NOD-like receptor cooperativity in effector-triggered immunity

Trends in Immunology

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 562-570

  Griebel, Thomas ^a   Maekawa, Takaki ^a   Parker, Jane E ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PLANT BREEDING RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Innate immunity; NLR pairs; Plant defense; Transcriptional reprogramming

Indexed keywords

INFLAMMASOME; NEURONAL APOPTOSIS INHIBITORY PROTEIN; NUCLEOTIDE BINDING OLIGOMERIZATION DOMAIN LIKE RECEPTOR; NUCLEOTIDE BINDING OLIGOMERIZATION DOMAIN PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

GENETIC ANALYSIS; HOST; HUMAN; IMMUNITY; INNATE IMMUNITY; MAMMAL; MOLECULE; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENESIS; PLANT IMMUNITY; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; IMMUNOLOGY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; IMMUNITY; IMMUNITY, INNATE; NOD SIGNALING ADAPTOR PROTEINS; PLANTS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84920561150     PISSN: 14714906     EISSN: 14714981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2014.09.005     Document Type: Review

References (120)

1. Stuart L.M., et al. Effector-triggered versus pattern-triggered immunity: how animals sense pathogens. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13:199-206.
2. Dangl J.L., et al. Pivoting the plant immune system from dissection to deployment. Science 2013, 341:746-751.
3. Zipfel C. Plant pattern-recognition receptors. Trends Immunol. 2014, 35:345-351.
4. Maekawa T., et al. NLR functions in plant and animal immune systems: so far and yet so close. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12:817-826.
5. Jones J.D.G., Dangl J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444:323-329.
6. Eulgem T., et al. Gene expression signatures from three genetically separable resistance gene signaling pathways for downy mildew resistance. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135:1129-1144.
7. Tao Y. Quantitative nature of Arabidopsis responses during compatible and incompatible interactions with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Cell 2003, 15:317-330.
8. Flor H.H. Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1971, 9:275-296.
9. Dodds P.N., et al. Direct protein interaction underlies gene-for-gene specificity and coevolution of the flax resistance genes and flax rust avirulence genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:8888-8893.
10. Cesari S., et al. The rice resistance protein pair RGA4/RGA5 recognizes the Magnaporthe oryzae effectors AVR-Pia and AVR1-CO39 by direct binding. Plant Cell 2013, 25:1463-1481.
11. Mackey D., et al. RIN4 interacts with Pseudomonas syringae type III effector molecules and is required for RPM1-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis. Cell 2002, 108:743-754.
12. Axtell M.J., Staskawicz B.J. Initiation of RPS2-specified disease resistance in Arabidopsis is coupled to the AvrRpt2-directed elimination of RIN4. Cell 2003, 112:369-377.
13. Gutierrez J.R., et al. Prf immune complexes of tomato are oligomeric and contain multiple Pto-like kinases that diversify effector recognition. Plant J. 2010, 61:507-518.
14. Ntoukakis V., et al. The tomato Prf complex is a molecular trap for bacterial effectors based on Pto transphosphorylation. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9:e1003123.
15. Caplan J.L., et al. Chloroplastic protein NRIP1 mediates innate immune receptor recognition of a viral effector. Cell 2008, 132:449-462.
16. Dodds P.N., Rathjen J.P. Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant-pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:539-548.
17. Katagiri F., Tsuda K. Understanding the plant immune system. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23:1531-1536.
18. Danot O., et al. Wheel of life, wheel of death: a mechanistic insight into signaling by STAND proteins. Structure 2009, 17:172-182.
19. Takken F.L.W., Goverse A. How to build a pathogen detector: structural basis of NB-LRR function. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15:375-384.
20. Takken F.L., et al. Resistance proteins: molecular switches of plant defence. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9:383-390.
21. Proell M., et al. The Nod-like receptor (NLR) family: a tale of similarities and differences. PloS ONE 2008, 3:e2119.
22. Albrecht M., Takken F.L.W. Update on the domain architectures of NLRs and R proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 339:459-462.
23. Bendahmane A., et al. Constitutive gain-of-function mutants in a nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat protein encoded at the Rx locus of potato. Plant J. 2002, 32:195-204.
24. Moffett P., et al. Interaction between domains of a plant NBS-LRR protein in disease resistance-related cell death. EMBO J. 2002, 21:4511-4519.
25. Moltke J., Von, et al. Recognition of bacteria by inflammasomes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 31:73-106.
26. Kofoed E.M., Vance R.E. Innate immune recognition of bacterial ligands by NAIPs determines inflammasome specificity. Nature 2011, 477:592-595.
27. Zhao Y., et al. The NLRC4 inflammasome receptors for bacterial flagellin and type III secretion apparatus. Nature 2011, 477:596-600.
28. Lightfield K.L., et al. Critical function for Naip5 in inflammasome activation by a conserved carboxy-terminal domain of flagellin. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9:1171-1178.
29. Lightfield K.L., et al. Differential requirements for NAIP5 in activation of the NLRC4 inflammasome. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79:1606-1614.
30. Halff E.F., et al. Formation and structure of a NAIP5-NLRC4 inflammasome induced by direct interactions with conserved N- and C-terminal regions of flagellin. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287:38460-38472.
31. Tenthorey J.L., et al. Molecular basis for specific recognition of bacterial ligands by NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasomes. Mol. Cell 2014, 54:17-29.
32. Hu Z., et al. Crystal structure of NLRC4 reveals its autoinhibition mechanism. Science 2013, 341:172-175.
33. Man S.M., et al. Inflammasome activation causes dual recruitment of NLRC4 and NLRP3 to the same macromolecular complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:7403-7408.
34. Hsu L-C., et al. A NOD2-NALP1 complex mediates caspase-1-dependent IL-1beta secretion in response to Bacillus anthracis infection and muramyl dipeptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:7803-7808.
35. Rathinam V.A.K., et al. Regulation of inflammasome signaling. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13:333-342.
36. Bonardi V., et al. Expanded functions for a family of plant intracellular immune receptors beyond specific recognition of pathogen effectors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:16463-16468.
37. Eitas T.K., Dangl J.L. NB-LRR proteins: pairs, pieces, perception, partners, and pathways. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13:472-477.
38. Kawano Y., Shimamoto K. Early signaling network in rice PRR-mediated and R-mediated immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16:496-504.
39. Sinapidou E., et al. Two TIR:NB:LRR genes are required to specify resistance to Peronospora parasitica isolate Cala2 in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2004, 38:898-909.
40. Ashikawa I., et al. Two adjacent nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat class genes are required to confer Pikm-specific rice blast resistance. Genetics 2008, 180:2267-2276.
41. Kanzaki H., et al. Arms race co-evolution of Magnaporthe oryzae AVR-Pik and rice Pik genes driven by their physical interactions. Plant J. 2012, 72:894-907.
42. Zhai C., et al. The isolation and characterization of Pik, a rice blast resistance gene which emerged after rice domestication. New Phytol. 2011, 189:321-334.
43. Zhai C., et al. Function and interaction of the coupled genes responsible for Pik-h encoded rice blast resistance. PloS ONE 2014, 9:e98067.
44. Lee S-K., et al. Rice Pi5-mediated resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae requires the presence of two coiled-coil-nucleotide-binding-leucine-rich repeat genes. Genetics 2009, 181:1627-1638.
45. Okuyama Y., et al. A multifaceted genomics approach allows the isolationof the rice Pia-blast resistance gene consisting of two adjacent NBS-LRR protein genes. Plant J. 2011, 66:467-479.
46. Birker D., et al. A locus conferring resistance to Colletotrichum higginsianum is shared by four geographically distinct Arabidopsis accessions. Plant J. 2009, 60:602-613.
47. Narusaka M., et al. RRS1 and RPS4 provide a dual resistance-gene system against fungal and bacterial pathogens. Plant J. 2009, 60:218-226.
48. Rushton P.J., et al. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15:247-258.
49. Eitas T.K., et al. Arabidopsis TAO1 is a TIR-NB-LRR protein that contributes to disease resistance induced by the Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:6475-6480.
50. Mestre P., Baulcombe D.C. Elicitor-mediated oligomerization of the tobacco N disease resistance protein. Plant Cell 2006, 18:491-501.
51. Ntoukakis V., et al. The changing of the guard: the Pto/Prf receptor complex of tomato and pathogen recognition. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 20:69-74.
52. Ade J., et al. Indirect activation of a plant nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat protein by a bacterial protease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:2531-2536.
53. Maekawa T., et al. Coiled-coil domain-dependent homodimerization of intracellular barley immune receptors defines a minimal functional module for triggering cell death. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 9:187-199.
54. Bernoux M., et al. Structural and functional analysis of a plant resistance protein TIR domain reveals interfaces for self-association, signaling, and autoregulation. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 9:200-211.
55. Frost D., et al. Tobacco transgenic for the flax rust resistance gene L expresses allele-specific activation of defense responses. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2004, 17:224-232.
56. Swiderski M.R., et al. The TIR domain of TIR-NB-LRR resistance proteins is a signaling domain involved in cell death induction. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2009, 22:157-165.
57. Weaver M.L., et al. The Arabidopsis thaliana TIR-NB-LRR R-protein, RPP1A; protein localization and constitutive activation of defence by truncated alleles in tobacco and Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2006, 47:829-840.
58. Krasileva K.V., et al. Activation of an Arabidopsis resistance protein is specified by the in planta association of its leucine-rich repeat domain with the cognate oomycete effector. Plant Cell 2010, 22:2444-2458.
59. Rairdan G.J., et al. The coiled-coil and nucleotide binding domains of the Potato Rx disease resistance protein function in pathogen recognition and signaling. Plant Cell 2008, 20:739-751.
60. Bendahmane A., et al. The Rx gene from potato controls separate virus resistance and cell death responses. Plant Cell 1999, 11:781-792.
61. Coll N.S., et al. Arabidopsis type I metacaspases control cell death. Science 2010, 330:1393-1397.
62. Heidrich K., et al. Arabidopsis EDS1 connects pathogen effector recognition to cell compartment-specific immune responses. Science 2011, 334:1401-1404.
63. Bai S., et al. Structure-function analysis of barley NLR immune receptor MLA10 reveals its cell compartment specific activity in cell death and disease resistance. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8:e1002752.
64. Hurni S., et al. Powdery mildew resistance gene Pm8 derived from rye is suppressed by its wheat ortholog Pm3. Plant J. 2014, 79:904-913.
65. Stirnweis D., et al. Suppression among alleles encoding NB-LRR resistance proteins interferes with resistance in F1 hybrid and allele-pyramided wheat plants. Plant J. 2014, 79:893-903.
66. Williams S.J., et al. Structural basis for assembly and function of a heterodimeric plant immune receptor. Science 2014, 344:299-303.
67. Wirthmueller L., et al. Nuclear accumulation of the Arabidopsis immune receptor RPS4 is necessary for triggering EDS1-dependent defense. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:2023-2029.
68. Tasset C., et al. Autoacetylation of the Ralstonia solanacearum effector PopP2 targets a lysine residue essential for RRS1-R-mediated immunity in Arabidopsis. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6:e1001202.
69. Sohn K.H., et al. Distinct regions of the Pseudomonas syringae coiled-coil effector AvrRps4 are required for activation of immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:16371-16376.
70. Noutoshi Y., et al. A single amino acid insertion in the WRKY domain of the Arabidopsis TIR-NBS-LRR-WRKY-type disease resistance protein SLH1 (sensitive to low humidity 1) causes activation of defense responses and hypersensitive cell death. Plant J. 2005, 43:873-888.
71. Heidrich K., et al. Arabidopsis TNL-WRKY domain receptor RRS1 contributes to temperature-conditioned RPS4 auto-immunity. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4:403.
72. Cesari S., et al. The NB-LRR proteins RGA4 and RGA5 interact functionally and physically to confer disease resistance. EMBO J. 2014, 33:1941-1959.
73. Brikos C., O'Neill L.A.J. Signalling of toll-like receptors. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2008, 183:21-50.
74. Monie T.P., et al. Activating immunity: lessons from the TLRs and NLRs. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2009, 34:553-561.
75. Tapping R.I. Innate immune sensing and activation of cell surface Toll-like receptors. Semin. Immunol. 2009, 21:175-184.
76. Gabriëls S.H.E.J., et al. An NB-LRR protein required for HR signalling mediated by both extra- and intracellular resistance proteins. Plant J. 2007, 50:14-28.
77. Jacob F., et al. Evolution and conservation of plant NLR functions. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4:297.
78. Zbierzak A.M., et al. A TIR-NBS protein encoded by Arabidopsis Chilling Sensitive 1 (CHS1) limits chloroplast damage and cell death at low temperature. Plant J. 2013, 75:539-552.
79. Wang Y., et al. A missense mutation in CHS1, a TIR-NB protein, induces chilling sensitivity in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013, 75:553-565.
80. Gassmann W. Alternative splicing in plant defense. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2008, 326:219-233.
81. Knepper C., et al. The role of NDR1 in pathogen perception and plant defense signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6:1114-1116.
82. Day B., et al. NDR1 interaction with RIN4 mediates the differential activation of multiple disease resistance pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18:2782-2791.
83. Wiermer M., et al. Plant immunity: the EDS1 regulatory node. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8:383-389.
84. García A.V., et al. Balanced nuclear and cytoplasmic activities of EDS1 are required for a complete plant innate immune response. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6:e1000970.
85. Venugopal S.C., et al. Enhanced disease susceptibility 1 and salicylic acid act redundantly to regulate resistance gene-mediated signaling. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000545.
86. Bhattacharjee S., et al. Pathogen effectors target Arabidopsis EDS1 and alter its interactions with immune regulators. Science 2011, 334:1405-1408.
87. Kim T-H., et al. Natural variation in small molecule-induced TIR-NB-LRR signaling induces root growth arrest via EDS1- and PAD4-complexed R protein VICTR in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24:5177-5192.
88. Feys B.J., et al. Arabidopsis SENESCENCE-ASSOCIATED GENE101 stabilizes and signals within an ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1 complex in plant innate immunity. Plant Cell 2005, 17:2601-2613.
89. Wagner S., et al. Structural basis for signaling by exclusive EDS1 heteromeric complexes with SAG101 or PAD4 in plant innate immunity. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 14:619-630.
90. Rietz S., et al. Different roles of Enhanced Disease Susceptibility1 (EDS1) bound to and dissociated from Phytoalexin Deficient4 (PAD4) in Arabidopsis immunity. New Phytol. 2011, 191:107-119.
91. Kwon S.H., et al. SRFR1, a suppressor of effector-triggered immunity, encodes a conserved tetratricopeptide repeat protein with similarity to transcriptional repressors. Plant J. 2009, 57:109-119.
92. Kim S.H., et al. The Arabidopsis immune adaptor SRFR1 interacts with TCP transcription factors that redundantly contribute to effector-triggered immunity. Plant J. 2014, 78:978-989.
93. Guo Y-L., et al. Genome-wide comparison of nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat-encoding genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157:757-769.
94. Karasov T.L., et al. Genomic variability as a driver of plant-pathogen coevolution?. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 18:24-30.
95. Lange C., et al. Defining the origins of the NOD-like receptor system at the base of animal evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28:1687-1702.
96. Hibino T., et al. The immune gene repertoire encoded in the purple sea urchin genome. Dev. Biol. 2006, 300:349-365.
97. Mukhtar M.S., et al. Independently evolved virulence effectors converge onto hubs in a plant immune system network. Science 2011, 333:596-601.
98. Collier S.M., et al. Cell death mediated by the N-terminal domains of a unique and highly conserved class of NB-LRR protein. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011, 24:918-931.
99. Akita M., Valkonen J.P.T. A novel gene family in moss (Physcomitrella patens) shows sequence homology and a phylogenetic relationship with the TIR-NBS class of plant disease resistance genes. J. Mol. Evol. 2002, 55:595-605.
100. Bai J., et al. Diversity in nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat genes in cereals. Genome Res. 2002, 12:1871-1884.
101. Faris J.D., et al. A unique wheat disease resistance-like gene governs effector-triggered susceptibility to necrotrophic pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:13544-13549.
102. Meyers B.C., et al. Genome-wide analysis of NBS-LRR-encoding genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2003, 15:809-834.
103. Tuskan G.A., et al. The genome of black cottonwood Populus trichocarpa. Science 2006, 313:1596-1604.
104. Xue J-Y., et al. A primary survey on bryophyte species reveals two novel classes of nucleotide-binding site (NBS) genes. PloS ONE 2012, 7:e36700.
105. Yang S., et al. Recent duplications dominate NBS-encoding gene expansion in two woody species. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2008, 280:187-198.
106. Chan S.L., et al. The crystal structure of a TIR domain from Arabidopsis thaliana reveals a conserved helical region unique to plants. Protein Sci. 2010, 19:155-161.
107. Hao W., et al. Structural basis for the interaction between the potato virus X resistance protein (Rx) and its cofactor Ran GTPase-activating protein 2 (RanGAP2). Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:35868-35876.
108. Kobayashi K.S., et al. NLRC5: a key regulator of MHC class I-dependent immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12:813-820.
109. Meissner T.B., et al. NLRC5: a newly discovered MHC class I transactivator (CITA). Microbs Infect. 2012, 14:477-484.
110. Zika E., et al. Epigenetic control of MHC-II: interplay between CIITA and histone-modifying enzymes. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2005, 17:58-64.
111. Bartsch M., et al. Salicylic acid-independent ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1 signaling in Arabidopsis immunity and cell death is regulated by the monooxygenase FMO1 and the Nudix hydrolase NUDT7. Plant Cell 2006, 18:1038-1051.
112. Ando S., et al. WRKY70 interacting with RCY1 disease resistance protein is required for resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2014, 85:8-14.
113. Chang C., et al. Barley MLA immune receptors directly interfere with antagonistically acting transcription factors to initiate disease resistance signaling. Plant Cell 2013, 253:1158-1173.
114. Inoue H., et al. Blast resistance of CC-NB-LRR protein Pb1 is mediated by WRKY45 through protein-protein interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:9577-9582.
115. Padmanabhan M.S., et al. Novel positive regulatory role for the SPL6 transcription factor in the N TIR-NB-LRR receptor-mediated plant innate immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9:e1003235.
116. Xu F., et al. NLR-associating transcription factor bHLH84 and its paralogs function redundantly in plant immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10:e1004312.
117. Zhu Z., et al. Arabidopsis resistance protein SNC1 activates immune responses through association with a transcriptional corepressor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:13960-13965.
118. Chang C., et al. Partitioning, repressing and derepressing: dynamic regulations in MLA immune receptor triggered defense signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4:396.
119. Padmanabhan M.S., Dinesh-Kumar S.P. The conformational and subcellular compartmental dance of plant NLRs during viral recognition and defense signaling. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2014, 20:55-61.
120. Qi D., Innes R.W. Recent advances in plant NLR structure, function, localization, and signaling. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4:348.