Corrigendum to: Reflective minds and open hearts: Cognitive style and personality predict religiosity and spiritual thinking in a community sample: Cognitive style, personality and religiosity (European Journal of Social Psychology, (2014), 44, 7, (736-742), 10.1002/ejsp.2059);Reflective minds and open hearts: Cognitive style and personality predict religiosity and spiritual thinking in a community sample

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 736-742

  Browne, Matthew ^a,c   Pennycook, Gordon ^d   Goodwin, Belinda ^a,c   Mchenry, Melinda ^b,c  

^a CQ University Australia   (Australia)

^b CQ University   (Australia)

^c CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919455494     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2271     Document Type: Erratum

References (44)

1. Albrecht, S. L., & Heaton, T. B. (1984). Secularization, higher education, and religiosity. Review of Religious Research, 26, 43-58 DOI: 10.2307/3511041
2. Argue, A., Johnson, D. R., & White, L. K. (1999). Age and religiosity: Evidence from a three-wave panel analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(3), 423. DOI: 10.2307/1387762
3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013) Reflecting a nation: Stories from the 2011 census, 2012-2013, (cat no. 2071.0). Retrieved from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2071.0, accessed on 3rd March, 2014.
4. Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Barr, N., Pennycook, G., Stolz, J. A., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought. Thinking & Reasoning, 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2014.895915
6. Beeghley, L., Velsor, E., & Bock, E. W. (1981). The correlates of religiosity among black and white Americans. The Sociological Quarterly, 22(3), 403-412. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1981.tb00670.x
7. Campitelli, G., & Gerrans, P. (2013). Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modelling approach. Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 434-447. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9
8. Campitelli, G., & Labollita, M. (2010). Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(3), 182-191. Retrieved from: http://mars.smu.edu.sg/SJDM/10/91230/jdm91230.pdf
9. Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
10. Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241. DOI: 10.1177/1745691612460685
11. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42. DOI: 10.2307/4134953
12. Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336(6080), 493-496.DOI: 10.1126/science.1215647
13. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
14. MacDonald, D. A. (2000). Spirituality: Description, measurement, and relation to the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 68(1), 153-197. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6494.t01-1-00094
15. McCrae, R. R. (1994). Openness to experience: Expanding the boundaries of Factor V. European Journal of Personality, 8, 251-272. DOI: 10.1002/per.2410080404
16. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.
17. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In J. A. J. R. Hogan, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (Vol. xxiv, 987, pp.825-847). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
18. McCrae, R. R., & Sutin, A. R. (2009). Openness to experience. In M. R. Leary, & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp.257-273). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
19. Miller, A. S., & Hoffmann, J. P. (1995). Risk and religion: An explanation of gender differences in religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(1), 63-75. DOI: 10.2307/1386523
20. Paxton, J. M., Unger, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgement. Cognitive Science, 36, 163-177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x
21. Pennycook, G. (2014). Evidence that analytic cognitive style influences religious belief: Comment on Razmyar and Reeve (2013). Intelligence, 43, 21-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.005
22. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014a). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7
23. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014b). The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 188-214.DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2013.865000
24. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2013). Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 806-811. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0394-313423-013-0394-3
25. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123(3), 335-346. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
26. Razmyar, S., & Reeve, C. L. (2013). Individual differences in religiosity as a function of cognitive ability and style. Intelligence, 41(5), 667-673. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.09.003
27. Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145-154. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
28. Rice, T. W. (2003). Believe it or not: Religious and other paranormal beliefs in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(1), 95-106. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5906.00163
29. Rowatt, W., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2002). Two dimensions of attachment to God and their relation to affect, religiosity, and personality constructs. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(4), 637-651. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5906.00143
30. Rozyman, E. B., Landy, J. F., & Goodwin, G. P. (2014). Are good reasoners more incest-friendly? Trait cognitive reflection predicts selective moralization in a sample of American adults. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 176-190.
31. Saroglou, V. (2002). Religion and the five-factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(1), 15-25. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00233-6
32. Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 423. DOI: 10.1037/a0025391
33. Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The Robot's rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
34. Stanovich, K. E. (2009a). Is it time for a tri-process theory? Distinguishing the reflective and algorithmic mind. In J. S. B. Evans, & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp.55-88). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Stanovich, K. E. (2009b). What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. London, UK: Yale University Press.
36. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(2), 161-188. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.161
37. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645-742.
38. Taylor, A., & MacDonald, D. A. (1999). Religion and the five factor model of personality: An exploratory investigation using a Canadian university sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(6), 1243-1259. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00068-9
39. Ten Holt, J. C. J. A., & Boomsma, A. (2010). Scale construction and evaluation in practice: A review of factor analysis versus item response theory applications. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(3), 272-297.
40. Thompson, V. A. (2013). Why it matters: The implications of autonomous processes for dual-process theories-Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 253-256. DOI: 10.1177/1745691613483476
41. Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63(3), 107-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
42. Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J., Pennycook, G., Ball, L., Brack, H., Ophir, Y., & Ackerman, R. (2013). The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking. Cognition, 128(2), 237-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.012
43. Toplak, M. V., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39 (7), 1275-1289. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
44. Zuckerman, P. (2007). Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns. In M. Martin (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Atheism (pp.47-65). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.