Mapping actor roles in social media: Different perspectives on value creation in theories of user participation

New Media and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 765-781

  Bechmann, Anja ^a   Lomborg, Stine ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Industry studies; social media; user studies; value creation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878792682     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444812462853     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Anderson CThe Long Tail: How Endless Choice is Creating Unlimited Demand. London: Random House Business; 2007.
2. Bakardjieva MInternet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2005.
3. Banks JMobilising the Audience. Belnaves MO'Regan TSternberg J, ed. St. Lucia, QLD, Australia: University of Queensland Press; 2002:188-212.
4. Banks J,Humphreys S.The labour of user co-creators: emergent social networks markets.Convergence. 2008;14 (4): 401-418.
5. Baym NKTune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2000.
6. Baym NKPersonal Connections in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2010.
7. Baym NKThe Handbook of Internet Studies. Consalvo MEss C, ed. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011:384-405.
8. BechmannA (2009) Cross-media. Doctoral Thesis, Aarhus University, Denmark.
9. Bechmann A.Around me: relevance and exploitation in the age of cloud services and location positioning. Paper presentation at Internet research 11.0 (AOIR); 2010Gothenburg, Sweden; 2010.
10. Bechmann AMaking Online News. Paterson CDomingo D, ed. New York: Peter Lang; 2011:15-29.
11. Bechmann A.Towards cross-platform business models: four patterns of circulation and control.Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15 (6): 888-908.
12. Benkler YThe Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2006.
13. Bogers M,Afuah A,Bastian B.Users as innovators: a review, critique, and future research directions.Journal of Management. 2010;36 (4): 857-875.
14. boydd (2008) Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics. Doctoral Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA. Available at: http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2009/01/18/taken_out_of_co.html.
15. Boyd D,Golder S,Lotan G.Tweet, tweet, retweet: conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. HICSS-43; 2010; 2010. 1.
16. Bruns ABlogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang; 2008.
17. Carpentier N.The BBC's video nation as a participatory media practice: everyday life, cultural diversity and participation in an online community.International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2003;6 (4): 425-447.
18. Castells MCommunication Power. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
19. Chesbrough HOpen Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2003.
20. Chesbrough H,Vanhaverbeke W,West JOpen Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
21. Deuze MMedia Work. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2007.
22. Donath JCommunities in Cyberspace. Smith MAKollock P, ed. London and New York: Routledge; 1999:27-58.
23. Ellison N,Heino R,Gibbs J.Managing impressions online: self presentation processes in the online dating environment.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2006;11 (2): 415-441.
24. Elmer GProfiling Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004.
25. Green J,Jenkins HMedia Industries: History, Theory, and Method. Holt JPerren A, ed. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:213-226.
26. Gross R,Acquisti A.Information revelation and privacy in online social networks (The Facebook case). WPES'05; 2005Alexandria, VA; 2005.
27. Jenkins HConvergence Culture. New York: New York University Press; 2006.
28. Kauffman RJ,Wang B.Turning into the digital channel: evaluating business model characteristics for Internet firm survival.Information Technology & Management. 2008;9 (3): 215-232.
29. Keen AThe Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing; 2007.
30. Kendall LHanging Out in the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and Relationships Online. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2002.
31. Kendall L."Shout Into the Wind, and It Shouts Back." Identity and interactional tensions on LiveJournal.First Monday. 2007;12 (9).
32. Küng L,Picard R,Towse RThe Internet and the Mass Media. London: SAGE; 2008.
33. Liu H.Social network profiles as taste performances.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007;13 (1): 252-275.
34. Livingstone S.The challenge of changing audiences: or, what is the audience researcher to do in the age of the Internet?.European Journal of Communication. 2004;19 (1): 75-86.
35. Livingstone S.Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression.New Media & Society. 2008;10 (3): 393-411.
36. Lomborg SSocial media. A genre perspective. Denmark: Aarhus University; 2011.
37. Lomborg S.Negotiating privacy through phatic communication. A case study of the blogging self.Philosophy and Technology. 2012;25 (3): 415-434.
38. Lüders MBeing in mediated spaces. An enquiry into personal media practices. Norway: University of Oslo; 2007.
39. Lüders M.Conceptualizing personal media.New Media & Society. 2008;10 (5): 683-702.
40. Digital Storytelling, Mediatized Stories: Self-Representations in New Media. Lundby K, ed. New York: Peter Lang; 2008.
41. McKenna KYA,Green AS,Gleason MEJ.Relationship formation on the Internet: what's the big attraction?.Journal of Social Issues. 2002;58 (1): 9-31.
42. Markham ANLife Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press; 1998.
43. Meyen M,Pfaff-Rüdiger S,Dudenhöffer K, et al.The Internet in everyday life: a typology of Internet users.Media Culture & Society. 2010;32 (5): 873-882.
44. Millar JLessons from the Identity Trail: Anonymity, Privacy and Identity in the Networked Society. Kerr ISteeves VLucock C, ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press; 2009:103-120.
45. Mørck S.Loser generated content: from participation to exploitation.First Monday. 2008;13 (3).
46. O'ReillyT (2005) What is Web 2.0? Available at: http://oreilly.com/ (accessed 19 January 2010).
47. Porter METhe Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan Press Ltd; 1990.
48. Quan-Haase A,Young AL.Uses and gratifications of social media: a comparison of Facebook and instant messaging.Bulletin of Science Technology & Society. 2010;30 (5): 350-361.
49. Roberts KLovemarks: The Future beyond Brands. New York: Powerhouse Cultural Entertainment Books; 2006.
50. Robinson L.The cyberself: the self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital age.New Media & Society. 2007;9 (1): 93-110.
51. Rogers RDeep Search: The Politics of the Search beyond Google. Stalder FBecker K, ed. Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 2009:173-184.
52. Schrøder K,Drotner K,Kline S, et alResearching Audiences. London: Arnold; 2003.
53. Solove DThe Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age. New York: New York University Press; 2004.
54. Solove DUnderstanding Privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2008.
55. Sundén JMaterial Virtualities: Approaching Online Textual Embodiment. New York: Peter Lang; 2003.
56. Surowiecki JThe Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Anchor Books; 2004.
57. Tapscott D,Williams ADWikonomics. London: Atlantic Books; 2006.
58. Terranova T.Free labor: producing culture for the digital economy.Social Text. 2000;18 (2): 33-58.
59. Thumin NDigital Storytelling, Mediatized Stories: Self-Representations in New Media. Lundby K, ed. New York: Peter Lang; 2008:85-104.
60. Tuomi INetworks of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
61. Turkle SLife on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1995.
62. Van Couvering EWeb Search: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Spink AZimmer M, ed. Berlin: Springer; 2008:177-206.
63. Van Couvering EThe Political Economies of Media: The Transformation of the Global Media Industries. Winseck DRJin DI, ed. London: Bloomsbury; 2011:183-200.
64. Van Dijck J.Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content.Media Culture & Society. 2009;31 (1): 41-58.
65. Von Hippel EDemocratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT press; 2005.
66. Wagman IHow Canadians Communicate III: Contexts of Popular Culture. Beaty BBriton DFilax G, ed. Athabasca, AB, Canada: Athabasca University Press; 2010:55-77.
67. Wardle C,Williams A.Beyond user-generated content: a production study examining the ways in which UGC is used at the BBC.Media Culture & Society. 2010;32 (5): 781-799.
68. Wellman B,Gulia MCommunities in Cyberspace. Smith MAKollock P, ed. London and New York: Routledge; 1999:167-194.
69. Wirtz B,Schilke O,Ullrich S.Strategic development of business models: implications of the Web 2.0 for creating value on the Internet.Long Range Planning. 2010;43 (2-3): 272-290.
70. Zimmer MWeb Search: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Spink AZimmer M, ed. Berlin: Springer; 2008:77-99.