The nanoscale geometry of TiO2 nanotubes influences the osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by modulating H3K4 trimethylation

Biomaterials

Volumn 39, Issue , 2015, Pages 193-205

  Lv, Longwei ^a   Liu, Yunsong ^a   Zhang, Ping ^a   Zhang, Xiao ^a   Liu, Jianzhang ^a   Chen, Tong ^a   Su, Penglei ^b   Li, Hongyi ^b   Zhou, Yongsheng ^a,c  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY SCHOOL AND HOSPITAL OF STOMATOLOGY   (China)

^b BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c NATIONAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY FOR DIGITAL AND MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY OF STOMATOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Adipose derived stem cells; Bone tissue engineering; Epigenetics; Nanotubes; Osteogenic differentiation; Titanium

Indexed keywords

ALKYLATION; AMINO ACIDS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BONE; CELL ENGINEERING; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; GEOMETRY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOTUBES; TISSUE; TISSUE REGENERATION; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; YARN;

ADIPOSE DERIVED STEM CELLS; BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING; CELLULAR DIFFERENTIATION; EPIGENETIC MECHANISMS; EPIGENETICS; FUTURE APPLICATIONS; NANO-SCALE GEOMETRIES; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION;

STEM CELLS;

HISTONE H3; LYSINE; NANOTUBE; OSTEOCALCIN; RETINOBLASTOMA BINDING PROTEIN 2; TITANIUM DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR RUNX2; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ADIPOSE DERIVED STEM CELL; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEOMETRY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; METHYLATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PROMOTER REGION; ADIPOCYTE; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; EPIGENETICS; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; STEM CELL; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ADIPOCYTES; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; EPIGENOMICS; HUMANS; NANOTUBES; OSTEOGENESIS; STEM CELLS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TITANIUM;

EID: 84919471771     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. 2 nanotubes for bone regeneration. Trends Biotechnol 2012, 30:315-322.
2. Bettinger C.J., Langer R., Borenstein J.T. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2009, 48:5406-5415.
3. Clair S., Variola F., Kondratenko M., Jedrzejowski P., Nanci A., Rosei F., et al. Self-assembled monolayer of alkanephosphoric acid on nanotextured Ti. JChem Phys 2008, 128:144705.
4. Dalby M.J., McCloy D., Robertson M., Wilkinson C.D., Oreffo R.O. Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. Biomaterials 2006, 27:1306-1315.
5. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007, 6:997-1003.
6. Dalby M.J., Hart A., Yarwood S.J. The effect of the RACK1 signalling protein on the regulation of cell adhesion and cell contact guidance on nanometric grooves. Biomaterials 2008, 29:282-289.
7. You M.H., Kwak M.K., Kim D.H., Kim K., Levchenko A., Kim D.Y., et al. Synergistically enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by culture on nanostructured surfaces with induction media. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:1856-1862.
8. Liu W., Wei Y., Zhang X., Xu M., Yang X., Deng X. Lower extent but similar rhythm of osteogenic behavior in hBMSCs cultured on nanofibrous scaffolds versus induced with osteogenic supplement. ACS Nano 2013, 7:6928-6938.
9. Hosseinkhani H., Hosseinkhani M., Tian F., Kobayashi H., Tabata Y. Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in self-assembled peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Biomaterials 2006, 27:4079-4086.
10. Moroni L., Licht R., de Boer J., de Wijn J.R., van Blitterswijk C.A. Fiber diameter and texture of electrospun PEOT/PBT scaffolds influence human mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and morphology, and the release of incorporated compounds. Biomaterials 2006, 27:4911-4922.
11. Pozio A., Palmieri A., Girardi A., Cura F., Carinci F. Titanium nanotubes stimulate osteoblast differentiation of stem cells from pulp and adipose tissue. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012, 9:S169-S174.
12. 2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett 2007, 7:1686-1691.
13. Bauer S., Park J., Faltenbacher J., Berger S., von der Mark K., Schmuki P. Size selective behavior of mesenchymal stem cells on ZrO(2) and TiO(2) nanotube arrays. Integr Biol (Camb) 2009, 1:525-532.
14. Oh S., Brammer K.S., Li Y.S., Teng D., Engler A.J., Chien S., et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:2130-2135.
15. Brammer K.S., Oh S., Cobb C.J., Bjursten L.M., van der Heyde H., Jin S. Improved bone-forming functionality on diameter-controlled TiO(2) nanotube surface. Acta Biomater 2009, 5:3215-3223.
16. 2 nanotube layers on MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. JBiomed Mater Res A 2010, 94:1012-1022.
17. 2 nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs. Biomaterials 2011, 32:6900-6911.
18. Arnsdorf E.J., Tummala P., Castillo A.B., Zhang F., Jacobs C.R. The epigenetic mechanism of mechanically induced osteogenic differentiation. JBiomech 2010, 43:2881-2886.
19. Ge W., Shi L., Zhou Y., Liu Y., Ma G.E., Jiang Y., et al. Inhibition of osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stromal cells by retinoblastoma binding protein 2 repression of RUNX2-activated transcription. Stem Cells 2011, 29:1112-1125.
20. Li S., Ni J., Liu X., Zhang X., Yin S., Rong M., et al. Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface modified by ultraviolet irradiation: an invitro study. JBiomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012, 100:1587-1598.
21. Liu Y.S., Ou M.E., Liu H., Gu M., Lv L.W., Fan C., et al. The effect of simvastatin on chemotactic capability of SDF-1alpha and the promotion of bone regeneration. Biomaterials 2014, 35:4489-4498.
22. Liu Y., Zhang X., Liu Y., Jin X., Fan C., Ye H., et al. Bi-functionalization of a calcium phosphate-coated titanium surface with slow-release simvastatin and metronidazole to provide antibacterial activities and pro-osteodifferentiation capabilities. PLoS One 2014, 9:e97741.
23. 2: time-resolved kinetics, structural changes, and competition study. Biointerphases 2012, 7:48.
24. Liu Y., Zhao Y., Zhang X., Chen T., Zhao X., Ma G.E., et al. Flow cytometric cell sorting and invitro pre-osteoinduction are not requirements for invivo bone formation by human adipose-derived stromal cells. PLoS One 2013, 8:e56002.
25. Ge W., Liu Y., Chen T., Zhang X., Lv L., Jin C., et al. The epigenetic promotion of osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by the genetic and chemical blockade of histone demethylase LSD1. Biomaterials 2014, 35:6015-6025.
26. Hall J., Sorensen R.G., Wozney J.M., Wikesjo U.M. Bone formation at rhBMP-2-coated titanium implants in the rat ectopic model. JClin Periodontol 2007, 34:444-451.
27. Dahl J.A., Collas P. Arapid micro chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (microChIP). Nat Protoc 2008, 3:1032-1045.
28. Neupane M.P., Park I.S., Lee M.H., Bae T.S., Watari F. Influence of heat treatment on morphological changes of nano-structured titanium oxide formed by anodic oxidation of titanium in acidic fluoride solution. Biomed Mater Eng 2009, 19:77-83.
29. He J., Zhou W., Zhou X., Zhong X., Zhang X., Wan P., et al. The anatase phase of nanotopography titania plays an important role on osteoblast cell morphology and proliferation. JMater Sci Mater Med 2008, 19:3465-3472.
30. Yu W.Q., Jiang X.Q., Xu L., Zhao Y.F., Zhang F.Q., Cao X. Osteogenic gene expression of canine bone marrow stromal cell and bacterial adhesion on titanium with different nanotubes. JBiomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2011, 99:207-216.
31. 2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm - an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. Small 2009, 5:666-671.
32. Oliveira J.M., Kotobuki N., Tadokoro M., Hirose M., Mano J.F., Reis R.L., et al. Exvivo culturing of stromal cells with dexamethasone-loaded carboxymethylchitosan/poly(amidoamine) dendrimer nanoparticles promotes ectopic bone formation. Bone 2010, 46:1424-1435.
33. Lee Y.H., Bhattarai G., Park I.S., Kim G.R., Kim G.E., Lee M.H., et al. Bone regeneration around N-acetyl cysteine-loaded nanotube titanium dental implant in rat mandible. Biomaterials 2013, 34:10199-10208.
34. 2 nanotubes with bone morphogenetic protein 2 and its synergistic effect on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:1097-1105.
35. Yu M., Zhou W., Song Y., Yu F., Li D., Na S., et al. Development of mesenchymal stem cell-implant complexes by cultured cells sheet enhances osseointegration in type 2 diabetic rat model. Bone 2011, 49:387-394.
36. Liu Y., Zhou Y., Feng H., Ma G.E., Ni Y. Injectable tissue-engineered bone composed of human adipose-derived stromal cells and platelet-rich plasma. Biomaterials 2008, 29:3338-3345.
37. Zhang W., Zhang X., Wang S., Xu L., Zhang M., Wang G., et al. Comparison of the use of adipose tissue-derived and bone marrow-derived stem cells for rapid bone regeneration. JDent Res 2013, 92:1136-1141.
38. Takemitsu H., Zhao D., Yamamoto I., Harada Y., Michishita M., Arai T. Comparison of bone marrow and adipose tissue-derived canine mesenchymal stem cells. BMC Vet Res 2012, 8:150.
39. Kang B.J., Ryu H.H., Park S.S., Koyama Y., Kikuchi M., Woo H.M., et al. Comparing the osteogenic potential of canine mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissues, bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, and Wharton's jelly for treating bone defects. JVet Sci 2012, 13:299-310.
40. Hayashi O., Katsube Y., Hirose M., Ohgushi H., Ito H. Comparison of osteogenic ability of rat mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, periosteum, and adipose tissue. Calcif Tissue Int 2008, 82:238-247.
41. Gulati K., Aw M.S., Findlay D., Losic D. Local drug delivery to the bone by drug-releasing implants: perspectives of nano-engineered titania nanotube arrays. Ther Deliv 2012, 3:857-873.
42. Hulsart-Billstrom G., Yuen P.K., Marsell R., Hilborn J., Larsson S., Ossipov D. Bisphosphonate-linked hyaluronic acid hydrogel sequesters and enzymatically releases active bone morphogenetic protein-2 for induction of osteogenic differentiation. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14:3055-3063.
43. Wang H., Zou Q., Boerman O.C., Nijhuis A.W., Jansen J.A., Li Y., et al. Combined delivery of BMP-2 and bFGF from nanostructured colloidal gelatin gels and its effect on bone regeneration invivo. JControl Rel 2013, 166:172-181.
44. Garcia-Bassets I., Kwon Y.S., Telese F., Prefontaine G.G., Hutt K.R., Cheng C.S., et al. Histone methylation-dependent mechanisms impose ligand dependency for gene activation by nuclear receptors. Cell 2007, 128:505-518.
45. Ye L., Fan Z., Yu B., Chang J., Al H.K., Zhou X., et al. Histone demethylases KDM4B and KDM6B promotes osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 11:50-61.
46. Barkhordarian A., Sison J., Cayabyab R., Mahanian N., Chiappelli F. Epigenetic regulation of osteogenesis: human embryonic palatal mesenchymal cells. Bioinformation 2010, 5:278-281.
47. Tan J., Huang H., Huang W., Li L., Guo J., Huang B., et al. The genomic landscapes of histone H3-Lys9 modifications of gene promoter regions and expression profiles in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. JGenet Genomics 2008, 35:585-593.
48. Teven C.M., Liu X., Hu N., Tang N., Kim S.H., Huang E., et al. Epigenetic regulation of mesenchymal stem cells: a focus on osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. Stem Cells Int 2011, 2011:201371.
49. Du J., Ma Y., Ma P., Wang S., Fan Z. Demethylation of epiregulin gene by histone demethylase FBXL11 and BCL6 corepressor inhibits osteo/dentinogenic differentiation. Stem Cells 2013, 31:126-136.
50. Noer A., Lindeman L.C., Collas P. Histone H3 modifications associated with differentiation and long-term culture of mesenchymal adipose stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2009, 18:725-736.