier H.C., Huang H., Knowles L.L. How low can you go? The effects of mutation rate on the accuracy of species-tree estimation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2014, 70:112-119.
60. Laporte V., Charlesworth B. Effective population size and population subdivision in demographically structured populations. Genetics 2002, 162:501-519.
61. Larkin M.A., Blackshields G., Brown N.P., Chenna R., McGettigan P.A., McWilliam H., Valentin F., Wallace I.M., Wilm A., Lopez R., Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Higgins D.G. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2947-2948.
62. Leaché A.D., Harris R.B., Rannala B., Yang Z. The influence of gene flow on species tree estimation: a simulation study. Syst. Biol. 2014, 63:17-30.
63. Lewis, P.O., Zaykin, D., 2000. Genetic Data Analysis: computer program for the analysis of allelic data, Version 1.0 (D15). University of Connecticut, Storrs CT.
64. Librado P., Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1451-1452.
65. Lohse K., Kelleher J. Measuring the degree of starshape in genealogies - summary statistics and demographic inference. Genet. Res. 2009, 91:281-292.
66. Lucchini V., Höglund J., Klaus S., Swenson J., Randi E. Historical biogeography and a mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of grouse and ptarmigan. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2001, 20:149-162.
67. Lumsden H.G. Prairie grouse Tympanuchus cupido x phasianellus, hybridization on Manitoulin Island, Ontario. Can. Field. Nat. 2005, 119:507-514.
68. Mank J.E., Nam K., Ellegren H. Faster-Z evolution is predominantly due to genetic drift. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:661-670.
69. McCormack J.E., Harvey M.G., Faircloth B.C., Crawford N.G., Glenn T.C., Brumfield R.T. A phylogeny of birds based on over 1500 loci collected by target enrichment and high-throughput sequencing. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e5848.
70. Melo-Ferreira J., Alves P.C., Freitas H., Ferrand N., Boursot P. The genomic legacy from the extinct Lepus timidus to the three hare species of Iberia: contrast between mtDNA, sex chromosomes and autosomes. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:2643-2658.
71. Naisbit R.E., Jiggins C.D., Mallet J. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2001, 268:1849-1854.
72. Nooker J.K., Sandercock B.K. Phenotypic correlates and survival consequences of male mating success in lek-mating greater prairie-chickens (Tympanuchus cupido). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2008, 62:1377-1388.
73. Nosil P., Feder J.L. Genome evolution and speciation: toward quantitative descriptions of pattern and process. Evolution 2013, 67:2461-2467.
74. Orr H.A. Haldane's rule. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1997, 28:195-218.
75. Oyler-McCance S.J., St.John J., Quinn T.W. Rapid evolution in lekking grouse: implications for taxonomic definitions. Ornithological Monographs 2010, 67:114-122.
76. Petit R.J., Excoffier C. Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:386-393.
77. Piertney S.B., Maccoll A.D.C., Bacon P.J., Racey P.A., Lambin X., Dallas J.F. Matrilineal genetic structure and female-mediated gene flow in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus): an analysis using mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 2000, 54:279-289.
78. Pool J.E., Nielsen R. Population size changes reshape genomic patterns of diversity. Evolution 2007, 61:3001-3006.
79. Posada D. JModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:1253-1256.
80. Pruett C.L., Johnson J.A., Larsson L.C., Wolfe D.H., Patten M.A. Low effective population size and survivorship in a grassland grouse. Conserv. Genet. 2011, 12:1205-1214.
81. Qvarnström A., Bailey R.I. Speciation through evolution of sex-linked genes. Heredity 2009, 102:4-15.
82. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2009. Tracer v1.5, Available from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/.
83. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2012a. LogCombiner v1.7.4. Available at: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/.
84. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2012b. TreeAnnotator v1.7.4. Available at: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/.
85. Rheindt F.E., Edwards S.V. Genetic introgression: an integral but neglected component of speciation in birds. Auk 2011, 128:620-632.
86. Rodríguez R.L., Boughman J.W., Gray D.A., Hebets E.A., Höbel G., Symes L.B. Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16:964-974.
87. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., Van Der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Hohna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:539-542.
88. Rosenberg N.A. The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model. Evolution 2003, 57:1465-1477.
89. Sæther S.A., Sætre G.-P., Borge T., Wiley C., Svedin N., Andersson G., Veen T., Haavie J., Servedio M.R., Bureš S., Král M., Hjernquist M.B., Gustafsson L., Träff J., Qvarnström A. Sex chromosome-linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 2007, 318:95-97.
90. Sætre G.-P., Borge T., Lindroos K., Haavie J., Sheldon B.C., Primmer C., Syvänen A.C. Sex chromosome evolution and speciation in Ficedula flycatchers. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 2003, 270:53-59.
91. Safran R.J., Scordato E.S.C., Symes L.B., Rodríguez R.L., Mendelson T.C. Contributions of natural and sexual selection to the evolution of premating reproductive isolation: a research agenda. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28:643-650.
92. Schroeder, M.A., Young, J.R., Braun, C.E., 1999. Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). In: Poole, A. (Ed.), The Birds of North America Online, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca.
93. Schroeder M.A., Aldridge C.L., Apa A.D., Bohne C., Bunnell S.D. Distribution of sage-grouse in North America. Condor 2004, 106:363-376.
94. Servedio M.R., Noor M.A.F. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34:339-364.
95. Silvy N.J., Peterson M.J., Lopez R.R. The cause of the decline of pinnated grouse: the Texas example. Wild. Soc. Bull. 2004, 32:16-21.
96. Sobel J.M., Chen G.F., Watt L.R., Schemske D.W. The biology of speciation. Evolution 2009, 64:295-315.
97. Spaulding A.W. Rapid courtship evolution in grouse (Tentraonidae): contrasting patterns of acceleration between the Eurasian and North American polygynous clades. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 274:1079-1086.
98. Spaulding A.W., Mock K.E., Shroeders A., Warheit K.I. Recency, range expansion, and unsorted lineages: implications for interpreting neutral genetic variation in the Sharp-tailed Grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus). Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:2317-2332.
99. Stephens M., Smith N.J., Donnelly P. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001, 68:978-989.
100. Storchová R., Reif J., Nachman M.W. Female heterogamety and speciation: reduced introgression of the Z chromosome between the two species of nightingales. Evolution 2010, 64:456-471.
101. Sundstöm H., Webster M.T., Ellegren H. Reduced variation on the chicken z chromosome. Genetics 2004, 167:377-385.
102. Svedin N., Wiley C., Veen T., Gustafsson L., Qvarnström A. Natural and sexual selection against hybrid flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. B 2008, 275:735-744.
103. Toews D.L., Brelsford A. The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:3907-3930.
104. Trier C.N., Harmansen J.S., Sætre G.-P., Bailey R.I. Evidence for mito-nuclear and sex-linked reproductive barriers between the hybrid Italian sparrow and its parent species. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10(1):e1004075. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004075.
105. Wang B., Ekblom R., Bunikis I., Siitari H., Hoglund J. Whole gneome sequencing of the black grouse (Tetrao tetrix): reference guided assembly suggests faster-Z and MHC evolution. BMC Genom. 2014, 15:180.
106. Woerner A.E., Cox M.P., Hammer M.F. Recombination-filtered genomic datasets by information maximization. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1851-1853.
107. Zink R.M., Barrowclough G.F. Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:2107-2121.