Social media social genres: Making sense of the ordinary

Social Media Social Genres: Making Sense of the Ordinary

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-212

  Lomborg, Stine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917389475     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203520802     Document Type: Book

References (195)

1. Andersen, Michael B. (1994). TV og genre. In P. Dahlgren (Ed.), Den mângtydiga rutan. Stockholm: Skriftserien JMK.
2. Anderson, Richard C. (1978). Schema-directed processes in language comprehension. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pellegrino, S. D. Fokkema & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction. New York: Plenum.
3. Anderson, Richard C., & Pearson, P. David. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
4. Ang, Ien. (1996). Ethnography and radical contextualism in audience studies. In J. Hay, L. Grossberg & E. Wartella (Eds.), The audience and its landscape (pp. 247-262). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5. Askehave, Inge, & Nielsen, Anne E. (2005). Digital genres: a challenge to traditional genre theory. Information Technology & People, 18(2), 120-141.
6. Atkinson, J. Maxwell, & Heritage, John (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Augoustinos, Martha, & Walker, Iain. (1995). Social cognition. An integrated introduction. London: Sage Publications.
8. Bakardjieva, Maria. (2005). Internet society. The Internet in everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Bakardjieva, Maria. (2011). The internet in everyday life: Exploring the tenets and contributions of diverse approaches. In M. Consalvo & C. M. Ess (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of internet studies (pp. 59-82). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
10. Bakhtin, Mikhail. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
11. Baron, Naomi S. (2008). Always on. Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Bartlett, Frederic C. (1932). Remembering. An experimental and social study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Bauman, Marcy L. (1999). The evolution of internet genres. Computers and Composition, 16(2), 269-282.
14. Baumer, Eric, Sueyoshi, Mark, & Tomlinson, Bill. (2008). Exploring the role of the reader in the activity of blogging. Paper presented at the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
15. Baym, Nancy K. (2000). Tune in, log on. Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Baym, Nancy K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
17. Bazerman, Charles. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
18. Bazerman, Charles. (2006). The writing of social organization and the literate situating of cognition: Extending Goody’s social implications of writing. In D. R. Olson & M. Cole (Eds.), Technology, literacy and the evolution of society: Implications of the work of Jack Goody. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Bechmann, Anja, & Lomborg, Stine. (2013). Mapping actor roles in social media: Different perspectives on value creation in theories of user participation. New Media & Society, 15(5), 765-781. doi: 1461444812462853.
20. Berger, Peter L., & Luckmann, Thomas. (1967). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
21. Berkenkotter, Carol, & Huckin, Thomas N. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10(4), 475-509.
22. Bernstein, Michael S., Bakshy, Eytan, Burke, Moira, & Karrer, Brian. (2013). Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. Paper presented at the CHI 2013, Paris, France.
23. Bhatia, Vijay K. (1993). Analysing genre —language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
24. Bhatia, Vijay K. (1996). Methodological issues in genre analysis. Hermes, Journal of Linguistics, 16, 39-59.
25. Blood, Rebecca. (2005). How blogging software reshapes the online community. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 53-55.
26. Boyd, Danah. (2006a). A blogger’s blog: Exploring the definition of a medium. Reconstruction, 6(4).
27. Boyd, Danah. (2006b). Friends, friendsters, and top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11(12).
28. Boyd, Danah. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Identity, and digital media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Boyd, Danah. (2008). Taken out of context. American teen sociality in networked publics. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
30. Boyd, Danah, & Ellison, Nicole B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
31. Boyd, danah, Golder, Scott, & Lotan, Gilad. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-43), Hawaii.
32. Brewer, Marilynn B., & Gardner, Wendi. (1996). Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83-93.
33. Briggs, Asa, & Burke, Peter. (2002). A social history of the media. From Gutenberg to the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
34. Bruns, Axel. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
35. Bruns, Axel, & Burgess, Jean. (2011). #ausvotes: How Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election. Communication, Politics & Culture, 44(2), 37-56.
36. Bruun, Hanne. (2004). Daytime talkshows i Danmark—om receptionen af en transnational TV-genre. Aarhus: Forlaget Modtryk.
37. Bruun, Hanne. (2010). Genre and interpretation in production: a theoretical approach. Media, Culture & Society, 32(5), 723-737.
38. Brügger, Niels. (2013). Facebooks historie. Udviklingen af en tom struktur. In J. L. Jensen & J. Tække (Eds.), Facebook i den danske hverdag —fra socialt netværk til metamedie. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
39. Castells, Manuel, Fernandez-Ardèvol, Mireia, Qiu, Jack L., & Sey, Araba. (2007). Mobile communication and society. A global perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Chayko, Mary. (2002). Connecting: How we form social bonds and communities in the Internet age. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
41. Christensen, Christa L., & Jerslev, Anne. (2009). Hvor gar Grænsen? Brudflader i den Moderne Mediekultur. Copenhagen: Tiderne Skifter.
42. Cicourel, Aaron V. (1973). Cognitive sociology. Language and meaning in social interaction. Baltimore: Penguin Education.
43. Coulter, Jeff. (1979). The social construction of mind: Studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy. London: Macmillan.
44. Crawford, Kate. (2009). These foolish things. On intimacy and insignificance in mobile media. In G. Gogging & L. Hjorth (Eds.), Mobile technologies. From telecommunications to media (pp. 252-265). London and New York: Routledge.
45. Crowston, Kevin, & Williams, M. (2000). Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the world-wide web. The Information Society, 16(3), 201-216.
46. Danmarks Statistik. (2009). Befolkningens brug af Internet 2009. Available at: http:// www.dst.dk/pukora/epub/upload/14039/it.pdf
47. Danmarks Statistik. (2012). It-anvendelse i befolkningen 2012. Available at: http:// www.dst.dk/pukora/epub/upload/17443/itanv.pdf
48. David, Gabriella. (2009). Clarifying the mysteries of an exposed intimacy: Another intimate representation mise-en-scène. In K. Nyìri (Ed.), Engagement and exposure: Mobile communication and the ethics of social networking (pp. 77-86). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
49. Dijck, Jose van. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41-58.
50. Donath, Judith. (2004). Sociable media. In W. S. Bainbridge (Ed.), Berkshire encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group.
51. Donath, Judith, & Boyd, danah. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.
52. Dyke, Gregory, Lund, Kristine, & Girardot, Jean-Jacques. (2009). Tatiana: an environment to support the CSCL analysis process. Paper presented at the CSCL 2009, Rhodes, Greece.
53. Edwards, Derek. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage Publications.
54. Ellison, Nicole B., Steinfield, Charles, & Lampe, Cliff. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
55. Erickson, Thomas. (2000). Making sense of computer-mediated communication (CMC); Conversations as genres, CMC systems as genre ecologies. Paper presented at the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS- 33), Hawaii.
56. Erjavec, Karmen, & Kovacic, Melita P. (2009). A discursive approach to genre: Mobi news. European Journal of Communication, 24(2), 147-164.
57. Finnemann, Niels Ole. (2005). Internettet i mediehistorisk perspektiv. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
58. Finnemann, Niels Ole. (2011). Mediatization theory and digital media. European Journal of Communication Research, 36(1), 67-89.
59. Fono, David, & Raynes-Goldie, Kate. (2005). Hyperfriends and beyond: Friendship and social norms on liveJournal. In M. Consalvo & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), Internet Research Annual, vol. 4 (pp. 91-104). New York: Peter Lang.
60. Frandsen, Kirsten, & Bruun, Hanne. (2005). Mediegenre, identifikation og reception. MedieKultur, 38, 51-61.
61. Furukawa, Tadanobu, Matsuo, Yutaka, Ohmukai, Ikki, Uchiyama, Koki, & Mitsuru, Ishizuka. (2007). Social networks and reading behavior in the blogosphere. Paper presented at the ICWSM.
62. Garcia, Angela C., & Jacobs, Jennifer B.(1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous cmc. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 32(4), 337-367.
63. Garfinkel, Harold. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice-Hall.
64. Giltrow, Janet, & Stein, Dieter (Eds.). (2009). Genres in the internet. Issues in the theory of genre. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
65. Goffman, Erving. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
66. Goffman, Erving. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.
67. Gumbrecht, Michelle. (2005). Blogs as ‘protected space.’ In D. Satish & K. R. Prabhakar (Eds.), BLOGS: Emerging Communication Media (pp. 79-91). Hyderabad, India: ICFAI University Press.
68. Gye, Lisa. (2007). Picture this: The impact of mobile camera phones on personal photographic practices. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 21(2), 279-288.
69. Hagen, Ingunn. (1998). Creation of socio-cultural meaning. Media reception research and cognitive psychology. In B. Höijer & A. Werner (Eds.), Cultural cognition. New perspectives in audience theory (pp. 59-72). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
70. Hampton, Keith N., Goulet, Lauren S., Marlow, Cameron, & Rainie, Lee. (2012). Why most Facebook users get more than they give. The effect of Facebook’s ‘power users’ on everybody else. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
71. Harrison, Sandra. (2008). Turn taking in email discussions. In S. Kelsey & K. St. Amant (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer-mediated communication (pp. 755-772). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
72. Haythornthwaite, Caroline. (2000). Online personal networks. Size, composition and media use among distance learners. New Media & Society, 2(2), 195-226.
73. Haythornthwaite, Caroline. (2005). Social networks and internet connectivity. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125-147.
74. Helles, Rasmus. (2009). Personlige medier i hverdagslivet. PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen.
75. Helles, Rasmus. (2010). Hverdagslivets nye medier. Dansk Sociologi, 21(3), 49-63.
76. Helles, Rasmus. (2013). Mobile communication and intermediality. Mobile Media and Communication, 1(1), 14-19.
77. Heritage, John. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
78. Hermes, Joke. (1993). Media, meaning and everyday life. Cultural Studies, 7(3), 493-506.
79. Herring, Susan C. (1999a). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(4).
80. Herring, Susan C. (1999b). Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in computer-mediated communication. In P. A. Mayer (Ed.), Computer media and communication: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. Herring, Susan C., & Paolillo, John C. (2006). Gender and genre variation in blogs Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 439-459.
82. Herring, Susan C., Scheidt, Lois A., Wright, Elijah, & Bonus, Sabrina. (2005). Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information Technology & People, 18(2), 142-171.
83. Highfield, Tim, Harrington, Stephen, & Bruns, Axel. (forthcoming). Twitter as a Technology for Audiencing and Fandom: The #Eurovision Phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.756053.
84. Honeycutt, Courtenay, & Herring, Susan C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS- 42), Los Alamitos, CA.
85. Horton, Donald, & Wohl, Richard R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215-229.
86. Huberman, Bernardo A., Romero, Daniel, & Wu, Fang. (2009). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14(1).
87. Humphreys, Lee. (2013). Mobile social media: Future challenges and opportunities. Mobile Media and Communication, 1(1), 20-25.
88. Höijer, Birgitta. (1991). Lystfulld glömska, kreativ illusion och realitetsafprövning. Swedish Radio/PUB nr. 15.
89. Höijer, Birgitta. (1992). Reception of television narration as a socio-cognitive process: A schema-theoretical outline. Poetics, 21.
90. Höijer, Birgitta. (1998). Cognitive and psycho-dynamic perspectives on reception of television narration. In B. Höijer & A. Werner (Eds.), Cultural cognition. New perspectives in Audience Theory (pp. 73-84). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
91. Höijer, Birgitta. (2007). A socio-cognitive perspective on ideological horizons in meaning-making. In B. Höijer (Ed.), Ideological horizons in media and citizen discourses. Theoretical and methodological approaches (pp. 33-50). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
92. Jakobson, Roman. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
93. Java, Akshay, Song, Xiaodan, Finin, Tim, & Tseng, Belle. (2007). Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. Paper presented at the WebKDD/SNA-KDD’07.
94. Jenkins, Henry. (2006). Convergence culture. Where old and new media collide. New York and London: New York University Press.
95. Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. (1998). Denmark. In K. B. Jensen (Ed.), News of the world. World cultures look at television news (pp. 39-60). London and New York: Routledge.
96. Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. (2010). Media convergence. The three degrees of network, mass, and interpersonal communication. London and New York: Routledge.
97. Jodelet, Denise. (1991). Madness and social representations. London: Harvester/ Wheatsheaf.
98. Jovchelovitch, Sandra. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. London and New York: Routledge.
99. Kant, Immanuel. (1929). Critique of pure reason. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
100. Kendall, Lori. (2005). Diary of a networked individual. System design’s effects on online relationships. In M. Consalvo & M. Allen (Eds.), Internet research annual, vol. 2. New York: Peter Lang.
101. Kendall, Lori. (2007). Shout into the wind, and it shouts back: identity and interactional tensions on LiveJournal. First Monday, 12(9).
102. Keyton, Joann. (1999). Relational communication in groups. In L. F. Frey, D. S. Gouran & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 192-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
103. Krishnamurthy, Balachander, Gill, Phillipa, & Arlitt, Martin. (2008). A few chirps about twitter. Paper presented at the WOSP’08.
104. Kuzel, Anton J. (1999). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 33-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
105. Lenhart, Amanda. (2009). Twitter and status updating. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
106. Lewis, Jane, & West, Anne. (2009). ‘Friending’: London-based undergraduates’ experience of Facebook. New Media & Society, 11(7), 1209-1229.
107. Licoppe, Christian. (2004). ‘Connected’ presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1), 135-156.
108. Ling, Richard S. (2008). New tech, new ties. How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
109. Ling, Richard S. (2012). Taken for grantedness. The embedding of mobile communication into society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
110. Ling, Richard S., Julsrud, Tom, & Yttri, Birgitte. (2005). Nascent communication genres within SMS and MMS. In R. Harper, L. A. Palen, & A. S. Taylor (Eds.), The inside text: Social perspectives on SMS in the mobile age (pp. 75-100). London: Kluwer.
111. Livingstone, Sonia. (2004). The challenge of changing audiences: Or, what is the audience researcher to do in the age of the internet? European Journal of Communication, 19, 75-86.
112. Livingstone, Sonia. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393-411.
113. Lomborg, Stine. (2009). Navigating the blogosphere: towards a genre-based typology of weblogs. First Monday, 14(5).
114. Lomborg, Stine. (2011). Social media. A genre perspective. PhD thesis, Aarhus University.
115. Lomborg, Stine. (2012a). Negotiating privacy through phatic communication. A case study of the blogging self. Philosophy & Technology, 25(3), 415-434.
116. Lomborg, Stine. (2012b). Researching communicative practice: Web archiving in qualitative social media research. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(3/4), 219-231.
117. Lüders, Marika. (2008). Conceptualizing personal media. New Media & Society, 10(5), 683-702.
118. Lüders, Marika, Pr0itz, Linn, & Rasmussen, Terje. (2010). Emerging personal media genres. New Media & Society, 12(6), 947-963.
119. Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 146-152). London and New York: Routledge.
120. Markova, Ivana. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
121. Markovsky, Barry, & Lawler, Edward J. (1994). A new theory of group solidarity. Advances in Group Processes, 11, 113-137.
122. Marwick, Alice, & Boyd, Danah. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114-133.
123. Marwick, Alice E. (2010). Status update: celebrity, publicity and self-branding in web 2.0. PhD thesis, New York University.
124. Matlin, Margaret W. (2005). Cognition (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
125. McLaughlin, Caitlin, & Vitak, Jessica. (2012). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(2), 299-315.
126. Meltzer, Bernard N., & Musolf, Gil R. (2000). “Have a nice day!”: Phatic communication and everyday life. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 23, 95-111.
127. Mikkelsen, Jan F. (1994). Pragmatisk receptionsteori. In L. H0jbjerg (Ed.), Reception af Levende Billeder. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
128. Miller, Carolyn R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
129. Miller, Carolyn R., & Shepherd, Dawn. (2004). Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. In L. Gurak, S. Antonijevic, L. Johnson, C. Ratliff, & J. Reyman (Eds.), Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of blogs. Available at: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/blogging_as_social_action.html
130. Miller, Vincent. (2008). New media networking and phatic culture. Convergence, 14(4), 387-400.
131. Milne, Esther. (2010). Letters, postcards, email. Technologies of presence. London and New York: Routledge.
132. Moscovici, Serge. (1976). La Psychoanalyse, son image, son public (2nd ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
133. Moscovici, Serge. (1994). Social representations and pragmatic communication. Social Science Information, 33(2), 163-177.
134. Moscovici, Serge. (2001). Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. New York: New York University Press.
135. Murray, Susan. (2008). Digital images, photo-sharing, and our shifting notions of everyday aesthetics. Journal of Visual Culture, 7(2), 147-153.
136. Murthy, Dhiraj. (2011). Twitter: Microphone for the masses? Media, Culture and Society, 33(5), 779-789.
137. Nardi, Bonnie A., Schiano, Diane J., & Gumbrecht, Michelle. (2004). Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary? Paper presented at the CSCW-2004.
138. Neale, Steven. (1980). Genre. London: British Film Institute.
139. Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C.-H. (2010). Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. Paper presented at the CSCW-2010.
140. Orlikowski, Wanda J., & Yates, JoAnne. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(4), 541-574.
141. Oulasvirta, Antti, Lehtonen, Esko, Kurvinen, Esko, & Raento, Mika. (2010). Making the ordinary visible in microblogs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14(3), 237-249.
142. Palmer, Daniel. (2012). iPhone photography, mediating visions of social space. In L. Hjorth, J. Burgess, & I. Richardson (Eds.), Studying mobile media. Cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone (pp. 85-97). London and New York: Routledge.
143. Palmer, Jerry. (1990). Genrer og medier—et kort overblik. MedieKultur, 14.
144. Paxton, Pamela, & Moody, James. (2003). Structure and sentiment: Explaining emotional attachment to group. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 34-47.
145. Piaget, Jean. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
146. Polanyi, Michael. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Books.
147. Pomerantz, Anita. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
148. Potter, Jonathan. (2006). Cognition and conversation. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 131-140.
149. Potter, Jonathan, & Edwards, Derek. (1999). Social representations and discursive psychology: From cognition to action. Culture & Psychology, 5(4), 447-458.
150. Potter, Jonathan, & Wetherell, Margaret. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage Publications.
151. Rainie, Lee, & Wellman, Barry. (2012). Networked. The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
152. Rasmussen, Terje. (2007). Kampen om Internett. Oslo: Pax.
153. Rettberg, Jill W. (2008). Blogging. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
154. Rheingold, Howard. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
155. Sacks, Harvey. (1984). On doing ‘being ordinary.’ In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 513-529). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
156. Sacks, Harvey. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
157. Sanderson, James, & Cheong, Pauline H. (2010). Tweeting prayers and communicating grief over Michael Jackson online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 328-340.
158. Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail, & Sacks, Harvey. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language in Society, 53(2), 361-382.
159. Schroder, Kim, Drotner, Kirsten, Kline, Stephen, & Murray, Catherine. (2003). Researching audiences. London: Arnold.
160. Schutz, Alfred. (1971). Collected papers I. The problem of social reality (3rd unchanged ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
161. Schutz, Alfred, & Luckmann, Thomas. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
162. Schwarz, Ori. (2011). Who moved my conversation? Instant messaging, intertextuality and new regimes of intimacy and truth. Media, Culture & Society, 33(1), 71-87.
163. Serfaty, Viviane. (2004). Online diaries: Towards a structural approach. Journal of American Studies, 38(3), 457-471.
164. Sessions, Lauren F. (2010). How offline gatherings affect online communities. Information, Communication & Society, 13(3), 375-395.
165. Silverman, David. (1998). Harvey Sacks. Social science and conversation analysis. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
166. Silverstone, Roger. (1994). Television and everyday life. London and New York: Routledge.
167. Simmel, Georg. (1955). Conflict and the web of group-affiliations. New York: The Free Press.
168. Simmel, Georg. (1971 [1910]). Sociability. In D. N. Levine (Ed.), Georg Simmel. On individuality and social forms. Selected writings (pp. 127-140). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
169. Smith, Aaron, & Rainie, L. (2010). 8% of online Americans use Twitter. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
170. Stake, Robert E. (2003). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications.
171. Swales, John. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
172. Sorensen, Anne Scott. (2009). Social media and personal blogging: Textures, routes and patterns. MedieKultur, 47, 66-78.
173. Thorseth, May. (2008). Reflective judgment and enlarged thinking online. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 221-231.
174. Todorov, Tzvetan. (1990). Genres in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
175. Tolson, Andrew. (1996). Mediations: Text and discourse in media studies. London: Arnold.
176. Turkle, Sherry. (2011). Alone together. Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
177. Ugander, Johan, Backstrom, Lars, Marlow, Cameron, & Kleinberg, Jon. (2012). Structural diversity in social contagion. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
178. Viégas, Fernanda B. (2005). Bloggers’ expectations of privacy and accountability: An initial survey. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3).
179. Vitak, Jessica, & Ellison, Nicole B. (2013). ‘There’s a network out there you might as well tap’: Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. New Media & Society, 15(2), 243-259.
180. Waldahl, Ragnar. (1998). A cognitive perspective on media effects. In B. H#x00F6;ijer & A. Werner (Eds.), Cultural cognition. New perspectives in audience theory. Gothenburg: Nordicom.
181. Walther, Joseph B., & D’Addario, Kyle P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 324-347.
182. Weick, Karl. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
183. Werry, Christopher C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of internet relay chat. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
184. Wertsch, James. (1991). Voices of the mind. A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
185. Williams, Raymond. (1974). Television. Technology and Cultural Form. London: Fontana.
186. Wittgenstein, Ludvig. (1967). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
187. Yates, JoAnne, & Orlikowski, Wanda J. (1992). Genres of organisational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299-326.
188. Yates, Simeon J., & Sumner, Tamara R. (1997). Digital genres and the new burden of fixity. Paper presented at the 30th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS ’97).
189. Yin, Robert K. (1994). Case study research. Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
190. Ytreberg, Espen. (2000). Notes on text production as a field of inquiry in media studies. Nordicom Review, 2, 53-62.
191. Ytreberg, Espen. (2009). Extended liveness and eventfulness in multi-platform reality formats. New Media & Society, 11(4), 467-485.
192. Yuan, Li, & Buckman, Rebecca. (2006, 4 April). Social networking goes mobile: MySpace, Facebook strike deals with cell companies. The Wall Street Journal.
193. Zerubavel, Eviatar. (1997). Social mindscapes: An invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
194. Zhao, Dejin, & Rosson, Mary Beth. (2009). How and why people Twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. Paper presented at the International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL.
195. Zhao, Shanyang, & Elesh, David. (2008). Copresence as ‘being with.’ Social contact in online public domains. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 565-583.