Recent range expansion and divergence among North American prairie grouse

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 165-173

  Johnson, Jeff A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b THE PEREGRINE FUND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ARTICLE; BASE PAIRING; BIRD; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HAPLOTYPE; NONHUMAN; NORTH AMERICA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TYMPANUCHUS; TYMPANUCHUS CUPIDO; TYMPANUCHUS CUPIDO ATTWATERI; TYMPANUCHUS CUPIDO CUPIDO; TYMPANUCHUS CUPIDO PINNATUS; TYMPANUCHUS PALLIDICINCTUS; TYMPANUCHUS PHASIANELLUS;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION; NORTH AMERICA;

TETRAONIDAE; TYMPANUCHUS; TYMPANUCHUS CUPIDO; TYMPANUCHUS CUPIDO ATTWATERI; TYMPANUCHUS CUPIDO CUPIDO; TYMPANUCHUS CUPIDO PINNATUS; TYMPANUCHUS PALLIDICINCTUS; TYMPANUCHUS PHASIANELLUS;

EID: 41149150720     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esn002     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Arbogast BS, Edwards SV, Wakeley J, Beerli P, Slowinski JB. 2002. Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetics and population genetic timescales. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 33:707-740.
2. Avise JC. 2004. Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution. 2nd ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates, Inc.
3. Avise JC, Walker D. 1998. Pleistocene phylogenetic effects on avian populations and the speciation process. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 265:457-463.
4. Bain MR, Farley GH. 2002. Display by apparent hybrid prairie-chickens in a zone of geographic overlap. Condor. 104:683-687.
5. Baker JM, López-Medrano E, Navarro-Sigüenza A, Rojas-Soto OR, Omland KE. 2003. Recent speciation in the orchard oriole group: divergence of Icterus spurius spurius and Icterus spurius fuertesi. Auk. 120:848-859.
6. Baum D, Shaw KL. 1995. Genealogical perspectives on the species problem. In: Hoch PC, Stephenson AC, editors. Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics. St Louis (MO): Missouri Botanical Garden. p. 289-303.
7. Bouzat JL, Cheng HH, Lewin HA, Westemeier RL, Brawn JD, Paige KN. 1998. Genetic evaluation of a demographic bottleneck in the greater prairie chicken. Conserv Biol. 12:836-843.
8. Carstens BC, Knowles LL. 2007. Shifting distributions and speciation: species divergence during rapid climate change. Mol Ecol. 16:619-627.
9. Connelly JW, Gratson MW, Reese KP. 1998. Sharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus). In: Poole A, Gill F, editors. The birds of North America, no. 354. Philadelphia (PA): The Birds of North America, Inc.
10. Dimcheff DE, Drovetski SV, Mindell DP. 2002. Phylogeny of Tetraoninae and other galliform birds using mitochondrial 12S and ND2 genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 24:203-215.
11. Drovetski SV. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of grouse: individual and combined performance of W-linked, autosomal, and mitochondrial loci. Syst Biol. 51:930-945.
12. Drovetski SV. 2003. Plio-Pleistocene climatic oscillations, Holarctic biogeography and speciation in an avian subfamily. J Biogeogr. 30:1173-1181.
13. Edmands S. 2007. Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol Ecol. 16:463-475.
14. Ellsworth DL, Honeycutt RL, Silvy NJ, Rittenhouse KD, Smith MH. 1994. Mitochondrial-DNA and nuclear-gene differentiation in North American prairie grouse (genus Tympanuchus). Auk. 111:661-671.
15. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin, version 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetic data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 1:47-50.
16. Fu YX. 1997. Statistical neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 147:915-925.
17. Giesen KM. 2005. Lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus). In: Poole A, editor. The birds of North America online. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology.
18. Gross AO. 1928. The heath hen. Mem Boston Soc Nat Hist. 6:489-588.
19. Gutiérrez RJ, Barrowclough GF, Groth JG. 2000. A classification of the grouse (Aves: Tetraoninae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Wildl Biol. 6:205-211.
20. Haig SM, Beever EA, Chambers SM, Draheim HM, Dugger BD, Dunham S, Elliott-Smith E, Fontaine JB, Kesler DC, Knaus BJ. 2006. Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. endangered species act. Conserv Biol. 20:1584-1594.
21. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Ecol. 22:160-174.
22. Hewitt GM. 2001. Speciation, hybrid zones and phylogeography - or seeing genes in space and time. Mol Ecol. 10:537-549.
23. Hewitt GM. 2004. Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 359:183-195.
24. Hey J. 2005. On the number of New World founders: a population genetic portrait of the peopling of the Americas. PLoS Biol. 3:e193.
25. Hey J, Machado CA. 2003. The study of structured populations - new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nat Rev Genet. 4:535-543.
26. Hey J, Nielsen R. 2004. Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics. 167:747-760.
27. Hudson RR, Coyne JA. 2002. Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution. 56:1557-1565.
28. Johnsgard PA. 2002. Grassland grouse and their conservation. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institute Press.
29. Johnson JA, Bellinger MR, Toepfer JE, Dunn PO. 2004. Temporal changes in allele frequencies and low effective population size in greater prairiechickens. Mol Ecol. 13:2617-2630.
30. Johnson JA, Dunn PO. 2006. Low genetic variation in the heath hen prior to extinction and implications for the conservation of prairie-chicken populations. Conserv Genet. 7:37-48.
31. Johnson JA, Dunn PO, Bouzat JL. 2007. Effects of recent population bottlenecks on reconstructing the demographic history of prairie-chickens. Mol Ecol. 16:2203-2222.
32. Johnson JA, Toepfer JE, Dunn PO. 2003. Contrasting patterns of mitochondrial and microsatellite population structure in fragmented populations of greater prairie-chickens. Mol Ecol. 12:3335-3348.
33. Johnson NK, Cicero C. 2004. New mitochondrial DNA data affirm the importance of Pleistocene speciation in North American birds. Evolution. 58:1122-1130.
34. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett. 7:1225-1241.
35. Klicka J, Zink RM. 1997. The importance of recent ice ages in speciation: a failed paradigm. Science. 277:1666-1669.
36. Knowles LL. 2004. The burgeoning field of statistical phylogeography. J Evol Biol. 17:1-10.
37. Kondo B, Baker JM, Omland KE. 2004. Recent speciation between the Baltimore oriole and the black-backed oriole. Condor. 106:674-680.
38. Lessa EP, Cook JA, Patton JL. 2003. Genetic footprints of demographic expansion in North America, but not Amazonia, during the late quaternary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:10331-10334.
39. Lovette IJ. 2005. Glacial cycles and the tempo of avian speciation. Trends Ecol Evol. 20:57-59.
40. Lucchini V, Höglund J, Klaus S, Swenson J, Randi E. 2001. Historical biogeography and a mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of grouse and ptarmigan. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 20:149-162.
41. Milá B, McCormack JE, Castañeda G, Wayne RK, Smith TB. 2007. Recent postglacial range expansion drives the rapid diversification of a songbird lineage in the genus Junco. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 274:2653-2660.
42. Milá B, Smith TB, Wayne RK. 2007. Speciation and rapid phenotypic differentiation in the yellow-rumped warbler Dendroica coronata complex. Mol Ecol. 16:159-173.
43. Nielsen R, Wakeley J. 2001. Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics. 158:885-896.
44. Omland KE, Baker JM, Peters JL. 2006. Genetic signatures of intermediate divergence: population history of Old and New World Holarctic ravens (Corvus corax). Mol Ecol. 15:795-808.
45. Ottvall R, Bensch S, Walinder G, Lifjeld JT. 2002. No evidence of genetic differentiation between lesser redpolls Carduelis flammea cabaret and common redpolls Carduelis f. flammea. Avian Sci. 2:237-244.
46. Palkovacs EP, Oppenheimer AJ, Gladyshev E, Toepfer JE, Amato G, Chase T, Caccone A. 2004. Genetic evaluation of a proposed introduction: the case of the greater prairie chicken and the extinct heath hen. Mol Ecol. 13:1759-1769.
47. Panhuis TM, Butlin R, Zuk M, Tregenza T. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol. 16:364-371.
48. Parchman TL, Benkman CW, Britch SC. 2006. Patterns of genetic variation in the adaptive radiation of New World crossbills (Aves: Loxia). Mol Ecol. 15:1873-1887.
49. Phillips JC. 1928. Wild birds introduced or transplanted in North America. USDA Tech Bull. 61:1-64.
50. Piertney SB, Summers R, Marquiss M. 2001. Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA homogeneity among phenotypically diverse crossbill taxa in the UK. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 268:1511-1517.
51. Prum RO. 1997. Phylogenetic tests of alternative intersexual selection mechanisms: trait macroevolution in a polygynous clade (Aves: Pipridae). Am Nat. 149:668-692.
52. Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Brooks T, editors. 2005. Phylogeny and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Rader RB, Belk MC, Shiozawa DK, Crandall KA. 2005. Empirical tests for ecological exchangeability. Anim Conserv. 8:239-247.
54. Rogers AR, Harpending H. 1992. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol. 9:552-569.
55. Rosenberg NA. 2003. The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model. Evolution. 57:1465-1477.
56. Ross JD, Arndt AD, Smith RFC, Johnson JA, Bouzat JL. 2006. Reexamination of the historical range of the greater prairie chicken using provenance data and DNA analysis of museum collections. Conserv Genet. 7:735-750.
57. Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. 2003. DnaSP. DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 19:2496-2497.
58. Schroeder MA, Hays DW, Murphy MA, Pierce DJ. 2000. Changes in the distribution and abundance of Columbian sharp-tailed grouse in Washington. Northwest Nat. 81:95-103.
59. Schroeder MA, Robb LA. 1993. Greater prairie-chicken. In: Poole A, Stettenheim P, Gill F, editors. The birds of North America, no. 36. Philadelphia (PA): The Academy of Natural Sciences.
60. Silvy NJ, Peterson MJ, Lopez RR. 2004. The cause of the decline of pinnated grouse: the Texas example. Wild Soc Bull. 32:16-21.
61. Spaulding AW. 2007. Rapid courtship evolution in grouse (Tetraonidae): contrasting patterns of acceleration between the Eurasian and North American polygynous clades. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 274:1079-1086.
62. Spaulding AW, Mock KE, Schroeder MA, Warheit KI. 2006. Genetic structure in the sharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus). Mol Ecol. 15:2317-2332.
63. Svensson EI, Gosden TP. 2007. Contemporary evolution of secondary sexual traits in the wild. Funct Ecol. 21:422-433.
64. Van Den Bussche RA, Hoofer SR, Wiedenfeld DA, Wolfe DH, Sherrod SK. 2003. Genetic variation within and among fragmented populations of lesser prairie-chickens (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus). Mol Ecol. 12:675-683.
65. Watson DM. 2005. Diagnosable versus distinct: evaluating species limits in birds. BioScience. 55:60-68.
66. Weir JT, Schluter D. 2004. Ice sheets promote speciation in boreal birds. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 271:1881-1887.
67. Williams JW, Shuman BN, Webb T, Bartlein PJ, Leduc PL. 2004. Late-Quaternary vegetation dynamics in North America: scaling from taxa to biomes. Ecol Monogr. 74:309-334.