The effect of anatase TiO2 nanotube layers on MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1012-1022

  Yu, Wei Qiang ^a   Jiang, Xing Quan ^a   Zhang, Fu Qiang ^a   Xu, Ling ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Anatase phase; Cell adhesion; Cell differentiation; Cell proliferation; TiO2 nanotubes

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ACTIVITY; AMORPHOUS PHASE; AMORPHOUS TIO; ANATASE NANOTUBES; ANATASE PHASE; ANATASE TIO; ANODIZATIONS; BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; BONE GROWTH; BONE-FORMING CELLS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATES; EFFECTIVE LENGTH; MC3T3-E1; NANOMETER-SCALE ROUGHNESS; NANOTUBE DIAMETERS; NANOTUBE LAYERS; NANOTUBULAR; PROLIFERATION RATE; TIO; TITANIUM OXIDE NANOTUBES; TUBE DIAMETERS;

ADHESION; BONE; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; MINERALOGY; PHOSPHATASES; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TITANIUM OXIDES;

NANOTUBES;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; NANOTUBE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SIZE; CELL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; MINERALIZATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; ANIMAL; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BONE MINERALIZATION; CELL CULTURE; CELL SHAPE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTRODE; ENZYMOLOGY; METABOLISM; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELLS, CULTURED; ELECTRODES; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; NANOTUBES; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 77956469278     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32687     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Linder L, Carlsson A, Marsal L, Bjursten LM, Brånemark PI. Clinical aspects of osseointegration in joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1988;70:550-555.
2. Pillar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observation on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1986;208:108-113. (Pubitemid 16049779)
3. Webster TJ. Nanophase ceramics as improved bone tissue engineering materials. Am Ceram Soc Bull 2003;82:1-8.
4. Ashley ET, Covington LL, Bishop BG, Breault LG Ailing and failing endosseous dental implants: A literature review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003;4:35-50.
5. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Hirt HP, Snetivy D, Nolte LP. Interface shear strength of titaniumimplants with a sanblasted and acid-etched surface: A biomechanicalstudy in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.
6. Webster TJ. Nanophase ceramics: The future of orthopedic anddental implant material. In: Ying JY, editor. Nanostructuredmaterials. New York: Academy Press; 2001. p 125-166.
7. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
8. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007;23:844-854.
9. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999;20:1222-1227.
10. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res A 2000;51:475-483.
11. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000;21:1803-1810. (Pubitemid 30365044)
12. Elias KL, Price RL, Webster TJ. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanometer diameter carbon fibers. Biomaterials 2002;23:3279-3287.
13. Rice JM, Hunt JA, Gallagher JA, Hanarp P, Sutherland DS, Gold J. Quantitative assessment of the response of primary derived human osteoblasts and macrophages to a range of nanotopography surfaces in a single culture model in vitro. Biomaterials 2003;24:4799-4818. (Pubitemid 37203407)
14. Price RL, Gutwein LG, Kaledin L, Tepper F, Webster TJ. Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: Influence of chemistry, phase, and topography. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:1284-1293.
15. Li P. Biomimetic nano-apatite coating capable of promoting bone ingrowth. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;66:79-85.
16. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 2004;25:4731-4739.
17. Price RL, Ellison K, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;70:129-138.
18. Webster TJ, Hellenmeyer EL, Price RL. Increased osteoblast functions on theta + delta nanofiber alumina. Biomaterials 2005;26:953-960.
19. Swan EE, Popat KC, Grimes CA, Desai TA. Fabrication and evaluation of nanoporous alumina membranes for osteoblast culture. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;72:288-295. (Pubitemid 40270999)
20. Popat KC, Leary Swan EE, Mukhatyar V, Chatvanichkul KI, Mor GK, Grimes CA, Desai TA. Influence of nanoporous alumina membranes on long-term osteoblast response. Biomaterials 2005;26:4516-4522.
21. Sato M, Sambito MA, Aslani A, Kalkhoran NM, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. Increased osteoblast functions on undoped and yttrium-doped nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium. Biomaterials 2006;27:2358-2369.
22. Colon G, Ward BC, Webster TJ. Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78:595-604. (Pubitemid 44253544)
23. Ward BC, Webster TJ. The effect of nanotopography on calcium and phosphorus deposition on metallic materials in vitro. Biomaterials 2006;27:3064-3074.
24. Bigi A, Nicoli-Aldini N, Bracci B. In vitro culture of mesenchymal cells onto nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite-coated Ti13Nb13Zr alloy. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;82:213-221.
25. Faghihi S, Azari F, Zhilyaev AP, Szpunar JA, Vali H, Tabrizian M. Cellular and molecular interactions between MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts and nanostructured titanium produced by high-pressure torsion. Biomaterials 2007;28:3887-3895.
26. Sato M, Aslani A, Sambito MA, Kalkhoran NM, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite/titania coatings on titanium improves osteoblast adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;84:265-272.
27. 2 coatings with nanostructural surface. Acta Biomater 2008;4:544-552.
28. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, Wilkinson CD, Oreffo RO. Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. Biomaterials 2006;27:1306-1315.
29. Arnold M, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Glass R, Blümmel J, Eck W, Kantlehner M, Kessler H, Spatz JP. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. Chemphyschem 2004;5:383-388.
30. Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Micoulet A, Blümmel J, Auernheimer J, Kessler H, Spatz JP. Lateral spacing of integrin ligands influences cell spreading and focal adhesion assembly. Eur J Cell Biol 2006;85:219-224.
31. Khang D, Lu J, Yao C, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. Biomaterials 2008;29:970-983. (Pubitemid 50020176)
32. Macak JM, Tsuchiya H, Ghicov A, Yasuda K, Hahn R, Bauer S, Schmuki P. Self-organized electrochemical formation, properties and applications. Curr Opin Solid StateMater Sci 2007;11:3-18.
33. Oh SH, Finõnes RR, Daraio C, Chen LH, Jin S. Growth of nano-scale hydroxyapatite using chemically treated titanium oxide nanotubes. Biomaterials 2005;26:4938-4943.
34. 2 nanotubes. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;77:534-541.
35. 2 nanotubes. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78:97-103.
36. Oh S, Jin S. Titanium oxide nanotubes with controlled. Morphology for enhanced bone growth. Mater Sci Eng C 2006;26:1301-1306.
37. Popat KC, Leoni L, Grimes CA, Desai TA. Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. Biomaterials 2007;28:3188-3197. (Pubitemid 46654214)
38. Yao C, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;85:157-166. (Pubitemid 351355365)
39. Popat KC, Eltgroth M, Latempa TJ, Grimes CA, Desai TA. Decreased Staphylococcus epidermis adhesion and increased osteoblast functionality on antibiotic-loaded titania nanotubes. Biomaterials 2007;28:4880-4888.
40. Popat KC, Eltgroth M, LaTempa TJ, Grimes CA, Desai TA. Titania nanotubes: A novel platform for drug-eluting coatings for medical implants? Small 2007;3:1878-1881.
41. 2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett 2007;7:1686-1691.
42. 2 nanotubes. Acta Biomater 2008;4:1576-1582.
43. Zhao J, Wang X, Sun T, Li L. Crystal phase transition and properties of titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodization. J Alloys Compounds 2007:792-795.
44. Sun H, Wu C, Dai K, Chang J, Tang T. Proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived stromal cells on akermanite-bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 2006;27:5651-5657. (Pubitemid 44294824)
45. Gregory CA, Gunn WG, Peister A, Prockop DJ. An Alizarin red-based assay of mineralization by adherent cells in culture: Comparison with cetylpyridinium chloride extraction. Anal Biochem 2004;329:77-84.
46. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001;7:291.
47. Gustafson T, Wolpert L. Studies on the cellular basis of morphogenesis in the sea urchin embryo. Directed movements of primary mesenchvme cells in normal and vegetalized larvae. Exp Cell Res 1961;24:64-79.
48. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. Biomaterials 2002;23:2945-2954.
49. Riehle M, Dalby MJ, Johnstone H, McIntosh A, Affrossman S. Cell behaviour of rat calvaria bone cells on surfaces with random nanometric features. Mater Sci Eng C 2003;23:337-340. (Pubitemid 36211423)
50. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: A brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10nm high nano-topography and fibroblast filopodia. Cell Biol Int 2004;28:229-236.
51. Washburn NR, Yamada KM, Simon CG Jr, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ. High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: Influence of nanometerscale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials 2004;25:1215-1224.