Mobile communication and intermediality

Mobile Media and Communication

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 14-19

  Helles, Rasmus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Affordances; Intermediality; Medium choice; Medium theory; Mobile communication; Smartphones; Wireless broadband

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011685168     PISSN: 20501579     EISSN: 20501587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2050157912459496     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bertel T. F., Stald G. (2011). From SMS to SNS: The use of the Internet on the mobile phone among young Danes. Paper presented at the Nordmedia Conference, Akureyri, Iceland, August 2011.
2. Dohn B. N. (2009). Affordances revisited: Articulating a Merleau-Pontian view. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 151-170.
3. Gibson J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Helles R. (2012). Personal media in everyday life: A baseline study. In Jensen K. B. (Ed.), A handbook of media and communication research. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London, UK & New York, USA: Routledge.
5. Hsieh Y. P. (2012). Online social networking skills: The social affordance approach to digital inequality. First Monday, 17(4), Retrieved from: http://www.firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3893/3192
6. Hutchby I. (2000). Conversation and technology: The telephone, the computer, and the nature of human communication. Cambridge, UK & Malden, MA.: Polity Press.
7. Hutchby I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456.
8. Jensen K. B. (2008). Intermediality. In Donsbach W. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
9. Jensen K. B. (2010). Media convergence: The three degrees of network, mass, and interpersonal communication. London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge.
10. Jensen K. B., Helles R. (2011). The Internet as a cultural forum. Implications for research. New Media & Society, 13(4), 517-533.
11. Ledbetter A. M. (2008). Media use and relational closeness in long-term friendships: Interpreting patterns of multimodality. New Media & Society, 10(4), 547-564.
12. Ling R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
13. Ling R., Stald G. (2010). Mobile communities: Are we talking about a village, a clan, or a small group? American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1133-1147.
14. Meyrowitz J. (1985). No sense of place. The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15. Meyrowitz J. (1994). Medium theory. In Crowley D., Mitchell D. (Eds.), Current Communication Theory (pp. 50-78). London: Polity Press.
16. Ramirez A., Dimmick J., Feaster J., Lin S. F. (2008). Revisiting interpersonal media competition: The gratification niches of instant messaging, e-mail, and the telephone. Communication Research, 35(4), 529-547.
17. Rappert B. (2003). Technologies, texts and possibilities: A reply to Hutchby. Sociology, 37(3), 565-580.
18. Strate L. (2004). A media echology review. Communication Research Trends, 23(2), 2-48.
19. The Ministry of Business and Growth Denmark. (2012). Telecom statistics. First half of 2011. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Business and Growth Denmark.