Evidence for stabilizing selection on codon usage in chromosomal rearrangements of Drosophila pseudoobscura

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 4, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2433-2449

  Fuller, Zachary L ^a   Haynes, Gwilym D ^a   Zhu, Dianhui ^b,c   Batterton, Matthew ^b   Chao, Hsu ^b   Dugan, Shannon ^b   Javaid, Mehwish ^b   Jayaseelan, Joy C ^b   Lee, Sandra ^b   Li, Mingmei ^b   Ongeri, Fiona ^b   Qi, Sulan ^b   Han, Yi ^b   Doddapaneni, Harshavardhan ^b   Richards, Stephen ^b   Schaeffer, Stephen W ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c CHEVRON ENERGY TECHNOLOGY COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromosomal; Codon bias; Inversions; Recombination; Selection; Stabilizing

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; INSECT PROTEIN; CODON;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CODON; CODON USAGE; DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA; GENE; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SELECTION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; INSECT CHROMOSOME; MALE; NONHUMAN; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME; DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMES; CODON; DROSOPHILA; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84916890014     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.014860     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Akashi, H., 1994 Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics 136: 927-935.
2. Akashi, H., 1995 Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics 139: 1067-1076.
3. Akashi, H., and S. W. Schaeffer, 1997 Natural selection and the frequency distributions of "silent" DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. Genetics 146: 295-307.
4. Andolfatto, P., F. Depaulis, and A. Navarro, 2001 Inversion polymorphisms and nucleotide variability in Drosophila. Genet. Res. 77: 1-8.
5. Andolfatto, P., K. M. Wong, and D. Bachtrog, 2011 Effective population size and the efficacy of selection on the x chromosomes of two closely related Drosophila species. Genome Biol. Evol. 3: 114-128.
6. Arguello, J. R., Y. Zhang, T. Kado, C. Fan, R. Zhao et al., 2010 Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27: 848-861.
7. Ayala, D., R. F. Guerrero, and M. Kirkpatrick, 2013 Reproductive isolation and local adaptation quantified for a chromosome inversion in a malaria mosquito. Evolution 67: 946-958.
8. Bachtrog, D., 2003 Protein evolution and codon usage bias on the neo-sex chromosomes of Drosophila miranda. Genetics 165: 1221-1232.
9. Bachtrog, D., 2007 Reduced selection for codon usage bias in Drosophila miranda. J. Mol. Evol. 64: 586-590.
10. Basatena, N.-K. S., C. J. Hoggart, L. J. Coin, and P. F. O'Reilly, 2013 The effect of genomic inversions on estimation of population genetic parameters from sNP data. Genetics 193: 243-253.
11. Begun, D. J., and C. F. Aquadro, 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature 356: 519-520.
12. Betancourt, A. J., J. J. Welch, and B. Charlesworth, 2009 Reduced effectiveness of selection caused by a lack of recombination. Curr. Biol. 19: 655-660.
13. Betts, M. J., and R. B. Russell, 2003 Amino acid properties and consequences of substitutions, pp. 289-316 in Bioinformatics for Geneticists, edited by M. R. Barnes, and I. C. Gray. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New York.
14. Bulmer, M., 1991 The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics 129: 897-907.
15. Campos, J., K. Zeng, D. Parker, B. Charlesworth, and P. Haddrill, 2013 Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome vs. the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 811-823.
16. Capra, J. A., M. J. Hubisz, D. Kostka, K. S. Pollard, and A. Siepel, 2013 A model-based analysis of GC-biased gene conversion in the human and chimpanzee genomes. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003684.
17. Carlini, D. B., and W. Stephan, 2003 In vivo introduction of unpreferred synonymous codons into the Drosophila Adh gene results in reduced levels of ASH protein. Genetics 163: 239-243.
18. Chan, A. H., P. A. Jenkins, and Y. S. Song, 2012 Genome-wide fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 8: e1003090.
19. Charlesworth, B., 2009 Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 195-205.
20. Charlesworth, B., 2013 Stabilizing selection, purifying selection, and mutational bias in finite populations. Genetics 194: 955-971.
21. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth, 1973 Selection of new inversions in multi-locus genetic systems. Genet. Res. 21: 167-183.
22. De la Chaux, N., P. W. Messer, and P. F. Arndt, 2007 DNA indels in coding regions reveal selective constraints on protein evolution in the human lineage. BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 191.
23. Cirulli, E. T., R. M. Kliman, and M. A. F. Noor, 2007 Fine-scale crossover rate heterogeneity in Drosophila pseudoobscura. J. Mol. Evol. 64: 129-135.
24. Comeron, J. M., and M. Kreitman, 2002 Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection. Genetics 161: 389-410.
25. Comeron, J. M., M. Kreitman, and M. Aguadé, 1999 Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. Genetics 151: 239-249.
26. Corbett-Detig, R. B., and D. L. Hartl, 2012 Population genomics of inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 8: e1003056.
27. Cutter, A. D., and B. Charlesworth, 2006 Selection intensity on preferred codons correlates with overall codon usage bias in Caenorhabditis remanei. Curr. Biol. CB 16: 2053-2057.
28. DePristo, M. A., E. Banks, R. Poplin, K. V. Garimella, J. R. Maguire et al., 2011 A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using nextgeneration DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43: 491-498.
29. Dobzhansky, T., 1950 Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Origin of heterosis through natural selection in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 35: 288-302.
30. Dobzhansky, T., and M. L. Queal, 1938 Genetics of natural populations. II. Genic variation in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura inhabiting isolated mountain ranges. Genetics 23: 463-484.
31. Dobzhansky, T., and A. H. Sturtevant, 1938 Inversions in the chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 23: 28-64.
32. Dobzhansky, T., and C. Epling, 1948 The suppression of crossing over in inversion heterozygotes of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 34: 137-141.
33. Drummond, D. A., and C. O. Wilke, 2008 Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134: 341-352.
34. Duret, L., and N. Galtier, 2009 Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 10: 285-311.
35. Eyre-Walker, A., and L. D. Hurst, 2001 The evolution of isochores. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2: 549-555.
36. Fryxell, K. J., and E. Zuckerkandl, 2000 Cytosine deamination plays a primary role in the evolution of mammalian isochores. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 1371-1383.
37. Gossmann, T. I., M. Woolfit, and A. Eyre-Walker, 2011 Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome. Genetics 189: 1389-1402.
38. Haddrill, P. R., D. L. Halligan, D. Tomaras, and B. Charlesworth, 2007 Reduced efficacy of selection in regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over. Genome Biol. 8: R18.
39. Haddrill, P. R., K. Zeng, and B. Charlesworth, 2011 Determinants of synonymous and nonsynonymous variability in three species of Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 1731-1743.
40. Han, E., J. S. Sinsheimer, and J. Novembre, 2013 Characterizing bias in population genetic inferences from low coverage sequencing data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31: 723-735.
41. Hense, W., N. Anderson, S. Hutter, W. Stephan, J. Parsch et al., 2010 Experimentally increased codon bias in the Drosophila Adh gene leads to an increase in larval, but not adult, alcohol dehydrogenase activity. Genetics 184: 547-555.
42. Hershberg, R., and D. A. Petrov, 2008 Selection on codon bias. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42: 287-299.
43. Hershberg, R., and D. A. Petrov, 2010 Evidence that mutation is universally biased towards AT in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 6: e1001115.
44. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson, 1966 The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8: 269-294.
45. Ikemura, T., 1981 Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. J. Mol. Biol. 151: 389-409.
46. Ikemura, T., 1985 Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2: 13-34.
47. Ishii, K., and B. Charlesworth, 1977 Associations between allozyme loci and gene arrangements due to hitch-hiking effects of new inversions. Genet. Res. 30: 93-106.
48. Keightley, P. D., U. Trivedi, M. Thomson, F. Oliver, S. Kumar et al., 2009 Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines. Genome Res. 19: 1195-1201.
49. Kennington, W., and A. A. Hoffmann, 2013 Patterns of genetic variation across inversions: geographic variation in the In(2L)t inversion in populations of Drosophila melanogaster from eastern Australia. BMC Evol. Biol. 13: 100.
50. Kimura, M., 1981 Possibility of extensive neutral evolution under stabilizing selection with special reference to non-random usage of synonymous codons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 78: 454-458.
51. Kimura, M., 1983 The Neutral Theory of Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
52. Kirkpatrick, M., and N. Barton, 2006 Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173: 419-434.
53. Kliman, R. M., 2014 Evidence that natural selection on codon usage in Drosophila pseudoobscura varies across codons. G3 (Bethesda) 4: 681-692.
54. Kliman, R. M., and J. Hey, 1993 Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 1239- 1258.
55. Kondrashov, F. A., A. Y. Ogurtsov, and A. S. Kondrashov, 2006 Selection in favor of nucleotides G and C diversifies evolution rates and levels of polymorphism at mammalian synonymous sites. J. Theor. Biol. 240: 616-626.
56. Kovacevic, M., and S. W. Schaeffer, 2000 Molecular population genetics of X-linked genes in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 156: 155-172.
57. Kulathinal, R. J., L. S. Stevison, and M. A. F. Noor, 2009 The genomics of speciation in Drosophila: diversity, divergence, and introgression estimated using low-coverage genome sequencing. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000550.
58. Langley, C. H., K. Stevens, C. Cardeno, Y. C. G. Lee, D. R. Schrider et al., 2012 Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 192: 533-598.
59. Li, H., and R. Durbin, 2009 Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754-1760.
60. Li, H., B. Handsaker, A. Wysoker, T. Fennell, J. Ruan et al., 2009 The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078- 2079.
61. Li, W. H., 1987 Models of nearly neutral mutations with particular implications for nonrandom usage of synonymous codons. J. Mol. Evol. 24: 337-345.
62. Lynn, D. J., G. A. C. Singer, and D. A. Hickey, 2002 Synonymous codon usage is subject to selection in thermophilic bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 4272-4277.
63. Machado, C. A., T. S. Haselkorn, and M. A. F. Noor, 2007 Evaluation of the genomic extent of effects of fixed inversion differences on intraspecific variation and interspecific gene flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 175: 1289-1306.
64. Marais, G., D. Mouchiroud, and L. Duret, 2001 Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5688-5692.
65. Maside, X., A. W. Lee, and B. Charlesworth, 2004 Selection on codon usage in Drosophila americana. Curr. Biol. CB 14: 150-154.
66. McGaugh, S. E., C. S. S. Heil, B. Manzano-Winkler, L. Loewe, S. Goldstein et al., 2012 Recombination modulates how selection affects linked sites in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 10: e1001422.
67. McKenna, A., M. Hanna, E. Banks, A. Sivachenko, K. Cibulskis et al., 2010 The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20: 1297-1303.
68. McVean, G. A. T., and B. Charlesworth, 1999 A population genetic model for the evolution of synonymous codon usage: patterns and predictions. Genet. Res. 74: 145-158.
69. McVean, G. A. T., and B. Charlesworth, 2000 The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Genetics 155: 929-944.
70. McVean, G. A. T., S. R. Myers, S. Hunt, P. Deloukas, D. R. Bentley et al., 2004 The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome. Science 304: 581-584.
71. Mestres, F., J. Sanz, and L. Serra, 1998 Chromosomal structure and recombination between inversions in Drosophila subobscura. Hereditas 128: 105-113.
72. Muyle, A., L. Serres-Giardi, A. Ressayre, J. Escobar, and S. Glémin, 2011 GC-biased gene conversion and selection affect GC content in the Oryza Genus (rice). Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 2695-2706.
73. Navarro, A., E. Betran, A. Barbadilla, and A. Ruiz, 1997 Recombination and gene flux caused by gene conversion and crossing over in inversion heterokaryotypes. Genetics 146: 695-709.
74. Navarro, A., A. Barbadilla, and A. Ruiz, 2000 Effect of inversion polymorphism on the neutral nucleotide variability of linked chromosomal regions in Drosophila. Genetics 155: 685-698.
75. Nei, M., 1987 Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Reprint edition. Columbia University Press, New York.
76. Nei, M., and T. Gojobori, 1986 Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3: 418-426.
77. Nei, M., K.-I. Kojima, and H. E. Schaffer, 1967 Frequency changes of new inversions in populations under mutation-selection equilibria. Genetics 57: 741-750.
78. Nielsen, R., V. L. Bauer DuMont, M. J. Hubisz, and C. F. Aquadro, 2007 Maximum likelihood estimation of ancestral codon usage bias parameters in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 228-235.
79. Novella, I. S., S. Zárate, D. Metzgar, and B. E. Ebendick-Corpus, 2004 Positive selection of synonymous mutations in vesicular stomatitis virus. J. Mol. Biol. 342: 1415-1421.
80. Ohta, T., and K. I. Kojima, 1968 Survival probabilities f new inversions in large populations. Biometrics 24: 501-516.
81. Palidwor, G. A., T. J. Perkins, and X. Xia, 2010 A general model of codon bias due to GC mutational bias. PLoS One 5: e13431.
82. Parmley, J. L., J. V. Chamary, and L. D. Hurst, 2006 Evidence for purifying selection against synonymous mutations in mammalian exonic splicing enhancers. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 301-309.
83. Peden, J., 1999 Analysis of codon usage. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.
84. Pool, J. E., R. B. Corbett-Detig, R. P. Sugino, K. A. Stevens, C.M. Cardeno et al., 2012 Population genomics of sub-Saharan Drosophila melanogaster: African diversity and non-African admixture. PLoS Genet. 8: e1003080.
85. Porceddu, A., S. Zenoni, and S. Camiolo, 2013 The signatures of selection for translational accuracy in plant genes. Genome Biol. Evol. 5: 1117-1126.
86. Precup, J., and J. Parker, 1987 Missense misreading of asparagine codons as a function of codon identity and context. J. Biol. Chem. 262: 11351- 11355.
87. Press, W., B. Flannery, S. Teukolsky, and W. Vetterling, 2012 Numerical Recipes in C: the Art of Scientific Computing. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
88. Qian, W., J. R. Yang, N. M. Pearson, C. Maclean, and J. Zhang, 2012 Balanced codon usage optimizes translational efficiency. PLoS Genetics 8: e1002603.
89. Rao, Y., G. Wu, Z. Wang, X. Chai, Q. Nie et al., 2011 Mutation bias is the driving force of codon usage in the Gallus gallus genome. DNA Res. Int. J. Rapid Publ. Rep. Genes Genomes 18: 499-512.
90. Richards, S., Y. Liu, B. R. Bettencourt, P. Hradecky, S. Letovsky et al., 2005 Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution. Genome Res. 15: 1-18.
91. Riley, M. A., M. E. Hallas, and R. C. Lewontin, 1989 Distinguishing the forces controlling genetic variation at the Xdh locus in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 123: 359-369.
92. Roberts, P. A., 1976 The Genetics of Chromosomal Aberration, pp. 671- 684 in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila. Vol. 1a. (M. Ashburner and E. Novitski, eds). Academic Press, London.
93. Schaeffer, S. W., 2002 Molecular population genetics of sequence length diversity in the Adh region of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genet. Res. 80: 163-175.
94. Schaeffer, S. W., 2008 Selection in heterogeneous environments maintains the gene arrangement polymorphism of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 62: 3082-3099.
95. Schaeffer, S. W., and E. L. Miller, 1992 Estimates of gene flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura determined from nucleotide sequence analysis of the alcohol dehydrogenase region. Genetics 132: 471-480.
96. Schaeffer, S. W., and W. W. Anderson, 2005 Mechanisms of genetic exchange within the chromosomal inversions of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 171: 1729-1739.
97. Schaeffer, S. W., M. P. Goetting-Minesky, M. Kovacevic, J. R. Peoples, J. L. Graybill et al., 2003 Evolutionary genomics of inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura: Evidence for epistasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 8319-8324.
98. Schrider, D. R., D. Houle, M. Lynch, and M. W. Hahn, 2013 Rates and genomic consequences of spontaneous mutational events in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 194: 937-954.
99. Schultz, J., and H. Redfield, 1951 Interchromosomal effects on crossing over in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 16: 175-197.
100. Sharp, P. M., and W. H. Li, 1987 The codon Adaptation Index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15: 1281-1295.
101. Sharp, P. M., L. R. Emery, and K. Zeng, 2010 Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365: 1203-1212.
102. Singleton, J. R., 1964 A mechanism intrinsic to heterozygous inversions affecting observed recombination frequencies in adjacent regions. Genetics 49: 541-560.
103. Stevison, L. S., K. B. Hoehn, and M. A. F. Noor, 2011 Effects of inversions on within- and between-species recombination and divergence. Genome Biol. Evol. 3: 830-841.
104. Sturtevant, A. H., and G. W. Beadle, 1936 The relations of inversions in the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster to crossing over and disjunction. Genetics 21: 554-604.
105. Tajima, F., 1989 Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
106. Vicario, S., E. N. Moriyama, and J. R. Powell, 2007 Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila. BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 226.
107. Wallace, A. G., D. Detweiler, and S. W. Schaeffer, 2011 Evolutionary history of the third chromosome gene arrangements of Drosophila pseudoobscura inferred from inversion breakpoints. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 2219-2229.
108. Wallace, A. G., D. Detweiler, and S. W. Schaeffer, 2013 Molecular population genetics of inversion breakpoint regions in Drosophila pseudoobscura. G3 (Bethesda) 3: 1151-1163.
109. Wallace, B., 1968 Topics in Population Genetics. W. W. Norton, New York.
110. Watterson, G. A., 1975 On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7: 256-276.
111. Wright, F., 1990 The "effective number of codons" used in a gene. Gene 87: 23-29.
112. Zeng, K., and B. Charlesworth, 2009 Estimating selection intensity on synonymous codon usage in a nonequilibrium population. Genetics 183: 651-662.