Physiological response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to weak acids present in lignocellulosic hydrolysate

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1234-1248

  Guo, Zhongpeng ^a,b   Olsson, Lisbeth ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b UMR792 INGÉNIERIE DES SYSTÈMES BIOLOGIQUES ET DES PROCÉDÉS   (France)

Author keywords

Glycolytic flux; Lignocellulosic hydrolysates; Reactive oxygen species stress; Trehalose

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; FORMIC ACID; GLUCOSE; GLUTATHIONE; LEVULINIC ACID; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE; TREHALOSE; VANILLIC ACID; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CARBOXYLIC ACID;

ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; CARBON SOURCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNGUS GROWTH; NONHUMAN; PH; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST CELL; AEROBIC METABOLISM; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; METABOLISM; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; AEROBIOSIS; ANAEROBIOSIS; CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; GLUCOSE; GLUTATHIONE; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; OXIDATIVE STRESS; REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TREHALOSE;

EID: 84918576525     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1567-1364.12221     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abbott DA, Knijnenburg TA, de Poorter LMI, Reinders MJT, Pronk JT & van Maris AJA (2007) Generic and specific transcriptional responses to different weak organic acids in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 7: 819-833.
2. Almeida B, Ohlmeier S, Almeida AJ, Madeo F, Leão C, Rodrigues F & Ludovico P (2009) Yeast protein expression profile during acetic acid-induced apoptosis indicates causal involvement of the TOR pathway. Proteomics 9: 720-732.
3. Alvarez-Peral FJ, Zaragoza O, Pedreno Y & Argüelles JC (2002) Protective role of trehalose during severe oxidative stress caused by hydrogen peroxide and the adaptive oxidative stress response in Candida albicans. Microbiology 148: 2599-2606.
4. Ask M, Bettiga M, Mapelli V & Olsson L (2013) The influence of HMF and furfural on redox-balance and energy-state of xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 6: 22.
5. Bauer BE, Rossington D, Mollapour M, Mamnun Y, Kuchler K & Piper PW (2003) Weak organic acid stress inhibits aromatic amino acid uptake by yeast, causing a strong influence of amino acid auxotrophies on the phenotypes of membrane transporter mutants. Eur J Biochem 270: 3189-3195.
6. Causton HC, Ren B, Koh SS, Harbison CT, Kanin E, Jennings EG, Lee TI, True HL, Lander ES & Young RA (2001) Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 2: 323-337.
7. Ding J, Bierma J, Smith MR et al. (2013) Acetic acid inhibits nutrient uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: auxotrophy confounds the use of yeast deletion libraries for strain improvement. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97: 7405-7416.
8. Fernandas L, Côrte-Real M, Loureiro V, Loureiro-Dias MC & Leão C (1997) Glucose respiration and fermentation in Zygosaccharomyces bailii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae express different sensitivity patterns to ethanol and acetic acid. Lett Appl Microbiol 25: 249-253.
9. Freese E, Sheu CW & Galliers E (1973) Function of lipophilic acids as antimicrobial food additives. Nature 241: 321-325.
10. Griffith OW (1980) Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide using glutathione reductase and 2-vinylpyridine. Anal Biochem 106: 207-212.
11. Hassa P, Haenni S, Elser M & Hottiger M (2006) Nuclear ADP-ribosylation reactions in mammalian cells: where are we today and where are we going? Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70: 789-829.
12. Holyoak CD, Stratford M, McMullin Z, Cole MB, Crimmins K, Brown AJ & Coote PJ (1996) Activity of the plasma membrane H-ATPase and optimal glycolytic flux are required for rapid adaptation and growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of the weak acid preservative sorbic acid. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 3158-3164.
13. Holyoak CD, Bracey D, Piper PW, Kuchler K & Coote PJ (1999) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae weak-acid-inducible ABC transporter Pdr12 transports fluorescein and preservative anions from the cytosol by an energy dependent mechanism. J Bacteriol 181: 4644-4652.
14. Kashket ER (1987) Bioenergetics of lactic acid bacteria: cytoplasmic pH and osmotolerance. FEMS Microbiol Lett 46: 233-244.
15. Krebs HA, Wiggins D, Stubbs M, Sols A & Bedoya F (1983) Studies on the mechanism of the antifungal action of benzoate. Biochem J 214: 657-663.
16. Ludovico P, Rodrigues F, Almeida A, Silva MT, Barrientos A & Côrte-Real M (2002) Cytochrome c release and mitochondria involvement in programmed cell death induced by acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 13: 2598-2606.
17. Mensonides FI, Bakker BM, Cremazy F, Messiha HL, Mendes P, Boogerd FC & Westerhoff HV (2013) A new regulatory principle for in vivo biochemistry: pleiotropic low affinity regulation by the adenine nucleotides - illustrated for the glycolytic enzymes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 587: 2860-2867.
18. Mensonides FI, Brul S, Hellingwerf KJ, Bakker BM & Teixeira de Mattos MJ (2014) A kinetic model of catabolic adaptation and protein reprofiling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during temperature shifts. FEBS J 281: 825-841.
19. Mollapour M & Piper PW (2007) Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation targets the yeast Fps1 aquaglyceroporin for endocytosis, thereby rendering cells resistant to acetic acid. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6446-6456.
20. Narendranath NV, Thomas KC & Ingledew WM (2001) Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 26: 171-177.
21. Nomura M & Takagi H (2004) Role of the yeast acetyltransferase Mpr1 in oxidative stress: regulation of oxygen reactive species caused by a toxic proline catabolism intermediate. P Natl Acad Sci USA 34: 12616-12621.
22. Ohmori S, Nawata Y, Kiyono K, Murata H, Tsuboi S, Ikeda M, Akagi R, Morohashi KI & Ono B (1999) Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultured under aerobic and anaerobic conditions: air-level oxygen stress and protection against stress. Biochim Biophys Acta 3: 587-594.
23. Palmqvist E & Hahn-Hägerdal B (2000) Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol 74: 25-33.
24. Pampulha ME & Loureiro-Dias MC (2000) Energetics of the effect of acetic acid on growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 184: 69-72.
25. Parrou JL & François J (1997) A simplified procedure for a rapid and reliable assay of both glycogen and trehalose in whole yeast cells. Anal Biochem 1: 186-188.
26. Peña PV, Glasker S & Srienc F (2013) Genome-wide overexpression screen for sodium acetate resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol 164: 26-33.
27. Piper PW (1999) Yeast superoxide dismutase mutants reveal a pro-oxidant action of weak organic acid food preservatives. Free Radic Biol Med 27: 1219-1227.
28. Piper P, Calderon CO, Hatzixanthis K & Mollapour M (2001) Weak acid adaptation: the stress response that confers yeasts with resistance to organic acid food preservatives. Microbiology 147: 2635-2642.
29. Rahman I, Kode A & Biswas SK (2006) Assay for quantitative determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide levels using enzymatic recycling method. Nat Protoc 6: 3159-3165.
30. Roels JA (1983) Energetics and Kinetics in Biotechnology, pp. 46-72. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam.
31. Rolfe MD, Rice CJ, Lucchini S et al. (2012) Lag phase is a distinct growth phase that prepares bacteria for exponential growth and involves transient metal accumulation. J Bacteriol 194: 686-701.
32. Russel JB (1992) Another explanation for the toxicity of fermentation acids at low pH: anion accumulation versus uncoupling. J Appl Bacteriol 73: 363-370.
33. Stratford M & Anslow PA (1998) Evidence that sorbic acid does not inhibit yeast as a classic 'weak acid preservative'. Lett Appl Microbiol 27: 203-206.
34. Ter Beek A, Keijser BJ, Boorsma A, Zakrzewska A, Orij R, Smits GJ & Brul S (2008) Transcriptome analysis of sorbic acid-stressed Bacillus subtilis reveals a nutrient limitation response and indicates plasma membrane remodeling. J Bacteriol 5: 1751-1761.
35. Ullah A, Orij R, Brul S & Smits GJ (2012) Quantitative analysis of the modes of growth inhibition by weak organic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 8377-8387.
36. van Hoek P, van Dijken JP & Pronk JT (2000) Regulation of fermentative capacity and levels of glycolytic enzymes in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb Technol 26: 724-736.
37. Verduyn C, Stouthamer AH, Scheffers WA & van Dijken JP (1991) A theoretical evaluation of growth yields of yeasts. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 59: 49-63.
38. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA & van Dijken JP (1992) Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8: 501-517.
39. Wei N, Quarterman J, Kim SR, Cate JH & Jin YS (2013) Enhanced biofuel production through coupled acetic acid and xylose consumption by engineered yeast. Nat Commun 4: 2580.
40. Wright J, Bellissimi E, de Hulster E, Wagner A, Pronk JT & van Maris AJ (2011) Batch and continuous culture-based selection strategies for acetic acid tolerance in xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 11: 299-306.
41. Yang J, Ding MZ, Li BZ, Liu ZL, Wang X & Yuan YJ (2012) Integrated phospholipidomics and transcriptomics analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with enhanced tolerance to a mixture of acetic acid, furfural, and phenol. OMICS 16: 374-386.
42. Zhang JG, Liu XY, He XP, Guo XN, Lu Y & Zhang BR (2011) Improvement of acetic acid tolerance and fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by disruption of the FPS1 aquaglyceroporin gene. Biotechnol Lett 33: 277-284.
43. Zhao J, Wang Z, Wang M, He Q & Zhang H (2008) The inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells by acetic acid quantified by electrochemistry and fluorescence. Bioelectrochemistry 72: 117-121.
44. Zheng DQ, Liu TZ, Chen J, Zhang K, Li O, Zhu L, Zhao YH, Wu XC & Wang PM (2013) Comparative functional genomics to reveal the molecular basis of phenotypic diversities and guide the genetic breeding of industrial yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97: 2067-2076.