iPhone photography: Mediating visions of social space

Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 85-97

  Palmer, Daniel ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876593195     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203127711     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Daniel Rubinstein and Katrina Sluis, “A life more photographic: Mapping the networked image,” Photographies1(1), 2008: 9-28.
2. Lisa Gye, “Picture this: The impact of mobile camera phones on personal photographic practices,” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies21(2), 2007: 279-288.
3. Susan Murray, “Digital images, photo-sharing, and our shifting notions of everyday aesthetics,” Journal of Visual Culture7, no. 2, 2008: 147-153.
4. Daniel Rubenstein, “Cameraphone photography: The death of the camera and the arrival of visible speech,” The Issues in Contemporary Culture and Aesthetics1, 2005: 113-118.
5. Mikko Villi, Visual Mobile Communication: Camera Phone Photo Messages as Ritual Communication and Mediated Presence(Helsinki: Aalto University School of Art and Design, 2010), 150.
6. Geoff rey Batchen, Forget Me Not: Photography and Remembrance(New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2004).
7. Mia Fineman, “Phoning it in,” unpublished conference paper presented at The Versatile Image: Photography in the Era of Web 2.0, University of Sunderland, 26 June 2011.
8. Gerard Goggin, Global Mobile Media(New York: Routledge, 2011), 48.
9. Damon Winter, “Through my eye, not hipstamatic’s,” The New York Times, 11 February 2011 http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/11/through-myeye-not-hipstamatics.
10. Rosemary Neill, “Not a good look,” Weekend Australian Review2-3 October 2010: 5-8.
11. Daniel Palmer, “In naked repose: The face of candid portrait photography,” Angelaki16(1), 2011: 111-128.
12. Larissa Hjorth, “Mobile spectres of intimacy: The gendered role of mobile technologies in love—past, present and future,” in Rich Ling and Scott Campbell, eds., The Mobile Communication Research Series: Volume II, Mobile Communication: Bringing Us Together or Tearing Us Apart? (Edison, NJ: Transaction Books, 2011), 37-60.
13. Ariella, A., The Civil Contract of Photography, trans. Rela Mazali and Ruvik Danieli (New York: Zone Books, 2008).
14. Geoff rey Batchen, “Guilty pleasures,” in Thomas Y. Levin, Ursula Frohne and Peter Weibel, eds., Ctrl [Space]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother(Cambridge, MA: Mit Press/ZKM Center for Art and Media, 2002), 447-459.
15. Eric Gordon and Adriana de Souza e Silva, Net Locality: Why Location Matters in a Networked World(Boston: Blackwell-Wiley, 2011).
16. Joel Sternfeld, “Joel Sternfeld: Idubai” (interview), Daylight Magazine, November 2010 http://www.daylightmagazine.org/podcast/november2010-0.
17. Helen Nissenbaum, “Protecting privacy in an information age: The problem of privacy in public,” Law and Philosophy17, 1998: 559-596.
18. Larissa Hjorth, “Photoshifting: Art practice, camera phones and social media,” Photofile89 2010: 32-37.
19. Walter Benjamin, “The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction,” in Hannah Arendt, ed., trans. Harry Zohn, Illuminations(New York: Schocken, 1969), 219-253.
20. Kate Shilton, “Participatory sensing: Building empowering surveillance,” Surveillance & Society8(2), 2010: 131-150.