Comparison of variants of canonical correlation analysis and partial least squares for combined analysis of MRI and genetic data

NeuroImage

Volumn 107, Issue , 2015, Pages 289-310

  Grellmann, Claudia ^a,b   Bitzer, Sebastian ^a   Neumann, Jane ^a,b   Westlye, Lars T ^c,d   Andreassen, Ole A ^c   Villringer, Arno ^a,b,e   Horstmann, Annette ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^e HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Canonical correlation analysis; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Partial least squares correlation; Single nucleotide polymorphisms

Indexed keywords

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN INTER BATTERY FACTOR ANALYSIS; CEREBELLUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC DATABASE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LINGUAL GYRUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES CORRELATION; PHENOTYPE; PUTAMEN; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPARSE CANONICAL CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; BAYES THEOREM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LINEAR MODELS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84920870218     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.025     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Avants B.B., Cook P.A., Ungar L., Gee J.C., Grossman M. Dementia induces correlated reductions in white matter integrity and cortical thickness: a multivariate neuroimaging study with sparse canonical correlation analysis. NeuroImage 2010, 50(3):1004-1016.
2. Benedetti F., Radaelli D., Poletti S., Falini A., Cavallaro R., Dallaspezia S., Riccaboni R., Scotti G., Smeraldi E. Emotional reactivity in chronic schizophrenia: structural and functional brain correlates and the influence of adverse childhood experiences. Psychol. Med. 2011, 41(3):509-519.
3. Boutte D., Liu J. Sparse canonical correlation analysis applied to fMRI and genetic data fusion. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine 2010, 422-426.
4. Browne M.W. The maximum-likelihood solution in inter-battery factor analysis. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 1979, 32:75-86.
5. Brunet J.F., Pattyn A. PHOX2 genes - from patterning to connectivity. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2002, 12:435-440.
6. Carre J.M., Fisher P.M., Manuck S.B., Hariri A.R. Interaction between trait anxiety and trait anger predict amygdala reactivity to angry facial expressions in men but not women. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2010, 7:213-221.
7. Chi E.C., Allen G.I., Zhou H., Kohannim O., Lange K., Thompson P.M. Imaging genetics via sparse canonical correlation analysis. Proc IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging 2013, 740-743.
8. Cramer R.D. BC(DEF) parameters. 2. An empirical structure-based scheme for the prediction of some physical properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102(6):1849-1859.
9. Crawford D., Nickerson D. Definition and clinical importance of haplotypes. Annu. Rev. Med. 2005, 56:303-320.
10. Demenescu L.R., Kortekaas R., Cremers H.R., Renken R.J., van Tol M.J., van der Wee N.J., Veltman D.J., den Boer J.A., Roelofs K., Aleman A. Amygdala activation and its functional connectivity during perception of emotional faces in social phobia and panic disorder. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2013, 47(8):1024-1031.
11. Dudoit S., Fridlyand J., Speed T. Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2001, 96:1151-1160.
12. Filippini N., Rao A., Wetten S., Gibson R.A., Borrie M., Guzman D., Kertesz A., Loy-English I., Williams J., Nichols T., Whitcher B., Matthews P.M. Anatomically-distinct genetic associations of APOE epsilon4 allele load with regional cortical atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage 2009, 44(3):724-728.
13. Fusar-Poli P., Placentino A., Carletti F., Landi P., Allen P., Surguladze S., Benedetti F., Abbamonte M., Gasparotti R., Barale F., Perez J., McGuire P., Politi P. Functional atlas of emotional faces processing: a voxel-based meta-analysis of 105 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. J. Psychiatr. Neurosci. 2009, 34(6):418-432.
14. Gottesman I.I., Gould T.D. The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am. J. Psychiatr. 2003, 160:636-645.
15. Hardoon D.R., Ettinger U., Mourão-Miranda J., Antonova E., Collier D., Kumari V., Williams S.C., Brammer M. Correlation-based multivariate analysis of genetic influence on brain volume. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 450(3):281-286.
16. Hariri A.R., Mattay V.S., Tessitore A., Kolachana B., Fera F., Goldman D., Egan M.F., Weinberger D.R. Serotonin transporter genetic variation and the response of the human amygdala. Science 2002, 297:400-403.
17. Hibar D.P., Kohannim O., Stein J.L., Chiang M.-C., Thompson P.M. Multilocus genetic analysis of brain images. Front. Genet. 2011, 2(73):1-21.
18. Hotelling H. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika 1936, 28(3/4):321-377.
19. Klami A., Virtanen S., Kaski S. Bayesian canonical correlation analysis. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013, 14:965-1003.
20. Knight D.C., Cheng D.T., Smith C.N., Stein E.A., Helmstetter F.J. Neural substrates mediating human delay and trace fear conditioning. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:218-228.
21. Kovacevic N., Abdi H., Beaton D., McIntosh A.R. Revisiting PLS resampling: comparing significance versus reliability across range of simulations. New Perspectives in Partial Least Squares and Related Methods, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics 2013, 56:159-170.
22. Krishnan A., Williams L.J., McIntosh A.R., Abdi H. Partial least squares (PLS) methods for neuroimaging: a tutorial and review. NeuroImage 2011, 56(2):455-475.
23. LaFramboise T. Single nucleotide polymorphism arrays: a decade of biological, computational and technological advances. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37(13):4181-4193.
24. Le Floch E., Guillemot V., Frouin V., Pinel P., Lalanne C., Trincherah L., Tenenhaus A., Moreno A., Zilbovicius M., Bourgerone T., Dehaene S., Thirion B., Poline J.-B., Duchesnay E. Significant correlation between a set of genetic polymorphisms and a functional brain network revealed by feature selection and sparse partial least squares. NeuroImage 2012, 63(1):11-24.
25. LeDoux J. The amygdala. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:868-874.
26. Lee B.T., Ham B.J. Monoamine oxidase A-uVNTR genotype affects limbic brain activity in response to affective facial stimuli. NeuroReport 2008, 19(5):515-519.
27. Li J., Chen Y. Generating samples for association studies based on HapMap data. BMC Bioinforma. 2008, 9(44):1-13.
28. Lin D., Zhang J., Li J., Calhoun V.D., Deng H.-W., Wang Y.-P. Group sparse canonical correlation analysis for genomic data integration. BMC Bioinforma. 2013, 14(1):245-260.
29. McIntosh A.R., Lobaugh N.J. Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances. NeuroImage 2004, 23(Supplement 1):S250-S263.
30. McIntosh A.R., Bookstein F.L., Haxby J.V., Grady C.L. Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. NeuroImage 1996, 3(3):143-157.
31. Meyer-Lindenberg A. The future of fMRI and genetics research. NeuroImage 2012, 62(2):1286-1292.
32. Morris J.S., Ohman A., Dolan R.J. Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala. Nature 1998, 393:467-470.
33. Neal R.M. Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks 1996, Springer-Verlag.
34. Ousdal O.T., Brown A.A., Jensen J., Nakstad P.H., Melle I., Agartz I., Djurovic S., Bogdan R., Hariri A.R., Andreassen O.A. Association between variants near a monoaminergic pathway gene (PHOX2B) and amygdala reactivity: a genome-wide functional imaging study. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2012, 15(3):273-285.
35. Parkhomenko E., Tritchler D., Beyene J. Genome-wide sparse canonical correlation of gene expression with genotypes. BMC Proc. 2007, 1:S119.
36. Parkhomenko E., Tritchler D., Beyene J. Sparse canonical correlation analysis with application to genomic data integration. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2009, 8(1):1-34.
37. Potkin S.G., Turner J.A., Guffanti G., Lakatos A., Fallon J.H., Nguyen D.D., Mathalon D., Ford J., Lauriello J., Macciardi F., FBIRN A genome-wide association study of schizophrenia using brain activation as a quantitative phenotype. Schizophr. Bull. 2009, 35(1):96-108.
38. Schraa-Tam C.K., Rietdijk W.J., Verbeke W.J., Dietvorst R.C., van den Berg W.E., Bagozzi R.P., De Zeeuw C.I. fMRI activities in the emotional cerebellum: a preference for negative stimuli and goal-directed behavior. Cerebellum 2012, 11(1):233-245.
39. Smit D.J.A., van't Ent D., de Zubicaray G., Stein J.L. Guest editorial - neuroimaging and genetics: exploring, searching, and finding. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2012, 15(3):267-272.
40. Surguladze S.A., Marshall N., Schulze K., Hall M.H., Walshe M., Bramon E., Phillips M.L., Murray R.M., McDonald C. Exaggerated neural response to emotional faces in patients with bipolar disorder and their first-degree relatives. NeuroImage 2010, 53(1):58-64.
41. The HapMap Consortium The international HapMap project. Nature 2003, 426:789-796.
42. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 1996, 58(1):267-288.
43. Tibshirani R., Hastie T., Narasimhan B., Chu G. Class prediction by nearest shrunken centroids, with applications to DNA microarrays. Stat. Sci. 2003, 18:104-117.
44. Tucker L.R. An inter-battery method of factor analysis. Psychometrika 1958, 23(2):111-136.
45. Virtanen S., Klami A., Kaski S. Bayesian CCA via group sparsity. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-II) 2011, 457-464.
46. Waaijenborg S., Verselewel De Witt Hamer P., Zwinderman A. Quantifying the association between gene expressions and DNA-markers by penalized canonical correlation analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2008, 7(1):1-27.
47. Wan J., Kim S., Inlow M., Nho K., Swaminathan S., Risacher S.L., Fang S., Weiner M.W., Faisal Beg M., Wang L., Saykin A.J., Shen L., ADNI Hippocampal surface mapping of genetic risk factors in AD via sparse learning models. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 2011, 14(2):376-383.
48. Wegelin J.A. A survey of partial least squares (PLS) methods, with emphasis on the two-block case. Technical Report 371 2000, University of Washington, Department of Statistics.
49. Wiesel A., Kliger M., Hero A.O. A Greedy Approach to Sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis (Available at). http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.2748v1.
50. Wilderjans T.F., Ceulemans E., Meers K. CHull: a generic convex-hull-based model selection method. Behav. Res. Methods 2013, 45:1-15.
51. Witten D.M., Tibshirani R.J. Extensions of sparse canonical correlation analysis with applications to genomic data. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2009, 8(1):1-27.
52. Witten D.M., Tibshirani R.J., Hastie T. A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis. Biostatistics 2009, 10(3):515-534.
53. Wold H. Path models with latent variables: the NIPALS approach. Quantitative sociology: International perspectives on mathematical and statistical modeling 1975, 307-357. Academic Press. H.M. Blalock (Ed.).