The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 280, Issue 1768, 2013, Pages

  Hill, Geoffrey E ^a   Johnson, James D ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellular respiration; Good genes; Lek paradox; Mate choice; Ornamentation

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

FEMALE BEHAVIOR; GENE EXPRESSION; GOOD GENES HYPOTHESIS; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATE CHOICE; MITOCHONDRION; ORNAMENTATION; RESPIRATION;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION;

ANIMALS; CHEMISTRY; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION;

EID: 84903303945     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1314     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Darwin C. 1871 The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London, UK: John Murray.
2. Andersson M. 1994 Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Hill GE. 2006 Female choice for ornamental coloration. In Bird coloration: function and evolution, vol. 3 (eds GE Hill, KJ McGraw), pp. 137-200. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Hill GE. In press. The evolution of ornaments and armaments. In Animal behavior: how and why animals do the things they do. Vol. 3: Function and evolution of animal behavior. New York, NY: Praeger/ABC-CLIO.
5. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ. 1991 The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350, 33-38. (doi:10.1038/350033a0)
6. Lande R. 1981 Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721-3725. (doi:10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721)
7. Kirkpatrick M. 1982 Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36, 1-12. (doi:10.2307/2407961)
8. Prum RO. 2010 The Lande-Kirkpatrick mechanism is the null model of evolution by intersexual selection: implications for meaning, honesty, and design in intersexual signals. Evolution 64, 3085-3100. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01054.x)
9. Svensson EI, Gosden TP. 2007 Contemporary evolution of secondary sexual traits in the wild. Funct. Ecol. 21, 422-433. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01265.x)
10. Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH. 1984 Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am. Nat. 124, 309-323. (doi:10.1086/ 284275)
11. Hamilton WD, Zuk M. 1982 Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218, 384-386. (doi:10.1126/science.7123238)
12. Grafen A. 1990 Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J. Theor. Biol. 144, 473-516. (doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80087-6)
13. Hoelzer GA. 1989 The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 38, 1067-1078. (doi:10. 1016/S0003-3472(89)80146-0)
14. Hill GE. 2011 Condition-dependent traits as signals of the functionality of vital cellular processes. Ecol. Lett. 14, 625-634. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011. 01622.x)
15. Zahavi A. 1975 Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53, 205-214. (doi:10. 1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3)
16. Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A. 2004 Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 771-783. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2688)
17. Cotton S, Small J, Pomiankowski A. 2006 Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Curr. Biol. 16, R755-R765. (doi:10. 1016/j.cub.2006.08.022)
18. Hill GE. 2006 Environmental regulation of ornamental coloration. In Bird coloration, volume 1: mechanisms and measurements (eds GE Hill, KJ McGraw), pp. 507-560. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Neff BD, Pitcher TE. 2005 Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol. Ecol. 14, 19-38. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02395.x)
20. Prokop ZM, Michalczyk L, Drobniak SM, Herdegen M, Radwan J. 2012 Meta-analysis suggests choosy females get sexy sons more than 'good genes'. Evolution 66, 2665-2673. (doi:10.1111j.1558-5646. 2012.01654.x)
21. Calvo SE, Mootha VK. 2010 The mitochondrial proteome and human disease. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 11, 25-44. (doi:10.1146/annurevgenom-082509-141720)
22. Rand DM, Haney RA, Fry AJ. 2004 Cytonuclear coevolution: the genomics of cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 645-653. (doi:10.1016/j.tree. 2004.10.003)
23. Bar-Yaacov D, Blumberg A, Mishmar D. 2012 Mitochondrial-nuclear co-evolution and its effects on OXPHOS activity and regulation. BBA-Gene Regul. Mech. 1819, 1107-1111. (doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm. 2011.10.008)
24. Lane N. 2011 Mitonuclear match: optimizing fitness and fertility over generations drives ageing within generations. Bioessays 33, 860-869. (doi:10.1002/ bies.201100051)
25. Blier PU, Dufresne F, Burton RS. 2001 Natural selection and the evolution of mtDNA-encoded peptides: evidence for intergenomic co-adaptation. Trends Genet. 17, 400-406. (doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02338-1)
26. Lane N, Martin W. 2010 The energetics of genome complexity. Nature 467, 929-934. (doi:10.1038/ nature09486)
27. Dey R, Barrientos A, Moraes CT. 2000 Functional constraints of nuclear-mitochondrial DNA interactions in xenomitochondrial rodent cell lines. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 31 520-31 527. (doi:10.1074/ jbc.M004053200)
28. Lane N. 2011 The costs of breathing. Science 334, 184-185. (doi:10.1126/science.1214012)
29. Burton RS, Ellison CK, Harrison JS. 2006 The sorry state of F-2 hybrids: consequences of rapid mitochondrial DNA evolution in allopatric populations. Am. Nat. 168, S14-S24. (doi:10.1086/509046)
30. Moreno-Loshuertos R, Acin-Perez R, Fernandez-Silva P, Movilla N, Perez-Martos A, de Cordoba SR, Gallardo ME, Enriquez JA. 2006 Differences in reactive oxygen species production explain the phenotypes associated with common mouse mitochondrial DNA variants. Nat. Genet. 38, 1261-1268. (doi:10.1038/ng1897)
31. Pichaud N, Ballard JWO, Tanguay RM, Blier PU. 2012 Naturally occurring mitochondrial DNA haplotypes exhibit metabolic differences: insight into functional properties of mitochondria. Evolution 66, 3189-3197. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012. 01683.x)
32. Ellison CK, Burton RS. 2008 Interpopulation hybrid breakdown maps to the mitochondrial genome. Evolution 62, 631-638. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646. 2007.00305.x)
33. Gershoni M, Templeton AR, Mishmar D. 2009 Mitochondrial bioenergetics as a major motive force of speciation. Bioessays 31, 642-650. (doi:10.1002/ bies.200800139)
34. Chou JY, Leu JY. 2010 Speciation through cytonuclear incompatibility: insights from yeast and implications for higher eukaryotes. Bioessays 32, 401-411. (doi:10.1002/bies.200900162)
35. Maynard Smith J. 1991 Theories of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 146-151. (doi:10.1016/0169-5347(91)90055-3)
36. Cogliati KM, Corkum LD, Doucet SM. 2010 Bluegill coloration as a sexual ornament: evidence from ontogeny, sexual dichromatism, and condition dependence. Ethology 116, 416-428. (doi:10.1111/ j.1439-0310.2010.01755.x)
37. Sullivan BK, Walsberg GE. 1985 Call rate and aerobic capacity in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei). Herpetologica 41, 404-407.
38. Alonso-Alvarez C, Bertrand S, Faivre B, Chastel O, Sorci G. 2007 Testosterone and oxidative stress: the oxidation handicap hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 819-825. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3764)
39. Hill GE, Montgomerie R. 1994 Plumage colour signals nutritional condition in the house finch. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 258, 47-52. (doi:10.1098/ rspb.1994.0140)
40. McGraw KJ, Ardia DR. 2003 Carotenoids, immunocompetence, and the information content of sexual colors: an experimental test. Am. Nat. 162, 704-712. (doi:10.1086/378904)
41. Buchanan KL, Grindstaff JL, Pravosudov VV. 2013 Condition dependence, developmental plasticity, and cognition: implications for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 290-296. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.02.004)
42. Velando A, Torres R, Alonso-Alvarez C. 2008 Avoiding bad genes: oxidatively damaged DNA in germ line and mate choice. Bioessays 30, 1212-1219. (doi:10.1002/bies.20838)
43. von Schantz T, Bensch S, Grahn M, Hasselquist D, Wittzell H. 1999 Good genes, oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1-12. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0597)
44. Brand MD. 2005 The efficiency and plasticity of mitochondrial energy transduction. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33, 897-904. (doi:10.1042/BST20050897)
45. Calvo S et al. 2006 Systematic identification of human mitochondrial disease genes through integrative genomics. Nat. Genet. 38, 576-582. (doi:10.1038/ng1776)
46. Hill GE, Johnson JD. 2012 The vitamin A-redox hypothesis: a biochemical basis for honest signaling via carotenoid pigmentation. Am. Nat. 180, E127-E150. (doi:10.1086/667861)
47. Johnson JD, Hill GE. 2013 Is carotenoid ornamentation linked to the inner mitochondria membrane potential? A hypothesis for the maintenance of signal honesty. Biochimie 95, 436-444. (doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2012.10.021)
48. Hill GE. 1991 Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350, 337-339. (doi:10.1038/350337a0)
49. Kelly RJ, Murphy TG, Tarvin KA, Burness G. 2012 Carotenoid-based ornaments of female and male American goldfinches (Spinus tristis) show sexspecific correlations with immune function and metabolic rate. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 85, 348-363. (doi:10.1086/666059)
50. Watt WB, Carter PA, Donohue K. 1986 Females' choice of 'good genotypes' as mates is promoted by an insect mating system. Science 233, 1187-1190. (doi:10.1126/science.3738528)
51. Hedenstrom A, Alerstam T. 1996 Skylark optimal flight speeds for flying nowhere and somewhere. Behav. Ecol. 7, 121-126. (doi:10.1093/beheco/7.2.121)
52. Hoback WW, Wagner WE. 1997 The energetic cost of calling in the variable field cricket, Gryllus lineaticeps. Physiol. Entomol. 22, 286-290. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1997.tb01170.x)
53. Nicoletto PF. 1993 Female sexual-response to condition-dependent ornaments in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim. Behav. 46, 441-450. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1213)
54. Stoddard PK, Salazar VL. 2011 Energetic cost of communication. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 200-205. (doi:10.1242/jeb.047910)
55. Nowicki S, Searcy WA. 2004 Song function and the evolution of female preferences-why birds sing, why brains matter. Behav. Neurobiol. Birdsong 1016, 704-723. (doi:10.1196/annals.1298.012)
56. Dowling DK, Friberg U, Lindell J. 2008 Evolutionary implications of non-neutral mitochondrial genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 546-554. (doi:10. 1016/j.tree.2008.05.011)
57. Bazin E, Glemin S, Galtier N. 2006 Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals. Science 312, 570-572. (doi:10.1126/ science.1122033)
58. Wallace AR. 1889 Darwinism. London, UK: Macmillian.
59. Mayr E. 1963 Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Qvarnstrom A, Bailey RI. 2009 Speciation through evolution of sex-linked genes. Heredity 102, 4-15. (doi:10.1038/hdy.2008.93)
61. Lane N. 2009 On the origin of bar codes. Nature 462, 272-274. (doi:10.1038/462272a)
62. Petit RJ, Excoffier L. 2009 Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 386-393. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.011)
63. Hill GE, McGraw KJ. 2004 Correlated changes in male plumage coloration and female mate choice in cardueline finches. Anim. Behav. 67, 27-35. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.02.002)
64. Drown DM, Preuss KM, Wade MJ. 2012 Evidence of a paucity of genes that interact with the mitochondrion on the X in mammals. Genome Biol. Evol. 4, 875-880. (doi:10.1093/gbe/evs064)
65. Hastings IM. 1994 Manifestations of sexual selection may depend on the genetic-basis of sex determination. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 258, 83-87. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0146)
66. Reeve HK, Pfennig DW. 2003 Genetic biases for showy males: are some genetic systems especially conducive to sexual selection? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1089-1094. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0337427100)
67. Kirkpatrick M, Hall DW. 2004 Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 58, 683-691. (doi:10.1554/ 03-332)
68. Kirkpatrick M, Hall DW. 2004 Male-biased mutation, sex linkage, and the rate of adaptive evolution. Evolution 58, 437-440. (doi:10.1554/03-333)
69. Mank JE, Axelsson E, Ellegren H. 2007 Fast-X on the Z: rapid evolution of sex-linked genes in birds. Genome Res. 17, 618-624. (doi:10.1101/gr.6031907)
70. Nabholz B, Glemin S, Galtier N. 2009 The erratic mitochondrial clock: variations of mutation rate, not population size, affect mtDNA diversity across birds and mammals. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 54. (doi:10.1186/ 1471-2148-9-54)
71. Barja G. 2007 Mitochondrial oxygen consumption and reactive oxygen species production are independently modulated: implications for aging studies. Rejuv. Res. 10, 215-223. (doi:10.1089/rej. 2006.0516)
72. Johnson NA. 2010 Hybrid incompatibility genes: remnants of a genomic battlefield? Trends Genet. 26, 317-325. (doi:10.1016/j.tig.2010.04.005)
73. Saether SA et al. 2007 Sex chromosome-linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 318, 95-97. (doi:10.1126/science.1141506)
74. Backstrom N, Vali U. 2011 Sex-and species-biased gene flow in a spotted eagle hybrid zone. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 9. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-100)
75. Carling MD, Brumfield RT. 2008 Haldane's rule in an avian system: using cline theory and divergence population genetics to test for differential introgression of mitochondrial, autosomal, and sexlinked loci across the Passerina bunting hybrid zone. Evolution 62, 2600-2615. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00477.x)
76. Coyne JA. 1985 The genetic basis of Haldane's rule. Nature 314, 736-738. (doi:10.1038/314736a0)
77. Wu CI, Johnson NA, Palopoli MF. 1996 Haldane's rule and its legacy: why are there so many sterile males? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 281-284. (doi:10. 1016/0169-5347(96)10033-1)
78. Borgia G. 1979 Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (eds MS Blum, NA Blum), pp. 19-80. New York, NY: Academic Press.
79. Taylor PD, Williams GC. 1982 The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Popul. Biol. 22, 392-409. (doi:10. 1016/0040-5809(82)90052-1)
80. Charlesworth B. 1988 The evolution of mate choice in a fluctuating environment. J. Theor. Biol. 130, 191-204. (doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(88)80094-8)
81. Charlesworth B. 1987 The heritability of fitness. In Sexual selection: testing the alternatives (eds JW Bradbury, MB Andersson), pp. 21-40. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
82. Maynard Smith J. 1978 The evolution of sex. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
83. Moller AP, Cuervo JJ. 2003 Sexual selection, germline mutation rate and sperm competition. BMC Evol. Biol. 3, 11. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-3-6)
84. Petrie M, Roberts G. 2007 Sexual selection and the evolution of evolvability. Heredity 98, 198-205. (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800921)
85. Rice WR. 1988 Heritable variation in fitness as a prerequisite for adaptive female choice: the effect of mutation-selection balance. Evolution 42, 817-820. (doi:10.2307/2408873)
86. Williams GC. 1966 Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought, 307 p. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
87. Trivers RL. 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (ed. B Campbell), pp. 136-179. Chicago, IL: Aldine.