TiO 2 nanotubes for bone regeneration

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 315-322

  Brammer, Karla S ^a   Frandsen, Christine J ^a   Jin, Sungho ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Mesenchymal stem cell; Nanostructure; Osteoblast; TiO 2 nanotube

Indexed keywords

BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL USE; CURRENT TRENDS; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANODIZATIONS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NANO-METER REGIMES; NANOTUBE SURFACE; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; ORTHOPEDIC MATERIALS; OSTEOGENIC CELLS; STRUCTURAL HIERARCHIES; SURFACE NANOSTRUCTURE; TIO;

BONE; CELL CULTURE; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSTEOBLASTS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

NANOTUBES;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR; NANOTUBE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE; TITANIUM;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; ORTHOPEDIC PROSTHESIS; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES;

BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NANOTUBES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; TITANIUM;

EID: 84861346240     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.02.005     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Christenson E.M., et al. Nanobiomaterial applications in orthopedics. J. Orthop. Res. 2007, 25:11-22.
2. McNamara L.E., et al. Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation. J. Tissue Eng. 2010, 2010:120623.
3. Li W.J., et al. Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 60:613-621.
4. Sundfeldt M., et al. Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories. Acta Orthop. 2006, 77:177-197.
5. Brammer K.S., et al. Improved bone-forming functionality on diameter-controlled TiO(2) nanotube surface. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5:3215-3223.
6. 2 nanotubes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006, 78:97-103.
7. Popat K.C., et al. Nanostructured surfaces for bone biotemplating applications. J. Orthop. Res. 2006, 24:619-627.
8. Popat K.C., et al. Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. Biomaterials 2007, 28:3188-3197.
9. Swan E.E.L., et al. Fabrication and evaluation of nanoporous alumina membranes for osteoblast culture. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Part A 2005, 72A:288-295.
10. Bauer S., et al. Size selective behavior of mesenchymal stem cells on ZrO(2) and TiO(2) nanotube arrays. Integr. Biol. 2009, 1:525-532.
11. 2 nanotube surfaces: 15nm - an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. Small 2009, 5:666-671.
12. 2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 2007, 7:1686-1691.
13. Oh S., et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:2130-2135.
14. Zhang Z.G., et al. Advances in bone repair with nanobiomaterials: mini-review. Cytotechnology 2011, 63:437-443.
15. Massia, S.P. (1999) Cell-extracellular matrix interactions relevant to vascular tissue engineering. In Tissue Engineering Prosthetic Vascular Grafts (Zilla, P. and Greisler, H., eds), pp. 583-593, Landes.
16. Liu H., Webster T.J. Nanomedicine for implants: a review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials 2006, 28:354-369.
17. Liu H., Webster T.J. Mechanical properties of dispersed ceramic nanoparticles in polymer composites for orthopedic applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 2010, 5:299-313.
18. Sato M., et al. Increased osteoblast functions on undoped and yttrium-doped nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium. Biomaterials 2006, 27:2358-2369.
19. Sato M., et al. Enhanced osteoblast adhesion on hydrothermally treated hydroxyapatite/titania/poly(lactide-co-glycolide) sol-gel titanium coatings. Biomaterials 2005, 26:1349-1357.
20. Jin H.J., et al. Biomaterial films of Bombyx mori silk fibroin with poly(ethylene oxide). Biomacromolecules 2004, 5:711-717.
21. Jin H.J., et al. Human bone marrow stromal cell responses on electrospun silk fibroin mats. Biomaterials 2004, 25:1039-1047.
22. Yao C., et al. Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2008, 85:157-166.
23. 2 nanotubes. J. Biomed. Materials Res. A 2006, 78:97-103.
24. Yao C., Webster T.J. Anodization: a promising nano-modification technique of titanium implants for orthopedic applications. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2006, 6:2682-2692.
25. Khang D., et al. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. Biomaterials 2008, 29:970-983.
26. Gimble J.M., et al. In vitro differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells. Transfusion Med. Hemotherapy 2008, 35:228-238.
27. Yim E.K., et al. Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31:1299-1306.
28. Webster T.J., et al. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999, 20:1221-1227.
29. Dalby M.J., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6:997-1003.
30. Popat K.C., et al. Osteogenic differentiation of marrow stromal cells cultured on nanoporous alumina surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2007, 80:955-964.
31. Oh S., et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:2130-2135.
32. Sjostrom T., et al. Fabrication of pillar-like titania nanostructures on titanium and their interactions with human skeletal stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5:1433-1441.
33. Hosseinkhani H., et al. Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in self-assembled peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Biomaterials 2006, 27:4079-4086.
34. Yin Z., et al. The regulation of tendon stem cell differentiation by the alignment of nanofibers. Biomaterials 2010, 31:2163-2175.
35. Dolatshahi-Pirouz A., et al. Fibronectin adsorption, cell adhesion, and proliferation on nanostructured tantalum surfaces. ACS Nano 2010, 4:2874-2882.
36. You M.H., et al. Synergistically enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by culture on nanostructured surfaces with induction media. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:1856-1862.
37. Wang G., et al. In vitro assessment of the differentiation potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on genipin-chitosan conjugation scaffold with surface hydroxyapatite nanostructure for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 2011, 17:1341-1349.
38. Mendonca G., et al. The combination of micron and nanotopography by H(2)SO(4)/H(2)O(2) treatment and its effects on osteoblast-specific gene expression of hMSCs. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2010, 94:169-179.
39. Moroni L., et al. Fiber diameter and texture of electrospun PEOT/PBT scaffolds influence human mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and morphology, and the release of incorporated compounds. Biomaterials 2006, 27:4911-4922.
40. 2 nanotube layers on MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2010, 94:1012-1022.
41. Bettinger C.J., et al. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2009, 48:5406-5415.
42. Jacobs J.J., Hallab N.J. Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: A local effect of metal hypersensitivity?. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2006, 88:1171-1172.
43. Niinomi M., Nakai M. Titanium-based biomaterials for preventing stress shielding between implant devices and bone. Int. J. Biomater. 2011, 2011:836587.
44. 2 nanotube surfaces for osteoblasts vs. osteo-progenitor cells. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7:2697-2703.
45. 2 nanotube array growth by anodization. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111:7235-7241.
46. He J., et al. The anatase phase of nanotopography titania plays an important role on osteoblast cell morphology and proliferation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2008, 19:3465-3472.
47. Tami A.E., et al. Probing the tissue to subcellular level structure underlying bone's molecular sieving function. Biorheology 2003, 40:577-590.
48. Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., et al. Lateral spacing of integrin ligands influences cell spreading and focal adhesion assembly. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 85:219-224.
49. Lavenus S., et al. Adhesion and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on titanium nanopores. Eur. Cell Mater. 2011, 22:84-96.
50. Lavenus S., et al. Cell interaction with nanopatterned surface of implants. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 2010, 5:937-947.
51. Bauer S., et al. Improved attachment of mesenchymal stem cells on super-hydrophobic TiO2 nanotubes. Acta Biomater. 2008, 4:1576-1582.
52. Rani S., et al. Synthesis and applications of electrochemically self-assembled titania nanotube arrays. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12:2780-2800.
53. Chen C.S. Mechanotransduction - a field pulling together?. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:3285-3292.
54. Dalby M.J. Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. Med. Eng. Phys. 2005, 27:730-742.
55. Orr A.W., et al. Mechanisms of mechanotransduction. Dev. Cell 2006, 10:11-20.
56. Teo B.K., et al. Nanotopography/mechanical induction of stem-cell differentiation. Methods Cell Biol. 2010, 98:241-294.
57. Dulgar-Tulloch A.J., et al. Human mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and proliferation in response to ceramic chemistry and nanoscale topography. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2009, 90:586-594.
58. 2 nanotubes with bone morphogenetic protein 2 and its synergistic effect on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:1097-1105.
59. 2 nanotube arrays with EGF and BMP-2 for modified behavior towards mesenchymal stem cells. Integr. Biol. 2011, 3:927-936.
60. Kodama A., et al. Bioactivation of titanium surfaces using coatings of TiO(2) nanotubes rapidly pre-loaded with synthetic hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5:2322-2330.
61. Yao C., et al. Nanostructured metal coatings on polymers increase osteoblast attachment. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2007, 2:487-492.
62. 2 nanotubes in inorganic and organic electrolytes using two-step anodization. Physica Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. 2008, 2:102-104.
63. Oliveira N.T., et al. Electrochemical studies on zirconium and its biocompatible alloys Ti-50Zr at.% and Zr-2.5Nb wt.% in simulated physiologic media. J. Biomed. Materials Res. A 2005, 74:397-407.
64. Feil A.F., et al. From alumina nanopores to nanotubes: dependence on the geometry of anodization system. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 11:2330-2335.
65. El-Sayed H.A., Birss V.I. Controlled growth and monitoring of tantalum oxide nanostructures. Nanoscale 2010, 2:793-798.
66. Losic D., Simovic S. Self-ordered nanopore and nanotube platforms for drug delivery applications. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2009, 6:1363-1381.
67. 2 nanotube arrays: an actively controllable drug delivery system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131:4230-4232.
68. 2 nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2009, 9:1932-1936.
69. Popat K.C., et al. Titania nanotubes: a novel platform for drug-eluting coatings for medical implants?. Small 2007, 3:1878-1881.
70. Popat K.C., et al. Decreased Staphylococcus epidermis adhesion and increased osteoblast functionality on antibiotic-loaded titania nanotubes. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4880-4888.
71. Yao C., Webster T.J. Prolonged antibiotic delivery from anodized nanotubular titanium using a co-precipitation drug loading method. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2009, 91:587-595.
72. 2 nanotubes as drug nanoreservoirs for the regulation of mobility and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater 2012, 8:439-448.
73. 2 nanotubes: an experimental study in the pig. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2009, 89:165-171.
74. Bjursten L.M., et al. Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2010, 92:1218-1224.
75. 2 nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs. Biomaterials 2011, 32:6900-6911.
76. Soumetz F.C., et al. Human osteoblast-like cells response to nanofunctionalized surfaces for tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2008, 84:249-255.
77. Sundelacruz S., Kaplan D.L. Stem cell- and scaffold-based tissue engineering approaches to osteochondral regenerative medicine. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009, 20:646-655.
78. Liu, H. and Webster, T.J. (2006) Ceramic/polymer nanocomposite tissue engineering scaffolds for more effective orthopedic applications: from 2D surfaces to novel 3D architectures. MRS Proc. 950, 0950-D10-03, doi:10.1557/PROC-0950-D10-03.