Norm evolution and violation on facebook

New Media and Society

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 299-315

  McLaughlin, Caitlin ^a   Vitak, Jessica ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Expectancy Violations Theory; Facebook; norms; social network sites

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858644391     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444811412712     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bachman GF,Guerrero LK.Relational quality and communicative responses following hurtful events in dating relationships: An expectancy violations analysis.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.2006;23 (6): 943-963.
2. Barnes SB.A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States.First Monday.2006;11 (9):.
3. Baym NK.The emergence of on-line community.Cybersociety 2.0.Jones SG, ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:35-68.
4. boyd d.Friends, Friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites.First Monday.2006;11 (12):.
5. boyd d,Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life.Youth, Identity, and Digital Media.Buckingham D, ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008:119-142.
6. Burgoon J.A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test.Human Communication Research.1978;4 (2): 129-142.
7. Burgoon J.Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication.Journal of Language and Social Psychology.1993;12 (1-2): 30-48.
8. Burgoon JK,Hale JL.Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and explication to immediacy behaviors.Communication Monographs.1988;55 (1): 58-79.
9. Burgoon JK,LePoire BA.Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior.Human Communication Research.1993;20 (1): 67-96.
10. Burgoon JK,Walther JB,Baesler EJ.Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch.Human Communication Research.1992;19 (2): 237-263.
11. Burke M,Marlow C,Lento T.Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites.Proceedings of the 27th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2009; 2009 New York: ACM, 945-954.
12. Burnett G.Colliding norms, community, and the place of online information: The case of archive.org.Library Trends.2009;57 (4): 694-710.
13. Burnett G,Bonnici L.Beyond the FAQ: Explicit and implicit norms in Usenet newsgroups.Library and Information Science Research.2003;25 (3): 333-351.
14. Cotter C,Wanzer MB.Facebook norms and expectancy violations.Paper presented at National Communication Association Conference; 2008San Diego, CA; 2008.
15. DiMicco JM,Millen DR.Identity management: Multiple presentations of self in Facebook.Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work; 2007; 2007 Sanibel Island, FL: ACM, 383-386.
16. Donath JS,boyd d.Public displays of connection.BT Technology Journal.2004;22 (4): 71-82.
17. Dwyer C,Hiltz SR,Passerini K.Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace.Proceedings of the Thirteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems; 2007; 2007.
18. Fiore AT,Donath JS.Online personals: An overview.Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2004; 2004.New York: ACM, 1395-1398
19. Floyd K,Voloudakis M.Affectionate behavior in adult platonic friendships: Interpreting and evaluating expectancy violations.Human Communication Research.1999;25 (3): 341-369.
20. HechingerJ (2008) College applicants, beware: Your Facebook page is showing.Wall Street Journal, 18September.Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122170459104151023.html (accessed 3 December 2009).
21. Homans GCThe Human Group.New York: Harpers; 1950:.
22. Honeycutt JM.The role of nonverbal behaviors in modifying expectancies during initial encounters.Southern Communication Journal.1991;56 (3): 161-177.
23. Kemper TD.Reference groups, socialization and achievement.American Sociological Review.1968;33 (1): 31-45.
24. Koermer CD,Petelle JL.Expectancy violation and student rating of instruction.Communication Quarterly.1991;39 (4): 341-350.
25. Krueger RA,Casey MAFocus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research.2008) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research(3rd edn) edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008:.
26. Lampe C,Ellison NB,Steinfeld C.Changes in use and perception of Facebook.In:.Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work; 2008; 2008.New York: ACM, 721-730.
27. LangKJ (2009) Facebook friend turns into big brother.LaCrosse Tribune, 19November.Available at: http://lacrossetribune.com/news/local/article_0ff40f7a-d4d1-11de-afb3-001cc4c002e0.html (accessed 5 April 2010).
28. Lannutti PJ,Camero MO.Women's perceptions of flirtatious nonverbal behavior: The effects of alcohol consumption and physical attractiveness.Southern Communication Journal.2007;72 (1): 21-35.
29. Lenhart A,Purcell K,Smith A,Zickhur KSocial Media & Mobile Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults.Washington, DC: Pew Internet Project; 2010:.
30. LePoire BA,Burgoon JK.Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: Expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory.Human Communication Research.1994;20 (4): 560-591.
31. Martey RM,Stromer-Galley J.The digital dollhouse: Context and social norms in The Sims Online.Games and Culture.2007;2 (4): 314-334.
32. Marwick AE,boyd d.I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.New Media & Society.2010;:.
33. Pempek TA,Yermolayeva YA,Calvert SL.College students' social networking experiences on Facebook.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.2009;30 (3): 227-238.
34. Postmes T,Spears R,Lea M.The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication.Human Communication Research.2000;26 (3): 341-371.
35. Preece J.Etiquette online: From nice to necessary.Communications of the ACM.2004;47 (4): 56-61.
36. Ramirez A,Wang Z.When online meets offline: An expectancy violations theory perspective on modality switching.Journal of Communication.2008;58 (1): 20-39.
37. RichardsonK (2010) Face values.Times Higher Education, 14September.Available at: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=413796&c=1 (accessed 15 November 2010).
38. Rycyna CC,Champion CD,Kelly AE.First impressions after various types of deception: Less favorable following expectancy violation.Basic and Applied Social Psychology.2009;31 (1): 40-48.
39. SalamR (2007) The Facebook commandments: How to deal with unwanted friend requests, the ethics of de-friending, and other social networking etiquette predicaments.Slate, 25September.Available at: http://www.slate.com/id/2174439/ (consulted 1 December 2010).
40. Sherif MThe Psychology of Social Norms.New York: Harper; 1936:.
41. Sherif M,Sherif CWReference Groups.New York: Harper and Row; 1964:.
42. Strano M.User descriptions and interpretations of self-presentation through Facebook profile images.Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace.2008;2 (2):.
43. Toma CL,Hancock JT,Ellison NB.Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.2008;34 (8): 1023-1036.
44. Tong ST,Van Der Heide B,Langwell L,Walther JB.Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook.Journal of Computer-mediated Communication.2008;13 (3): 531-549.
45. Walther JB,Slovacek C,Tidwell LC.Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long term and short term virtual teams.Communication Research.2001;28 (1): 105-134.