Arts education and the learning sciences

The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 626-646

  Halverson, Erica Rosenfeld ^a   Sheridan, Kimberly M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919372357     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.037     Document Type: Chapter

References (106)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1982). The social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.
2. Azevedo, F. (2000). Designing representations of terrain: A study in meta-representational competence. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 443-480.
3. Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 113-117.
4. Ball, A., & Heath, S. B. (1993). Dances of identity: Finding an ethnic self in the arts. In S. B. Heath & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), Identity and inner city youth: Beyond ethnicity and gender (pp. 69-93). New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Bamberger, J. (1991). The mind behind the ear: How children develop musical intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Bing-Canar, J., & Zerkel, M. (1998) Reading the Media and Myself: Experiences in critical media literacy with young Arab-American women. Signs, 23 (3), 735-743.
7. Black, R. (2008). Adolescents and onlinefanfiction. New York: Peter Lang.
8. Buckingham, D., Fraser, P., & Sefton-Green, J. (2000). Making the grade: Evaluating student production in media studies. In J. Sefton-Green & R. Sinker (Eds.), Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people (pp. 129-153). London: Routledge.
9. Buechley, L., Eisenberg, M., Catchen, J., & Crockett, A. (2008). The LilyPad Arduino: Using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI) (pp. 423-432). Florence, Italy, April.
10. Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of theLearningSciences, 19, 187-229.
11. Campbell, M. I., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2003). The A-design approach to managing automated design synthesis. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 12-24.
12. Chavez, V., & Soep, E. (2005). Youth radio and the pedagogy of collegiality. Harvard Educational Review, 75(4), 409-434.
13. Clark, K., & Sheridan, K. (2010). Game design through mentoring and collaboration. Journal of Educational MultimediaandHypermedia, 19(2), 125-145.
14. Cross, N. (1993). Science and design methodology: A review. Research in Engineering Design, 5(2), 63-69.
15. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
16. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325-339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
18. Davis, J. H., & Evans, M. J. (1987). Theatre, children, and youth. New Orleans, LA: Anchorage Press.
19. Deasy, R. J. (Ed.) (2002). Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
20. diSessa, A. (2004). Metarepresentational competence: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293-331.
21. DuPont, S. (1992). The effectiveness of creative drama as an instructional strategy to enhance reading comprehension skills of fifth-grade remedial readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 31(3), 41-52.
22. Dyson, A. H. (1997). Writingsuperheroes. NewYork: Teachers College Press.
23. Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24. Eisner, E. W, & Day, M. D. (2004). Handbook of research and policy in art education: A project of the National Art Education Association. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 427-466.
26. Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.) (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Fleetwood, N. (2005). Authenticating practices: Producing realness, performing youth. In S. Maira & E. Soep (Eds.), Youthscapes: The popular, the national, the global (pp. 155-172). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
28. Fleming, M. (2010). Arts in education and creativity: A literature review. New Castle Upon Tyne, UK: Arts Council England.
29. Fiske, E. B. (2000). Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning. Washington, DC: The Arts Education Partnership.
30. Freeman, N. H. (2004). Aesthetic judgment and reasoning. In E. W Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research andpolicy in art education (pp. 359-377). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Gadsden, V. (2008). The arts and education: Knowledge generation, pedagogy, and the discourse of learning. Review of Research in Education, 32, 29-61.
32. Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind, and brain: A cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic Books.
33. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Ghandi. New York: Basic Books.
34. Gazzaniga, M. (2008). Arts and cognition: Findings hint at relationships. In M. deLong & T. Wichmann (Eds.), Learning, arts, and the brain. The Dana Consortium Arts and Cognition report (pp. 7-11). New York: Dana Press.
35. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
36. Golomb, C. (2002). Child art in context: A cultural and comparative perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
37. Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Company.
38. Grafton, S., & Cross, M. (2008). Dance and the brain. In C. Asbury & B. Rich (Eds.), Learning, the arts, and the brain: The Dana Consortium Arts and Cognition report (pp. 61-70). New York: Dana Foundation.
39. Halverson, E. R. (2005). InsideOut: Facilitating gay youth identity development through a performance-based youth organization. Identity: An International Journal of Theory & Research, 5(1), 67-90.
40. Halverson, E. R. (2009). Artistic production processes as venues for positive youth development. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formation del Profesorado (Interuniversity Journal of Teacher Education), 23(3), 181-202.
41. Halverson, E. R. (2010a). Detypification as identity development: The dramaturgical process and LGBTQ youth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(5), 635-668.
42. Halverson, E. R. (2010b). Film as identity exploration: A multimodal analysis of youth-produced films. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2352-2378.
43. Halverson, E. R. (2012). Participatory media spaces: A design perspective on learning with media and technology in the 21st century. In C. Steinkuehler, K. Squire, & S. Barab (Eds.), Games learning & society: Learning and meaning in a digital age (pp. 244-270). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Halverson, E. R. (2013). Digital art-making as a representational process. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 121-162.
45. Halverson, E. R., & Gibbons, D. (2010). "Key moments" as pedagogical windows into the digital video production process. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 69-74.
46. Halverson, E. R., Gibbons, D., Copeland, S., Andrews, A., Hernando Llorens, B., & Bass, M. (2012). What makes a youth-produced film good? The youth audience perspective. Learning, Media, & Technology, 1-18.
47. Halverson, E. R., Lowenhaupt, R., Gibbons, D., & Bass, M. (2009). Conceptualizing identity in youth media arts organizations: A comparative case study. E-Learning, 6(1), 23-42.
48. Hanna, J. L. (1987). To dance is human: A theory of nonverbal communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Hanna, J. L. (2008). A nonverbal language for imagining and learning: Dance education in a K-12 curriculum. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 491-506.
50. Heath, S. B. (2000). Making learning work. After School Matters, 1, 33-43.
51. Heath, S. B. (2004). Risks, rules, and roles: Youth perspectives on the work of learning for community development. In A. Perret-Clermont, C. Pontecorvo, L. Resnick, T. Zittoun, & B. Burge, (Eds.), Joining society: Social interaction and learning in adolescence and youth (pp. 41-70). New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Heathcote, D., & Johnson, L. (1991). Ed. C. O’Neill. Collected writings on education and drama. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
53. Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. M. (2013). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York: Teachers College Press.
54. Hill, M. L., & Petchauer, E. (2013). Schooling Hip-Hop: Expanding Hip-Hop education across the curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
55. Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224-261.
56. Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittani, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., Pascoe, C. J., & Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary offindings from the digital youth project. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
57. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Clinton, K., Weigler, M., & Robison, A. (2007). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Building the field of digital media and learning. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
58. Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3-11.
59. Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Constructionism. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
60. Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Keinänen, M., Sheridan, K., & Gardner, H. (2006). Opening up creativity: The lenses of axis and focus. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 202-218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Kindler, A. M. (2004). Introduction: Development and learning in art. In E. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in arts education (pp. 227-232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64. Lange, P. G., & Ito, M. (2010). Creative production. In M. Ito et al. (Eds.), Hanging out, messing around, andgeeking out: Kids living and learning with new media (pp. 243-293). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Lowenfeld, V. (1957). Creative and mental growth. Third Edition. New York: MacMillan.
66. Magnifico, A. M. (2012). The game of Neopian writing. In E. R. Hayes & S. C. Duncan (Eds.), Learning in videogame affnity spaces (pp. 212-234). New York: Peter Lang.
67. Mayer, V. (2000). Capturing cultural identity/creating community. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 3(1), 57-78.
68. McCaslin, N. (1995). Creative drama in the classroom and beyond. Addison-Wesley.
69. McPherson, G. E., Davidson, J. W., & Faulkner, R. (2012). Music in our lives: Rethinking musical ability, development, and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Miller, K. (2009). Schizophonic performance: Guitar Hero, Rock Band, and Virtual Virtuosity. Journal of the Society for American Music, 3(4), 395-429.
71. Moore, B. H., & Caldwell, H. (1993). Drama and drawing for narrative writing in primary grades. Journal of Educational Research, 87(2), 100-110.
72. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (1).
73. Papert, S., &Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel& S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1-11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
74. Penhune, V. B. (2011). Sensitive periods in human development: Evidence from musical training. Cortex, 47(9), 1126-1137.
75. Peppler, K. A. (2010). Media arts: Arts education for a digital age. Teachers College Record, 112(8), 2118-2153.
76. Peppler, K., Warschauer, M., & Diazgranados, A. (2010). Game critics: Exploring the role of critique in game-design literacies. E-Learning, 7(1), 35-48.
77. Perani, D., Saccuman, M. C., Scifo, P., Spada, D., Andreolli, G., Rovelli, R., Baldoli, C., & Koelsch, S. (2010). Functional specializations for music processing in the human newborn brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(10), 4758-4763.
78. Podlozny, A. (2000). Strengthening verbal skills through the use of classroom drama: A clear link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3-4), 239-276.
79. Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185-217.
80. Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1996). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies, 17(4), 363-383.
81. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (Eds.) (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82. Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
83. Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
84. Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Journal of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.
85. Schlaug, G., Norton, A., Overy, K., & Winner, E. (2005). Effects of music training on the child ‘s brain and cognitive development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 219-230.
86. Schon, D. A. (1988). Designing: Rules, types and words. Design studies, 9(3), 181-190.
87. Sefton-Green, J. (2000). From creativity to cultural production: Shared perspectives. In J. Sefton-Green & R. Sinker (Eds.), Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people (pp. 216-231). London: Routledge.
88. Sefton-Green, J., & Sinker, R. (Eds.) (2000). Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people. London: Routledge.
89. Sheridan, K. M. (2008). Reading, writing and watching: The informal education of film fans. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, & S. B. Heath (Eds.), Handbook on teaching literacy through the communicative, visual and performing arts. Second Edition (pp. 259-269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
90. Sheridan, K. M. (2011). Envision and observe: Using the studio thinking framework for learning and teaching in digital arts. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5 (1), 19-26.
91. Sheridan, K. M., Clark, K., & Williams, A. (2013). Designing games, designing roles: A study of youth agency in an informal education program. Urban Education, 48(3), 734-758.
92. Sheridan, K. M., & Gardner, H. (2012). Artistic development: Three essential spheres. In A. Shimamura & S. Palmer (Eds.), Aesthetic science: connecting minds, brains, and experience (pp. 276-296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93. Shimamura, A. P., & Palmer, S. E. (2012). Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
94. Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford.
95. Simonton, D. K. (1996). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games (pp. 227-253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
96. Soep, E. (1996). An art in itself: Youth development through critique. In New Designs for Youth Development, 12(4), 42-46.
97. Solso, R. L. (2001). Brain activities in a skilled versus a novice artist: An fMRI study. Leonardo, 34(1), 31-34.
98. Stalinski, S. M., & Schellenberg, E. G. (2012). Music cognition: A developmental perspective. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 485-497.
99. Sternberg, R. (Ed.) (1999). Handbookof creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Sternberg, R. (2006). Creating a vision of creativity: The first 25 years. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8 (1), 1-12.
101. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
102. Wiley L., & Feiner, D. (2001). Making a scene: Representational authority and a community-centered process of script development. In S. C. Haedicke & T. Nellahus (Eds.), Performing democracy: International perspectives on urban community-based performance (pp. 121-142). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
103. Winner, E. (1982). Invented worlds: The psychology of the arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
104. Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (2000). The arts in education: Evaluating the evidence for a causal link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34 (3/4), 3-10.
105. Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (Eds.) (2001). Proceedings from beyond the soundbite: What the research actually shows about arts education and academic outcomes. Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Trust.
106. Worthman, C. (2002). "Just playing the part": Engaging adolescents in drama and literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.