How cells explore shape space: A quantitative statistical perspective of cellular morphogenesis

BioEssays

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1195-1203

  Yin, Zheng ^a   Sailem, Heba ^b   Sero, Julia ^b   Ardy, Rico ^b   Wong, Stephen T C ^a   Bakal, Chris ^b  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cellular morphogenesis; High content screening; Morphological complexity; Morphological landscapes; RNAi; Signaling networks

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRUCTURE; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; BLOOD CELL; CELL ADHESION; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EPITHELIAL MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; METABOLISM; RNA INTERFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TUMOR CELL CULTURE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL SHAPE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EPITHELIAL-MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HEMOCYTES; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RNA INTERFERENCE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TUMOR CELLS, CULTURED;

EID: 84920278831     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201400011     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bilder D, Li M, Perrimon N. 2000. Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors. Science 289: 113-6.
2. Nelson WJ, Nusse R. 2004. Convergence of Wnt, beta-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science 303: 1483-7.
3. Takeichi M. 1995. Morphogenetic roles of classic cadherins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 7: 619-27.
4. Wildenberg GA, Dohn MR, Carnahan RH, Davis MA, et al. 2006. p120-catenin and p190RhoGAP regulate cell-cell adhesion by coordinating antagonism between Rac and Rho. Cell 127: 1027-39.
5. Bustelo XR. 2012. Intratumoral stages of metastatic cells: a synthesis of ontogeny, Rho/Rac GTPases, epithelial-mesenchymal transitions, and more. BioEssays 34: 748-59.
6. Kueh HY, Mitchison TJ. 2009. Structural plasticity in actin and tubulin polymer dynamics. Science 325: 960-3.
7. Nieto MA. 2013. Epithelial plasticity: a common theme in embryonic and cancer cells. Science 342: 1234850.
8. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, et al. 1999. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284: 143-7.
9. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. 2006. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126: 677-89.
10. Deng J, Petersen BE, Steindler DA, Jorgensen ML, et al. 2006. Mesenchymal stem cells spontaneously express neural proteins in culture and are neurogenic after transplantation. Stem Cells 24: 1054-64.
11. Pelham RJ, Jr, Wang Y. 1997. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 13661-5.
12. DuFort CC, Paszek MJ, Weaver VM. 2011. Balancing forces: architectural control of mechanotransduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 308-19.
13. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. 2005. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310: 1139-43.
14. Doyle AD, Petrie RJ, Kutys ML, Yamada KM. 2013. Dimensions in cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol 25: 642-9.
15. Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, Lakins JN, et al. 2005. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 8: 241-54.
16. Folkman J, Moscona A. 1978. Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 273: 345-9.
17. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, et al. 1997. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 276: 1425-8.
18. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, et al. 2004. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 6: 483-95.
19. Mammoto A, Connor KM, Mammoto T, Yung CW, et al. 2009. A mechanosensitive transcriptional mechanism that controls angiogenesis. Nature 457: 1103-8.
20. North TE, Goessling W, Peeters M, Li P, et al. 2009. Hematopoietic stem cell development is dependent on blood flow. Cell 137: 736-48.
21. Farge E. 2003. Mechanical induction of Twist in the Drosophila foregut/stomodeal primordium. Curr Biol 13: 1365-77.
22. Wolf K, Friedl P. 2011. Extracellular matrix determinants of proteolytic and non-proteolytic cell migration. Trends Cell Biol 21: 736-44.
23. Yin Z, Sadok A, Sailem H, McCarthy A, et al. 2013. A screen for morphological complexity identifies regulators of switch-like transitions between discrete cell shapes. Nat Cell Biol 15: 860-71.
24. Yin Z, Zhou X, Bakal C, Li F, et al. 2008. Using iterative cluster merging with improved gap statistics to perform online phenotype discovery in the context of high-throughput RNAi screens. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 264.
25. Bakal C, Aach J, Church G, Perrimon N. 2007. Quantitative morphological signatures define local signaling networks regulating cell morphology. Science 316: 1753-76.
26. Evans L, Sailem H, Vargas PP, Bakal C. 2013. Inferring signalling networks from images. J Microscopy 252: 1-7.
27. Altschuler SJ, Wu LF. 2010. Cellular heterogeneity: do differences make a difference? Cell 141: 559-63.
28. Pelkmans L. 2012. Cell Biology. Using cell-to-cell variability - a new era in molecular biology. Science 336: 425-6.
29. Sailem H, Bousgouni V, Cooper S, Bakal C. 2014. Cross-talk between Rho and Rac GTPases drives deterministic exploration of cellular shape space and morphological heterogeneity. Open Biol 4: 130132.
30. Keren K, Pincus Z, Allen GM, Barnhart EL, et al. 2008. Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature 453: 475-80.
31. Tweedy L, Meier B, Stephan J, Heinrich D, et al. 2013. Distinct cell shapes determine accurate chemotaxis. Sci Rep 3: 2606.
32. Gibson MC, Patel AB, Nagpal R, Perrimon N. 2006. The emergence of geometric order in proliferating metazoan epithelia. Nature 442: 1038-41.
33. Jones TR, Carpenter AE, Lamprecht MR, Moffat J, et al. 2009. Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 1826-31.
34. Kauffman SA. 1993. The Origins of Order. Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Waddington CH. 1957. The Strategy of Genes: Allen & Unwin.
36. Miller-Jensen K, Janes KA, Brugge JS, Lauffenburger DA. 2007. Common effector processing mediates cell-specific responses to stimuli. Nature 448: 604-8.
37. Janes KA, Albeck JG, Gaudet S, Sorger PK, et al. 2005. A systems model of signaling identifies a molecular basis set for cytokine-induced apoptosis. Science 310: 1646-53.
38. Pomerening JR. 2008. Uncovering mechanisms of bistability in biological systems. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19: 381-8.
39. Huang S. 2009. Reprogramming cell fates: reconciling rarity with robustness. BioEssays 31: 546-60.
40. Lim J, Thiery JP. 2012. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: insights from development. Development 139: 3471-86.
41. Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA. 2009. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 139: 871-90.
42. Desprat N, Supatto W, Pouille PA, Beaurepaire E, et al. 2008. Tissue deformation modulates twist expression to determine anterior midgut differentiation in Drosophila embryos. Dev Cell 15: 470-7.
43. Cordenonsi M, Zanconato F, Azzolin L, Forcato M, et al. 2011. The Hippo transducer TAZ confers cancer stem cell-related traits on breast cancer cells. Cell 147: 759-72.
44. Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, et al. 2011. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474: 179-83.
45. Mammoto A, Mammoto T, Ingber DE. 2012. Mechanosensitive mechanisms in transcriptional regulation. J Cell Sci 125: 3061-73.
46. Rajakyla EK, Vartiainen MK. 2014. Rho, nuclear actin, and actin-binding proteins in the regulation of transcription and gene expression. Small GTPases 5: e27539.
47. Jamora C, Fuchs E. 2002. Intercellular adhesion, signalling and the cytoskeleton. Nat Cell Biol 4: E101-18.
48. Etienne-Manneville S. 2011. Control of polarized cell morphology and motility by adherens junctions. Semin Cell Dev Biol 22: 850-7.
49. Daley WP, Yamada KM. 2013. ECM-modulated cellular dynamics as a driving force for tissue morphogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 23: 408-14.
50. Houk AR, Jilkine A, Mejean CO, Boltyanskiy R, et al. 2012. Membrane tension maintains cell polarity by confining signals to the leading edge during neutrophil migration. Cell 148: 175-88.